Patient Education Materials Research Articles

Using ChatGPT to Improve Readability of Interventional Radiology Procedure Descriptions.

This project examines ChatGPT's potential to enhance the readability of patient educational materials about interventional radiology (IR) procedures. The descriptions of IR procedures from the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) were used as the original text. Readability scores were calculated using three metrics: Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Gunning Fog (GF), and the Automated Readability Index (ARI) using an online calculator ( https://readabilityformulas.com ). FRE is scored on a scale of 0-100, where 100 indicates easy-to-read texts, and GF and ARI represent the grade level required to comprehend the text. The DISCERN instrument measured credibility and reliability. ChatGPT was prompted to simplify the texts to a fifth-grade reading level, with subsequent recalculation of readability and DISCERN scores for comparison. Statistical significance was determined using a Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test. Articles were subsequently organized by subgroups and analyzed. 73 interventional radiology procedures from CIRSE were analyzed. The original FRE score was 47.2 (Difficult), improved to 78.4 (Fairly Easy) by ChatGPT. GF and ARI scores dropped from 14.4 and 11.2 to 7.8 and 5.8, respectively, after simplification, showing significant improvement (p < 0.001). However, the average DISCERN score decreased from 3.73 to 2.99 (p < 0.001) post-ChatGPT simplification. This study shows ChatGPT's ability to make interventional radiology descriptions more readable but highlights its struggle to maintain the original's reliability, suggesting the need for human review and prompt engineering to enhance outcomes. Level 6.

Strategic use of resources to enhance colorectal cancer screening for patients with diabetes (SURE: CRC4D) in federally qualified health centers: a protocol for hybrid type ii effectiveness-implementation trial

BackgroundPersons with diabetes have 27% elevated risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) and are disproportionately from priority health disparities populations. Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) struggle to implement CRC screening programs for average risk patients. Strategies to effectively prioritize and optimize CRC screening for patients with diabetes in the primary care safety-net are needed.MethodsGuided by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation and Sustainment Framework, we conducted a stakeholder-engaged process to identify multi-level change objectives for implementing optimized CRC screening for patients with diabetes in FQHCs. To identify change objectives, an implementation planning group of stakeholders from FQHCs, safety-net screening programs, and policy implementers were assembled and met over a 7-month period. Depth interviews (n = 18–20) with key implementation actors were conducted to identify and refine the materials, methods and strategies needed to support an implementation plan across different FQHC contexts. The planning group endorsed the following multi-component implementation strategies: identifying clinic champions, development/distribution of patient educational materials, developing and implementing quality monitoring systems, and convening clinical meetings. To support clinic champions during the initial implementation phase, two learning collaboratives and bi-weekly virtual facilitation will be provided. In single group, hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial, we will implement and evaluate these strategies in a in six safety net clinics (n = 30 patients with diabetes per site). The primary clinical outcomes are: (1) clinic-level colonoscopy uptake and (2) overall CRC screening rates for patients with diabetes assessed at baseline and 12-months post-implementation. Implementation outcomes include provider and staff fidelity to the implementation plan, patient acceptability, and feasibility will be assessed at baseline and 12-months post-implementation.DiscussionStudy findings are poised to inform development of evidence-based implementation strategies to be tested for scalability and sustainability in a future hybrid 2 effectiveness-implementation clinical trial. The research protocol can be adapted as a model to investigate the development of targeted cancer prevention strategies in additional chronically ill priority populations.Trial registrationThis study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05785780) on March 27, 2023 (last updated October 21, 2023).

"Does My Kid Have an Ear Infection?" An Analysis of Pediatric Acute Otitis Media Videos on TikTok.

