Effective Method Of Pain Control Research Articles

VIRTUAL REALITY AS A DISTRACTION METHOD FOR PAIN CONTROL DURING ENDODONTIC TREATMENT: RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL

Aim and Objective : The aim of the present study was to assess the effectiveness of virtual reality distraction on pain perception undergoing endodontic procedures. Methodology:This randomised clinical trial has been written according to Preferred Reporting Items for Randomized Trials in Endodontics (PRIRATE) 2020 guidelines. An interventional study of 40patients of age group between 18-45 years was used in the study. The intervention was distraction with virtual reality eyeglasses. Participants were divided into two treatmentgroups: (a) without VR condition or (b) with VR condition. Blood pressure (BP) and pulse rate (PR) were measured. Patients were questioned about their discomfort and/or pain by using a visual analogue scale.Level of pain was measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Participants gave ratings using 0-10 scales with cut points on the scale indicating that (0) none, (1-3) mild, (4-6) moderate or (7-10) severe. Patients were asked regarding the treatment modalities they preferred. Result: Data were analysed using SPSS® software. Paired t tests revealed that VAS scores were significantly (P < .005) lower during VR compared without VR condition. Paired t test revealed that on average, participants experienced significantly lower systolic BP after using VR (M = 110.72, SE = 2.16) than systolic BP after treatment without VR. Patients reported that they preferred the VR condition. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that use of immersive VR distraction may be an effective method of pain control during endodontic procedures.

Limited cryoablation reduces hospital stay and opioid consumption compared to thoracic epidural analgesia after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum.

pain following minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE) is a critical concern that leads to a prolonged hospital stay and high doses of opiates administered to the patients. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative cryoanalgesia (cryoablation of the intercostal nerves) during MIRPE. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 64 patients who underwent MIRPE and received cryoanalgesia or epidural analgesia between January 2019 and January 2021. The oral morphine milligram equivalent (MME) was used to calculate the dosage of opioid agents. The median age was 15 years (range, 4–33 years). The median postoperative hospital stay was 4 days (range, 2–6 days), with a median oral MME consumption of 45 mg (ranging from 0 to 1360 mg). Cryoanalgesia was performed in 38 patients, and epidural analgesia was administered to the remaining 26 patients. The cryoanalgesia group had a significantly lesser pain score, shorter postoperative hospital stay and lower oral MME consumption than the epidural analgesia group (5 vs 2; P < .001, 3 days vs 5 days; P < .001, 19 mg vs 634 mg; P < .001). Cryoanalgesia appears to reduce postoperative hospital stay and opioid consumption compared with epidural analgesia. The outcomes of this study indicate that cryoanalgesia might be a safe and effective method for pain control following MIRPE.

Ultrasound-guided versus laparoscopic-guided subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus No TAP block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy; a randomized double-blind controlled trial

BackgroundTransversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is an effective modality for the control of immediate postoperative pain. The present randomized trial aimed to assess the efficacy of ultrasound-guided subcostal TAP (USTAP) and laparoscopic subcostal TAP (LSTAP) block as compared to standard care without TAP block after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. MethodsThis was a prospective, randomized, controlled trial on patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were equally randomized to one of three groups: USTAP, LSTAP, and control group (no TAP block). The main outcome measures were pain scores and analgesic consumption within the first 24 h postoperatively, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), time to ambulation, time to first flatus, and adverse effects of TAP block. ResultsThe trial included 110 patients (90% females) with a mean age of 40.9 ± 11.7 years. Both USTAP and LSTAP block groups were associated with significantly lower pain scores at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively, lower cumulative dose of paracetamol, less PONV, and shorter time to flatus than the control group. USTAP and LSTAP block were associated with similar pain scores at all time points, similar analgesic requirements, a similar incidence of PONV, and comparable time to first ambulation and time to first flatus. No adverse effects related to TAP block were recorded. ConclusionsTAP block is a safe and effective method for pain control and improving recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Both USTAP and LSTAP blocks were equally effective in terms of pain relief, analgesic requirements, PONV, return of bowel function, and time to ambulation.

