EBT-XD Films Research Articles

1520: Characterization of EBT, EBT-XD and OC-1 Films for Absolute Dose measurement in Electron Beams

1520: Characterization of EBT, EBT-XD and OC-1 Films for Absolute Dose measurement in Electron Beams

Characterization of a Modified Clinical Linear Accelerator for Ultra-High Dose Rate Beam Delivery

Irradiations at Ultra-High Dose Rate (UHDR) regimes, exceeding 40 Gy/s in single fractions lasting less than 200 ms, have shown an equivalent antitumor effect compared to conventional radiotherapy with reduced harm to normal tissues. This work details the hardware and software modifications implemented to deliver 10 MeV UHDR electron beams with a linear accelerator Elekta SL 18 MV and the beam characteristics obtained. GafChromic EBT XD films and an Advanced Markus chamber were used for dosimetry characterization, while a silicon sensor assessed the machine’s beam pulses stability and repeatability. The dose per pulse, average dose rate and instantaneous dose rate in the pulse were evaluated for four experimental settings, varying the source-to-surface distance and the beam collimation, i.e., with and without the use of a cylindrical applicator. The results showed a dose per pulse from 0.6 Gy to a few tens of Gy and an average dose rate up to 300 Gy/s. The obtained results demonstrate the possibility to perform in vitro radiobiology experiments and test new technologies for beam monitoring and dosimetry at the upgraded LINAC, thus contributing to the electron UHDR research field.

Gafchromic EBT3 film provides equivalent dosimetric performance to EBT-XD film for stereotactic radiosurgery dosimetry

The accurate assessment of film results is highly dependent on the methodology and techniques used to process film. This study aims to compare the performance of EBT3 and EBT-XD film for SRS dosimetry using two different film processing methods. Experiments were performed in a solid water slab and an anthropomorphic head phantom. For each experiment, the net optical density of the film was calculated using two different methods; taking the background (initial) optical density from 1) an unirradiated film from the same film lot as the irradiated film (stock to stock (S-S) method), and 2) a scan of the same piece of film taken prior to irradiation (film to film (F-F) method). EBT3 and EBT-XD performed similarly across the suite of experiments when using the green channel only or with triple channel RGB dosimetry. The dosimetric performance of EBT-XD was improved across all colour channels by using an F-F method, particularly for the blue channel. In contrast, EBT3 performed similarly well regardless of the net optical density method used. Across 21 SRS treatment plans, the average per-pixel agreement between EBT3 and EBT-XD films, normalised to the 20 Gy prescription dose, was within 2% and 4% for the non-target (2—10 Gy) and target (> 10 Gy) regions, respectively, when using the F-F method. At doses relevant to SRS, EBT3 provides comparable dosimetric performance to EBT-XD. In addition, an S-S dosimetry method is suitable for EBT3 while an F-F method should be adopted if using EBT-XD.

Assessment of stereotactic high-resolution detectors for stereotactic body radiotherapy: comparative analysis between myQA® SRS and Gafchromic EBT-XD films.

The study aimed to evaluate dosimetry systems used for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), specifically 2D array dosimetry and film dosimetry systems, for exploring their characteristics and clinical suitability. For this, high-resolution myQA SRS detectors and Gafchromic EBT-XD films were employed. Film analysis included net optical density (OD) values depending on energy, dose rate, scanner orientation, scanning side, and post-exposure growth. For myQA SRS, signal values were evaluated in terms of dose rate (400-1400 MU/min) and angular dependence (0-180° at 30° intervals) along with couch angles of 0°, 45°, and 90°. Pre-treatment verification included 32 SBRT patients for whom myQA SRS results were compared with those obtained with Gafchromic EBT-XD films. Analysis revealed less than 1% deviation in net OD for energy and dose rate dependence. Scanner orientation caused 2.5% net OD variation, with minimal differences between film front and back scan orientations (variance < 1.0%). A rapid OD rise occurred within six hours post-exposure, followed by gradual increase. The myQA SRS detector showed -3.7% dose rate dependence (400 MU/min), while the angular dependence at 90° was -26.7%. A correction factor effectively reduced these differences to < 1%. For myQA SRS, gamma passing rates were-93.6% (2%/1mm), while those for EBT-XD films were-92.8%. Improved rates were observed with 3%/1mm: for myQA SRS-97.9%, and for EBT-XD film-98.16%. In contrast, for 2%/2mm with 10% threshold, for myQA SRS-97.7% and for EBT-XD film-98.97% were obtained. It is concluded that both myQA SRS detectors and EBT-XD films are suitable for SBRT pre-treatment verification, ensuring accuracy and reliability. However, myQA SRS detectors are preferred over EBT-XD film due to the fact that they offer real-time measurements and user-friendly features.

