"Just Accepted" papers have undergone full peer review and have been accepted for publication in Radiology: Artificial Intelligence. This article will undergo copyediting, layout, and proof review before it is published in its final version. Please note that during production of the final copyedited article, errors may be discovered which could affect the content. Purpose To develop and evaluate the performance of NNFit, a self-supervised deep-learning method for quantification of high-resolution short echo-time (TE) echo-planar spectroscopic imaging (EPSI) datasets, with the goal of addressing the computational bottleneck of conventional spectral quantification methods in the clinical workflow. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 89 short-TE whole-brain EPSI/GRAPPA scans from clinical trials for glioblastoma (Trial 1, May 2014-October 2018) and major-depressive-disorder (Trial 2, 2022- 2023). The training dataset included 685k spectra from 20 participants (60 scans) in Trial 1. The testing-dataset included 115k spectra from 5 participants (13 scans) in Trial 1 and 145k spectra from 7 participants (16 scans) in Trial 2. A comparative analysis was performed between NNFit and a widely used parametric-modeling spectral quantitation method (FITT). Metabolite maps generated by each method were compared using the structural- similarity-index-measure (SSIM) and linear-correlation-coefficient (R2). Radiation treatment volumes for glioblastoma based on the metabolite maps were compared with the Dice-coefficient and a two-tailed t test. Results Average SSIM and R2 scores for Trial 1 test set data were 0.91/0.90 (choline), 0.93/0.93 (creatine), 0.93/0.93 (n-acetylaspartate), 0.80/0.72 (myo-inositol), and 0.59/0.47 (glutamate + glutamine). Average scores for Trial 2 test set data were 0.95/0.95, 0.98/0.97, 0.98/0.98, 0.92/0.92, and 0.79/0.81 respectively. The treatment volumes had average Dice coefficient of 0.92. NNFit's average processing time was 90.1 seconds, whereas FITT took 52.9 minutes on average. Conclusion This study demonstrates that a deep learning approach to spectral quantitation offers comparable performance to conventional quantification methods for EPSI data, but with faster processing at short-TE. ©RSNA, 2025.
Read full abstract