Effects Of Direct Stimulation Research Articles

Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation and increased beta amplitude in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on depression symptoms

Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation and increased beta amplitude in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on depression symptoms

Efficacy observation of combined transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on gait in 169 subacute stroke patients.

To investigate the combined effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation on improving lower limb function in stroke patients. Randomized controlled trial. Subacute stroke patients. 169 post-stroke hemiplegia patients were randomly divided into 4 groups (control, transcranial direct current stimulation, transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation, and transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation combined with transcranial direct current stimulation) and evaluated using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Lower Extremity (FMA-LL), Timed Up-and-Go (TUG) test, Modified Barthel Index (MBI), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), gait parameters, and surface electromyography (sEMG). Significant improvements in FMA-LL, MBI, BBS, TUG, gait parameters, and sEMG were noted in the intervention groups compared with the control, with the transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation combined with transcranial direct current stimulation group showing the most pronounced improvements. Differences in some outcomes were also notable between the transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation groups. The combination of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation effectively enhances gait, balance, and daily living activities in subacute stroke patients. These benefits are likely due to transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation activating the solitary and trigeminal nuclei and transcranial direct current stimulation stimulating the motor cortex. Wearable gait analysis systems and electromyography are valuable in clinical gait assessment for these patients.

Exploring the Effect of Single-Session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Attention, Verbal Fluency, and Working Memory in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease-Related Dementia.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among the elderly. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applies low-intensity currents to the brain, resulting in short-term neurocognitive effects and long-term neuroplasticity enhancement. Limited research reported on the impact of tDCS on cognitive functions in dementia due to AD. This study aims to compare changes in verbal fluency and working memory following a single tDCS application to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in AD patients. Patients with mild dementia due to AD underwent cognitive assessment using the Standardized Mini-Mental Test, Clock Drawing Test, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Functional Activities Questionnaire, Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale. A single-session tDCS was administered by applying anodal tDCS to the left DLPFC for a duration of 30 minutes. Verbal fluency and working memory were evaluated before and after tDCS using the WAIS-R Digit Span Test forward and backward subscales, Trail Making Test (TMT) A and B, and Verbal Fluency Test. Regarding cognitive test scores before and after tDCS application, there were statistically significant reductions in the durations of TMT-A and TMT-B. However, there were no significant differences observed for TMT B-A, VFT, DST-forward, and DST-backward performances. The findings indicate that a single anodal tDCS targeting the left DLPFC enhances attention and processing speed in AD patients but has no effect on working memory or verbal fluency.

Treatment strategies for smartphone addiction: efficacy study of transcranial direct current stimulation and exergaming

ObjectiveSmartphone addiction is on the rise globally. This study aimed to compare the rehabilitative effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and exergames on smartphone addiction among college students. Additionally, we discussed the central mechanisms through changes in electroencephalography (EEG) to provide clinical insights.MethodsThirty-six participants were randomly assigned to three groups: control group, tDCS group (bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex stimulation), and exergame group. The intervention lasted for 4 weeks with twice-weekly sessions. Outcome measures included the Smartphone Addiction Scale - Chinese Version (SAS-C), Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) net scores, and event-related potential (ERP) data collected during the IGT, focusing on P300 and feedback-related negativity (FRN) amplitudes.ResultsAll groups showed significant reductions in SAS-C scores post-intervention. Behaviorally, post-intervention scores improved, indicating significant effects of different interventions on participants’ strategy choices. P300 amplitudes increased significantly at outcome electrode sites for all groups, with the most notable increase in tDCS group FC2 and CP1. FRN amplitudes decreased significantly post-intervention in the control and tDCS groups, with significant differences between the two groups.ConclusionAll three interventions appeared to have alleviating effect on smartphone addiction. After 4 weeks, participants showed improved executive control and decision-making abilities. Specifically, significant effects were observed in the tDCS group, with increased P300 amplitudes in the frontal, parietal, and central regions, as well as FRN amplitudes in the central and frontal regions. This suggested that tDCS enhanced psychological resources and improved inhibition control capabilities.

Efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation for upper extremity function after ischemic stroke: A systematic review of parallel randomized clinical trials

BackgroundAlthough existing studies had shown therapeutic effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on upper limb dysfunction after stroke, previous systematic reviews had mostly provided general analyses on the polarity of tDCS and the type of stroke, with inconsistent results. We aimed to determine the efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in enhancing upper extremity function following ischemic stroke. MethodsA comprehensive search was conducted across a variety of databases, spanning from their inception to March 15th, 2024.The focus was on parallel randomized clinical trials published that explored the impact of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on upper extremity function in ischemic stroke patients. Data extraction and quality assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was utilized to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. ResultsA total of 19 studies involving 1032 participants were included in the analysis. The pooled results of these studies indicated that anodal transcranial direct current stimulation had a positive impact on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity, Wolf Motor Function Test, Resting Motion Threshold, and Barthel Index Score in ischemic stroke patients with upper extremity dysfunction. Follow-up data suggested the potential long-term efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in ischemic stroke. Reported adverse reactions indicated that anodal transcranial direct current stimulation was relatively safe for stroke patients. ConclusionsAnodal transcranial direct current stimulation is an effective intervention and relatively safe and effective intervention for improving upper extremity function in ischemic stroke patients.

Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial.

The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome (CCAS) encompasses cognitive and affective symptoms in patients with cerebellar disorders, for which no proven treatment is available. Our primary objective was to study the effect of cerebellar anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cognitive performance in CCAS patients. Secondary effects on ataxia severity, mood, and quality of life were explored. We performed a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Thirty-five patients with CCAS were included and received 10 sessions of 20 minutes sham (n = 17) or real (n = 18) tDCS, with a current of 2 mA. Cognitive performance was assessed using executive function subtests of the computerized Test of Attentional Performance (TAP), with the composite as primary endpoint. Secondary outcomes were ataxia severity, mood, and quality of life. Outcomes were evaluated 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-intervention. Cerebellar tDCS was well tolerated and no serious adverse events related to the intervention occurred. No significant tDCS effect was found on cognitive performance. Improvement on the TAP was observed in the sham group 1 month post-treatment (estimate = -0.248, 95% CI, -0.49 to -0.01), but not clinically relevant. A positive tDCS effect was observed for ataxia severity 1 month post-treatment (estimate = -0.985, 95% CI, -1.94 to -0.03). Ten sessions of 20 minutes cerebellar anodal tDCS did not prove efficacious for CCAS-related cognitive impairment, but a significant positive effect of tDCS was found for ataxia severity, aligning with previous findings indicative of tDCS as a therapeutic neuromodulation tool in cerebellar disorders. © 2024 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex on Reactive Aggression in Intoxicated and Sober Individuals

Alcohol-related aggression is a widely observed phenomenon that has detrimental effects on both individuals and society, putatively caused by dysfunction in the prefrontal cortex. The ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) plays a critical role in representing the reward value of future actions. Emerging research has suggested that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the vmPFC can reduce aggression. However, no study has examined whether tDCS can mitigate intoxicated aggression. In this study, 153 healthy participants consumed alcohol or not and completed the anger-infused Ultimatum Game with simultaneous double-blind anodal tDCS or sham over the bilateral vmPFC. For participants in the anodal tDCS condition, intoxicated participants were less aggressive than sober participants when insulted. However, among sober participants, anodal tDCS increased aggression. For participants in the alcohol condition, we observed no differences in aggression between the anodal tDCS and the sham tDCS conditions. These findings provide mixed support for tDCS as a means to attenuate intoxicated aggression.

Shapes of direct cortical responses vs. short-range axono-cortical evoked potentials: The effects of direct electrical stimulation applied to the human brain

ObjectiveDirect cortical responses (DCR) and axono-cortical evoked potentials (ACEP) are generated by electrically stimulating the cortex either directly or indirectly through white matter pathways, potentially leading to different electrogenic processes. For ACEP, the slow conduction velocity of axons (median ≈ 4 m.s−1) is anticipated to induce a delay. For DCR, direct electrical stimulation (DES) of the cortex is expected to elicit additional cortical activity involving smaller and slower non-myelinated axons. We tried to validate these hypotheses. MethodsDES was administered either directly on the cortex or to white matter fascicles within the resection cavity, while recording DCR or ACEP at the cortical level in nine patients. ResultsShort but significant delays (≈ 2 ms) were measurable for ACEP immediately following the initial component (≈ 7 ms). Subsequent activities (≈ 40 ms) exhibited notable differences between DCR and ACEP, suggesting the presence of additional cortical activities for DCR. ConclusionDistinctions between ACEPs and DCRs can be made based on a delay at the onset of early components and the dissimilarity in the shape of the later components (>40 ms after the DES artifact). SignificanceThe comparison of different types of evoked potentials allows to better understand the effects of DES.

The effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on information processing speed in children with intellectual disability

PurposeThe speed of information processing is known to play an important role in mental disorders; This study investigated the effect of the transcranial direct current stimulation on information processing speed in children with intellectual disabilities. MethodAn experimental design with a pretest- posttest control group was used. The study population consisted of 8- to 14-year-old children with intellectual disabilities attending special primary schools in Urmia, Iran. 36 children were randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups (18 for each group). The experimental group received 10 sessions of tDCS with anode positioned over the F3 electrode (left DLPFC) and cathode over F4 (right DLPFC) The control group did not receive any intervention. Trail Making Test (TMT) was used to assess information processing speed. Data were analyzed using MANCOVA. ResultsThe results revealed that tDCS led to a significant increase in information processing speed in the experimental group compared to the control group. ConclusionThis study demonstrates that tDCS applied to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is effective in enhancing information processing speed in children with intellectual disabilities. These finding have important implications for the development of interventions aimed at improving cognitive functioning in children with intellectual disabilities.

The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Lower-Limb Endurance Performance: A Systematic Review

This study systematically reviews the literature on transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) interventions for lower-limb endurance performance in healthy adults and provides a summary of the effects and underlying mechanisms of tDCS on lower-limb endurance performance. Systematic searches were performed in PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, and ScienceDirect. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. The electronic search totaled 341 studies. Twenty-one studies were included in the review after screening. The results show that tDCS effectively improved time to task failure (TTF), increased blood lactate accumulation, and reduced the rating of perceived exertion during cycling. However, the tDCS failed to significantly improve the TTF, relieve muscle pain, and reduce fatigue indices during single-joint fatigue tasks in the knee. Moreover, tDCS intervention caused the effective improvement of the overall lower-limb endurance performance but exerted no uniformly conclusive effect on knee endurance performance. This finding can be partly attributed to varying stimulation protocols across studies. Future studies may focus on the effects of the application of stimulation protocols, such as multitarget stimulation and personalized dosage, to develop targeted stimulation protocols.

Understanding novel neuromodulation pathways in tDCS: brain stem recordings in rats during trigeminal nerve direct current stimulation

tDCS is widely assumed to cause neuromodulation via the electric field in the cortex acting directly on cortical neurons. However, recent evidence suggests that tDCS may indirectly influence brain activity through cranial nerve pathways, notably the trigeminal nerve, but these neuromodulatory pathways remain unexplored. To investigate the first stages in this potential pathway we developed an animal model to study the effect of trigeminal nerve direct current stimulation (TN-DCS) on neuronal activity in the principal sensory nucleus (NVsnpr) and the mesencephalic nucleus of the trigeminal nerve (MeV). We conducted experiments on twenty-four male Sprague Dawley rats (n = 10 NVsnpr, n = 10 MeV during anodic stimulation, and n = 4 MeV during cathodic stimulation). DC stimulation, ranging from 0.5 to 3 mA, targeted the trigeminal nerve’s marginal branch. Concurrently, single-unit electrophysiological recordings were obtained using a 32-channel silicon probe, encompassing three 1-min intervals: pre, during, and post-stimulation. Xylocaine trigeminal nerve blockage served as a control. TN-DCS increased neuronal spiking activity in both NVsnpr and MeV, returning to baseline during the post-stimulation phase. The 3 mA DC stimulation of the blocked trigeminal nerve failed to induce increased spiking activity in the trigeminal nuclei. These findings provide empirical support for trigeminal nuclei modulation via TN-DCS, suggesting the cranial nerve pathways could play a role in mediating the tDCS effects in humans.

Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on tinnitus modulation: A randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical trial: Effect of tDCS on tinnitus modulation: A clinical trial

ObjectivesTo evaluate the short and long-term effects of anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) targeting the left temporoparietal area (LTA) on tinnitus severity, annoyance, and loudness. MethodsThis is a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, and parallel-group clinical trial. A total of 42 individuals with tinnitus were randomized to a-tDCS (n = 24) or sham tDCS (n = 18). The a-tDCS group received tDCS over the LTA during five consecutive day sessions (2 mA, 20 min). The sham group received a placebo current with the same characteristics as the a-tDCS group. Participants were assessed at baseline, after the fifth session, and at the 30-day follow-up, using hearing assessments and symptom questionnaires. ResultsThere was no effect of comparison between groups or interaction effect (time x group) in all hearing assessments and symptom questionnaires. There was only a main effect of time for Tinnitus Handicap Inventory - THI [F(1.642, 45.988) = 5.128; p = 0.014; η2 = 0.155]. Bonferroni post hoc showed that there was a significant difference in THI in the sham group between pre and post-treatment [CI (0.107, 14.643; p = 0.046)]. However, there was no difference between pre-treatment and follow-up THI, or between post-treatment and follow-up THI. There was no treatment effect on tinnitus severity (assessed by Tinnitus Functional Inventory - TFI), tinnitus annoyance or loudness (assessed by Visual Analogue Scale - VAS), or tinnitus pitch, loudness or minimum masking level (assessed by tinnitometry). ConclusionFive consecutive sessions of a-tDCS targeting LTA do not improve tinnitus severity, annoyance, and loudness. Future studies should investigate if other tDCS protocols are effective or a combination of tDCS with other forms of treatment.

