Effects Of Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs Research Articles

Safety of Biologic and Nonbiologic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drug Therapy in Veterans with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Hepatitis C Virus Infection.

To examine the effect of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy on hepatotoxicity among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We identified biologic and nonbiologic treatment episodes of patients with RA using the 1997-2011 national data from the US Veterans Health Administration. Eligible episodes had HCV infection (defined by detectable HCV RNA) and subsequently initiated a new biologic or nonbiologic DMARD. Cohort entry required a baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) < 66 IU/l and quantifiable HCV RNA within 90 days prior to starting biologic/DMARD therapy. The primary outcome of interest was hepatotoxicity, defined as ALT elevation ≥ 100 IU/l or increase in HCV RNA of 1 log or more, and was examined within the first year of biologic/DMARD use. Results were reported as the cumulative incidence of treatment episodes achieving predefined hepatotoxicity at 3, 6, and 12 months after biologic/DMARD initiation. RA patients with HCV (n = 748) were identified and contributed 1097 biologic/DMARD treatment episodes. Overall, ALT elevations were uncommon, with 37 (3.4%) hepatotoxicity events occurring within 12 months. Treatment episodes with biologic DMARD demonstrated more frequency of hepatotoxicity than did nonbiologic DMARD (4.8% vs 2.3%, p = 0.03). Among treatment episodes involving hepatotoxicity events, the majority occurred within 6 months of DMARD initiation (29/37, 78%). In US veterans with HCV and RA receiving biologic and nonbiologic DMARD, the frequency of hepatotoxicity (ALT ≥ 100 IU/l) was low, with a higher frequency observed in treatment episodes with current biologic use.

Rheumatoid arthritis, insulin resistance, and diabetes

Recent progress in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is turning attention toward comorbidities, such as diabetes. The objectives of this review are to clarify the links between RA and diabetes and to assess potential effects of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on diabetes. The increased insulin resistance seen in RA is closely linked to the systemic inflammation induced by certain proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) and interleukin-6. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes is increased in patients with RA. Furthermore, certain DMARDs including hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate, TNFα antagonist, and interleukin-1β antagonists seem to improve the markers of glucose metabolism. In contrast, glucocorticoids tend to adversely affect glycemic control, particularly when taken chronically. Consequently, a crucial yet insufficiently applied rule is that cardiovascular risk factors must be sought and treated routinely, particularly as the choice of the DMARD may affect glucose metabolism.

Psoriatic Arthritis: An Update

Advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of psoriatic arthritis and clinical aspects of the disease justify the present review. Studies have identified common inflammatory pathways related to the innate immune response, such as the IL-12/IL-23 axis, along with numerous genes that affect susceptibility to both diseases and influence phenotypic development. Interest has grown in biomarkers that can be used for early diagnosis or prognosis or to predict joint destruction and the response to treatment. Recent reports describe important differences between the effects of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologics on the process of new bone formation. Other issues that have been discussed include the need for reliable screening methods, particularly for early detection of oligoarticular arthritis, and for protocols to guide referral to specialists, especially in newly created multidisciplinary practices.

FRI0054 Left Ventricular Function and Structure in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis without Cardiac Symptoms: Comparison between Nonbiologic and Biologic DMARD Treatment Groups

BackgroundCongestive heart failure (CHF) is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, but effects of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on myocardial structure and function are...

Actualización en artritis psoriásica

Advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of psoriatic arthritis and clinical aspects of the disease justify the present review. Studies have identified common inflammatory pathways related to the innate immune response, such as the IL-12/IL-23 axis, along with numerous genes that affect susceptibility to both diseases and influence phenotypic development. Interest has grown in biomarkers that can be used for early diagnosis or prognosis or to predict joint destruction and the response to treatment. Recent reports describe important differences between the effects of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologics on the process of new bone formation. Other issues that have been discussed include the need for reliable screening methods, particularly for early detection of oligoarticular arthritis, and for protocols to guide referral to specialists, especially in newly created multidisciplinary practices.