Effect of glass compression plate on EBT-XD film dosimetry for pretreatment quality assurance of stereotactic body radiotherapy.

EBT-XD film specially designed for high dose verifications such as stereotactic treatments. The dose response of the film can be affected by several factors, the curly nature of the film being one of them. In this study this curly nature of the film was investigated for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plan verifications. For this study, 18 SBRT (11 prostate, 3 spines, and 4 lungs) cases were enrolled. For all the cases, VMAT plans were created in the Monaco treatment planning system and plan was delivered in Elekta Versa HD linear accelerator and delivered fluence was captured by EBT-XD films. All films were scanned with and without a compression plate. All the films were analyzed using the single-channel film method using the red channel. A significant difference in the gamma passing rates (GPR) for the films scanned with and without the compression plate was observed. The maximum percentage differences in GPR between using and not using a compression plate were 12.7% for 1% 1 mm, 8.1% for 2% 2 mm, 7.5% for 3% 2 mm, and 5% for 3% 3mm criteria. Similarly, the mean %difference in GPR was 5.8% for 1% 1 mm, 2.4% for 2% 2 mm, 1.6% for 3% 2 mm and 0.96% for 3% 3 mm criteria. The results suggest that placing a compression plate over the film during scanning provided a great advantage in achieving a more accurate gamma passing rate irrespective of gamma criteria.

Patient-specific QA for the HyperArc technique using gafchromic film with multiple calibration methods

Purpose This study aims to evaluate different methods for calibrating EBT-XD films to develop a precise pre-treatment verification method for stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) patients using the HyperArc (HA, Varian Medical System) technique. Methods Gafchromic EBT-XD films were calibrated using three different approaches: manual calibration, EDW calibration, and PDD calibration. Films were digitalized with an Epson V850 Pro scanner applying the local scanning protocol. Three clinical treatment plans were selected for evaluation. Patient-specific QA films were irradiated in the Mobius MVP phantom and the STEEV phantom. Scanned film images were converted into dose images using the calibration curves. Gamma analysis was performed to compare film dose and TPS calculated dose with various criteria. Results The scan-to-scan variation was evaluated to be ≤ 0.2%. The accuracy of the calibration curves was verified and the deviation from the converted dose deviates ≤ 3% from the known delivered dose. The gamma passing rate for all calibration methods was found to be over 94% with clinically relevant criteria. EDW calibration demonstrated higher average gamma passing rates compared to the manual method for single target plans, which is 99% ± 1.2% and 98.8% ± 1.5%, respectively. PDD method demonstrated improved agreement for multiple targets with the result of 99.3% ± 0.8%. Conclusions The three calibration methods were validated, and they produced accurate calibration curves for EBT-XD films to enable pre-treatment patient-specific QA for stereotactic radiotherapy.

Development and characterization of a versatile mini-beam collimator for pre-clinical photon beam irradiation.

