Hermann (1) has investigated the electromotive properties of the skins of Fish. His object in so doing was to attempt to determine, by the employment for experiment of a skin usually credited with being bereft of glands, whether the marked “current of rest” exhibited by the skins of Amphibia is with greater probability to be ascribed to glandular processes in accordance with the opinion of du Bois Reymond (2), or whether the phenomena are not explained with greater simplicity upon the principles of his own ‘Alterations-Theorie.’ Du Bois failed to obtain evidence of a “current of rest” in the four kinds of Fish with which he worked (Eel, Tench, Pike, and Perch), a fact, which taken in conjunction with the absence of “glands” satisfied him that in the richly glandular Amphibian skin the source of the E. M. F. must lie in the secreting structures. Hermann himself, previous to his examination of the skins of Fish, shared to some extent the opinion of du Bois, for in a paper published in 1878 (3), he inclines to the idea, that preparatory processes of glandular origin are the cause of the E. M. F. of the current of rest in the skin of the Frog, but also advances the supposition of a possible contribution from epithelial action at the surface. Finally, as is well known, Hermann demonstrated the presence of an ingoing current of rest in the skins of some ten genera of Fish, but found that its E. M. F. was far less than that exhibited by the Amphibian skin. After noting that substances, the application of which destroys the current of rest in Amphibian skin, cannot be traced microscopically beyond the upper layers of epidermic cells, and recalling the fact that an electromotive excitatory change was demonstrated by Bach and Oehler (4), in the skin of the Frog, after complete removal of the current of rest, by the action of corrosive sublimate applied to the outer surface, Hermann concludes that the E. M. F. of the current of rest, and that of the current of action are of different origin. In speaking of the origin of the current of rest, he makes the following statement, upon the strength of his demonstration of such a current in the “non-glandular” skins of Fish, “dass nicht, oder nicht in erster Linie, die Driisen, sondern die Epithelschicht, der Sitz der elektromotorischen Haut-wirkung ist.” Finally he bases his explanation of the source of the E. M. F. of the current of rest of the skins of both Amphibians and Fish upon the axioms of the “Alterations-Theorie.” According to this hypothesis, the processes of dying or excitation in the continuity of protoplasm cause the more altered parts to be negative electrically to the less altered, so Hermann says “Nun haben wir aber zunächst in alien verhornenden Epithelgebilden eine dem Absterben völlig analoge Alteration, welche von aussen nach innen fortschreitet (und durch den Nachwuchs compensirt wird), nämlich die Verhornung.” Thus in the case of the Amphibian the keratinized superficial cells of the epidermis are supposed to form a demarcation surface whose electrical sign is negative to that of the deeper less altered portions of the skin tissue. Analogous to the “keratin-metamorphose” of protoplasm stands in this connection a “mucin-metamorphose,” and Hermann remarks “Am Aal und an der Trüsche kann man direct sehen, wie die äusseren Zellenden unter Mucinbildung zu Grunde gehen.”