Comparison of Physician and Patient Global Assessments Over Time in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), there is discordance between patient and physician assessments of disease severity and treatment response. This retrospective analysis of the RADIUS (RA Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug Intervention and Utilization Study) 1 cohort examined specific factors that influence differences in global assessments for therapeutic effectiveness of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs made by physicians (physician global assessment [PhGA]) and patients (patient global assessment [PtGA]). The RADIUS 1 cohort consisted of primarily community-based private practice patients with RA requiring either the addition of or a switch to a new biologic or nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug and who were followed for up to 5 years by their rheumatologists. Periodic assessments included PhGA, PtGA, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 28-item tender/painful joint count (TJC28), swollen joint count (SJC28), pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and acute-phase reactants. Among 4359 patients (mean disease duration, 7.3 years), PhGA most highly correlated with TJC28 (0.6956; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6881-0.7030) and SJC28 (0.6757; 95% CI, 0.6678-0.6834). Moderate overall correlations were observed for PtGA with TJC28 (0.5000; 95% CI, 0.4890-0.5108) and less 50 with SJC28 (0.3754; 95% CI, 0.3628-0.3878). Patient global assessment most strongly correlated with pain VAS (0.8349; 95% CI, 0.8305-0.8392) and moderately correlated with HAQ-DI (0.5979; 95% CI, 0.5886-0.6071). Acute-phase reactants poorly correlated with PhGA and PtGA. Low correlations between PhGA and acute-phase reactants suggest that these measurements have a limited contribution compared with the physical examination when physicians make global assessments. These results also suggest that physicians should consider patients' assessments of their disease activity (HAQ, pain VAS, and PtGA) and put joint counts into proper context.

FRI0113 Rheumatoid arthritis and eosinophilia: the risk of lymphoproliferative malignancies and solid cancers. a study based on the copenhagen primary care differential count (copdiff) database

BackgroundCohort and population studies have indicated an association between rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and malignancies. Several mechanisms have been suggested; i) extrinsic pro-oncogenic effects of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, ii) intrinsic pro-oncogenic...

Conventional DMARD therapy (methotrexate-sulphasalazine) may decrease the requirement of biologics in routine practice of ankylosing spondylitis patients: A real-life experience

The effect of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is still controversial. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of sulphasalazine (SSZ) mono- or combination therapy with methotrexate (MTX) in AS patients naive to anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) agents. Patients with AS (n = 87, male : female, 46 : 41) treated with SSZ (n = 61) or SSZ + MTX (n = 26) combination and a documented 6-month follow-up were evaluated retrospectively. Disease activity was assessed by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Requirement for anti-TNFα therapy was assessed after 6 months. Mean (SD) age was 43.0 (11.0) versus 40.2 (11.1) and disease duration was 11.0 (8.6) versus 8.2 (5.2) years, in the SSZ and SSZ + MTX groups, respectively. Initially, 59% (34/61) of the patients in SSZ monotherapy and 68% (17/26) in the combination arm had BASDAI > 4. At the end of the study, BASDAI scores decreased similarly in both groups (mono: 1.4 [-7-6] versus combination: 0.7 [-3-6] P = 0.2). BASDAI was > 4 in 32.8% (20/61) of patients in the SSZ monotherapy and in 44% (11/26) in the combination arm. Only 4 (6.6%) patients in the SSZ group and 2 (7.7%) in the ombination arm were switched to anti-TNFα therapies. A significant subset of our AS patients responded to SSZ mono or SSZ + MTX combination therapies at 6 months follow-up. Using BASDAI, the requirement for biological therapies decreased by 21-24%. In AS patients, including those with axial involvement only, DMARD therapy may be a reasonable first alternative to anti-TNFα therapy and may delay the switch to biologic agents.

Summary of AHRQ's comparative effectiveness review of drug therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in adults--an update.