An effective method for pain control after inguinal hernia repair with TAPP technique: Transversus abdominis plane block A case-control study

An effective method for pain control after inguinal hernia repair with TAPP technique: Transversus abdominis plane block A case-control study

Efficacy of Multimodal Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

Simple SummaryChronic opioid use is a serious global health problem and surgery is often the point of initial exposure for many chronic opioid users. Multimodal analgesia (MMA) is an approach designed to reduce or eliminate opioid use in surgical patients, but it has not been studied in patients having major head and neck surgery. This study explores the impact of an MMA protocol on opioid prescribing practices in patients having major head and neck surgery with flap reconstruction. The results of this study will provide evidence to inform and guide pain management practice in this important patient population. The results of this study could also be applied to other areas of otorhinolaryngology. MMA is an important tool in the effort to reduce chronic opioid use.Postoperative opioid use has been linked to the subsequent development of opioid dependency. Multimodal analgesia (MMA) can reduce the use of opioids in the postoperative period, but MMA has not been well-studied after major head and neck surgery. Our goal is to explore the association between MMA and postoperative opioid use and pain control in patients undergoing major head and neck surgery. We performed a retrospective study in adult (age ≥ 18 years) patients undergoing primary head and neck cancer resection with free-flap reconstruction. All patients were treated using an established care pathway. The baseline group was treated between January 2015–December 2015 (n = 41), prior to the implementation of MMA, and were compared to an MMA-treated cohort treated between December 2017–June 2019 (n = 97). The primary outcome was the proportion of opioids prescribed and oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) consumed during the hospitalization. The secondary outcome was pain control. We found that the post-MMA group consumed fewer opioids in the postoperative period compared to the pre-MMA group. Prior to post-operative day (POD) 6, pain control was better in the post-MMA group; however, the pain control lines intersect on POD 6 and the pre-MMA group appeared to have better pain control from PODs 7–10. In conclusion, our data suggest MMA is an effective method of pain control and opioid reduction in patients undergoing surgery for head and neck cancer with free flap reconstruction. MMA use was associated with a significant decrease in the quantity of opioids consumed postoperatively. The MMA protocol was associated with improved pain management early in the postoperative course. Finally, the MMA protocol is a feasible method of pain control and may reduce the adverse side effects associated with opioid use.

Comparative Evaluation of Different Numerical Pain Scales Used for Pain Estimation during Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets.

Introduction Patients experience various levels of discomfort during orthodontic treatment, i.e., after placement of separators, orthodontic implant placement, and archwire placement and during debonding. Various pain control methods have been developed to relive pain during debonding, i.e., finger pressure (FP), elastomeric wafer (EW), and stress relief (SR). Aim To analyse various pain scales commonly used to determine the effect of different pain control methods during debonding of orthodontic brackets. Study Design. A comparative cross-sectional study performed on a sample of 60 patients (n = 60) including 14 males and 46 females who were ready for debonding and who were divided into three groups, i.e., finger pressure (FP), elastomeric wafer (EW), and stress relief (SR). Materials and Methods A 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to record the pain intensity for each tooth. Another scale known as Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) was used to evaluate the patient's general attitude towards pain perception. The armamentarium and operator were kept same for all the patients. Statistical analysis used was the Kruskal–Wallis test, used for intergroup and intragroup comparison of pain scores. Results Lowest total pain score was recorded in the FP group (P=0.043) on intergroup comparison, while on intragroup comparison, higher pain scores were recorded in lower anterior region (P=0.02) in all three groups. There was no significant difference between the pain scores reported by the male and female subjects. Conclusion FP is an effective method of pain control. And teeth in the anterior region of lower and upper arches are more sensitive to pain. In terms of cognitive-affective constructs, although the VAS has been widely used in previous studies, the PCS has been detailed to show the most reliable association with physical discomfort and emotional distress.