Interest in spatial fractionation radiotherapy has exponentially increased over the last decade as a significant reduction of healthy tissue toxicity was observed by mini-beam irradiation. Published studies, however, mostly use rigid mini-beam collimators dedicated to their exact experimental arrangement such that changing the setup or testing new mini-beam collimator configurations becomes challenging andexpensive. In this work, a versatile, low-cost mini-beam collimator was designed and manufactured for pre-clinical applications with X-ray beams. The mini-beam collimator enables variability of the full width at half maximum (FWHM), the center-to-center distance (ctc), the peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR), and the source-to-collimator distance (SCD). The mini-beam collimator is an in-house development, which was constructed of 10× 40mm2 tungsten or brass plates. These metal plates were combined with 3D-printed plastic plates that can be stacked together in the desired order. A standard X-ray source was used for the dosimetric characterization of four different configurations of the collimator, including a combination of plastic plates of 0.5, 1, or 2mm width, assembled with 1 or 2mm thick metal plates. Irradiations were done at three different SCDs for characterizing the performance of the collimator. For the SCDs closer to the radiation source, the plastic plates were 3D-printed with a dedicated angle to compensate for the X-ray beam divergence, making it possible to study ultra-high dose rates of around 40Gy/s. All dosimetric quantifications were performed using EBT-XD films. Additionally, in vitro studies with H460 cells were carriedout. Characteristic mini-beam dose distributions were obtained with the developed collimator using a conventional X-ray source. With the exchangeable 3D-printed plates, FWHM and ctc from 0.52 to 2.11mm, and from 1.77 to 4.61mm were achieved, with uncertainties ranging from 0.01% to 8.98%, respectively. The FWHM and ctc obtained with the EBT-XD films are in agreement with the design of each mini-beam collimator configuration. For dose rates in the order of several Gy/min, the highest PVDR of 10.09 ± 1.08 was achieved with a collimator configuration of 0.5mm thick plastic plates and 2mm thick metal plates. Exchanging the tungsten plates with the lower-density metal brass reduced the PVDR by approximately 50%. Also, increasing the dose rate to ultra-high dose rates was feasible with the mini-beam collimator, where a PVDR of 24.26 ± 2.10 was achieved. Finally, it was possible to deliver and quantify mini-beam dose distribution patterns in vitro. With the developed collimator, we achieved various mini-beam dose distributions that can be adjusted according to the needs of the user in regards to FWHM, ctc, PVDR and SCD, while accounting for beam divergence. Therefore, the designed mini-beam collimator may enable low-cost and versatile pre-clinical research on mini-beamirradiation.

Dosimetric response of Gafchromic™ EBT-XD film to therapeutic protons.

EBT-XD model of Gafchromic™ films has a broader optimal dynamic dose range, up to 40 Gy, compared to its predecessor models. This characteristic has made EBT-XD films suitable for high-dose applications such as stereotactic body radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery, as well as ultra-high dose rate FLASH radiotherapy. The purpose of the current study was to characterize the dependence of EBT-XD film response on linear energy transfer (LET) and dose rate of therapeutic protons from a synchrotron. A clinical spot-scanning proton beam was used to study LET dependence at three dose-averaged LET (LETd) values of 1.0 keV/µm, 3.6 keV/µm, and 7.6 keV/µm. A research proton beamline was used to study dose rate dependence at 150 Gy/second in the FLASH mode and 0.3 Gy/second in the non-FLASH mode. Film response data from LETd values of 0.9 keV/µm and 9.0 keV/µm of the proton FLASH beam were also compared. Film response data from a clinical 6 MV photon beam were used as a reference. Both gray value method and optical density (OD) method were used in film calibration. Calibration results using a specific OD calculation method and a generic OD calculation method were compared. The four-parameter NIH Rodbard function and three-parameter rational function were compared in fitting the calibration curves. Experimental results showed that the response of EBT-XD film is proton LET dependent but independent of dose rate. Goodness-of-fit analysis showed that using the NIH Rodbard function is superior for both protons and photons. Using the "specific OD + NIH Rodbard function" method for EBT-XD film calibration is recommended.

