Eclipse Treatment Planning System Research Articles

Commissioning and dosimetric validation of a novel compensator-based Co-60 IMRT system for evaluating suitability to automated treatment planning.

A novel compensator-based system has been proposed which delivers intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with cobalt-60 beams. This could improve access to advanced radiotherapy in low- and middle-income countries. For this system to be clinically viable and to be adapted into the Radiation Planning Assistant (RPA), being developed to offer automated planning services in low- and middle-income countries, it is necessary to commission and validate it in a commercial treatment planning system (TPS). The novel treatment device considered here employs a cobalt-60 source and nine compensators. Each compensator is produced by 3-D printing a thin plastic mold which is then filled on-demand within the machine with reusable 2-mm-diameter spherical tungsten balls. This system was commissioned in the Eclipse TPS and validation tests were conducted with Monte Carlo using Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission for percentage depth dose, in-plane profiles, penumbra, and IMRT dose validation. And the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 119 benchmarking testing was performed. Additionally, compensator-based cobalt-60 IMRT plans were created for 46 head-and-neck cancer cases and compared to the linac-based volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans used clinically, then dosimetric parameters were evaluated. Beam-on time for each field was calculated. In addition, the measurement was also performed in a limited environment and compared with the Monte Carlo simulations. The differences in percent depth doses and in-plane profiles between the Eclipse and Monte Carlo simulations were 0.65%±0.41% and 1.02%±0.99%, respectively, and the 80%-20% penumbra agreed within 0.46±0.27mm. For the Task Group 119 validation plans, all treatment planning goals were met and gamma passing rates were>95% (3%/3mm criteria). In 46 clinical head-and-neck cases, the cobalt-60 compensator-based IMRT plans had planning target volume (PTV) coverages similar to linac-based VMAT plans: all dosimetric values for PTV were within 1.5%. The organs at risk dose parameters were somewhat higher in cobalt-60 compensator-based IMRT plans versus linac-based VMAT plans. The mean dose differences for the spinal cord, brain, and brainstem were 4.43±1.92, 3.39±4.67, and 2.40±3.71Gy, while those for the rest of the organs were<1Gy. The average beam-on time per field was 0.42±0.10min for the 6 MV multi-leaf-collimator plans while those for the cobalt-60 compensator plans were 0.17±0.01 and 0.31±0.01min at the dose rates of 350 and 175 cGy/min. There was a good agreement between in-plane profiles from measurements and Monte Carlo simulations, which differences are 1.34±1.90% and 0.13±2.16% for two different fields. A novel compensator-based IMRT system using cobalt-60 beams was commissioned and validated in a commercial TPS. Plan quality with this system was comparable to that of linac-based plans in all test cases with shorter estimated beam-on times. This system enables reliable, high-quality plans with reduced cost and complexity and may have benefits for underserved regions of the world. This system is being integrated into the RPA, a web-based platform for auto-contouring and auto-planning.

Sensitivity and specificity of Varian Halcyon's portal dosimetry for plan-specific pre-treatment QA.

Developed as a plan-specific pre-treatment QA tool, Varian portal dosimetry promises a fast, high-resolution, and integrated QA solution. In this study, the agreement between predicted fluence and measured cumulative portal dose was determined for the first 140 patient plans at our Halcyon linear accelerator. Furthermore, the capability of portal dosimetry to detect incorrect plan delivery was compared to that of a common QA phantom. Finally, tolerance criteria for verification of VMAT plan delivery with Varian portal dosimetry were derived. All patient plans and the corresponding verification plans were generated within the Eclipse treatment planning system. Four representative plans of different treatment sites (prostate, prostate with lymphatic drainage, rectum, and head & neck) were intentionally altered to model incorrect plan delivery. Investigated errors included both systematic and random errors. Gamma analysis was conducted on both portal dose (criteria γ2%/2mm , γ2%/1mm , and γ1%/1mm ) and ArcCHECK measurements (criteria γ3%/3mm , γ3%/2mm , and γ2%/2mm ) with a 10% low-dose threshold. Performance assessment of various acceptance criteria for plan-specific treatment QA utilized receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Predicted and acquired portal dosimetry fluences demonstrated a high agreement evident by average gamma passing rates for the clinical patient plans of 99.90%, 96.64%, and 91.87% for γ2%/2mm , γ2%/1mm , and γ1%/1mm , respectively. The ROC analysis demonstrated a very high capability of detecting erroneous plan delivery for portal dosimetry (area under curve (AUC)>0.98) and in this regard outperforms QA with the ArcCHECK phantom (AUC ≈ 0.82). With the suggested optimum decision thresholds excellent sensitivity and specificity is simultaneously possible. Owing to the high achievable spatial resolution, portal dosimetry at the Halcyon can reliably be deployed as plan-specific pre-treatment QA tool to screen for errors. It is recommended to support the fluence integrated portal dosimetry QA by independent phantom-based measurements of a random sample survey of treatment plans.

Evaluation of plan quality and treatment efficiency in cranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatment plans with a variable source-to-axis distance.

