Sir: As surgical residency programs move toward more objective-based training protocols, curricula will need to include tangible measures of the advancement of a surgical trainee.1,2 The evaluation of microsurgical skills lacks the standardized criteria necessary for an adequate assessment, and in a world dominated by metrics, developing a reproducible, valid, low-cost, and easy-to-administer evaluation instrument is essential for self-improvement.3 Recent reports have used an online video system to assess microsurgical skills.4 In a similar fashion, the authors present the use of emerging technology in video analysis to improve microsurgical skills. Ubersense, a free and already available iPod/iPad App, allows athletes and coaches to improve their performance through “slow-motion video analysis.” Videos of the desired activity are captured and subsequently uploaded. The video can be analyzed at slower speeds or in a frame-by-frame fashion. The drawing tool allows marks to be made on the video, including various measurements (i.e., the angle a golf driver makes with the body at the highest point of a backswing). The video can be trimmed, and the user can view videos uploaded by others. A video can be simultaneously compared in a side-by-side fashion with any other video recording (Fig. 1). This technology is directly applicable to microsurgical training.Fig. 1: Video comparison of a golf swing before and after adjustments.A video of a senior surgeon placing microsurgical sutures is taken from the operating microscope, and the same is done for a trainee. These videos are uploaded to Ubersense, and each video is analyzed in a frame-by-frame fashion to obtain data points: Needle-to–needle driver angle. Needle tip–to–needle driver distance. The distance of suture entry and exit in relationship to the vessel edge. Needle-to–vessel wall angle. Suture tail length. Number of ancillary movements. Time to completion. The data points obtained from the two are compared, and the differences are calculated. The videos are then viewed in a side-by-side fashion to appreciate the differences between the senior staff and the trainee (Fig. 2). When the video analysis is reviewed together, opportunities for development arise as the senior surgeon can demonstrate exactly what the trainee can improve on by having a “correct” version to directly compare to.Fig. 2: Side-by-side video comparison of senior staff and resident trainee performing microsurgery. Immediate comparisons can be made and feedback given based on the differences seen in the video comparison.Although we have only begun using this technology to evaluate microsurgical skills, the possibilities are numerous. A compendium of norms for the data points mentioned previously could be compiled to calculate a true standard, which the trainees could be evaluated against. Trainees could view videos of their own progress in a side-by-side fashion to ensure their skills are advancing. Experts could upload videos of different suture techniques, and trainees could then compare their technique with mentors that are not directly available at their institution. This can all be accomplished with zero cost to the trainee or the institution. Therefore, we encourage readers to download the application and begin using the technology—athletes are not the only ones who can “raise their game.” SUBJECT CONSENT The man shown in Figure 1 provided written consent for the use of his images. DISCLOSURE The authors have no commercial associations or disclosures that might pose or create a conflict of interest with the information presented in this article. Ajul Shah, M.D. Megan Rowlands, B.S. Anup Patel, M.D., M.B.A. Stefano Fusi, M.D. Jeffrey Salomon, M.D. Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Yale University School of Medicine New Haven, Conn.
Read full abstract