With the rise of social media, online platforms have become a common way to access healthcare information. This study examines the quality of pediatric acute otitis media (AOM) videos on TikTok, a popular short-form video social media platform. A TikTok search was conducted between 8/18 and 8/19/2023 using pediatric AOM hashtags: #pediatric acute otitis media management, #kid ear infections remedy, #child ear infections treatment, and #kid ear infection. Data collected include number of views/shares per day, uploader type (nonmedical influencer, lay individual, and medical professional), and content categories. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Material (PEMAT-AV) and DISCERN questionnaire measured understandability, actionability, and quality of videos. Multivariable linear regression models were used (significance set at ≤0.05). Of 166 videos, 38.6% (64) of uploaders were medical professionals, and 32.5% (54) were nonmedical influencers. Nonmedical influencer videos were viewed and shared significantly more than those by medical professionals (p < 0.05). Controlling for covariates, physicians were more likely to produce more beneficial and higher quality videos as compared with nonmedical influencers (β = 2.4 and 1.3, p < 0.01, respectively). However, physicians did not have significantly different ratings for understandability compared with nonmedical influencers (β = 0.45, p > 0.05). AOM content on TikTok is often geared toward caretakers of symptomatic children. Although physician-created AOM content was significantly higher quality, these videos reached a statistically smaller audience than those from nonmedical influencers. Addressing misinformation on social media platforms requires physicians to reach larger audiences by producing more actionable and understandable content. NA Laryngoscope, 2024.

A Comparative Analysis of Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Acne Inversa Webpages.

We investigated the literacy level of online patient education materials on hidradenitis suppurativa. Overall, secondary education is required to access the information, with webpages employing the term “acne inversa” more difficult to read than those employing “hidradenitis suppurativa.”

Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Google Gemini in the Creation of Patient Education Materials for Acute Appendicitis, Cholecystitis, and Hydrocele

Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Google Gemini in the Creation of Patient Education Materials for Acute Appendicitis, Cholecystitis, and Hydrocele

The Promise and the Challenge: Large Language Models for Patient Education - Are We There Yet?

This study aimed to evaluate the potential of large language models (LLMs) for delivering patient education materials. Two LLMs, Gemini and ChatGPT 3.5, were analysed for their ability to provide clear and understandable information on the topic of blepharitis, a common eye condition. The understandability and actionability of the information provided by the LLMs in response to a set of questions were evaluated using PEMAT, a standardised tool for assessing educational materials. The responses included the important aspects of blepharitis, yet the Flesch-Kincaid readability scores were below the suggested range of 60-70 for patient education materials. Gemini received a score of 38.75, whereas ChatGPT 3.5 earned 26.35, suggesting that the content might be too intricate for the target audience.. These findings suggest that while LLMs have the potential to be informative resources, their current readability levels may limit their effectiveness in providing accessible health information to patients. Further research is needed to explore methods for adapting LLM outputs to ensure clear and concise communication suitable for patient education.

Artificial Intelligence-Generated Patient Education Materials for Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Comparative Analysis.

Patient education contributes to improve public awareness of Helicobacter pylori. Large language models (LLMs) offer opportunities to revolutionize patient education transformatively. This study aimed to assess the quality of patient educational materials (PEMs) generated by LLMs and compared with physician sourced. Unified instruction about composing a PEM about H. pylori at a sixth-grade reading level in both English and Chinese were given to physician and five LLMs (Bing Copilot, Claude 3 Opus, Gemini Pro, ChatGPT-4, and ERNIE Bot 4.0). The assessments of the completeness and comprehensibility of the Chinese PEMs were conducted by five gastroenterologists and 50 patients according to three-point Likert scale. Gastroenterologists were asked to evaluate both English and Chinese PEMs and determine the accuracy and safety. The accuracy was assessed by six-point Likert scale. The minimum acceptable scores were 4, 2, and 2 for accuracy, completeness, and comprehensibility, respectively. The Flesch-Kincaid and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook scoring systems were employed as readability assessment tools. Accuracy and comprehensibility were acceptable for English PEMs of all sources, while completence was not satisfactory. Physician-sourced PEM had the highest accuracy mean score of 5.60 and LLM-generated English PEMs ranged from 4.00 to 5.40. The completeness score was comparable between physician-sourced PEM and LLM-generated PEMs in English. Chinese PEMs from LLMs proned to have lower score in accuracy and completeness assessment than English PEMs. The mean score for completeness of five LLM-generated Chinese PEMs was 1.82-2.70 in patients' perspective, which was higher than gastroenterologists' assessment. Comprehensibility was satisfactory for all PEMs. No PEM met the recommended sixth-grade reading level. LLMs have potential in assisting patient education. The accuracy and comprehensibility of LLM-generated PEMs were acceptable, but further optimization on improving completeness and accounting for a variety of linguistic contexts are essential for enhancing the feasibility.

