Sir:FigureAntiplatelet drugs and combination therapies are on the rise because or their proven benefits concerning an antithrombotic effect on coronary vessels. Surgeons fear the side effects, including hemorrhage. Nevertheless, both cardiologists and microsurgeons are involved in the patency of small-caliber vessels. In addition, the mechanism of acute coronary syndrome reminds us of the process in microanastomosed and pedicled flaps; similar to myocardium, microsurgical transposed tissue is subjected to ischemia, thrombosis, and endothelial injury. Therefore, the idea suggests transforming the foe into a friend and making use of antiplatelet drugs in microsurgery. This idea is promoted by data acquired through animal models. In animal models, a potential benefit of antiplatelet therapy has been proved in randomized, controlled, double-blind studies.1 Antiplatelet drugs have been shown to result in a significant increase in arterial and venous patency and a decrease in anastomotic thrombus formation. Therefore, this knowledge could be used in clinical practice. We present the case report of a 53-year-old patient whose right breast was reconstructed using a pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap. After an inconspicuous initial course, epitheliolysis manifested on the fifth postoperative day, with a rapidly increasing livid coloration of the whole flap between days 7 and 11, suggestive of a no-reflow phenomenon. Therefore, on day 11, a salvage attempt was made. The patient was submitted to double-platelet inhibition therapy consisting of acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel. One hundred milligrams of of acetylsalicylic acid was administered daily and clopidogrel was given with a loading dose of 225 mg on the first day of treatment, changing to a 75-mg daily dose on the following days. This treatment was maintained for 4 weeks. After this regimen, the vascular changes ceased and the flap recovered appreciably, leaving only a marginal necrosis in zone IV behind (Fig. 1). In addition, no signs of bleeding were recorded.Fig. 1: Imminent loss of a transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap affiliated with a no-reflow phenomenon. (Left) The obvious livid coloration in almost the whole flap on postoperative day 11, when dual platelet inhibition therapy started. (Right) The imminent flap loss stopped, and after 10 days of dual platelet inhibition, most of the flap appeared salvaged.Whereas the available data1 strongly suggest a potential benefit of antiplatelet drugs in the prevention of flap failure, the question arises of whether this benefit is paid for by an increased bleeding risk. With regard to continued clopidogrel monotherapy in coronary artery bypass grafting, a significant increase in perioperative blood loss, excessive postoperative hemorrhage, increase in transfusion rate and amount of administered blood products, high reoperation rate, and even mortality have been noted.2 Also, in dermatologic surgery, clopidogrel intake has been found to be significantly associated with hemorrhagic complications.3 Thus, operations performed under continued antiplatelet therapy may be associated with a considerable risk of bleeding. However, what about making use of the positive effect of platelet inhibition by administering the drugs postoperatively? Thus, the bleeding risk should be low and the positive effect must be maintained. We can make use of the experience of cardiac surgeons who routinely operate on patients under acetylsalicylic acid therapy, which is combined with clopidogrel therapy 24 to 48 hours postoperatively. Despite the obvious invasiveness of cardiac operations, studies have shown that this postoperative dual platelet inhibition does not cause any significant increase in bleeding risk when compared with acetylsalicylic acid monotherapy.4,5 Keeping in mind the obvious bleeding risks when administered preoperatively, we suggest examining its potential benefits in microsurgery rather than just considering antiplatelet therapy as a foe when administered postoperatively. Stefan Riml, M.D. Heinz Wallner, M.D. Peter Kompatscher, M.D. Department for Plastic, Aesthetic, and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors thank A. Piontke for excellent photodocumentation. DISCLOSURE The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this communication.