Effect Of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy Research Articles

Menopausal complaints, oestrogens, and heart disease risk: an explanation for discrepant findings on the benefits of post-menopausal hormone therapyThe opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the Editors of the European Heart Journal or of the European Society of Cardiology.

There is a large discrepancy between the findings of observational and experimental studies on the effects of post-menopausal hormone therapy (HT) and coronary heart disease risk. Observational studies, mainly comprising peri-menopausal women, report risk reductions up to 30-50%, whereas the experimental studies, comprising elderly women, do not show coronary protection. Suggested explanations are methodological differences, such as confounding or healthy user bias, incomplete capture of early events, the stage of atherosclerosis at the start of HT, formulation or dose of HT, or early susceptibility to thrombotic events. We propose that the presence of climacteric complaints determines the susceptibility to hormone replacement therapy. Climacteric complaints are the main indication for HT in the population, whereas in the clinical trials women with climacteric complaints were either explicitly excluded or comprised only a minority of the total randomized population. There is some, albeit circumstantial evidence to support this hypothesis. Women with climacteric complaints of sweating not only appear to have lower levels of serum oestradiol, but also lose more bone than women without climacteric complaints. Consequently, sweating episodes may indicate potential benefits from HT. It has also been reported that hot flushes during menopause correlate with a higher level of oxidative stress and an increased cardiovascular reactivity to stressful situations. We suggest epidemiological approaches to test our hypothesis.

Effects of postmenopausal hormone therapy every day and every other day on lipid levels according to difference in body mass index

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of postmenopausal estrogen and progestogen therapy (EPT) every day and every other day on lipid levels, particularly triglyceride (TG) levels, according to difference in body mass index (BMI). Ninety-nine postmenopausal women (mean age, 53.9 +/- 5.6 years; mean BMI, 22.8 +/- 2.8 kg/m) were randomly treated with EPT every other day or every day for 1 year. Fifty women received oral administration of 0.625 mg of conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) and 2.5 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) every other day, and 49 women received oral administration of 0.625 mg of CEE and 2.5 mg of MPA every day. Blood samples were collected at baseline and after 1 year of therapy for measurement of fasting TG, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), and apolipoproteins. Data from 88 of the 99 postmenopausal women were used for analysis. In women whose BMI was 25 kg/m or higher, TG levels during EPT every day increased by 26.8%, while TG levels during EPT every other day decreased by 12.3%. There was a significant (P < 0.05) difference between percentage changes in TG during EPT every day and every other day. In women whose BMI was less than 25 kg/m, TG levels during EPT every day increased by 21.7%, while during EPT every other day TG levels did not change. The mean levels of estradiol during EPT every day in women whose BMI was less than 25 kg/m and in women whose BMI was 25 kg/m or higher were 28.5 and 38.7 pg/mL, respectively, the difference between these levels was significant (P < 0.01). On the other hand, there was no significant difference between levels of estradiol during EPT every other day in these two BMI groups. Triglyceride levels during EPT every day with conventional doses of CEE and MPA increased more in overweight and obese postmenopausal women in association with increased estrogen levels.

1201: Effects of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy on Sexual Function: The Hers trial

1201: Effects of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy on Sexual Function: The Hers trial

The effect of hormone therapy on the risk for age-related maculopathy in postmenopausal women.

To evaluate the effect of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) as well as the use of oral contraceptives and lifetime endogenous hormone exposure on the risk for age-related maculopathy (ARM) in postmenopausal women. This was a cross-sectional, controlled study. A total of 102 women from 60 to 80 years of age who were receiving HT and 100 controls underwent a detailed clinical funduscopic evaluation and stereoscopic fundus photography for the presence and grading of ARM. All participants completed a standardized questionnaire regarding vascular risk factors, HT, and lifetime exogenous and endogenous estrogen and progesterone exposure. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t test, chi2 test, and a multivariate logistic regression model. The HT and the non-HT groups did not differ in terms of early (11% v 15%), late (6% v 6%), or wet (2% v 2%) ARM prevalence rates. Women with ARM were significantly older than controls (69 v 66 years; P = 0.001, 95% CI = 0.008 - 0.027) and were more likely to have ischemic heart disease (21% v 9%; OR = 2.86, P = 0.03, 95% CI = 0.020 - 0.360). Lifetime exogenous and endogenous hormone exposures and other cardiovascular risk factors were not significantly different among women with ARM as compared with controls. Postmenopausal HT may not affect the risk for either early or late ARM in women aged 60 to 80 years. The risk for both entities is not necessarily affected by either exogenous or endogenous lifetime hormone exposure. A history of ischemic heart disease may be associated with an increased risk for ARM.