Characterization of 250 MeV Protons from the Varian ProBeam PBS System for FLASH Radiation Therapy.

Shoot-through proton FLASH radiation therapy has been proposed where the highest energy is extracted from a cyclotron to maximize the dose rate (DR). Although our proton pencil beam scanning system can deliver 250 MeV (the highest energy), this energy is not used clinically, and as such, 250 MeV has yet to be characterized during clinical commissioning. We aim to characterize the 250-MeV proton beam from the Varian ProBeam system for FLASH and assess the usability of the clinical monitoring ionization chamber (MIC) for FLASH use. We measured the following data for beam commissioning: integral depth dose curve, spot sigma, and absolute dose. To evaluate the MIC, we measured output as a function of beam current. To characterize a 250 MeV FLASH beam, we measured (1) the central axis DR as a function of current and spot spacing and arrangement, (2) for a fixed spot spacing, the maximum field size that achieves FLASH DR (ie, > 40 Gy/s), and (3) DR reproducibility. All FLASH DR measurements were performed using an ion chamber for the absolute dose, and irradiation times were obtained from log files. We verified dose measurements using EBT-XD films and irradiation times using a fast, pixelated spectral detector. R90 and R80 from integral depth dose were 37.58 and 37.69 cm, and spot sigma at the isocenter were σx = 3.336 and σy = 3.332 mm, respectively. The absolute dose output was measured as 0.343 Gy*mm2/MU for the commissioning conditions. Output was stable for beam currents up to 15 nA and gradually increased to 12-fold for 115 nA. Dose and DR depended on beam current, spot spacing, and arrangement and could be reproduced with 6.4% and 4.2% variations, respectively. Although FLASH was achieved and the largest field size that delivers FLASH DR was determined as 35 × 35 mm2, the current MIC has DR dependence, and users should measure dose and DR independently each time for their FLASH applications.

Modification of Commercial Radiotherapy System for Ultra-High Dose Rate Electron Beam Irradiation

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> Because electron generation in X-ray mode needs to be about 1000 times more than electron beam mode, modifying commercial radiotherapy system make it possible to irradiate with ultra-high dose rate. This study aimed to show the feasibility of ultra-high dose rate irradiation using a commercial linear accelerator. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> Removing targets and flattening filters, adjusting source-surface-distance (SSD), and controlling RF driver and electron gun were performed in Simens Oncor® and Varian Clinac iX® radiotherapy system. The irradiation time was adjusted in microseconds through the Arduino-based gating system, and dose rate was confirmed with EBT3 and EBT-XD films. <h3>Results</h3> In 6 MV X-ray mode of Siemens® system, 100.9±3.78 Gy/s electron beam was irradiated at SSD of 60cm. After modifying 10MV X-ray mode in Varian® radiotherapy system, dose rate was 43.1Gy/s at SSD of 100cm. By manually controlling the parameters of the RF driver and electron gun, 318 Gy/s rate of electron beam was irradiated within 15 × 15 cm² of irradiation field at SSD of 100cm. Acquired ultra-high dose rate electron beam exhibits the following characteristics at SSD of 100cm with full opened jaw irradiation: R₅₀ 4.1cm, W₈₀ 9.8cm (vertical) and 9.3cm (horizontal). <h3>Conclusion</h3> We confirmed that FLASH irradiation was feasible by modifying a commercial radiotherapy system, which made further research possible.

Electron ultra-high dose rate FLASH irradiation study using a clinical linac: Linac modification, dosimetry, and radiobiological outcome.

