To the Editor: Geriatric medicine has not been an obligatory part of the undergraduate medical education in Germany, until recently. It was not until 2002 that the new law on medical board certification directed that “medicine in old age and the old person” be part of the clinical curriculum. However, there are no obligatory recommendations on which issues should be taught. At the University of Hamburg, a geriatric curriculum has been incorporated.1 It should provide an understanding of the need for prerequisite assessment and the inappropriateness of diagnostic and therapeutic nihilism, recognizing as well limitations and potential risks of medical interventions in old patients. Experienced geriatric staff members engaged in teaching were responsible for the educational concept and wrote the curriculum to achieve maximum congruence and adherence to the items in focus (Table 1). This choice of topics was based strictly on the faculty's expertise after extensive discussions of its probable benefit for young doctors. Furthermore, the time budget as directed by the university had to be adhered to. The lectures are complementary to the seminars' contents. All seminars are of the same didactical structure, aiming to involve the students through tasks and practical exercises in small groups (5–6 students) that address clinical problems or explicit questions. An interdisciplinary seminar includes a 15-minute introductory presentation about theoretical aspects and the practical implications of “telling bad news,” followed by one-to-one (patient-to-physician) supervised practical student exercises using case vignettes. Thereafter, another 15-minute presentation, reinforcing the previous presentation, addresses communication needs focusing on older patients (including caregivers and team aspects), problems with consent decision-making, the end of life, and dying. These are discussed in the whole seminar group (18–20 students) referring to relevant publications (e.g., 2). The consideration of communication problems is a prerequisite for effective medication management and concordance,3 which are addressed in a special seminar (Table 1). Another example is prevention, in which effective communication and establishing a trustful relationship are mandatory to meet the “unreported needs” of older persons.4 Then, a second round of one-to-one supervised student exercises takes place using case vignettes before the seminar is finally discussed together. The dedicated geriatric problem-oriented learning (POL) addresses a complex case vignette (a patient coming into the emergency department after a fall) using the classic seven-step POL strategy. The bedside teaching is accomplished using a clinical round. Thereafter, students visit individual patients for history taking and physical examination to create a “problem list” and to answer a five-item questionnaire. The examinations consist of a written test based on multiple choice and essay questions, and a 9-minute Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) with volunteer older persons (aged ≥75). Both examinations must be passed separately (≥60% of each maximum score). Beginning in the autumn of 2004 and continuing through 2005, 597 students (5 trimesters, 12 weeks each) received this instruction, of whom 562 (94.1%) were examined and 524 (87.8%) evaluated the curriculum. Approximately 8% of the students had no clinical experiences during their previous studies. Nevertheless, 551 (98%) passed the examinations, reaching a mean rating of 2.26 for total score (1=very good). The results were constantly better on written tests than on the OSCE (variation of mean ratings over time 1.81–2.51 vs 1.85–2.76). This may reflect successful acquisition of knowledge, although its practical application in an OSCE situation is more difficult. Nonetheless, half of the students reached very good and good results on the OSCE. The student evaluations of the curriculum exhibited mean ratings for single items and the total value of the geriatric curriculum (mean 4.68±1.22; 6=excellent) that were constantly above the ratings of all clinical blocks (mean 3.70±1.36) and were among the top group of all 33 clinical specialties. Issues of geriatric medicine are ideally suited for patient- or problem-centered teaching and learning. It is possible to raise students' interest, irrespective their previous level of clinical knowledge. In response to the students' demand for more-intensive clinical practice-based education, geriatric clinical clerkships are implemented now. Financial Disclosure: Jennifer Anders was a postgraduate geriatric research fellow supported by a grant from the Robert Bosch Stiftung, Stuttgart (Forschungskolleg Geriatrie). Author Contributions: W. von Renteln-Kruse, A. Rösler, and J. Anders contributed to the educational concept, analysis and interpretation of data, and the manuscript and were active teachers. M. Michaelis and P. Dieckmann contributed to the educational concept and were active teachers. O. Tesch and J. Vogel were active teachers. M. de Wit contributed to the concept of an interdisciplinary seminar and was an active teacher. M. Ehrhardt was an active teacher in an interdisciplinary seminar. Sponsor's Role: None.
Read full abstract