Radiotherapy deliveries with dynamic couch motions that shorten the source-to-axis distance (SAD) on a C-arm linac have the potential to increase treatment efficiency through the increase of the effective dose rate. In this investigation, we convert clinically deliverable volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and dynamic conformal arc (DCA) plans for cranial radiosurgery into virtual isocenter plans through implementation of couch trajectories that maintain the target at a shortened but variable SAD throughout treatment. A randomly sampled population of patients treated with cranial radiosurgery from within the last three years were separated into groups with one, two, and three lesions. All plans had a single isocenter (regardless of number of targets), and a single prescription dose. Patient treatment plans were converted from their original delivery at a standard isocenter to a dynamic virtual isocenter in MATLAB. The virtual isocenter plan featured a variable isocenter position based upon the closest achievable source-to-target distance (referred to herein as a virtual source-to-axis distance [vSAD]) which avoided collision zones on a TrueBeam STx platform. Apertures were magnified according to the vSAD and monitor units at a given control point were scaled based on the inverse square law. Doses were calculated for the plans with a virtual isocenter in the Eclipse (v13.6.23) treatment planning system (TPS) and were compared with the clinical plans. Plan metrics (MU, Paddick conformity index, gradient index, and the volume receiving 12 Gy or more), normal brain dose-volume differences, as well as maximum doses received by organs at risk (OARs) were assessed. The values were compared between standard and virtual isocenter plans with Wilcoxon Sign Ranked tests to determine significance. A subset of the plans were mapped to the MAX-HD anthropomorphic phantom which contained an insert housing EBT3 GafChromic film and a PTW 31010 microion chamber for dose verification on a linac. Delivering plans at a virtual isocenter resulted in an average reduction of 20.9% (p = 3×10-6 ) and 20.6% (p = 3.0×10-6 ) of MUs across all VMAT and all DCA plans, respectively. There was no significant change in OAR max doses received by plans delivered at a virtual isocenter. The low dose wash (1.0-2.0 Gy or 5-11% of the prescription dose) was increased (by approximately 20 cc) for plans with three lesions. This was equivalent to a 2.7%-3.8% volumetric increase in normal tissue receiving the respective dose level when comparing the plan with a virtual isocenter to a plan with a standard isocenter. Gamma pass rates with a 5%/1mm analysis criteria were 96.40% ± 2.90% and 95.07% ± 3.10% for deliveries at standard and virtual isocenter, respectively. Absolute point dose agreements were within -0.36% ± 3.45% and -0.55% ± 3.39% for deliveries at a standard and virtual isocenter, respectively. Potential time savings per arc were found to have linear relationship with the monitor units delivered per arc (savings of 0.009 s/MU with an r2 = 0.866 when fit to plans with a single lesion). Converting clinical plans at standard isocenter to a virtual isocenter design did not show any losses to plan quality while simultaneously improving treatment efficiency through MU reductions.

Comparison between the HyperArc™ technique and the CyberKnife® technique for stereotactic treatment of brain metastases

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to compare the planimetric capacities between HyperArc™-based stereotactic radiosurgery and robotic radiosurgery system-based planning using CyberKnife® M6 for single and multiple cranial metastases. Materials and methodsWe evaluated 51 treatment plans for cranial metastases, including 30 patients with a single lesion and 21 patients with multiple lesions, treated with the CyberKnife® M6. These treatment plans were optimized using the HyperArc™ (HA) system with the TrueBeam. The comparison of the quality of the treatment plans between the two treatment techniques (CyberKnife and HyperArc) was performed using the Eclipse treatment planning system. Dosimetric parameters were compared for target volumes and organs at risk. ResultsCoverage of the target volumes was equivalent between the two techniques, whereas median Paddick conformity index and median gradient index for all target volumes were 0.9 and 3.4, respectively for HyperArc plans, and 0.8 and 4.5 for CyberKnife plans (P<0.001). The median dose of gross tumor volume (GTV) for HyperArc and CyberKnife plans were 28.4 and 28.8, respectively. Total brain V18Gy and V12Gy-GTVs were 11cm3 and 20.2cm3 for HyperArc plans versus 18cm3 and 34.1cm3 for CyberKnife plans (P<0.001). ConclusionThe HyperArc provided better brain sparing, with a significant reduction in V12Gy and V18Gy, associated with a lower gradient index, whereas the CyberKnife gave a higher median GTV dose. The HyperArc technique seems to be more appropriate for multiple cranial metastases and for large single metastatic lesions.

