This research examines the role of status quo bias in shaping monetary policy decision-making during the 2008 financial crisis, focusing on the responses of the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank (ECB). Status quo bias, a cognitive bias that leads individuals and institutions to resist change, often results in delayed decisions and sub-optimal outcomes. This study employs a comparative case study methodology, analyzing the timing and nature of central bank interventions, such as interest rate cuts and quantitative easing during the crisis. By systematically reviewing policy actions and utilizing qualitative content analysis, the research identifies how status quo bias contributed to delayed responses and inadequate adjustments. The findings indicate that while the Federal Reserve, despite initial hesitation, quickly implemented unconventional measures that helped stabilize the U.S. economy, the ECB's adherence to traditional frameworks led to critical delays, resulting in a slower recovery in the Eurozone. These insights underscore the significant influence of cognitive biases on monetary policy, with implications for future crisis management strategies. Addressing the effects of status quo bias could lead to more agile and adaptive central banking policies, ultimately enhancing economic resilience during times of crisis.
Read full abstract