Horace Mann, an early American educational reformer, considered public education essential for democracy. In 1975, P.L. 94142, the Education of All Handicapped Children Act, expanded the rights to a free appropriate public education for children with disabilities, and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) further refined those rights. In 2001, No Child Left Behind, the most recent reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), was intended to improve education for all students. Every child, regardless of their circumstances, would achieve to high standards. If achievement was mandated, then how could schools demonstrate that all students were leaving school for college and careers? Assessment took on new significance as outcomes became ever more important for students, their teachers, and their schools. Yet major differences between schools in funding, community support, curriculum, and achievement still existed. Not all schools produced the same outcomes. Not all children with disabilities had access to a rigorous curriculum and highly qualified teachers. U.S. states began working to standardize the content of educational coursework. By doing so, a diploma would represent the same high standards across states and would emphasize necessary skills, particularly in reading and math. The U.S. Department of Education explained the intent was to close achievement gaps, promote rigorous accountability, and ensure that all students are on track to graduate, college and career ready (Department of Education, 2014). Enter the common core curriculum (which has been adopted by 43 states as of this writing) and on its heels a need for large-scale standardized testing. Twenty states have adopted tests from the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (2014); 12 states and the District of Columbia have adopted tests created by the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PAARC, 2014). Both companies are developing tests that will be taken and scored using computers. The past school year (2013-2014) was considered a practice year for these evaluations, an opportunity to test the online assessments and work out any issues. The 2014-2015 school year will be the first year in which these new testing systems will be fully implemented. The computerized tests have embedded and non-embedded supports (calculators on the screen, for example, or enlarged print). There are tools, supports, and in the Smarter Balanced platform. These supports are designed to provide universal accessibility at levels needed by students as designated in their Individualized Education Programs or 504 plans. PAARC provides both embedded and external accommodations. Although there were numerous problems during the trial phase, many of the issues that were identified have been reported and are being addressed. The biggest issues affected braille, readers who needed to have access to refreshable braille displays and tactile graphics printers or needed hardcopy braille with tactile graphics in order to take these tests. At this time, neither company appears to be fully prepared to facilitate access to braille readers in a smooth and coordinated fashion, and these accommodations may encounter additional obstacles in individual school settings. …
Read full abstract