Conquering hypertension in Vietnam: 12- month follow up results from a cluster-randomised controlled trial

BackgroundApproximately 20% of adults in Vietnam have hypertension, and management of this chronic condition remains challenging. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention in reducing blood pressure (BP) in adults with uncontrolled hypertension. MethodsThis cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted in sixteen communities (8 intervention and 8 comparison) in a rural setting in Vietnam (2017-2022). Consenting adults (aged≥18 years) with uncontrolled hypertension were enrolled. Sixteen communities were equally randomised to an intervention or comparison group stratified by district. Consenting adults were assigned to study groups by community. The comparison arm received training sessions about hypertension prevention and management for health workers, and patient education materials. The intervention arm received training sessions about hypertension prevention and management for health workers, and patient education materials and three enhancement components including a storytelling intervention, home BP self-monitoring, and expanded community health worker services. The primary outcome was the difference in changes in patient’s levels of systolic BP between the study groups over a 12-month follow-up period. Patients and outcome assessors were masked. FindingsA total of 671 patients (340: intervention, 331: comparison) were enrolled in the trial. The mean age was 66 years and 45% were men. At the 12-month follow-up, the mean systolic BP declined by 18.4 mmHg in the intervention group and 3.7 mmHg in the control group (differential decline of 14.7 mmHg [95% CI: 11.8 – 17.6]). The intervention group also achieved better BP control and medication adherence than the control group. There were no serious adverse events related to study participation. InterpretationThe results of this trial demonstrate that a multicomponent intervention can effectively reduce elevated BP in individuals with uncontrolled hypertension in Vietnam. Trial registrationThis trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03590691. FundingNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Assessing the Readability of Patient Education Materials on Cardiac Catheterization From Artificial Intelligence Chatbots: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a burgeoning new field that has increased in popularity over the past couple of years, coinciding with the public release of large language model (LLM)-driven chatbots. These chatbots, such as ChatGPT, can be engaged directly in conversation, allowing users to ask them questions or issue other commands. Since LLMs are trained on large amounts of text data, they can also answer questions reliably and factually, an ability that has allowed them to serve as a source for medical inquiries. This study seeks to assess the readability of patient education materials on cardiac catheterization across four of the most common chatbots: ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini, and Meta AI. A set of 10 questions regarding cardiac catheterization was developed using website-based patient education materials on the topic. We then asked these questions in consecutive order tofour of the most common chatbots: ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini, and Meta AI. The Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) was used to assess the readability score. Readability grade levels were assessed using six tools: Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Gunning Fog Index (GFI), Coleman-Liau Index (CLI), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) Index, Automated Readability Index (ARI), and FORCAST Grade Level. The mean FRES across all four chatbots was 40.2, while overall mean grade levels for the four chatbots were 11.2, 13.7, 13.7, 13.3, 11.2, and 11.6 across the FKGL, GFI, CLI, SMOG, ARI, and FORCAST indices, respectively. Mean reading grade levels across the six tools were 14.8 for ChatGPT, 12.3 for Microsoft Copilot, 13.1 for Google Gemini, and 9.6 for Meta AI. Further, FRES values for the four chatbots were 31, 35.8, 36.4, and 57.7, respectively. This study shows that AI chatbots are capable of providing answers to medical questions regarding cardiac catheterization. However, the responses across the four chatbots had overall mean reading grade levels at the 11th-13th-grade level, depending on the tool used. This means that the materials were at the high school and even college reading level, which far exceeds the recommended sixth-grade level for patient education materials. Further, there is significant variability in the readability levels provided by different chatbots as, across all six grade-level assessments, Meta AI had the lowest scores andChatGPT generally had the highest.