Dosimetric comparison of two dose expansion methods in intensity modulated radiotherapy for breast cancer

BackgroundTo explore the dosimetric difference between IMRT-VB plan based on the establishment of external expansion structure and virtual bolus (VB) and IMRT-SF based on the skin flash (SF) tool of the Eclipse treatment planning system in postoperative chest wall target intensity modulation radiotherapy plan of breast cancer.MethodsTwenty patients with breast cancer were randomly selected as subjects to develop IMRT-VB plan based on virtual bolus and IMRT-SF plan based on skin flash tool of Eclipse treatment planning system. The planning target volume, monitor unit (MU) of every single treatment and the dosimetric parameters of organ at risk (OARs) were recorded. Paired t-test was used for normal distribution data while nonparametric paired Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for non-normal distribution data.ResultsBoth IMRT-VB and IMRT-SF plan can expand outward to the chest wall skin and meet the dose requirements of clinical prescription. The conformal index, the homogeneity index, D2%, D98% and D50% were significantly better in IMRT-SF plan than those in IMRT-VB plan (P < 0.05). The average MU of the IMRT-SF plan was much higher than that of the IMRT-VB plan (866.0 ± 68.1 MU vs. 760.9 ± 50.4 MU, P < 0.05). In terms of organ at risk protection, IMRT-SF plan had more advantages in the protection of ipsilateral lung and spinal cord than IMRT-VB plan (P < 0.05).ConclusionOur study indicated that IMRT-SF plan displayed clinical application superiority compared to IMRT-VB plan, and the operation steps of which are simpler and faster. Besides, IMRT-SF plan took advantages in achieve effective external expansion of skin dose intensity and OARs protection.

An integrated solution of deep reinforcement learning for automatic IMRT treatment planning in non-small-cell lung cancer.

To develop and evaluate an integrated solution for automatic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases. A novel algorithm named as multi-objectives adjustment policy network (MOAPN) was proposed and trained to learn how to adjust multiple optimization objectives in commercial Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS), based on the multi-agent deep reinforcement learning (DRL) scheme. Furthermore, a three-dimensional (3D) dose prediction module was developed to generate the patient-specific initial optimization objectives to reduce the overall exploration space during MOAPN training. 114 previously treated NSCLC cases suitable for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) were selected from the clinical database. 87 cases were used for the model training, and the remaining 27 cases for evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of MOAPN in automatic treatment planning. For all tested cases, the average number of adjustment steps was 21 ± 5.9 (mean ± 1 standard deviation). Compared with the MOAPN initial plans, the actual dose of chest wall, spinal cord, heart, lung (affected side), esophagus and bronchus in the MOAPN final plans reduced by 14.5%, 11.6%, 4.7%, 16.7%, 1.6% and 7.7%, respectively. The dose result of OARs in the MOAPN final plans was similar to those in the clinical plans. The complete automatic treatment plan for a new case was generated based on the integrated solution, with about 5-6min. We successfully developed an integrated solution for automatic treatment planning. Using the 3D dose prediction module to obtain the patient-specific optimization objectives, MOAPN formed action-value policy can simultaneously adjust multiple objectives to obtain a high-quality plan in a shorter time. This integrated solution contributes to improving the efficiency of the overall planning workflow and reducing the variation of plan quality in different regions and treatment centers. Although improvement is warranted, this proof-of-concept study has demonstrated the feasibility of this integrated solution in automatic treatment planning based on the Eclipse TPS.

Clinical Application of a Customized 3D-Printed Bolus in Radiation Therapy for Distal Extremities

In radiation therapy (RT) for skin cancer, tissue-equivalent substances called boluses are widely used to ensure the delivery of an adequate dose to the skin surface and to provide a radioprotective effect for normal tissue. The aim of this study was to develop a new type of three-dimensional (3D) bolus for RT involving body parts with irregular geometries and to evaluate its clinical feasibility. Two 3D-printed boluses were designed for two patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of their distal extremities based on computed tomography (CT) images and printed with polylactic acid (PLA). The clinical feasibility of the boluses was evaluated by measuring the in vivo skin dose at the tumor site with optically stimulated luminescence detectors (OSLDs) and comparing the results with the prescribed and calculated doses from the Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS). The average measured dose distribution for the two patients was 94.75% of the prescribed dose and 98.8% of the calculated dose. In addition, the average measured dose during repeated treatments was 189.5 ± 3.7 cGy, thus demonstrating the excellent reproducibility of the proposed approach. Overall, the customized 3D-printed boluses for the RT of distal extremities accurately delivered doses to skin tumors with improved reproducibility.

Pretreatment Spinal Column Dose Estimation for Spinal SBRT Using Octavius Four-dimensional Phantom and Dose-volume Histograms Four-dimensional Feature: A Dosimetric Analysis.

The aim of this study was to estimate the spinal column dose for spinal Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) before patient treatment using the PTW dosimetry Octavius dose-volume histograms (DVH) four-dimensional (4D) feature. Twenty-three patients were included in the study, and a volumetric modulated arc therapy plan with 6MV flattening filter-free (6FFF) was generated for each patient in the Eclipse planning system using the Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) algorithm (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) for the TrueBeam STx LINAC machine. The Octavius 4D system was used to estimate the spinal cord dose by delivering the plans to the 4D phantom. The measured dose was compared with the Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) dose. The spinal cord max and mean doses estimated using Varisoft DVH 4D are in close agreement with the TPS calculated max and mean doses. The deviation between measured dose and TPS dose is ±5% for the spinal max dose, and the deviation between measured dose and TPS dose is ± 3% for the spinal mean dose. The study demonstrates that the PTW Octavius 4D phantom and DVH 4D feature can be used as a tool to estimate spinal cord dose before the treatment in spinal SBRT plans. The system provides an independent dose measurement that is comparable to the TPS dose. The close agreement between measured and calculated doses validates the use of this system as a critical organ dose verification tool.

