The research problem is confined to decline in the contribution ofagricultural resources generally available, and capitalist resources particularlyto finance of agricultural economic development programs under the lowproportion of agricultural investment expenditure of the total investmentexpenditure, which decreased from about 19% during the period (1973-1985)to about 11.2 % during the period (1986-2009), which impact negatively onthe performance of the agricultural sector, and then low rates of agriculturaldevelopment in Libya, which required him directing economic policiestowards increasing investments of the agricultural sector to achieve theobjectives of the desired development, achieve the highest rate of selfsufficiency possible strategic commodities produced by this sector, and itbecame clear the importance of each of the Agricultural Bank and Rural Bankin lending to agricultural producers loans agricultural accessible and specialcategories of low-income, which is a real addition to financial institutions andsocial Libyan interested in assisted groups low-income so that they candevelop their performance and active participation in various economic activities, helping them to improve their income and raise their standard ofliving, and then trend Libyan community to the economic developmentprospects1The research aims in general to highlight the importance of the role ofeach of the Agricultural Bank and the Libyan Rural Bank in financingagricultural economic development programs, social, even can raise the levelof living of employees in the agricultural sector1A study the evolution of the value of short-term agricultural loans ittook years growing trend statistically significantly increased by increasing anannual rate of about 568.1 million dinars, representing about 10.3% of theannual average of such loans of about 5508 million dinars during the period ofthe policy of economic development plans (1973-1985). It also took thoseloans-year declining trend statistically significantly by decreasing the annualrate of about 822.5 million dinars by decreasing amounted to approximately9.3% of the total annual average of short-term agricultural loans of about 8879million dinars during the second period (1986 - 2009). It could be argued thatthe period of economic transformation has had a negative impact on the valuesof short-term agricultural loans. This can be explained that most of the farmersturned to borrow medium-term agricultural loans and long-term with thehighest value to take advantage of them to increase their incomes more thanwhat they get from the short-term agricultural loans1As shown by the study of the evolution of the value of medium-termagricultural loans that there is a continuous increase significantly statisticallyfor such loans during the two periods of the study (1973 - 1985), (1986 -2009), increased from about 393.9 million dinars annually representingapproximately 10.40% of the annual average for those loans of about 3802million dinars during the first period to about 1.4134 billion dinars annuallyrepresenting about 17.4% of the annual average of such loans of about 8097million dinars during the second period, which demonstrates the positiveimpact of the policy of economic transformation on the evolution of the totalmedium-term agricultural loans1As shown by the study of the evolution of the value of long termagricultural loans that those loans took a decreasing trend by decreasingannual rate of about 195.9 million dinars by decreasing amounted toapproximately 11% of the annual average of such loans of about 1769 milliondinars during the first period (1973 - 1985), but the those long-termagricultural loans took a general trend growing significantly statistically bygrowing an annual rate of about 1.3039 billion dinars, representingapproximately 16.57% of the annual average of such loans of about 7865million dinars during the second period, which illustrates the positive impactof the economic transformation on the value of agricultural loans long-termgranted Agricultural Bank because the Libyan government has pumped fundsfor the Agricultural Bank to offset part of the years of economic and politicalblockade imposed on Libya and seek to achieve agricultural developmentthrough the implementation of agricultural projects, long-term funds that havebeen borrowed from the Agricultural Bank1With regard to knowledge of the effects of these policies on thedevelopment of the total agricultural loans granted by the Agricultural Bank