0 NE OF THE oldest surgicaI procedures for sustaining Iife under emergency conditions is that of tracheostomy; we find it first mentioned by AscIepiades of Dithyma in 124 B.C. [I]. There is further mention of this operation in the days of Pompeii by a daring and capabIe surgeon, PauI of Agenia in 6go A.D. [2]. Coming to somewhat more modern times, Armond Trousseau was the first to perform tracheostomy in Paris, and for his brilIiant treatise on the subject, he received the coveted prize of the Academy of Medicine [3]. This procedure proved to be of such worth that American physicians were rapid to adopt its use and a number of pioneers in this country are listed in our historica writings. With this ancient background, it is obvious that the operation is no new story in medicine, nor is it our intention to suggest anything that might Iead to a comphcation of the simpIe methods of this very oId operation of opening the windpipe. Recent experience, however, pfompted the recording of present day uses of a modaIity sometimes considered appIicabIe onIy ih the direst of emergencies, as a Iast gasp procedure. The experience of ourseIves and many others [4-71 in the past decade does in no way suggest that “something new had been added,” but rather that “something oId has been expanded.” The broader use of tracheostomy in situations more Iifesustaining rather than actuaIIy Iife-saving seems worthy of consideration. The performance of this operation in the hospita1 bed, x-ray department, or in areas otherwise not surgicaIIy adapted seems to us rareIy necessary. We are not inclined to agree with recent reports in which the favored IocaIe was at the bedside [8]. Signs, symptoms and prodroma1 warnings are suffIcientIy we11 estabhshed to permit ampIe time for forma1 scheduIing of this operation in the surgica1 amphitheater where the operation can be done under idea1 surroundings and with the frequentIy needed support of our anesthesioIogy coIIeagues. This phiIosophic attitude with reference to respiratory probIems of this type admittedIy pIays a major roIe in surgica1 judgment and in the handIing of each individual patient. If, in our consuItative evaIuation of a given case, tracheostomy is a subconscious suggestion, in most instances evidence is probabIy sufficient to warrant immediate pIanned surgery. It is with these precepts in mind that we wouId Iike to present this cIinica1 experience. Our series incIudes that of the writers, thoracic surgica1 attendings, genera1 surgeons and residents in hospitaIs Iocated throughout the greater East Bay Area. These procedures were performed during a five year period from JuIy 1957 through June 1962 and totaIIed 461 cases. TabIe I, Iists the indications for which tracheostomy was performed in this series. The deaths, al1 but five of which were beIieved due to the underlying pathoIogy, wiII be discussed Iater.