Direct dosimetric comparison of linear accelerator vs. Gamma Knife fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) of large brain tumors.

The purpose of this study was to directly compare the plan quality of Gamma Knife (GK) (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden)- vs linear accelerator (LINAC)-based delivery techniques for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) of large brain metastases. Eighteen patients with clinical target volumes (CTVs) larger than 9.5 cc were selected to generate comparative plans for the prescription dose of 9 Gy × 3 fractions, utilizing the Eclipse (Varian, Palo Alto, US) vs Leksell GammaPlan (LGP) (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden) treatment planning systems (TPS). Each GK plan was first developed using LGP's automatic planning, followed by manual adjustments/refinements. The same MRI and structures, including CTVs and organs at risk, were then DICOM-transferred to the Eclipse TPS. Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Dynamic Conformal Arc (DCA) plans for a Truebeam, with high-definition multi-leaf collimators (MLCs), were developed on these MR images and structures using a single isocenter and 3 non-coplanar arcs. No planning target volume (PTV) margins were added, and no heterogeneity correction was used for either TPS. GK plans were prescribed to the 50% isodose line, and Eclipse VMAT and DCA plans allowed a maximum dose up to 170% and ∼125%, respectively. Gradient index (GI), Paddick Conformity Index (PCI), V20GyRind, and V4GyRind of all 3 techniques were calculated and compared. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to determine the statistical significance of the differences of these planning indices for the 3 planning techniques. A total of eighteen treatment targets were analyzed. Median CTV volume was 14.4 cc (range 9.5 cc - 55.9 cc). Mean ± standard deviation of PCI were 0.85 ± 0.03, 0.90 ± 0.03, and 0.72 ± 0.11 for GK, VMAT and DCA plans, respectively. They were respectively 2.64 ± 0.17, 2.46 ± 0.18, and 2.83 ± 0.48 for GI; 15.33 ± 8.45 cc, 10.47 ± 4.32 cc and 23.51 ± 16 cc for V20GyRind; and 316.28 ± 138.35 cc, 317.81 ± 108.21 cc, and 394.85 ± 142.16 cc for V4GyRind. The differences were statistically significant with p < 0.01 for all indices, except for V4GyRind (p > 0.129). In conclusion, a direct dosimetric comparison using the same MRI scan and contours was performed to evaluate the plan quality of various fSRT delivery techniques for CTV > 9.5 cc. LINAC VMAT plans provided the best dosimetric outcome in regard to PCI, GI, and V20GyRind. GK outcomes were similar to LINAC VMAT plans while LINAC DCA outcomes were significantly worse. Even though GK has a smaller physical penumbra, LINAC VMAT outperformed GK in this study due to enhanced penumbra sharpening and better beam optimization.

Delivery of a VMAT technique with flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter free (FFF) mode for whole breast irradiation with five fractions (FAST-Forward trial).

To investigate the feasibility of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery for whole breast irradiation with a 5-fraction regimen according to the FAST-Forward trial. Recently, we treated 10 patients with carcinoma of the left breast after breast conserving surgery. The dose prescription to the PTV was 26 Gy in 5 fractions. Treatment plans were produced using a VMAT technique with the Eclipse treatment planning system for 6 MV flattening filter (FF) and FF free (FFF) beams. Dose volume histograms (DVHs) for the PTV and the organs at risk (OARs), the ipsilateral lung and heart, were compared with the dose constraints specified in the FAST-Forward trial (PTV, D95 > 95%, D5 < 105%, D2 < 107% and Dmax < 110%; ipsilateral lung, D15 < 8Gy; Heart, D30 < 1.5Gy and D5 < 7Gy). Furthermore, conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI) and dose to the heart, contralateral lung, contralateral breast, and left anterior descending artery (LAD), were also assessed. Mean ± SD D95(%), D5(%), D2(%), and Dmax (%) for PTV were 97.75 ± 1.12, 105.2 ± 0.82, 105.90 ± 0.89, 109.36 ± 1.00 (FF) and 96.46 ± 0.75, 103.97 ± 0.97, 104.70 ± 1.09, 108.58 ± 1.33 (FFF) respectively. The mean ± SD CI was 1.07 ± 0.05 (FF), 1.048 ± 0.06 (FFF) and HI was 0.11 ± 0.02 (FF), 0.10 ± 0.02 (FFF). Dose constraints for OARs were met for both treatment techniques. However, D15 (Gy) for ipsilateral lung was 3.0% lower with FFF beams. In contrast, D5 (Gy) for heart was 9.0% higher with FFF beams. The dose difference between FF and FFF beams for other OARs such as contralateral lung-D10 (Gy) contralateral breast-D5 (Gy) and LAD was up to 6.0%. Both FF and FFF methods met the acceptable criteria. However, the treatment plans with FFF mode were more conformal and provided greater target homogeneity.