In 2011, the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (AHRQ) published a systematic review on the comparative effectiveness of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) used to treat adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The publication was an update to a 2007 report. A total of 258 published articles were used in the AHRQ review to compare the effectiveness of corticosteroids, and oral and biologic DMARDs in the treatment of RA. Head-to-head studies and prospective cohort trials were used to compare one drug to another in determining efficacy and effectiveness. AHRQ compiled this report in an attempt to summarize and integrate the available data for clinicians to make evidence based practice decisions for their patients since there is limited consensus among the medical community regarding the comparative effectiveness of drugs used to treat RA. The report reveals there is still much research to be done concerning the side effects of these agents and their influence in different patient subgroups. To: (a) utilize review findings to make diagnostic and treatment management decisions in clinical practice, (b) inform clinicians on the findings from the updated AHRQ's 2011 comparative effectiveness review on drug therapy for RA in adults, and (c) identify shortcomings in the current research and future directions revealed by the report. Rheumatoid arthritis is a major public health burden. The 2011 updated AHRQ report includes several new medications approved by the FDA since 2007. The review includes 31 head-to-head randomized clinical trials (RCTs), 1 head-to-head nonrandomized controlled trial, 44 placebo controlled trials, 28 meta-analyses or systematic reviews, and 107 observational studies. Most of the studies used for the comparative analysis are of fair quality with an insufficient to moderate strength of evidence assigned to the findings (Table 1). A mixed treatment comparisons (MTC)meta-analysis from the AHRQ report found that the biologic etanercept has a higher probability of improvement in disease activity compared with other biologic DMARDs, but the MTC findings have a low strength of evidence and caution is recommended in the interpretation of this weak evidence. For patients with early RA, limited evidence precludes conclusions about the superiority of one combination therapy versus another. The data are also inconclusive for comparisons of therapeutic similarity among oral DMARDs including the limitation created by differences inmethotrexate (MTX) dosing across trials. Extensive clinical experience over the years support the preferred use of MTX in most patients versus other oral DMARDs as well as its use in multidrug regimens, whereas there is little data on the use of oral DMARDs in combination with biologic agents. The review does not support a specific biologic DMARD over another due to the lack of head-to-head trials comparing these agents using validated RA outcome measures. The data show that the majority of biologics have approximately the same efficacy except for anakinra, which was found to be less effective. The biologic and oral DMARDs are similar in overall tolerability, but several studies suggest that adverse events are more common with biologic DMARDs versus oral DMARDs. Based on limited evidence, the oral DMARDs do not appear to have an increased risk of severe adverse events including cardiovascular events and cancer. Although most studies also found no increased risk of cardiovascular events or cancer with the biologic DMARDs, cohort studies show an increased risk of heart failure with adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab compared with oral DMARDs. The updated AHRQ review synthesizes the current literature on therapies used for the treatment of RA in adults. The investigators are also able to identify pertinent research gaps in the literature that can be addressed with future research.

Summary of AHRQ's Comparative Effectiveness Review of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs for Children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.

A systematic review on the comparative effectiveness of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) used to treat children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) was published by the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (AHRQ) in September 2011. Studies from 198 articles included in the review addressed the benefits and harms of DMARDs compared with conventional treatments and other DMARDs used to treat JIA. The review also incorporated studies comparing various clinical tools used for diagnosing JIA and measuring disease activity. Clinical outcome measures were analyzed to determine the most effective methods to measure disease state. The lack of current research for the treatment of JIA motivated AHRQ to contract with researchers to synthesize the available information with the intent of enabling health professionals to make evidence-based practice decisions for their patients. The review alsohighlights gaps in the research and areas that need to be addressed in the future. To (a) educate health care practitioners on the findings from AHRQ's 2011 comparative effectiveness review on DMARDs used to treat children with JIA, (b) apply review findings to make diagnosis and treatment decisions in clinical practice, and (c) recognize limitations and gaps n the current research relating to the comparative benefits and harms of DMARDs for treatment of JIA. JIA is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting approximately 300,000 children and adolescents in the United States.1 Initially manifesting with inflammation, swelling, pain, and stiffness of the joints, the disease as no apparent or known cause. JIA is a clinical diagnosis based on several actors including the number of affected joints and the involvement of other tissues (e.g., the skin and lymphoid tissues), and JIA has 7 categories: systemic-onset arthritis, oligoarthritis, rheumatoid-factor positive polyarthritis, rheumatoid-factor negative polyarthritis, enthesitis-related arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and undifferentiated arthritis.2 Complete remission and resolution of disease activity are the ultimate treatment goals; however, there is no present cure. Inhibition of inflammation, prevention of joint damage, and promotion of a high level of functioning are the immediate goals of treatment. Even with treatment, patients with JIA continue to experience disease activity, joint destruction, suboptimal function, and impaired quality of life, all of which extend into adulthood.3 JIA can be severely debilitating and places a heavy physical and psychological burden on children and families affected by the disease. Methotrexate is a nonbiologic DMARD with an unknown mechanism of action. Methotrexate has been used for so long in the treatment of JIA that it is frequently considered a part of conventional treatment; the evidence shows that methotrexate is superior to conventional treatment with NSAIDsand/or intra-articular corticosteroids. The introduction of newer biologic DMARDs has spawned optimism that treatment will increasingly lead to improved outcomes for JIA, but the evidence is insufficient to support superiority over methotrexate. There is moderate evidence to support the claim that continued treatment from 4 months to 2 years with a biologic DMARD in children who have responded to a biologic DMARD decreases the risk of a flare. However, the safety of biologic DMARDs for long-term use has not been determined and may be associated with the developmentof cancer. The association between tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha inhibitors and potential increased risk of lymphoma caused the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to place boxed warning labels on biologic DMARDs including etancercept, infliximab, and adalimumab. The effectiveness of the DMARDs appears to vary among categories of JIA and the treatment history of individual patients. Except for methotrexate, there is insufficient evidence to support selection of a specific drug or drug class over another in the treatment of JIA. The AHRQ review examines the scientific literature on DMARDs used in children with JIA in an effort to synthesize what is known about the subject, and the comprehensive review identifies important research gaps in the literature that need to be addressed. Only 8 studies (in 9 publications) were rated "good quality" by the AHRQ investigators.