Ultra-high dose rate FLASH irradiation (FLASH-IR) has been shown to cause less normal tissue damage compared with conventional irradiation (CONV-IR), this is known as the "FLASH effect." It has attracted immense research interest because its underlying mechanism is scarcely known. The purpose of this study was to determine whether FLASH-IR and CONV-IR induce differential inflammatory cytokine expression using a modified clinical linac. An Elekta Synergy linac was used to deliver 6 MeV CONV-IR and modified to deliver FLASH-IR. Female FvB mice were randomly assigned to three different groups: a non-irradiated control, CONV-IR, or FLASH-IR. The FLASH-IR beam was produced by single pulses repeated manually with a 20-s interval (Strategy 1), or single-trigger multiple pulses with a 10 ms interval (Strategy 2). Mice were immobilized in the prone position in a custom-designed applicator with Gafchromic films positioned under the body. The prescribed doses for the mice were 6 to 18 Gy and verified using Gafchromic films. Cytokine expression of three pro-inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-α [TNF-α], interferon-γ [IFN-γ], interleukin-6 [IL-6]) and one anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL-10) in serum samples and skin tissue were examined within 1 month post-IR. The modified linac delivered radiation at an intra-pulse dose rate of around 1 × 106 Gy/s and a dose per pulse over 2 Gy at a source-to-surface distance (SSD) of 13 to 15 cm. The achieved dose coverage was 90%-105% of the maximum dose within -20 to 20 mm in the X direction and 95% within -30 to 30 mm in the Y direction. The absolute deviations between the prescribed dose and the actual dose were 2.21%, 6.04%, 2.09%, and 2.73% for 6, 9, 12, and 15 Gy as measured by EBT3 films, respectively; and 4.00%, 4.49%, and 2.30% for 10, 14, and 18 Gy as measured by the EBT XD films, respectively. The reductions in the CONV-IR versus the FLASH-IR group were 4.89%, 10.28%, -7.8%, and -22.17% for TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-6, and IL-10 in the serum on D6, respectively; 37.26%, 67.16%, 56.68%, and -18.95% in the serum on D31, respectively; and 62.67%, 35.65%, 37.75%, and -12.20% for TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-6, and IL-10 in the skin tissue, respectively. Ultra-high dose rate electron FLASH caused lower pro-inflammatory cytokine levels in serum and skin tissue which might mediate differential tissue damage between FLASH-IR and CONV-IR.

Comparative study of SRS end-to-end QA processes of a diode array device and an anthropomorphic phantom loaded with GafChromic XD film.

PurposeEnd‐to‐end testing (E2E) is a necessary process for assessing the readiness of the stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) program and annual QA of an SRS system according to the AAPM MPPG 9a. This study investigates the differences between using a new SRS MapCHECK (SRSMC) system and an anthropomorphic phantom film‐based system in a large network with different SRS delivery techniques.Methods and materialsThree SRS capable Linacs (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) at three different regional sites were chosen to represent a hospital network, a Trilogy with an M120 multi‐leaf collimator (MLC), a TrueBeam with an M120 MLC, and a TrueBeam Stx with an HD120 MLC. An anthropomorphic STEEV phantom (CIRS, Norfolk, VA) and a phantom/diode array: StereoPHAN/SRSMC (Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, FL) were CT scanned at each site. The new STV‐PHANTOM EBT‐XD films (Ashland, Bridgewater, NJ) were used. Six plans with various complexities were measured with both films and SRSMC in the StereoPHAN to establish their dosimetric correlations. Three SRS cranial plans with a total of sixteen fields using dynamic conformal arc and volumetric‐modulated arc therapy, with 1–4 targets, were planned with Eclipse v15.5 treatment planning system (TPS) using a custom SRS beam model for each machine. The dosimetric and localization accuracy were compared. The time of analysis for the two systems by three teams of physicists was also compared to assess the throughput efficiency.ResultsThe correlations between films and SRSMC were found to be 0.84 (p = 0.03) and 0.16 (p = 0.76) for γ (3%, 1 mm) and γ (3%, 2 mm), respectively. With film, the local dose differences (ΔD) relative to the average dose within the 50% isodose line from the three sites were found to be −3.2%–3.7%. The maximum localization errors (Elocal) were found to be within 0.5 ± 0.2 mm. With SRSMC, the ΔD was found to be within 5% of the TPS calculation. Elocal were found to be within 0.7 to 1.1 ± 0.4 mm for TrueBeam and Trilogy, respectively. Comparing with film, an additional uncertainty of 0.7 mm was found with SRSMC. The delivery and analysis times were found to be 6 and 2 h for film and SRSMC, respectively.ConclusionsThe SRS MapCHECK agrees dosimetrically with the films within measurement uncertainties. However, film dosimetry shows superior sub‐millimeter localization resolving power for the MPPG 9a implementation.