Dosimetry Verification of Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) In Eclipse Treatment Planning System (TPS) Based on Multileaf Collimator Variations

Dosimetry verification of anisotropic analytical (AAA) algorithms based on variations of the multileaf collimator has been investigated using the Eclipse Treatment Planning System. This study used a 0.6cc ionization chamber farmer detector and Linac Clinical CX variant equipped with TPS Eclipse with AAA. This study used 6 MV energy and 2 Gy dose. The multileaf collimator was varied into six groups with the size (A, B, C, D, E, F) of the irradiation field used 20 cm x 20 cm. The measurement results were a dose deviation value or a dose ratio presentation in each irradiation area. The dose deviation of the multileaf collimator variation was A 0.86% for each group. Group B had 6.8%, Group C had -0.43%, Group D had 0.73%, Group E had 1.11%, and Group F had 0.84%. The mean dose deviation value for all multileaf collimator forms was 1.67%, where this value is within the tolerance value recommended by ICRU, namely 3-5%. The p-value in the Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the entire group was 0.00. This data shows that there is no effect of variation in the multileaf collimator on the dose given.

Frequency of errors in the transfer of treatment parameters from the treatment planning system to the oncology information system in a multi-vendor environment.

Technological advancements have made it possible to improve patient outcomes in radiotherapy, sparing both normal tissues and increasing tumour control. However, these advancements have resulted in an increase in the number of software systems used, which each require data inputs to function. For institutions with multiple vendors for their treatment planning systems and oncology information systems, the transfer of data between them is potentially error prone and can lead to treatment errors. The goal of this work was to determine the frequency of errors in data transfers between the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system and the Elekta Mosaiq oncology information system. An in-house program was used to quantify the number of errors for 2700 unique plans over an 8-month period. Using this information, the frequency of the errors were calculated. A risk priority number was calculated using the calculated frequencies to determine the impact on the clinic. The most common errors discovered were backup timer settings (10.7%), Field label (8.5%), DRR associations (3.3%), imaging field types (3.1%), dose rate (1%), Field Id (0.8%), imaging isocenter (0.7% and SSD (0.7%). Based on the risk priority numbers, the DRR association error was ranked as having the highest potential impact on the patient. The results of the work show that the most effort should be focused on checking the manual steps performed in the transfer process, while items that are imported directly from DICOM-RT without modification are highly likely to be transferred accurately. The data can be used to help guide the implementation of future automated tools and process improvement in the clinic.

Volume staging for arteriovenous malformation SRS treatment using VMAT.

Volume staging involves dividing the target volume into smaller parts and treating each part separately. In this study, the feasibility of volume-staged stereotactic radiosurgery (VS-SRS) on a linear accelerator using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and a frameless patient positioning system is investigated. Ten patients, previously treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with arteriovenous malformation (AVM) sized from 1.6 to 4.0cm in diameter, were selected. VS-SRS plans were created with the VMAT technique on the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) using the TrueBeam STx linear accelerator. For each patient, an AVM-VMAT set was planned with the AVM as the target and a PTV-VMAT set using the (PTV=AVM+1mm) as the target. All targets were divided into two sub-volumes. The TPS data from the AVM-VMAT plans was compared to Gamma Knife (GK) VS-SRS plan data available in the literature. The AVM-VMAT and PTV-VMAT plans were compared to investigate the effect of a 1mm PTV margin on normal brain (NB) dose. End-to-end testing was performed using a GaFchromic EBT3 film and point-dose measurements. Dosimetric effects of multiple setups were investigated through film-to-film comparisons. Median target dose coverage, NB V12Gy , and conformity index for the AVM-VMAT plans were 97.5%, 17cm3 , and 0.8, respectively. PTV-VMAT plans attained comparable target dose coverage, but the average NB V12Gy increased by 48.9% when compared to the AVM-VMAT plans. Agreement of point-dose measurements with TPS calculations was -0.6% when averaged over all patients. Gamma analysis passing rates were above 90% for all film-to-film comparisons (2%/1mm criteria), and for the film to TPS comparison (5%/1mm). This work suggests that VMAT is capable of producing VS-SRS plans with similar dose falloff characteristics as GK plans. NB dose depends on PTV margin size, and two-stage treatment setups do not appear to contribute additional uncertainty to treatment delivery.

Dosimetric evaluation of a treatment planning system using the AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 5.a (MPPG 5.a) validation tests.