Thymic function in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Objective:Thymic function declines exponentially with age. Impaired thymic function has been associated with autoimmune disease in adults but has never been formally assessed in childhood autoimmunity. Therefore, thymic function in...

The importance of the disease process and disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug treatment in the development of septic arthritis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

To evaluate the effect of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on the likelihood of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) developing septic arthritis (SA). The United Kingdom General Practice Research Database (GPRD) was used to identify adults with RA, and age-, sex-, and practice-matched control subjects. Subjects were studied between 1987 and 2002. The risk of developing SA (excluding infected joint replacements) for individuals with RA was calculated and the effect of DMARD use determined. A total of 136,977 subjects (34,250 patients with RA, 102,747 controls) were identified. SA was identified in 345 subjects, of which 321 (236 in patients with RA, 85 in controls) cases occurred during the study period. The incidence rate of SA was 12.9 times higher in subjects with RA than in those without (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 10.1-16.5, P < 0.001). The incident rate ratios (IRRs) for developing SA while receiving DMARDs compared with receiving no DMARDs were different for different medications. Penicillamine (adjusted IRR 2.51, 95% CI 1.29-4.89, P = 0.004), sulfasalazine (adjusted IRR 1.74, 95% CI 1.04-2.91, P = 0.03), and prednisolone (adjusted IRR 2.94, 95% CI 1.93-4.46, P < 0.001) were associated with an increased incidence of SA when compared with not receiving any DMARD. The use of other DMARDs including methotrexate showed no such effect. Individuals with RA have an increased risk of developing SA. This increased risk can be attributed to both the disease process and the use of DMARDs.

Effects of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on the activities of rheumatoid arthritis-associated cathepsins K and S

Rheumatoid arthritis is an inflammatory and disabling joint disease affecting 0.5-1.5% of the population. Although various anti-inflammatory (NSAIDs) and disease-modifying (DMARDs) drugs are in clinical use, their precise mechanisms of action are not always defined. In this report, we discuss the effects of widely used DMARDs such as gold derivatives and chloroquine on cathepsins K and S, which have been implicated as critical mediators of inflammation and joint erosion in rheumatoid arthritis. We demonstrate that clinically potent gold derivatives inhibit cathepsins K and S in in vitro and cell-based assays. An X-ray analysis of the gold thiomalate/cathepsin K complex reveals that the inhibitor is bound to the active-site cysteine residue of the protease. Chloroquine, a lysosomotropic agent of lower clinical potency than gold derivatives, inhibits neutral pH-labile cathepsins intracellularly, but does not affect the neutral pH-stable cathepsin S. The potent inhibition of cathepsins implicated in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis by gold derivatives may explain the therapeutic efficacy of these drugs.

Quantitative gait analysis as a method to assess mechanical hyperalgesia modulated by disease-modifying antirheumatoid drugs in the adjuvant-induced arthritic rat

In the present study, azothioprine, chloroquine, D-penicillamine, methotrexate and sodium aurothiomalate (gold salt) were evaluated for possible disease-modifying effects in the adjuvant-induced arthritis model of human rheumatoid arthritis in rats. Gait analysis was used to examine the role of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in the development of pain. Body weights were also measured to monitor the progression of disease and the systemic antiarthritic effects of the test compounds used in this study, as well as their systemic toxicity. Our results showed that azothioprine (5 mg/kg/day), chloroquine (12.5 mg/kg/day), sodium aurothiomalate (2.5 mg/kg/day) and methotrexate (1 mg/kg/week) not only inhibited the macroscopic changes such as erythema and swelling of limbs, but also exhibited significant reversal of gait deficits seen in the untreated or saline-treated arthritic rats. No reduction in the body weights were observed in the arthritic rats treated with azothioprine, chloroquine, sodium aurothiomalate and methotrexate. D-Penicillamine (12.5 mg/kg/day), however, showed a significant reduction (P < 0.03) in the body weights of the arthritic rats over a period of 22 days; furthermore, it was unable to show any reduction in arthritic score (P < 0.1). In earlier experiments, chloroquine and methotrexate failed to suppress carageenan-induced edema, suggesting that the mode of antiarthritic action may be different from those of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents. Since these disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs are reported to have an immunomodulatory role, especially the gold salt, which influences the monocyte–macrophage system, it is suggested that the observed antiarthritic effects of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs may be partly attributed to their immunomodulatory activity.