Optimizing Readability of Patient-Facing Hand Surgery Education Materials Using Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer 3.5

To address patient health literacy, the American Medical Association and the National Institutes of Health recommend that readability of patient education materials should not exceed an eighth grade reading level. However, patient-facing materials often remain above the recommended average reading level. Current online calculators provide readability scores; however, they lack the ability to provide text-specific feedback, which may streamline the process of simplifying patient materials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT) 3.5 as a tool for optimizing patient-facing hand surgery education materials through reading level analysis and simplification. The readability of 18 patient-facing hand surgery education materials was compared by a traditional online calculator for reading level and ChatGPT 3.5. The original excerpts were then entered into ChatGPT 3.5 and simplified by the artificial intelligence tool. The simplified excerpts were scored by the same calculators. The readability scores for the original excerpts from the online calculator and ChatGPT 3.5 were similar. The simplified excerpts' scores were lower than the originals, with a mean of 7.28, less than the maximum recommended8. The use of ChatGPT 3.5 for the purpose of simplification and readability analysis of patient-facing hand surgery materials is efficient and may help facilitate the conveyance of important health information. ChatGPT 3.5 rendered readability scores comparable with traditional readability calculators, in addition to excerpt-specific feedback. It was also able to simplify materials to the recommended grade levels. By confirming ChatGPT3.5's ability to assess and simplify patient education materials, this study offers a practical solution for potentially improving patient comprehension, engagement, and health outcomes in clinical settings.

Readability of English and Spanish online patient education materials for shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundOnline patient educational materials (OPEMs) are a vital source of information for those undergoing shoulder arthroplasty, though their utility is limited by patient health literacy as the average American reads at an eighth-grade level. To promote optimal reading comprehension, the American Medical Association and National Institutes of Health recommend that OPEMs be written at or below a sixth-grade level. The purpose of this study is to analyze the readability of English and Spanish shoulder arthroplasty OPEMs. MethodsGoogle Search was used to identify the first 25 eligible Shoulder Arthroplasty OPEMs in both English and Spanish using the search terms “shoulder replacement” and “reemplazo de hombro.” Readability of the English OPEMs was calculated using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Flesch Reading Ease Index (FRE), Flesch Reading Ease Grade Level, Gunning-Fog Index, Coleman-Liau Index, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook Index. The readability of Spanish OPEMs was calculated using the Fernandez-Huerta Index (FHI; the Spanish version of FRE), Fernandez-Huerta Index Grade Level, Gutiérrez de Polini's Fórmula de compresibilidad, and Índice Flesch-Szigriszt. ResultsThe mean FHI of Spanish OPEMs was significantly higher than the mean FRE of English OPEMs (60.09 vs. 51.48). As such, Spanish OPEMs were written at a significantly lower grade level than English OPEMs (9.70 vs. 11.53). There was not an English or Spanish OPEM that was written at or below a sixth-grade reading level. 4% of Spanish OPEMs and 4% of English OPEMs were written below an eighth-grade reading level. 52% of Spanish OPEMs and 8% of English OPEMs were written between an eighth- and ninth-grade reading level. The designation of OPEMs as being Very Easy/Easy, Standard/Normal, Fairly/Somewhat Difficult, or Difficult/Very Difficult was significantly dependent on whether the OPEM was written in English or Spanish. Discussion and conclusionEnglish shoulder arthroplasty OPEMs were written at a higher reading difficulty than Spanish OPEMs. However, neither English nor Spanish OPEMs were written at a reading level at or below the recommended sixth-grade reading level. As older adults and those in the United States with limited English proficiency are susceptible to low health literacy, OPEMs must be written at an accessible reading level for all. Addressing these disparities in OPEM readability will improve patient care and understanding of shoulder arthroplasty and other orthopedic procedures.