Verifying the accuracy of the dose calculation algorithm is considered one of the most critical steps in radiotherapy treatment for delivering an accurate dose to the patient. This work aimed to evaluate the dosimetric performance of the treatment planning system (TPS) algorithms; the AAA (v. 15.6), AXB (v. 15.6) and eMC (v. 15.6) following the AAPM medical physics practice guideline 5.a (MPPG 5.a) validation tests package in a Varian iX Linear Accelerator (Linac). A series of tests were developed based on the MPPG 5.a. on a Varian's Eclipse TPS (v. 15.6) (Varian Medical Systems). First, the basic photon and electron tests were validated by comparing the TPS calculated dose with the measurements. Next, for heterogeneity tests, we verified the Computed Tomography number to electron density (CT-to-ED) curve by comparing it with the baseline values, and TPS calculated point doses beyond heterogeneous media were compared to the measurements. Finally, for IMRT/VMAT dose validation tests, clinical reference plans were re-calculated on ArcCheck's virtual phantom (Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, FL, USA) and exported to the Linac for delivery using the ArcCheck dosimetry system. All validation tests were evaluated following the MPPG 5.a recommended tolerances. In basic dose validation tests, the TPS calculated depth dose profiles agreed well with the measurements, with a minimum gamma passing rate of 95% at 2%/2mm criteria. However, disagreements are seen in the build-up and penumbra region. Results for most point doses in homogeneous water phantoms were within the MPPG 5.a tolerance. For the heterogeneity tests, the CT-to-ED curve was established, and calculated point doses were all within 3% of the measurements for heterogeneous media for both photon algorithms at three energies. These results are within the MPPG5.a the recommended tolerance of 3%. Moreover, for electron beams, the differences between the calculated and measured point doses averaged 5% and 7%, but were just within the MPPG 5.a tolerance of 7%. For IMRT and VMAT validation tests using a gamma criteria of a 2%/2mm, IMRT plans showed maximum and minimum passing rates of 98.2% and 97.4%, respectively. Whereas VMAT plans showed maximum and minimum passing rates of 100% and 94.3%, respectively. We conclude that the dosimetric accuracy of the Eclipse TPS (v15.6) algorithm is adequate for clinical use. The MPPG 5.a tests are valuable for evaluating dose calculation accuracy and are very useful for TPS upgrade checks, commissioning tests, and routine TPS QA.

PO41 Presentation Time: 4:45 PM: Initial Experience with the New Commercial Aarhus MR Compatible Hybrid Interstitial Brachytherapy Applicator in Indian Setting

<h3>Purpose -</h3> We have been using CT based intracavitary applicator in our clinic for cervical cancer. The advent of new hybrid applicator and short sequence cube MRI sequence opened up opportunity to do advanced MRI based brachytherapy in our clinic. We present the initial clinical experience of Aarhus ring and tandem MR compatible hybrid interstitial applicator with both straight and oblique needles and no ring channel (Varian may need to add TM) which was recently approved for use in a patient with bulky cervical cancer. <h3>Material and methods -</h3> A 45 years old lady, with initial diagnosis of carcinoma cervix, stage 1B3, completed External beam radiotherapy to a total dose of 45Gy in 25 Fractions, with a good clinical response, was taken up for further treatment with brachytherapy to a total dose of 28 Gy in 4 fractions. Brachytherapy was split into two applications one week apart and two treatment fractions delivered with each application, with 8 hours gap between each fraction.We used 60 degree Aarhus applicator set with Intrauterine tandem of 40 mm length and outer ring diameter of 32 mm. The Ring includes 19 guide holes for plastic interstitial needles arranged in 2 circles, 9 in inner circle for oblique needles and 10 in outer circle for straight needles.After external radiation patient underwent MRI pelvis with only T2 weighted axial and Cube sequences, which showed residual disease limited to cervix on the right side. The depth of needle insertion into the cervix was measured on MRI to be 3cms. Procedure performed under short general anaesthesia and 4 straight plastic needles through the ring were inserted with two on either side along with 4 cm central Tandem. CT and MR performed for both applications and fused. GTV-primary and HR CTV delineated on MRI, while OARs were delineated on CT. A dose of 7 Gy per fraction prescribed to HR CTV. An optimised plan was generated on eclipse treatment planning system with repeat CT planning for remaining fractions. <h3>Results -</h3> Treatment delivery went uneventful with very minimal blood loss. Average Dose per fraction received by 90 % of volume (D90) of HR CTV was 7.617 Gy and D98 of GTV primary was 10.35 Gy, delivering a total EQD2 of 89 Gy to HR CTV and at the same time delivering 115 Gy to the GTVp. OAR doses were well constrained with Bladder 2cc receiving 79.25 Gy, Rectum 2cc constrained to 53.48 Gy, sigmoid 2cc to 58.99 Gy and small bowel to 51.98 Gy. <h3>Conclusions -</h3> We successfully implemented MRI based planning with new Aarhus applicator in our clinic. Procedure was uneventful with excellent dosimetry. We will continue to use it in our clinic for patients with locally advanced cancer.

Comparison of PRIMO Monte Carlo code and Eclipse treatment planning system in calculation of dosimetric parameters in brain cancer radiotherapy.