Comparing the effects of anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex at varying intensities on motor learning in healthy young adults.

Inconsistent results are observed in the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with different montages on motor learning. This study aimed to compare the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS (c-tDCS) over primary motor cortex (M1) at different intensities on motor learning in healthy young adults. The participants were randomly divided into: (1) 1mA M1 c-tDCS, (2) 1mA M1 anodal tDCS (a-tDCS), (3) 2mA M1 c-tDCS, (4) 2mA M1 a-tDCS and (5) M1 sham tDCS groups. The groups received 20-min stimulation with serial reaction time task (SRTT) incidentally, while the tDCS was turned off after 30 s in the sham tDCS group. Response time (RT) and error rate (ER) during SRTT were assessed prior, during and 72 h after the intervention. The results of the paired t-test indicated that online learning occurred in all groups (p< 0.05), except in M1 c-tDCS (1mA) (p> 0.05). One-way ANOVA analysis also indicated that there were differences in offline learning (RT (F(DF) =5.19(4); p< 0.001; and ER (F(DF) =9(4), p< 0.0001) among groups, with more offline learning in 1mA M1 a-tDCS, 2mA M1 c-tDCS and 2mA M1 a-tDCS groups (p< 0.05). On the other hand, the 1mA M1 c-tDCS group did not indicate any consolidation effect or even a trend toward negative offline learning. M1 a-tDCS with different intensities and also 2mA M1 c-tDCS may be helpful for the enhancement of motor learning in young healthy adults. This study enhances our understanding of tDCS intensity and polarity effects on motor learning, with potential for optimizing therapeutic protocols.

TDCS Cranial Nerve Co-Stimulation: Unveiling Brainstem Pathways Involved in Trigeminal Nerve Direct Current Stimulation in Rats.

The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are typically attributed to the polarization of cortical neurons by the weak electric fields it generates in the cortex. However, emerging evidence indicates that certain tDCS effects may be mediated through the co-stimulation of peripheral or cranial nerves, particularly the trigeminal nerve (TN), which projects to critical brainstem nuclei that regulate the release of various neurotransmitters throughout the central nervous system. Despite this, the specific pathways involved remain inadequately characterized. In this study, we examined the effects of acute transcutaneous TN direct current stimulation (TN-DCS) on tonic (i.e. mean spike rate and spike rate over time) and phasic (number of bursts, spike rate per burst, burst duration, and inter-burst interval) activities while simultaneously recording single-neuron activity across three brainstem nuclei in rats: the locus coeruleus (LC), dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN), and median raphe nucleus (MnRN). We found that TN-DCS significantly modulated tonic activity in the LC, with notable interactions between stimulation amplitude, polarity, and time epoch affecting mean spike rates. Similar effects were observed in the DRN regarding tonic activity. Further, phasic activity in the LC was influenced by TN-DCS, with changes in burst number, duration, and inter-burst intervals linked to stimulation parameters. Conversely, MnRN tonic activity following TN-DCS remained unchanged. Importantly, xylocaine administration to block TN abolished the effects on tonic activities in both the LC and DRN. These results suggest that tDCS effects may partially arise from indirect modulation of the TN, leading to altered neuronal activity in DRN and LC. Besides, the differential changes in tonic and phasic LC activities underscore their complementary roles in mediating TN-DCS effects on higher cortical regions. This research bears significant translational implications, providing mechanistic insights that could enhance the efficacy of tDCS applications and deepen our understanding of its neurophysiological effects.

Differential Effects of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation with Gait Training on Functional Mobility, Balance, and Ataxia Symptoms.

Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) has emerged as a promising, non-invasive, and safe neuromodulatory intervention capable of reducing ataxia symptoms and restoring cerebellum-motor connectivity. However, previous studies have only applied ctDCS in isolation, without association with specific training. This study aimed to assess the effect of ctDCS combined with gait training on functional mobility, balance, and symptoms and severity of ataxia. A randomized, triple-blind, sham-controlled, bi-center clinical trial was conducted with forty-four adults with cerebellar ataxia. Volunteers were randomized to receive five daily sessions of either real ctDCS (n = 11; 2mA for 25min) or sham ctDCS (n = 11) during gait training. Functional mobility, balance, and symptoms and severity of ataxia were assessed using the Time Up and Go test, the MiniBESTest, and the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), respectively, before and after the interventions. Both groups showed improvement in functional mobility, but there was no significant difference between the ctDCS and sham groups. However, the ctDCS group demonstrated significant improvements in cerebellar ataxia severity as reflected by SARA scores, particularly in tests of stance, sitting, speech disturbance, nose-finger test, and heel-shin slide test. Notably, no improvements were observed in balance. This study indicates that while ctDCS combined with gait training may improve specific symptoms of cerebellar ataxia, it does not significantly enhance overall functional mobility compared to sham treatment.