Superior hypogastric plexus block as an effective treatment method for endometriosis-related chronic pelvic pain: an open-label pilot clinical trial

We aimed to investigate the effect of superior hypogastric plexus (SHP) block on pain relief and quality of life of patients with refractory endometriosis. Sixteen patients with refractory endometriosis underwent SHP block. The outcome measures included visual analogue scale (VAS) for chronic pelvic pain, VAS for dysmenorrhoea, and VAS for dyspareunia. The short-form endometriosis health profile (EHP-5) was used to measure quality of life. All the outcome measures were evaluated at weeks 0, 1, 4, 12 and 24. The mean baseline VAS scores significantly improved after the SHP block (p < .001 for all). The mean overall EHP-5 score also significantly improved from 54.3 ± 18.2 to 24.6 ± 13.3 (p < .001). The positive effects of SHP were not diminished over time. No serious adverse effect was noticed in any of the patients. Preliminary results suggest that SHP block could be used as an effective method in pain control and improvement of quality of life in refractory endometriosis. IMPACT STATEMENT What is already known on this subject? Safety and efficacy of SHP block in the treatment of CPP has been revealed in earlier investigations. However, the efficacy of SHP block for pain management in patients with refractory endometriosis has not been investigated in earlier investigations. What do the results of this study add? SHP block is an effective method for pain control and improvement of quality of life in patients with refractory endometriosis. The positive effects of this treatment did not diminish over 24-weeks follow-up of the study. No serious adverse effect was noticed in any of the patients. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Preliminary results suggest that SHP block could be used safely and effectively for controlling pain and improvement of quality of life in patients with refractory endometriosis.

Effectiveness of Ultrasound-guided Single-injection Triple Nerve Block Before Cementless Bipolar Hip Hemiarthroplasty in Femoral Neck Fractures.

PurposeTo compare efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided single-injection nerve blocks (SINB) before bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA) of the hip in patients with femoral neck fractures.Materials and MethodsClinical outcomes of 89 patients who underwent BHA between September 2016 and February 2018 were retrospectively compared. Eight patients were excluded according to exclusion criteria and the remaining patients were divided into two groups: patients who received SINB before surgery (Group I; n=40), and patients who did not (Group II; n=41). The femoral, obturator, and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves were each blocked separately under US guidance. Pain scores determined using the visual analogue scale (VAS) were recorded 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively, and all use of analgesics were recorded separately for 72 hours after surgery. Duration of hospitalization, general complications, and local complications due to SINB were also compared among the groups.ResultsSignificant differences were observed between the two groups: I) VAS at 6 hours and at 12 hours after the operation, II) total amounts of analgesics used. VAS at 24 hours and at 48 hours were not significantly different between the two groups. General complications and duration of hospitalization were also not significantly different between the groups.ConclusionUS-guided lower limb nerve blocks provide excellent immediate postoperative pain relief and can be used as a safe, and effective method of pain control after BHA.

Transversus Abdominis Plane Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Thoracic Epidural for Postoperative Analgesia After Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Autologous breast reconstruction with abdominally based free flaps has traditionally been associated with a longer hospital stay and higher initial cost relative to other reconstructive methods. One important component of this course is postoperative pain control. Thoracic epidural anesthesia is considered among the most effective methods for pain control in the immediate postoperative period following these procedures. Recently, our institution began using 4 quadrant transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks with liposomal bupivacaine. Encouraging trends were observed with utilization of TAP blocks; however, we sought to quantify this effect compared with that of thoracic epidural anesthesia. This study would contribute to a growing body of evidence supporting an enhanced recovery pathway for microvascular breast reconstruction. Thirty patients who underwent deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap-based breast reconstruction from January 2016 to April 2017 were evaluated. Fifteen patients received thoracic epidural anesthesia, and 15 received 4 quadrant TAP blocks with liposomal bupivacaine. Opioid consumption was evaluated and compared for the first 3 days postoperatively. All opioids were converted to oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) for standardization. Day of discharge, day of Foley removal, and several traditionally opioid-related adverse effects were also recorded and compared. On postoperative days 0, 1, 2, and 3, opioid consumption among those given epidural anesthesia compared with those who received TAP blocks with liposomal bupivacaine was 34.9 versus 32.6 OMEs (P = 0.81), 98.9 versus 92.4 OMEs (P = 0.78), 59.7 versus 56.0 OMEs (P = 0.79), and 59.6 versus 24.5 OMEs (P = 0.005*), respectively. Total opioid consumption for the epidural group was 253.1 versus 205.4 OMEs for the TAP block group (P = 0.2743). Time until removal of Foley was 2.7 days for patients with an epidural and 2.1 days for those receiving TAP blocks (P = 0.0056*). Length of stay for those receiving epidural was 4.33 days compared with 3.53 days for those receiving TAP blocks (P = 0.0002*). When using TAP blocks with liposomal bupivacaine, a statistically significant effect on postoperative day 3 and decreased opioid utilization overall were observed. Patients also had their Foley removed sooner and were discharged from the hospital earlier.