It is important to evaluate the dose calculated by treatment planning systems (TPSs) and dose distribution in tumor and organs at risk (OARs). The aim of this study is to compare dose calculated by the PRIMO Monte Carlo code and Eclipse TPS in radiotherapy of brain cancer patients. PRIMO simulation code was used to simulate a Varian Clinac 600C linac. The simulations were validated for the linac by comparison of the simulation and measured results. In the case of brain cancer patients, the dosimetric parameters obtained by the PRIMO code were compared with those calculated by Eclipse TPS. Gamma function analysis with 3%, 3 mm criteria was utilized to compare the dose distributions. The evaluations were based on the dosimetric parameters for the planning target volume (PTV) and OAR including D min, D mean, and D max, homogeneity index (HI), and conformity index (CI). The gamma function analysis showed a 98% agreement between the results obtained by the PRIMO code and measurement for the percent depth dose (PDD) and dose profiles. The corresponding value in comparing the dosimetric parameters from PRIMO code and Eclipse TPS for the brain patients was 94%, on average. The results of the PRIMO simulation were in good agreement with the measured data and Eclipse TPS calculations. Based on the results of this study, the PRIMO code can be utilized to simulate a medical linac with good accuracy and to evaluate the accuracy of treatment plans for patients with brain cancer.

Validating TG119 VMAT Commissioning on a Volumetric Phantom

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> The present work adapts AAPM TG119 on a volumetric detector array and evaluates its feasibility for VMAT commissioning for two different Treatment Planning Systems (TPS). <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> TG119 describes a group of test plans for standard structure sets following prescription and dose constraints objectives. These plans were calculated and evaluated using both Elekta Monaco V5.0 (Montecarlo) and Varian Eclipse v15.6 (AAA algorithm) TPS. TG119 structure sets were inserted on virtual CT images for volumetric Quality Assurance (QA) phantom. A set of plans calculated on both TPS were delivered on a 6MV photon beam on an Elekta Synergy Linac. A set of plans was generated only on Eclipse for a Varian Halcyon Linac with 6MV Flattening Filter Free beam. Generated plans were delivered, dose distribution was concurrently measured with Ion Chamber (IC) point doses using a cavity plug holder inserted on the QA phantom. Dose constraints and goals comparison between TPS was executed. Gamma analysis was performed for 3%3mm and 3%2mm global gamma index and Confidence Limits (CL) according to the TG119 definition of Normal quantile were calculated. Measured and planned point doses on relevant positions were compared. <h3>Results</h3> TG119 goals were mostly satisfied except for some critical situations: PTV D99 goal on head & neck plan calculated on Eclipse TPS and Superior Target D10 goal on Multitarget Plan for Monaco TPS calculation. Gamma Analysis for 3%3mm range of passing rate was 96.8% to 100% while CLs range between 4.1% and 4.7% for a Normal quantile for Monaco TPS. For Eclipse TPS range of passing rate achieved was among 97.2% and 99.9%, CLs range was between 3.2% and 3.1%. For Eclipse plans delivered on Halcyon, the passing rate range was among 98.6% and 99.8%, CLs between 1.6% and 1.7%. 3%2mm global gamma index analysis shows a range of passing rate of 93.5% and 100% for Monaco TPS while CLs range between 4.8% and 8.3%. For Elekta plans on Eclipse TPS range of passing rate was 95.6% and 98.8%, CLs range was between 5.1% and 4.5%. The gamma passing rate range for Halcyon plans was between 94.5% and 99.3 and CLs between 3.4% and 6.0%. IC measurements for Synergy Linac showed an average dose difference of 0.84% between measured and calculated plans on Monaco, range among -3.15% and 7.01%, the greatest differences were found on C-Shape plan for high gradient regions measurements. For Eclipse TPS, the average dose difference was 1.28%, range between -1.04% and 10.26%, the highest difference was found in high gradient region C-Shape plan. For Halcyon plans, IC measurements showed an average dose difference of 0.74%, ranging between -0.27% and 3.38%. <h3>Conclusion</h3> CLs agreed with TG119 reference values even when stricter requirements were used. New criteria are more appropriate for modern treatments, but TG119 methodology remains a valid procedure for VMAT. The methodology described for commissioning VMAT technique on a volumetric QA phantom shows to be robust and consistent for various TPS and lilacs.

Testing of an enhanced leaf model for improved dose calculation in a commercial treatment planning system.

