Abstract Background Guselkumab (GUS), a dual-acting interleukin-23p19 subunit inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy and safety in participants (pts) with moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease (CD) in the global Phase 3 GALAXI 2 & 3 (G2 & G3) studies.1 We report a subgroup analysis of GUS efficacy and safety in East Asian pts from G2 & G3. Methods G2 & G3 (NCT03466411) are identical 48-week, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo (PBO)- and active comparator- (ustekinumab; UST) controlled treat-through trials assessing the efficacy and safety of GUS in pts with CD (Figure 1).1 Pts with moderately to severely active CD (Crohn’s Disease Activity Index [CDAI] 220–450 and either mean daily stool frequency [SF]>3 or abdominal pain [AP]>1), Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease (SES-CD) ≥6 (≥4 for isolated ileal disease), and inadequate response or intolerance to conventional or biologic therapy were randomised 2:2:2:1 to the following induction→maintenance regimens: GUS 200 mg intravenous (IV) every 4 weeks (q4w) (x3)→100 mg subcutaneous (SC) every 8 weeks (q8w), GUS 200 mg IV q4w (x3)→200 mg SC q4w, UST ~6 mg/kg IV→90 mg SC q8w, or PBO. PBO pts not in clinical response at Week (W)12 switched to UST. Composite co-primary endpoints for both studies were (1) clinical response at W12 + clinical remission at W48 and (2) clinical response at W12 + endoscopic response at W48, comparing each GUS regimen to PBO. This subgroup analysis included G2 and G3 pts from study sites located in East Asia (China, Japan, Korea, and Taiwan). Results The East Asian subgroups included 98 G2 and 94 G3 pts. Greater proportions of G2 & G3 pts in both GUS SC maintenance dose cohorts achieved the composite co-primary efficacy endpoints relative to PBO (Figure 2). In pooled analysis of G2 & G3 in 192 pts, proportions of pts with ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE)/serious TEAE through W48 were 87.3%/11.1% in the GUS 200 mg IV→100 mg SC q8w cohort, 90.2%/7.8% in the GUS 200 mg IV→200 mg SC q4w cohort, 71.9%/15.6% for PBO pts, and 89.1%/13.0% among UST pts. Corresponding rates of infections/serious infections were 57.1%/0 in the GUS 100 mg SC q8w cohort, 54.9%/0 in the GUS 200 mg SC q4w cohort, 25.0%/6.3% for PBO, and 52.2%/4.3% for UST. Conclusion Efficacy of GUS in the subgroup of East Asian pts from G2 & G3 was consistent with that observed in the global study population. The safety profile of GUS was also favourable and consistent with previous reports. This study was supported by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC.
Read full abstract