Effect of Premedication with Ibuprofen, Paracetamol and Diclofenac Sodium on the Outcome of Maxillary Infiltration Anaesthesia in Patients with Irreversible Pulpitis- A Double-blind Randomised Controlled Trial

Introduction: The most important aspect of endodontic treatment is pain control. The quest for newer ways of pain control is always a topic of interest among the researchers. Though local anaesthesia proved to be the effective method of pain control, there are many instances of failure to achieve successful anaesthesia even with proper technique of administration in cases of irreversible pulpitis. Aim: To determine the effect of Preoperative Oral Administration of Paracetamol (PARA), Ibuprofen (IBUP) or Diclofenac Sodium (DS) on the success of maxillary infiltration anaesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis in a double-blinded randomised controlled trial. Materials and Methods: One hundred and twenty patients having irreversible pulpitis of a maxillary first molar were selected for this prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients indicated their pain scores on a Heft Parker visual analog scale, after which they were randomly divided into four groups (n=30). The subjects received identical capsules containing either 500 mg PARA, 400 mg IBUP, 50 mg DS or 400 mg lactose powder (placebo, PLAC), 1 hour before administration of maxillary infiltration anaesthesia with 2% lidocaine containing 1:80,000 epinephrine. Access cavities were then prepared and anaesthesia was defined as successful if pain is absent or patient has mild pain during access preparation and pulp extirpation. The data was analysed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple post-hoc tests. p-value at &lt;0.05 to be considered significant. Results: The success rates in descending order were 65% (IBUP), 60.83% (DS), 58.33% (PARA), and 20% (PLAC). A significant (p-value 0.0001) difference was found between the drug groups and the PLAC group. Conclusion: Preoperative administration of PARA (500 mg), IBUP (400 mg), and DS (50 mg) significantly improved the efficiency of maxillary infiltration anaesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis.

Clinical and imaging characteristics of patients with extreme low back pain or sciatica referred for spinal injection.

To analyze the causes of pain, imaging characteristics, and therapeutic effect of spinal injection in patients with extreme low back pain or sciatica. We analyzed 381 consecutive patients with extreme low back pain or sciatica visiting our spinal intervention center between January and December 2017. Clinical and imaging characteristics were analyzed. The treatment response, defined as a numerical pain rating scale decrease of ≥ 30%, was measured. Fisher's exact test was performed to identify the association between the injection response and subsequent lumbar surgery rate. The most frequent cause of pain was spinal stenosis, followed by herniated intervertebral disc, facet osteoarthritis, and osteoporotic compression fracture. A herniated intervertebral disc was the most common disorder in patients < 50years of age, while spinal stenosis was the most common in patients ≥ 50years of age. Women comprised 66.4% of the study population. The majority of lumbar pathologies occurred below L3/4. Spinal injection was found to be effective in 44.2% of cases. Those who responded to the injection showed a significantly lower rate of lumbar surgery within 6months (P = 0.004). Those with extreme low back pain or sciatica had clinical and imaging characteristics similar to those with typical low back pain referred for spinal injection. Spinal injection could be an effective method of pain control for patients with extreme low back pain or sciatica.