With the ever-increasing complexity of dynamic radiotherapy treatments, dose calculation algorithms are challenged to accurately calculate the dose resulting from small, on- and off-axis multileaf collimator (MLC) aperture movements. Although the currently available Eclipse (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto) dose calculation algorithms still use a simplified, binary MLC model, a more advanced and detailed modeling of the MLC could be beneficial for the dose calculation precision of high-end treatments. To improve the modeling of the MLC in the dose calculation algorithms of the Eclipse treatment planning system, an enhanced MLC attenuation model was constructed through ray tracing through the actual leaf designs for the most commonly used Varian MLC types. The enhanced leaf model (ELM) thus includes the rounded leaf tip shape, the drive screw cutout, and the leaf body thickness. The purpose of this work is to test out this new model and explore possible improvements compared to the previous model. Dose calculations were performed in a research Eclipse environment equipped with the original and enhanced MLC model. Measurements were performed on TrueBeam and on Halcyon dual MLC treatment units. Dedicated static and dynamic MLC test plans were designed to challenge the dose calculation and highlight differences between both models while keeping the experimental setup simple in order to minimize measurement uncertainties. Measurements were performed with single ion chambers, 2D ion chamber arrays and film. The improved MLC model considerably improves the accuracy of the dose calculation for the test fields used in this study. For the TrueBeam MLC, improvements are most prominent for off-axis dose delivery through narrow (static or dynamic) MLC gaps. For 3mm narrow sweeping gap deliveries at 12cm off-axis, the advanced model agrees within 2% with the measurement, in contrast to the 12% deviation observed with the original MLC model. For the Halcyon MLC, improvements are especially prominent when the leaves of both MLC stacks are aligned, regardless of their position in the field. Sweeping gap measurements improve from a 7%-10% deviation with the original model to within 2% with the new model. Although test fields designed in this study emphasize the flaws in the original MLC dose calculation model, the enhanced MLC model resolves all of the observed discrepancies, showing excellent on- and off-axis agreements with all of the performed measurements.

Patient-specific dose correction for prostate postimplant evaluation with flexible timing of postimplant imaging.

The dosimetric effect of edema on prostate implants have long been realized, but large uncertainties still exist in the estimation of dose actually received by the prostate. This study attempted to develop a new method to accurately estimate dose delivered to the prostate accounting for the variation of prostate volume and seed distribution, edema half-lives, and times for postimplant evaluation. A series of prostate seed implants for Cs-131, Pd-103, and I-125 with various prostate volumes were simulated in a water phantom using the TG-43 algorithm on the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system. Dose analysis was performed to derive a quantitative relationship between the prostate peripheral dose and the prostate radius with the variation of prostate volume and seed distribution. Using this relationship to calculate dynamically, the total dose accumulated in the prostate (DT ) accounting for the variation of prostate volume and seed distribution and edema half-lives. Moreover, the total dose can be estimated statically based on the prostate volume that can be determined in a computerized tomography (CT) image taken at a time after implantation. The statically estimated total dose (DCT ) was compared with DT to determine optimal imaging times as well as dose correction factors for other imaging times. An inverse power law was established between the prostate peripheral dose and prostate radius. The value of the power was 1.3 for Cs-131 and I-125, and 1.5 for Pd-103, respectively. DT was derived dynamically using the inverse power law. Given the edema half-lives, TE , of 4, 9.3, and 25 days and the volume expansion of 1.1 and 2.0 times of the prostate without edema, the optimal times for postimplant imaging were: 7, 9, and 16 days for TE = 4 days; 10, 14, and 28days for TE = 9.3 days; and 12, 19, 45 days TE = 25 days, for Cs-131, Pd-103, and I-125, respectively. DCT calculated using the prostate volume determined on the optimal days agreed with DT to 0.0%-1.8% and within 0.3% for most cases. For various prostate volumes, edema half-lives, and nonoptimal times, DCT was able to achieve a 1% accuracy. The postimplant dose calculation based on the proposed inverse power law for prostate seed implants with edema has improved the accuracy of postimplant dosimetry with accurate and patient-specific dose corrections accounting for prostate size, edema half-life, and postimplant imaging times. Optimal times for postimplant imaging have been accurately determined, and the high accuracy of postimplant dose calculation can be achieved for both optimal imaging times and nonoptimal imaging times.

A concept for anisotropic PTV margins including rotational setup uncertainties and its impact on the tumor control probability in canine brain tumors

Objective. In this modelling study, we pursued two main goals. The first was to establish a new CTV-to-PTV expansion which considers the closest and most critical organ at risk (OAR). The second goal was to investigate the impact of the planning target volume (PTV) margin size on the tumor control probability (TCP) and its dependence on the geometrical setup uncertainties. The aim was to achieve a smaller margin expansion close to the OAR while allowing a moderately larger expansion in less critical areas further away from the OAR and whilst maintaining the TCP. Approach. Imaging data of radiation therapy plans from pet dogs which had undergone radiation therapy for brain tumor were used to estimate the clinic specific rotational setup uncertainties. A Monte-Carlo methodology using a voxel-based TCP model was used to quantify the implications of rotational setup uncertainties on the TCP. A combination of algorithms was utilized to establish a computational CTV-to-PTV expansion method based on probability density. This was achieved by choosing a center of rotation close to an OAR. All required software modules were developed and integrated into a software package that directly interacts with the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system. Main results. Several uniform and non-isotropic PTVs were created. To ensure comparability and consistency, standardized RT plans with equal optimization constraints were defined, automatically applied and calculated on these targets. The resulting TCPs were then computed, evaluated and compared. Significance. The non-isotropic margins were found to result in larger TCPs with smaller margin excess volume. Further, we presented an additional application of the newly established CTV-to-PTV expansion method for radiation therapy of the spinal axis of human patients.