Patient satisfaction with letter-based communication of LCS pulmonary nodule results.

To analyze patient satisfaction with letter-based communication of lung cancer screening (LCS) pulmonary nodule results. Prospective randomized controlled trial of LCS between May and December 2019. All participants came from a prospective randomized controlled study on pulmonary nodule results in LCS with low-dose CT (LDCT) to analyze patient satisfaction, perception of information received via letters, preferred methods of receiving results, and dissatisfaction-relatedcharacteristics. A total of 153 patients were detected to have pulmonary nodules among 600 recruited participants in the lung cancer high-risk group screened using LDCT. Most of the patients were satisfied with receiving pulmonary nodule results via letters (78.4%; n = 120) and agreed that the letters contained an appropriate amount of information (83.7%; n = 128). Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that satisfaction was related to age (OR, 0.905; 95% CI, 0.832-0.985), education level (OR, 0.367; 95% CI, 0.041-3.250), no family history of cancer (OR, 0.100; 95% CI, 0.011-0.914), and the number of nodules (OR, 6.028; 95% CI, 1.641-22.141). Of the patients who reported dissatisfaction with letter-based communication (7.2%; n = 11), the most common reasons cited were that they contained insufficient patient education materials and that it was difficult to comprehend the medical terminology. The majority of participants (61.4%; n = 94) reported that they would prefer the letter-based communication. No correlation was identified between satisfaction and gender, smoking status, alcohol consumption, risk factors, nodule size, or nodule location. Patients were generally satisfied with receiving their LCS pulmonary nodule results via letters, reporting that the letters included adequate information about their diagnosis and follow-up steps. This may provide a basis for feasible result communication via letters for cancer screening programs in underdeveloped regions inChina.

Quality and Readability of Online Health Information on Common Urologic Cancers: Assessing Barriers to Health Literacy in Urologic Oncology.

A growing number of Americans search online for health information related to urologic oncologic care each year. The American Medical Association recommends that medical information be written at a maximum sixth-grade level in order to be comprehensible by the majority of patients. As such, it is important to assess the quality and readability of online patient education material that patients are being exposed to. A Google search was performed using the terms "testicular cancer," "prostate cancer," "kidney cancer," and "bladder cancer," and the top 30 results for each were reviewed. Websites were categorized based on their source. Readability was assessed using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, the Gunning Frequency of Gobbledygook, and the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook indices. Quality was assessed using the DISCERN Quality Index (1-5 scale). A total of 91 websites were included in our analysis. On average, online health information pertaining to urologic cancers is written at a 10th- to 11th-grade reading level, which is significantly higher than that of an average American adult and that recommended by the American Medical Association (P < .01). The overall quality of websites was 3.4 ± 0.7, representing moderate to high quality. There was no significant difference in readability based on cancer type or information source. Despite being of moderate to high quality, online patient education materials related to common urologic cancers are often written at a grade level that exceeds the reading level of an average American adult. This presents as a barrier to online health literacy and calls into question the utility of these resources.

Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for the 10 Most Common Hand Conditions.

Background Millions of individuals every day turn to the internet for assistance in understanding their hand conditions and potential treatments. While online educational resources appear abundant, there are concerns about whether resources meet the readability recommendations agreed upon by the American Medical Association (AMA) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Identifying educational resources that are readable for the majority of patients could improve a patient's understanding of their medical condition, subsequently improving their health outcomes. Methods The readability of the top five websites for the 10 most common hand conditions was examined using the Flesch-Kincaid (FK) analysis, comprising the FK reading ease and FK grade level. The FK reading ease score is an indicator of how difficult a text is to comprehend, while the FK grade level score is the grade level an individual reading a particular text would need to fully understand the text. Results The average FK reading ease was 56.00, which correlates with "fairly difficult (high school)". The average FK corresponded to an eighth-grade reading level, far above the sixth-grade reading level recommendation set by the AMA and NIH. Conclusion Patient education, satisfaction, and the patient-physician relationship can all be improved by providing patients with more readable educational materials. Our study shows there is an opportunity for drastic improvement in the readability of online educational materials. Guiding patients with effective search techniques, advocating for the creation of more readable materials, and having a better understanding of the health literacy barriers patients face will allow hand surgeons to provide more comprehensive care to patients.