What is the most effective local anesthesia for transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy of the prostate? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of 47 randomized clinical trials

We aimed to compare the effectiveness of various local anesthetic methods for controlling prostate biopsy (PBx) related pain using network meta-analysis. Literature searches were performed on PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to March 2018. Forty-seven randomized controlled trials, in which the effectiveness of PBx-related pain was investigated using a visual analogue scale after various local anesthetic methods, were included. The local anesthetic methods included intraprostatic local anesthesia (IPLA), intrarectal local anesthesia (IRLA), intravenous sedation (IVS), periprostatic nerve block (PNB), pelvic plexus block (PPB), and spinal anesthesia (SPA). Eight pairwise meta-analyses and network meta-analyses with 21 comparisons were performed. All modalities, except single use of IPLA and IRLA, were more effective than placebo. Our results demonstrate that PNB + IVS (rank 1) and SPA (rank 2) were the most effective methods for pain control. The followings are in order of PPB + IRLA, PNB + IPLA, PPB, PNB + IRLA, IVS, and PNB. In conclusion, the most effective way to alleviate PBx-related pain appears to be PNB + IVS and SPA. However, a potential increase in medical cost and additional risk of morbidities should be considered. In the current outpatient setting, PPB + IRLA, PNB + IPLA, PPB, PNB + IRLA, and PNB methods are potentially more acceptable options.

Intravenous vs Oral Acetaminophen as a Component of Multimodal Analgesia After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Blinded Trial

BackgroundMultimodal analgesia including acetaminophen is increasingly popular for analgesia after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Intravenous (IV) administration of acetaminophen has pharmacokinetic benefits, but unclear clinical advantages. The authors hypothesized that IV acetaminophen would reduce pain with activity, opioid usage, or opioid-related side effects, compared to oral acetaminophen. MethodsIn this double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial, 154 THA patients received either IV or oral acetaminophen as part of a comprehensive opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia strategy. Primary outcomes were pain with physical therapy on postoperative day (POD) 1, opioid side effects (POD 1), and cumulative opioid use. ResultsThere was no difference in opioid side effects, pain scores, or opioid use between the groups. ConclusionPatients in both groups had low pain scores, minimal opioid side effects, and limited opioid usage (corresponding to 6 doses of tramadol 100 mg over 3 days). This highlights multimodal analgesia as an effective method of pain control for THA.

Evaluating the Effect of Intravenous Acetaminophen in Multimodal Analgesia After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundPostoperative pain is a significant concern of patients before surgery. Multimodal pain management is an effective method of pain control after major orthopedic surgery. Acetaminophen is the most commonly used analgesic for the management of pain. It was hypothesized that 1000 mg of intravenous acetaminophen (IA) dosed every 6 hours would significantly reduce the postoperative pain score at rest and the opioid consumption volume in patients who would undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA) when compared to a control group. MethodsA single-center, prospective, open-label randomized control study was conducted. A total of 97 patients undergoing unilateral primary THA were divided into 2 groups: the study group (IA) (n = 45) and the control group (n = 52). The study group received administered IA after surgery, while the control group received only a standard pain control. Both groups received a preoperative femoral nerve block and postoperative intravenous fentanyl citrate. The primary outcome was the evaluation of the pain score at rest 24 hours after surgery. The pain score was measured using the Numerical Rating Scale. The primary outcome of this study was analyzed using generalized estimating equation. ResultsThe IA group had a significant improvement in Numerical Rating Scale score at rest 24 hours after THA compared to the control group (−0.91, 95% confidence interval −1.56 to −0.26, P = .006), suggesting a positive effect of IA usage for pain relief. The total fentanyl citrate consumption after surgery for 24 hours was significantly lower in the IA group than those of the control group (52.07 ± 7.64 vs 57.83 ± 12.44 mg, P < .001). ConclusionPostoperative administration of IA significantly reduced the postoperative pain score and opioid consumption volume after primary THA. IA was useful as one role of multimodal pain management after THA.Level of Evidence: Level 2.

Thoracic Epidural Analgesia: Does It Enhance Recovery?