Adaptation and dosimetric commissioning of a synchrotron-based proton beamline for FLASH experiments

Objective. Irradiation with ultra-high dose rates (>40 Gy s−1), also known as FLASH irradiation, has the potential to shift the paradigm of radiation therapy because of its reduced toxicity to normal tissues compared to that of conventional irradiations. The goal of this study was to (1) achieve FLASH irradiation conditions suitable for pre-clinical i n vitro and in vivo biology experiments using our synchrotron-based proton beamline and (2) commission the FLASH irradiation conditions achieved. Approach. To achieve these suitable FLASH conditions, we made a series of adaptations to our proton beamline, including modifying the spill length and size of accelerating cycles, repurposing the reference monitor for dose control, and expanding the field size with a custom double-scattering system. We performed the dosimetric commissioning with measurements using an Advanced Markus chamber and EBT-XD films as well as with Monte Carlo simulations. Main results. Through adaptations, we have successfully achieved FLASH irradiation conditions, with an average dose rate of up to 375 Gy s−1. The Advanced Markus chamber was shown to be appropriate for absolute dose calibration under our FLASH conditions with a recombination factor ranging from 1.002 to 1.006 because of the continuous nature of our synchrotron-based proton delivery within a spill. Additionally, the absolute dose measured using the Advanced Markus chamber and EBT-XD films agreed well, with average and maximum differences of 0.32% and 1.63%, respectively. We also performed a comprehensive temporal analysis for FLASH spills produced by our system, which helped us identify a unique relationship between the average dose rate and the dose in our FLASH irradiation. Significance. We have established a synchrotron-based proton FLASH irradiation platform with accurate and precise dosimetry that is suitable for pre-clinical biology experiments. The unique time structure of the FLASH irradiation produced by our synchrotron-based system may shed new light onto the mechanism behind the FLASH effect.

Technical note: Characterization and practical applications of a novel plastic scintillator for online dosimetry for an ultrahigh dose rate (FLASH).

Although flash radiation therapy (FLASH-RT) is a promising novel technique that has the potential to achieve a better therapeutic ratio between tumor control and normal tissue complications, the ultrahigh pulsed dose rates (UHPDR) mean that experimental dosimetry is very challenging. There is a need for real-time dosimeters in the development and implementation of FLASH-RT. In this work, we characterize a novel plastic scintillator capable of temporal resolution short enough (2.5ms) to resolve individual pulses. We characterized a novel plastic dosimeter for use in a linac converter to deliver 16-MeV electrons at 100-Gy/s UHPDR average dose rates. The linearity and reproducibility were established by comparing relative measurements with a pinpoint ionization chamber placed at 10-cm water-equivalent depth where the electrometer is not saturated by the high dose per pulse. The accuracy was established by comparing the plastic scintillator dose measurements with EBT-XD Gafchromic radiochromic films, the current reference dosimeter for UHPDR. Finally, the plastic scintillator was compared against EBT-XD films for online dosimetry of two in vitro experiments performed at UHPDR. Relative ion chamber measurements were linear with plastic scintillator response within ≤1% over 4-20Gy and pulse frequencies (18-180Hz). When characterized under reference conditions with NIST-traceability, the plastic scintillator maintained its dose response under UHPDR conditions and agreed with EBT-XD film dose measurements within 4% under reference conditions and 6% for experimental online dosimetry. The plastic scintillator shows a linear and reproducible response and is able to accurately measure the radiation absorbed dose delivered by 16-MeV electrons at UHPDR. The dose is measured accurately in real time with a greater level of precision than that achieved with a radiochromic film.