Effects of TDCS combined with Mat exercises on balance in patients with stroke

Abstract The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) along with Mat exercises in stroke. A single blinded RCT with ‘intention to treat’ analysis was conducted according to the ‘Consolidated standards of reporting trial (CONSORT)’ 2010 guidelines. Patients suffering from haemorrhagic/ischemic stroke with unilateral hemiplegia having balance problems and age group above the 40 years were included in this study. A total of 32 participants were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A (n = 16) and Group B (n = 16). The patients in Group A were treated with TDCS and Mat exercises whereas participants of Group B were given sham TDCS for 15 min and conventional balance training. The treatment was given alternatively, thrice a week, for 2 weeks. Entire procedure was completed within 45-60 min. Two outcome measures were used to assess the balance, i.e. functional reach test (FRT) and time up &amp; go test (TUG). There were more males than females in both experimental groups. Results of baseline comparison reported that there was a statistically non-significant difference in the variables and the data were normally distributed. Results of the within group analysis found that there was statistically significant improvement in pre- and post-intervention scores of both groups. Results of between group analysis showed that there was a statistically significant improvement in the variables of Group A compared to Group B. This study concludes that the combined use of TDCS along with Mat exercises can improve the balance as compared to Sham TDCS along with conventional balance training.

Comparing the Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Cognitive Rehabilitation on Language Skills and Attention in Elderly With Mild Alzheimer's Disease

Objectives Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is one of the most common problems in the elderly, which causes a decline in their cognitive function. This study aims to compare the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and short-term cognitive rehabilitation on language skills and attention in older people with mild AD. Methods &amp; Materials This is a quasi-experimental study with a pre-test/post-test/follow-up design. Participants were 60 people over 65 years of age with mild Alzheimer’s referred to a neurologist in 2022, who were selected by a convenience sampling method and were randomly assigned into two experimental groups and one control group (20 in each group). Then, the tDCS was applied in one experimental group at 10 sessions of 20 minutes once a week and the short-term cognitive rehabilitation program was provided to the second experimental group at 9 sessions of 90 minutes, once a week. No intervention was provided to the control group. Before, one week after (post-test) and one month after (follow-up) the end of the intervention, the assessments were conducted in all groups using Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination- revised (ACE-R). For data analysis, repeated measures analysis of variance test was used in SPSS software, version 23. Results Both methods improved the writing and naming domains of language skills, but they had no significant effect on the attention variable. Conclusion Both tDCS and short-term cognitive rehabilitation can be used to improve the language skills of older adults with mild AD.

Effects of cervical transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation on spinal excitability

ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) on spinal cord excitability using neurophysiological methods. MethodsSpinal cord motoneuron excitability was assessed using various neurophysiological techniques in a sham-controlled randomized experiment, which involved delivering 2 mA tsDCS and testing four different montages. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), F-waves to supramaximal ulnar nerve stimulation and somatosensory evoked potentials to upper limb nerves stimulation were measured in the participants with the electrode configuration that yielded the greatest effect, for a total of about 18 min. 18 young volunteers were recruited. ResultsAmong the tested ones, the most promising tsDCS montage was the one with the anode placed on the 7th cervical spinous process and the cathode on the glottis. With this configuration, a significant enhancement of motor responses in the hand muscles to TMS of the contralateral hand motor area was observed during tsDCS (p<0.00001), reaching a plateau after 6 min. This facilitation rapidly declined within a few minutes after the tsDCS was stopped. ConclusionResults of the different techniques suggest a possible contribution to facilitatory neuromodulation of the motoneurons at the cervical spine level. SignificanceThe occurrence of enhanced excitability after tsDCS suggests potential application in individuals with partial corticospinal fiber impairment affecting hand motor function.

Effect of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on postural control and associated neuroplastic alternations in chronic ankle instability

Effect of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on postural control and associated neuroplastic alternations in chronic ankle instability

Effects Of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation On Skill Acquisition After Sports Fatigue In Basketball Players: A Pilot Study

Effects Of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation On Skill Acquisition After Sports Fatigue In Basketball Players: A Pilot Study