Systematic review of studies of productivity loss due to rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, debilitating disease with a significant impact on workplace productivity. To perform a systematic review of studies of the relationship between RA and reduced workplace productivity. Screening of 307 titles identified in bibliographic database searches resulted in 38 articles subject to systematic review. Productivity loss was expressed by three different measures: work disability, work loss (synonymous with absenteeism or short-term sick leave) and work limitation (reduction in productivity while present at work). A median of 66% (range 36-84%) of employed RA subjects experienced work loss due to RA in the previous 12 months, for a median duration of 39 days (range 7-84 days). The times from RA diagnosis until a 50% probability of being work disabled varied from 4.5 to 22 years. In inception cohort studies, the baseline variables consistently predictive of subsequent work disability were a physically demanding work type, more severe RA and older age. RA-related work-disability rates were similar in the USA and European countries. An apparent decrease in the prevalence of RA-related work disability since the 1970s may be related to a decrease in physically demanding work rather than to epidemiologic changes in RA. The majority of the literature addresses permanent disability and temporary work loss; none of the studies reviewed reported the effect of RA on presenteeism, i.e. work limitation from the employer perspective, and there are few published studies of the effectiveness of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in reducing work-related productivity loss.

The inhibitory effect of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and steroids on gliostatin/platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor production in human fibroblast-like synoviocytes

Gliostatin/platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor (GLS/PD-ECGF) is known to have both angiogenic and arthritogenic activities. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and steroids are involved in the regulation of GLS expression. Fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLSs) obtained from patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were cultured and stimulated by interleukin (IL)-1beta with or without DMARDs and steroids. The expression levels of GLS were determined using the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and an ELISA. In cultured rheumatoid FLSs, the expression of GLS mRNA was significantly increased by stimulation with IL-1beta. By contrast, GLS mRNA levels in IL-1beta-stimulated FLSs were reduced by treatment with aurothioglucose (AuTG) and dexamethasone (DEX). These findings indicate that AuTG and DEX have anti-rheumatic activity, which is mediated via the suppression of GLS production. Neither methotrexate (MTX) nor sulfasalazine (SSZ) had a significant influence on GLS levels in our study.

Effects of disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs and antiinflammatory cytokines on human osteoclastogenesis through interaction with receptor activator of nuclear factor κB, osteoprotegerin, and receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand

To demonstrate the effects of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and antiinflammatory cytokines on human osteoclastogenesis through their effects on receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB (RANK), osteoprotegerin (OPG), and RANK ligand (RANKL). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) were cocultured in the presence of macrophage colony-stimulating factor, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3), and various concentrations of methotrexate (MTX), sulfasalazine (SSZ), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody (infliximab), interleukin-4 (IL-4), and IL-10. Osteoclast formation was assayed by counting cells after staining for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase. RANKL expression in RA FLS and RANK expression in PBMCs were assayed by Western blotting, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and real-time PCR. OPG expression was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, RT-PCR, and real-time PCR in cultures of RA FLS. MTX, SSZ, infliximab, and IL-4, but not IL-10 and HCQ, each inhibited osteoclast formation in a dose-dependent manner. We observed no evidence of synergistic inhibition of osteoclast formation by IL-4 and IL-10. High doses of infliximab suppressed the expression of RANK in PBMCs. MTX, SSZ, infliximab, and IL-4 each inhibited the expression of RANKL in RA FLS in a dose-dependent manner, and also increased the secretion of OPG in RA FLS supernatants. MTX, SSZ, infliximab, and IL-4 inhibit human osteoclastogenesis by modulating the interaction of RANKL, RANK, and OPG. These results are indicative of the underlying mechanisms of the antiresorptive effects of these 4 agents.

Pursuit of optimal outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis.