Quality of Popular Online Resources About Vestibular Migraine.

To evaluate the readability, understandability, actionability, and accuracy of online resources covering vestibular migraine (VM). Cross-sectional descriptive study design. Digital collection of websites appearing on Google search. Google searches were conducted to identify common online resources for VM. We examined readability using the Flesch Reading Ease(FRE) and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level scores, understandability and actionability using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), and accuracy by comparing the website contents to the consensus definition of "probable vestibular migraine." Eleven of the most popular websites were analyzed. Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level averaged at a 13th-gradelevel (range: 9th-18th). FRE scores averaged 35.5 (range: 9.1-54.4). No website had a readability grade level at the USAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality recommended 5th-grade level or an equivalent FRE score of 90 or greater. Understandability scores varied ranging from 49% to 88% (mean 70%). Actionability scores varied more, ranging from 12% to 87% (mean 44%). There was substantial inter-rater agreement for both PEMAT understandability scoring (mean κ = 0.76, SD = 0.08) and actionability scoring (mean κ = 0.65, SD = 0.08). Three sites included all 3 "probable vestibular migraine" diagnostic criteria as worded in the consensus statement. The quality of online resources for VM is poor overall in terms of readability, actionability, and agreement with diagnostic criteria.

Assessing readability of online patient educational material on concussion and return to play.

Concussions are self-limited forms of mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). Gradual return to play (RTP) is crucial to minimizing the risk of second impact syndrome. Online patient educational materials (OPEM) are often used to guide decision-making. Previous literature has reported that grade-level readability of OPEM is higher than recommended by the American Medical Association and the National Institutes of Health. The authors evaluated the readability of OPEM on concussion and RTP. An online search engine was used to identify websites providing OPEM on concussion and RTP. Text specific to concussion and RTP was extracted from each website and readability was assessed using the following six standardized indices: Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Gunning Fog Index, Coleman-Liau Index, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook Index, and Automated Readability Index. One-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test were used to compare readability across sources of information. There were 59 concussion and RTP articles, and readability levels exceeded the recommended 6th grade level, irrespective of the source of information. Academic institutions published OPEM at simpler readability levels (higher FRE scores). Private organizations published OPEM at more complex (higher) grade-level readability levels in comparison with academic and nonprofit institutions (p < 0.05). The readability of OPEM on RTP after concussions exceeds the literacy of the average American. There is a critical need to modify the concussion and RTP OPEM to improve comprehension by a broad audience.

AUA Guideline Committee Members Determine Quality of Artificial Intelligence‒Generated Responses for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence.

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) affects countless women worldwide. Given ChatGPT's rising ubiquity, patients may turn to the platform for SUI advice. Our objective was to evaluate the quality of clinical information about SUI from the ChatGPT platform. The most-asked patient questions regarding SUI were derived from patient materials from societal websites and forums, and queried using ChatGPT 3.5. The responses from ChatGPT were compiled into a survey and disseminated to 3 AUA guideline committee members who developed the Surgical Management of Female SUI guidelines. They were asked to grade responses on reliability, understandability, quality, and actionability using DISCERN and Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool standardized questionnaires. Accuracy was assessed with a 4-point Likert scale and readability using Flesch Reading Ease score. The overall material was rated as moderate to moderately high quality (DISCERN = 3.73/5) with potentially important but no serious shortcomings. Reliability and quality were reported to be 63% and 75%. Understandability was 89%, actionability 18%, and accuracy 88%. All question domains were rated at moderate or better. Actionability was poor in all domains. Every response was "hard to read" translating to a college graduate reading level. The urologic community should critically evaluate this platform's output if patients are to use it for adjunctive medical guidance. AUA committee members, who are experts in the field, rate ChatGPT-produced responses on SUI as moderate to moderately high quality, moderate reliability, excellent understandability, and poor actionability utilizing standardized questionnaires. The reading level of the material was advanced, which is an area of potential improvement to make generated responses more comprehensible.

