REVIEWS 757 known about such attemptswhich were, in any case, renderedperipheralby the Pilsudski-ite'Doctrine of the Two Enemies' and other exigencies of that period. Bokajlo'sequally ill-focused and overlong paper also adds very little that is intrinsicallynew, in this case about the federalismassociated with the old Polish-LithuanianCommonwealth, J6zef Pilsudski'sideas, and with the weakly-definednotions of a Mitteleuropa entertained for a time by sections of the Polish socialistand nationalistmovements. The volume is rounded off by Jurgen Elverts'sratherflat account, based directlyon his earlierpublications, of how the original nineteenth-century concept of a German-led Central EuropeanFederationwas subsequentlycommandeeredby right-wingintellectualsand eventuallyincorporatedby the Third Reich into itsracist-imperialist foreignpolicy. However interesting and significantideas of European unity and the like are, it must be remembered that until 1945 they were marginalized intellectually and politically by the steamroller of an increasingly militant, intolerant nationalism, especially from about i890 onwards, and by its corollary, the emergence of the self-conscious nation-state, which was exemplified during the interwaryears by, among others, Weimar Germany and the Second Polish Republic. It is that proper, wider perspectivewhich is lacking in most of this volume, whose limited scope, moreover, cannot reasonably be expected to address wholly satisfactorilya topic -'United Europe' of such complexity and magnitude. TheCentrefor Research inPolishHistory PETER D. STACHURA University ofStirling Berend, Ivan T. Histogy Derailed.Central andEastern Europe in theLong Nineteenth Century. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA, and London, 2003. xx + 330 pp. Maps. Illustrations. Bibliography. Index. $39.95: /27.95. MORE than two decades ago, two Hungarian scholars,the late Gyorgi Ranki and Ivan Berendpublishedtwo studies,in English,on economic development and backwardness in Central and Eastern Europe (Underdevelopment and Economic Growth, Budapest, I979 and TheEuropean Periphegy andIndustrialization, Cambridge, I982). They were among the few booksfrom Communist Europe which merged easilyinto the mainstreamof Westernhistoriography. The study under review was written by Professor Berend alone: after a distinguishedcareer in Budapest (he was Rector of the Karl Marx University and then President of the Academy of Sciences), he now works at the Universityof California.The book dealswith the long nineteenth centuryand the short Eastern Europe. Russia makes brief appearances:the lands under Habsburgruleas well as the Balkansstandat the book'scentre. ProfessorBerend argues that the main goal of the Eastern nations was to join the 'civilized', that is, Western Europe. The economic, cultural and political life of the region was dominated by that objective and 'fundamental nationalism' (p. 235) was the preferred instrumentfor its achievement. The process often involved aggression abroad or police terror at home, and the 758 SEER, 82, 3, 2004 development of extreme right- and left-wing populism pointed to the revolutionsto come. The complexjigsaw puzzle assembledbyBerendcontains some dazzlingpieces depicting,for example, the historyof music harnessedto the national cause, or the story of the delayed revolution in agriculture.The argument concerning the 'core' and the 'peripheral' regions in Europe (Berend's Eastern Europe contains a similar core region, the AustrianBohemian territory) is carefully developed and skilfully deployed. It is a perspectivewhich is shaped by the development theories of the I96os, and it isbroughtinto a somewhat sharperfocusby the fallof Communismin Eastern Europe. The strengthof theWesternmagnet, however, deniesanykindof autonomy in the historicaldevelopment of the region. Its German description,Zwischeneuropa , helps to change the perspective. Froma periphery,the region emerges as the object of long-term and fierce contests, and not between Germany and Russia alone. It is a borderland,with militaryfrontiers,fortresses,privileged standing armies. The Habsburg military frontiers were turned against the Balkans and were still in place in the nineteenth century; as late as the eighteenth century, new militaryfortresstowns were establisheddeep in the hinterland of the Habsburg state. The consequences of such a strenuous military past were by no means negligible: it may be that some of Berend's 'parasitic landlords' had a distinguished military ancestry or, that later, 'barrackssocialism'derivedfrom the common usagesof the contested region. In the West, Berend points out, the state helped to create the nation, whereas in the East -including Germany and Italy the nation was expected to form the state.In the multi-nationalempiresof the East,however, the state also had the capacity profoundly to affect the future of nations. In Austria...
Read full abstract