The aim of this review is to describe methods of quantifying disease activity and symptomatology and discuss treatment goals for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The benefits and limitations of existing therapeutic approaches, the importance of early therapy in preventing disease progression and the place of biologicals in early therapy will be discussed. Disease activity and symptomatology in RA are often measured using a set of core endpoints that incorporate pain, patient global assessment, physical disability, swollen joints, tender joints, acute phase reactants, physician global assessment and radiographic imaging of joints. Imaging of joints is the only means by which to measure the effects of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on the irreversible joint damage that occurs during RA. There is increasing evidence that this damage and its functional consequences occur early in the onset of disease. The consensus is that patients with RA should be treated with DMARDs earlier rather than later in the disease process. Remission, or a state of sustained response or low disease activity that is not damaging or disabling, is the ideal goal of therapy for RA, but formal criteria defining a state of remission need to be revised and, ideally, updated to include a radiographic component. Currently available DMARDs are limited in their ability to achieve early, sustained response or remission, by delayed onset of action, cumulative toxicity and lack of long-term therapeutic response. It is hoped that the emergence of novel DMARDs--targeted biological agents, such as anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-alpha)--will help to counteract such limitations and will allow early DMARD use to be adopted as standard practice in place of their use as a last resort therapy after failure of other treatment. One such biological agent, etanercept, has been shown to reduce radiographic disease progression and induce overall clinical response during the early stages of RA. It is significantly more effective and fast-acting than methotrexate, one of the most effective, commonly used DMARDs.

A survey of United States rheumatologists concerning effectiveness of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and prednisone in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

To collect the ratings of American rheumatologists regarding relative short-term and long-term effectiveness of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and to compare these data with results of a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of these drugs. A survey was mailed to 3,200 United States rheumatologists who were members of the American College of Rheumatology during the summer of 1996. The survey was completed by 645 rheumatologists. Methotrexate (MTX) was rated as substantially more effective than any other DMARD after both 1 year and 4 years of therapy. At 1 year, more than 90% of rheumatologists rated MTX as "good or excellent," compared with 35% giving a similar rating to intramuscular (IM) gold, the second-ranked DMARD. At 4 years, MTX was rated as "good or excellent" by 65%, compared with 53% for combinations, 30% for prednisone, and 11% for hydroxychloroquine, the second-ranked single DMARD. These ratings reflect results of long-term observational studies, but differ considerably from a meta-analysis of results of short-term RCTs, in which the efficacy of MTX, sulfasalazine, penicillamine, and IM gold were indistinguishable. The ratings of US rheumatologists regarding effectiveness of DMARD therapies are in agreement with observational data, but differ substantially from results of RCTs. These findings suggest that observational studies may yield useful and important information about treatment results, which are complementary to, but not available from, the RCT model. Regulatory agencies should consider long-term observational studies as a part of the evaluation of drugs.

Management of oral complications of disease-modifying drugs in rheumatoid arthritis.

Stomatitis is a troublesome adverse effect of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. This review presents data to examine the incidence, clinical features and consequences of DMARD-related stomatitis, and suggests an algorithm for its clinical management. The specific objectives of the two studies presented here were to determine the incidence of DMARD-related stomatitis and its effect on DMARD continuation, and secondly to identify the clinical and laboratory risk factors. We investigated two cohorts of patients: (i) a retrospective survey of data collected from drug monitoring clinics run for patients on DMARDs from 1987 to 1994 involving 1539 patients and 2394 drug exposures; (ii) a prospective study of 25 consecutive RA patients presenting with DMARD-related stomatitis compared to 29 RA controls with no history of DMARD stomatitis. The retrospective survey showed that 2% of DMARD patients stopped therapy because of stomatitis, but 55% of these were able to resume the same therapy. In the case control study. 24% of patients discontinued temporarily and 8% permanently. Cases of DMARD-related stomatitis differed from controls in that they had a higher incidence of previous mouth ulcers (40% vs 14%), they smoked less (8% vs 31%) and Schirmer's test was more often abnormal (44% vs 21%). There were no differences in RA severity, disease activity or oral hygiene. Haematinic deficiencies were equally common in cases and controls: 30% for iron, 8% for vitamin B12 and 24% for folic acid. Herpes simplex virus was involved in a minority (8%) of cases. In conclusion, the occurrence of stomatitis in RA patients on DMARD should not lead to cessation of drug therapy, but to a careful evaluation so that patients may be maintained on effective treatment.