Quality and readability of online information and materials on post-surgery breast seroma.

Aims/Background Seroma formation is the most common complication following breast surgery. However, there is little evidence on the readability of online patient education materials on this issue. This study aimed to assess the accessibility and readability of the relevant online information. Methods This systematic review of the literature identified 37 relevant websites for further analysis. The readability of each online article was assessed through using a range of readability formulae. Results The average Flesch-Reading Ease score for all patient education materials was 53.9 (± 21.9) and the average Flesch-Kincaid reading grade level was 7.32 (± 3.1), suggesting they were 'fairly difficult' to read and is higher than the recommended reading level. Conclusion Online patient education materials regarding post-surgery breast seroma are at a higher-than-recommended reading grade level for the public. Improvement would allow all patients, regardless of literacy level, to access such resources to aid decision-making around undergoing breast surgery.

Can artificial intelligence (AI) educate your patient? A study to assess overall readability and pharmacists' perception of AI‐generated patient education materials

Can artificial intelligence (<scp>AI</scp>) educate your patient? A study to assess overall readability and pharmacists' perception of <scp>AI</scp>‐generated patient education materials

Barriers to Health Care Communication: Patient Education Resource Readability and Spanish Translation for Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

BackgroundThe American Medical Association (AMA) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) recommend that patient education resources be written at 6th and 8th grade reading levels, respectively. However, many existing resources are written above this level. In addition, the majority of patient education resources are only available in English, despite the significant Spanish-speaking population in the United States. The purpose of this study was to determine the availability and readability of online patient education resources for Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis (SCFE) provided by the top-ranked pediatric orthopaedic hospitals and major pediatric orthopedic professional societies. MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis to determine the availability of English and Spanish language resources for SCFE provided by the top pediatric orthopaedic hospitals and major professional societies. We then assessed the readability of available patient education materials via three measures of readability. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive, univariate, and correlation analyses. ResultsIn total, 79.6% (39/49) of hospitals and 66.7% (2/3) of professional societies provided English language resources for SCFE. In contrast, Spanish language resources were provided by 34.7% (17/49) and 33% (1/3) hospitals and professional societies. English language resources scored significantly lower than Spanish language resources using the Flesch-Kincaid and Fernandez-Huerta reading ease scales, respectively (60.32 vs. 65.89, p<0.05). There was no difference in grade level calculated by Fry Graph/Gilliam-Peña-Mountain (9.5 vs. 8.5, p>0.05), but English language resources had a significantly higher grade level calculated by SMOG/SOL (11.9 vs. 10.4, p<0.01). There was greater availability of Spanish language resources in states with >20% primary Spanish- speakers (p<0.05). ConclusionThe majority of top-ranked hospitals and professional societies provide online educational materials on SCFE in English; however, only a third provide similar materials in Spanish. Additionally, the average reading level of English and Spanish language resources is above the recommendations from the AMA and NIH. Additional effort and resources should be allocated toward improving SCFE patient education materials to increase accessibility to broader patient and caregiver populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCELevel III KEY CONCEPTS(1)Online patient education resources for Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis (SCFE) are written above the recommended reading grade level for both English and Spanish.(2)There is limited availability of Spanish-language patient education recourses for SCFE, despite a significant Spanish-speaking population in the United States.(3)There is greater availability of Spanish-language resources for SCFE in states with a primary Spanish-speaking population greater than 20%.