Technical note: Proton beam dosimetry at ultra-high dose rates (FLASH): Evaluation of GAFchromic™ (EBT3, EBT-XD) and OrthoChromic (OC-1) film performances.

The ARRONAX cyclotron facility offers the possibility to deliver proton beams from low to ultra-high dose rates (UHDR). As a good control of the dosimetry is a prerequisite of UHDR experimentations, we evaluated in different conditions the usability and the dose rate dependency of several radiochromic films commonly used for dosimetry in radiotherapy. We compared the dose rate dependency of three types of radiochromic films: GAFchromic™ EBT3 and GAFchromic™ EBT-XD (Ashland Inc., Wayne, NJ, USA), and OrthoChromic OC-1 (OrthoChrome Inc., Hillsborough, NJ, USA), after proton irradiations at various mean dose rates (0.25, 40, 1500, and 7500Gy/s) and for 10 doses (2-130Gy). We also evaluated the dose rate dependency of each film considering beam structures, from single pulse to multiple pulses with various frequencies. EBT3 and EBT-XD films showed differences of response between conventional (0.25Gy/s) and UHDR (7500Gy/s) conditions, above 10Gy. On the contrary, OC-1 films did not present overall difference of response for doses except below 3Gy. We observed an increase of the netOD with the mean dose rate for EBT3 and EBT-XD films. OC-1 films did not show any impact of the mean dose rate up to 7500Gy/s, above 3Gy. No difference was found based on the beam structure, for all three types of films. EBT3 and EBT-XD radiochromic films should be used with caution for the dosimetry of UHDR proton beams over 10Gy. Their overresponse, which increases with mean dose rate and dose, could lead to non-negligible overestimations of the absolute dose. OC-1 films are dose rate independent up to 7500Gy/s in proton beams. Films response is not impacted by the beam structure. A broader investigation of the usability of OC-1 films in UHDR conditions should be conducted at intermediate and higher mean dose rates and other beam energies.

DOSE MAPPING OF GAMMA IRRADIATION CHAMBER (GIC)

The use of gamma rays to irradiate blood products have been demonstrated to reduce the probability of post-transfusion graft versus host disease. The aim of this study is to investigate the accuracy of a new batch of Gafchromic EBT-XD films to map the homogeneity of gamma radiation dose delivered to the blood bags and identify the lowest and highest levels of radiation exposure to the blood. The Gammacell 3000 Elan Gamma irradiation chamber (GIC) @ Blood Irradiator with Cesium-137 source was used. During the gamma irradiation at an exposure of 8 minutes 51 seconds to deliver a central dose of 25 Gy to the film, the EBT-XD films were placed at the centre of a blood-equivalent phantom. The doses then were measured using dose mapping analysis of Gafchromic EBT-XD film. The responses of EBT-XD films were compared with EBT3 films and GS 300 Dose Mapping Report 2021 prepared by Best Theratronics Dosimetry Laboratory, Canada. Results showed the value of doses obtained from the mapping using EBT-XD were reliable compared with the doses measured in EBT3 film as they were in the range of the acceptable dose ranges for blood irradiation procedures. The mapping with EBT-XD film yielded a minimum dosage of 18 Gy and a maximum exposure of 32 Gy at 8 minutes 51 seconds of irradiation. In conclusion, EBT-XD offered excellent dosimetric characteristics and has a the potential to dose map the blood irradiator.