Thoracic epidural analgesia has been shown to be an effective method of pain control. The utility of epidural analgesia as part of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol is debatable. This study aimed to determine if the use of thoracic epidural analgesia in an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol decreases hospital length of stay or inpatient opioid consumption after elective colorectal resection. This is a single-institution retrospective cohort study. The study was performed at a high-volume, tertiary care center in the Midwest. An institutional database was used to identify patients. All patients undergoing elective transabdominal colon or rectal resection by board-certified colon and rectal surgeons from 2013 to 2017 were included. The main outcome was length of stay. The secondary outcome was oral morphine milligram equivalents consumed during the first 48 hours. There were 1006 patients (n = 815 epidural, 191 no epidural) included. All patients received multimodal analgesia with opioid-sparing agents. Univariate analysis demonstrated no difference in length of stay between those who received thoracic epidural analgesia and those who did not (median, 4 vs 5 days; p = 0.16), which was substantiated by multivariable linear regression. Subgroup analysis showed that the addition of epidural analgesia resulted in no difference in length of stay regardless of an open (n = 362; p = 0.66) or minimally invasive (n = 644; p = 0.46) approach. Opioid consumption data were available after 2015 (n = 497 patients). Univariate analysis demonstrated no difference in morphine milligram equivalents consumed in the first 48 hours between patients who received epidural analgesia and those who did not (median, 135 vs 110 oral morphine milligram equivalents; p = 0.35). This was also confirmed by multivariable linear regression. The retrospective observational design was a limitation of this study. The use of thoracic epidural analgesia within an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol was not found to be associated with a reduction in length of stay or morphine milligram equivalents consumed within the first 48 hours. We cannot recommend routine use of thoracic epidural analgesia within enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A765.

Pain Management in Pectus Excavatum Surgery: A Comparison of Subcutaneous Catheters Versus Epidurals in a Pediatric Population

Pectus excavatum is a common chest wall anomaly. Achieving optimal pain control is a priority for adolescents undergoing surgical correction of this condition. Options for pain control include the use of subcutaneous catheters (On-Q® pumps) and epidurals. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of using subcutaneous catheters for pain control and to compare them with the use of epidurals during surgical correction of pectus excavatum. We identified patients who underwent pectus excavatum repair at our institution between January 2010 and August 2016. Patients were divided into two cohorts (epidural or On-Q pump). Patient charts were reviewed for length of stay, pain scores, pain medications, and complications. A total of 124 patients were included. Forty percent of patients used an epidural (n = 50), and 60% had the On-Q pump (n = 74). The average patient age was 15.6 years. The average Haller index was 4.3. The On-Q pump population had a significant decrease in postoperative length of stay (mean [M] = 4.86, standard deviation [SD] = 0.85) compared with the epidural population (M = 5.60, SD = 0.97); P ≤ .001. There was a significant difference observed in pain scores for patients on the epidural (M = 2.91, SD = 1.13) and On-Q pump (M = 3.81, SD = 1.19; P ≤ .001). There was n = 1 wound infection in each group. The use of bilateral subcutaneous infusion catheters is a safe and effective method for pain control in patients undergoing surgical correction of pectus excavatum. Even though the degree of pain control is not necessarily superior to epidurals, in this study, the catheters were associated with a shorter postoperative length of stay in this patient population and did not increase the incidence of complications.

Effectiveness of scheduled postoperative intravenous acetaminophen for colon cancer surgery pain

BackgroundClinical cases are often observed when patients are in need of repeated use of analgesic infusion to manage pain after colon cancer surgery. This paper investigates analgesic frequency as well as safety of postoperative intravenous (IV) acetaminophen in colon cancer surgery where epidural anesthesia is used.MethodsAmong patients who received epidural anesthesia during colon cancer surgery, one group of twenty eight (28) patients received acetaminophen while another group of patients (30) did not receive it. The groups were analyzed from the surgery day to two days after for the postoperative occurrence and frequency of liver dysfunction in relation to analgesic usage.ResultsThe patient group with acetaminophen infusion significantly reduced the amount of analgesic medication compared to the group without the treatment (p = 0.008). Furthermore there was a significantly larger number of patients in the group receiving acetaminophen treatment with the baseline increase of alanine aminotransferase (p = 0.043). In most of the cases, however, the rate of the increase is mild and the patients did not need medication and subsequently recovered quickly.ConclusionsScheduled IV infusion of acetaminophen after colon cancer surgey is concluded an effective method of pain control and alleviation of postoperative discomfort from the surgery day to two days after the surgery.