Analysis of Recent Papers in Hypertension

Analysis of Recent Papers in Hypertension

Glycemic effects of postmenopausal hormone therapy: the heart attack and estrogen/progestin replacement study. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

The Beta Blocker Heart Attack Trial (BHAT) recruited 3837 patients who within the previous 5–21-day period had experienced a myocardial infarction. The purpose of the trial was to test the efficacy of propranolol in decreasing total mortality after such an event. Recruitment was carried out over a 28-month period and involved 31 clinics, 134 hospitals, and 136 acute coronary care units. Of the 1577,771 patients admitted to these units, 16,358 met the BHAT criteria for a myocardial infarction, and 23% of those eligible were ultimately randomized. The use of a coronary care unit log was helpful for tracking patients to maximize recruitment and to provide information in regard to the universe from which patients were recruited.

Effect of postmenopausal hormone therapy on cognitive function: the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study

Purpose To determine if hormone therapy results in better cognitive function in older postmenopausal women. Subjects and methods The Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving 2763 women with coronary disease. Women were assigned randomly to conjugated estrogen (0.625 mg) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (2.5 mg) in one tablet daily or identical placebo; they were followed for a mean (± SD) of 4.2 ± 0.4 years. Participants at 10 of the 20 HERS centers were invited to enroll in the cognitive function substudy. At the end of the trial, we measured cognitive function in 517 women in the hormone group and 546 in the placebo group using six standard tests: the modified Mini-Mental Status Examination, Verbal Fluency, Boston Naming, Word List Memory, Word List Recall, and Trails B. Cognitive function was not measured at baseline. Results The mean age of participants at the time of cognitive function testing was 71 ± 6 years. There were no differences in age-adjusted cognitive function test scores between the two treatment groups, except that women assigned to hormones scored worse on the Verbal Fluency test than women assigned to placebo (15.9 ± 4.8 vs. 16.6 ± 4.8, P = 0.02). Adjustment for other potential confounders and restriction of the analyses to women who had been adherent to study medication did not change the results. Conclusion Among older postmenopausal women with coronary disease, 4 years of treatment with postmenopausal hormone therapy did not result in better cognitive function as measured on six standardized tests. Whether these results also apply to elderly women without coronary disease cannot be determined from this study.

Effect of postmenopausal hormone therapy on major adverse cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention: the HERS trial

Effect of postmenopausal hormone therapy on major adverse cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention: the HERS trial

Postmenopausal hormone therapy: less favourable risk-benefit ratios in healthy Dutch women.

To estimate the health effects of postmenopausal hormone therapy used for 10 or 20 years in a population of intermediate cardiovascular risk. Using existing estimates of the effect of hormone therapy on rates of myocardial infarction, hip fracture and breast cancer, a proportional multistage life table was generated to calculate the effects of use for 10 and 20 years in a synthetic cohort of Dutch women aged 55 with an average and a high-risk profile for cardiovascular disease. A woman of the general population who starts hormone therapy at age 55 for 10 years can prolong her life by 1 month and may postpone the occurrence of first incidence of one of the diseases under consideration by 2.4 months. One excess breast cancer case is likely to occur per 5-6 averted cases of first myocardial infarction or hip fracture. If she prolongs her use to 20 years, the gain of life expectancy and disease-free life expectancy is doubled. The risk-benefit ratio worsens to one extra breast cancer per 3-4 averted cases of the preventable diseases. For a woman with a high-risk profile, the gains in health are about twice as high as for her counterpart in the general population, and her risk-benefit ratio is also more favourable. Yet, the risk-benefit ratio still worsens for 20 as compared with 10 years of use. Women from the general population in the Netherlands and similar populations can achieve only a modest gain in life expectancy by using hormones during 10 or 20 years following menopause. This is a consequence of the low incidence of myocardial infarction and hip fracture and the relatively high incidence of breast cancer before the age of 75. Women at increased cardiovascular risk can benefit more from hormone therapy. But even amongst these women, the risk of breast cancer incurred with long-term use offsets much of the benefit that could accrue from changing the risk of heart disease and hip fracture.