The accuracy of helium ion CT based particle therapy range prediction: an experimental study comparing different particle and x-ray CT modalities

This work provides a quantitative assessment of helium ion CT (HeCT) for particle therapy treatment planning. For the first time, HeCT based range prediction accuracy in a heterogeneous tissue phantom is presented and compared to single-energy x-ray CT (SECT), dual-energy x-ray CT (DECT) and proton CT (pCT). HeCT and pCT scans were acquired using the US pCT collaboration prototype particle CT scanner at the Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center. SECT and DECT scans were done with a Siemens Somatom Definition Flash and converted to RSP. A Catphan CTP404 module was used to study the RSP accuracy of HeCT. A custom phantom of 20 cm diameter containing several tissue equivalent plastic cubes was used to assess the spatial resolution of HeCT and compare it to DECT. A clinically realistic heterogeneous tissue phantom was constructed using cranial slices from a pig head placed inside a cylindrical phantom (ø150 mm). A proton beam (84.67 mm range) depth-dose measurement was acquired using a stack of GafchromicTM EBT-XD films in a central dosimetry insert in the phantom. CT scans of the phantom were acquired with each modality, and proton depth-dose estimates were simulated based on the reconstructions. The RSP accuracy of HeCT for the plastic phantom was found to be 0.3 ± 0.1%. The spatial resolution for HeCT of the cube phantom was 5.9 ± 0.4 lp cm−1 for central, and 7.6 ± 0.8 lp cm−1 for peripheral cubes, comparable to DECT spatial resolution (7.7 ± 0.3 lp cm−1 and 7.4 ± 0.2 lp cm−1, respectively). For the pig head, HeCT, SECT, DECT and pCT predicted range accuracy was 0.25%, −1.40%, −0.45% and 0.39%, respectively. In this study, HeCT acquired with a prototype system showed potential for particle therapy treatment planning, offering RSP accuracy, spatial resolution, and range prediction accuracy comparable to that achieved with a commercial DECT scanner. Still, technical improvements of HeCT are needed to enable clinical implementation.

Comparison of Dose–Response Curves between EBT-XD and EBT3 Radiochromic Films at High Dose Range (2000–4500 cGy) for a 175 MeV Proton Beam

Comparison of Dose–Response Curves between EBT-XD and EBT3 Radiochromic Films at High Dose Range (2000–4500 cGy) for a 175 MeV Proton Beam

PO-1622 A comparison between Gafchromic EBT3 and EBT-XD films for pre-treatment QA of SBRT/SRS plans

PO-1622 A comparison between Gafchromic EBT3 and EBT-XD films for pre-treatment QA of SBRT/SRS plans

Validating Acuros XB with heterogeneous phantoms: can film orientation have an impact?

The aim of this study was to measure doses using films placed parallel and perpendicular to a 6MV radiation beam in heterogeneous phantoms, and to compare these doses to those calculated using the dose calculation algorithms Acuros XB and Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA). A heterogeneous slab phantom composed of SB5 bone equivalent material sandwiched between WTe solid water, and another composed of cork between WTe solid water were studied. Dose measurements were carried out using Gafchromic EBT-3 and EBT-XD films placed parallel to the radiation beam through the centre of the phantom setup. Each film was then placed perpendicular to the beam, at four depths along the beam axis, with a similar method reported by Delbaere et al. Each phantom was CT scanned and a 3x3cm2 beam was calculated using Acuros XB dose-to-medium/ dose-to-water and AAA. The results showed agreement between the film measurements and dose calculations in the solid water and cork regions of the phantoms. However, deviations were observed in the bone where vertical film measurements agreed with doses calculated by Acuros dose-to-water, whereas horizontal film measurements agreed with AAA calculations. Horizontal and vertical film doses differed by up to 8%. Acuros dose-to-medium calculations were not in agreement with either film orientation. In conclusion, the orientation of the film when measuring the dose delivered by a radiation beam does have an impact on the measured dose. However, for the horizontal film measurements there were air gaps on either side of the film which may have affected the results.Reference: Delbaere A, Younes T, Vieillevigne L. On the conversion from dose-to-medium to dose-to-water in heterogeneous phantoms with Acuros XB and Monte Carlo calculations. Phys Med Biol. 2019 Oct;64.