Hydrotherapy as a Nursing Intervention for Labour Pain

This literature review provides a brief history of hydrotherapy during labour, a summary of the existing literature, and implications for practice. The objective of the literature review is to explore the evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of hydrotherapy as a method to alleviate labour pain during the first stage of labour. A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted in August 2016 using CINAHL, ProQuest, and MedLine databases. Keywords used were: hydrotherapy, water immersion, intrapartum, labour and/or nurse with truncation and Boolean methods. The inclusion criteria for the search were: articles available in English, accessible electronically, peer-reviewed, and with year restrictions of 2005-2016. The search yielded one practice guideline, four recommendations from regulatory colleges, three systematic reviews, and five single studies. The author concludes that hydrotherapy for low risk parturients is a safe and effective method of pain control that empowers nurses and promotes positive patient outcomes.

Intrathecal Catheter Insertion and Analgesia is a Safe and Effective Method of Pain Control in Patients with Advanced and Intractable Cancer Pain

Introduction: Pain affects the quality of life in cancer patients. The World Health Organization established a simple three-step “ladder” approach in 1986, beginning with nonopioid drugs and progressing to stronger opioids as necessary. The implementation of this guideline enables analgesia to be achieved in 75% to 90% of patients. The remaining patients suffer from intractable pain requiring intrathecal analgesia. Advances in intrathecal analgesia and intrathecal drug delivery systems have allowed for a range of medications to be used in the control of pain in the remaining 20% of patients with intractable cancer pain. This technique allows for reduced medication doses that can decrease the side effects typically associated with oral or parenteral drug delivery. We aim to analyse the pain intensity before and after intrathecal analgesia and review the complications associated with the implantation and the care of the intrathecal device. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analysed medical records of all cancer patients whose pain were managed by intrathecal catheter implants in our centre from February 2005 to December 2014. The pain intensity was reviewed at the time prior to administration of intrathecal analgesia and at physician review prior to hospital discharge or death. Complications related to intrathecal analgesia were reviewed from the patients’ medical records. Results: We analysed the data obtained from 44 patients. 86.4% had metastatic cancer. Pain intensity was reduced significantly at the time of discharge from hospital (P<0.001). Opioids side effects were reduced after intrathecal treatment. The main catheter-related complications were catheter displacement and infection. Conclusion: Intrathecal catheter insertion and analgesia is a safe and effective method of pain control in patients with intractable cancer pain.

Two prophylactic medication approaches in addition to a pain control regimen for early medical abortion < 63 days' gestation with mifepristone and misoprostol: study protocol for a randomized, controlled trial.

BackgroundPain is often cited as one of the worst features of medical abortion. Further, inadequate pain management may motivate some women to seek unnecessary clinical care. There is a need to identify effective methods for pain control in this setting.Methods/DesignWe propose a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. 576 participants (288 nulliparous; 288 parous) from study sites in Nepal, South Africa and Vietnam will be randomly allocated to one of three treatments: (1) ibuprofen 400 mg PO and metoclopramide 10 mg PO; (2) tramadol 50 mg PO and a placebo; or (3) two placebo pills, to be taken immediately before misoprostol and repeated once four hours later. All women will be provided with supplementary analgesia for use as needed during the medical abortion. We hypothesize that women receiving prophylactic analgesia will report lower maximal pain scores in the first 8 h following misoprostol administration compared to women receiving placebos for medical abortion through 63 days’ gestation. Our primary objective is to determine whether prophylactic administration of ibuprofen and metoclopramide or tramadol provides superior pain relief compared to analgesia administration after pain begins, measured during the first eight hours after misoprostol administration. Secondary objectives include identifying covariates associated with higher reported pain scores; determining any impact of the study medicines on medical abortion success; and, qualitatively exploring women’s physical experiences of medical abortion, especially related to pain, and how can they be improved. Data sources include medical records, participant symptom diaries and interview data obtained on the day of enrollment, during the medical abortion, and at follow-up. Participants will be contacted via telephone on day 3 and return for follow-up will occur approximately 14 days after mifepristone, concluding study participation. A subset of 42 women will also be invited to undergo in-depth qualitative interviews following study completion.DiscussionAlthough pain is one of the most common side effects encountered with medical abortion, little is known about optimal pain management for this process. This multi-arm trial design offers an efficient approach to evaluating two prophylactic pain management regimens compared to use of pain medication as needed.Trial registration ACTRN12613000017729 (Prospectively registered 8/1/2013).