Value of drug-licensing documents in studying the effect of postmenopausal hormone therapy on cardiovascular disease

In a previous study of pooled data from published trials, we found no evidence to support the claim that postmenopausal hormone therapy (PHT) is associated with a decrease in cardiovascular disease. The purpose of this study was to see whether reports of clinical trials attached to drug-licensing applications in Finland could be obtained for scientific purposes, whether they are useful for studying cardiovascular events resulting from PHT, and if so, whether these unpublished reports corroborate the results of published reports. Since clinical trials in drug-licensing documents are confidential, we had to obtain special permission from the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health to use the data for research purposes. After permission was granted, we studied the clinical sections of licensing documents for PHT drugs sent by drug companies to the Finnish Drug Agency. We aimed to identify trials that compared PHT and a placebo (or no therapy, or vitamin-mineral drugs), and that reported on cardiovascular and thromboembolic events or superficial phlebitis. New trials were identified and their data were pooled with those of published trials. 17 licensing applications for drugs used as PHT were found. The number, type, and quality of reporting of clinical trials varied widely between applications. The trials and their reporting of unanticipated adverse events were mostly inadequate. Six new trials (ie, those fulfilling the inclusion criteria and not included in our earlier report) were found. The new trials added little to the conclusions of previously published studies: the calculated odds ratios of cardiovascular and thromboembolic events for women taking PHT versus those not taking it was 1.97 (95% CI 0.84-4.63), compared with 1.65 (0.65-4.21) in our previous study. In this case, unpublished trials added only a little to the data available from published trials, mainly due to the type of clinical data used in the licensing applications. The new data did not change the previous conclusion that clinical trials do not support a beneficial effect of PHT on cardiovascular diseases.

Postmenopausal hormone therapy into the 21st century

At the time of the menopause, a review of the major health issues can be especially rewarding. Besides the general issues of good health, particular attention is now being focused on prevention of cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis because of the potentially beneficial effects of postmenopausal hormone therapy. Hormone therapy should be offered to most women as they consider their paths for successful aging. However, as for any pharmacological intervention, the benefits of treatment must outweigh the risk. The available data would appear to indicate that, for most women, this is in fact the case with current research into future hormonal therapies aimed at further improving the benefit:risk ratio.

Effect of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy on Body Weight and Waist and Hip Girths

Effect of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy on Body Weight and Waist and Hip Girths

Impact of postmenopausal hormone therapy on cardiovascular events and cancer: pooled data from clinical trials

Objective: To examine the incidence of cardiovascular diseases and cancer from published clinical trials that studied other outcomes of postmenopausal hormone therapy as some surveys have suggested that it may...

Effect of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy on Body Weight and Waist and Hip Girths

Effect of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy on Body Weight and Waist and Hip Girths

Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy prevents central distribution of body fat after menopause

The reduction in cardiovascular risk induced by hormone replacement therapy is only partly explained by changes in serum lipids and lipoproteins. As body composition and body fat distribution in particular are independent predictors of cardiovascular disease, we investigated the effect of postmenopausal hormone therapy on body composition parameters directly measured. Sixty-two early postmenopausal women were followed up for 2 years in a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study. We found that combined estrogen-progestogen therapy prevented the increase in abdominal fat after menopause ( P < .05), and that this effect was independent of the effect on serum lipids and lipoproteins. The therapy reduced postmenopausal bone loss significantly ( P < .001), whereas it did not have a statistically significant influence on total body fat mass or total lean body mass. The findings of the present study suggest that some of the protective impact of postmenopausal hormone therapy on cardiovascular disease may be explained by the effect on body composition, in particular abdominal fat.

Estrogen monotherapy and combined estrogen-progestogen replacement therapy attenuate aortic accumulation of cholesterol in ovariectomized cholesterol-fed rabbits.

Cardiovascular disease is currently the leading cause of death among women in the United States. To investigate the effect of postmenopausal hormone therapy on atherogenesis, we studied 75 cholesterol-fed female rabbits for 19 wk. The rabbits were randomly assigned to five groups. Four groups underwent bilateral ovariectomy followed by treatment with either 17 beta-estradiol, 17 beta-estradiol plus norethisterone acetate, 17 beta-estradiol plus levonorgestrel, or placebo. The fifth group had a sham operation and received placebo. The hormone groups had only one-third of the aortic accumulation of cholesterol found in the placebo groups, a difference that was highly statistically significant (P less than 0.0001). No significant differences in aortic accumulation of cholesterol were found in the hormone groups. This indicates that estrogen attenuates atherogenesis in cholesterol-fed ovariectomized rabbits and that two commonly prescribed progestogens do not counteract the effect. The beneficial effect of estradiol could only partly be explained by its lowering effects on serum total cholesterol or VLDL cholesterol, which implies that estradiol possesses additional beneficial effects, possibly a direct action on the arterial wall.