Early Urinary Catheter Removal Research Articles

Enhanced recovery after surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Few publications in the literature examine enhanced recovery after scoliosis surgery (ERAS) in children, despite significant scientific interest in adults. The objective of the current study was to describe an ERAS protocol for surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and its results. ERAS outcomes were measured in two patient cohorts. Historical controls and ERAS groups were selected from patients managed for scoliosis surgery in 2015 and 2018, respectively. The ERAS protocol included fasting minimization, carbohydrate loading, the avoidance of background morphine infusions, perioperative opioid-sparing protocols, the use of a cooling brace, early physiotherapy, feeding and oral medications, and the early removal of urinary catheters and surgical drains. The main outcome of the study was hospital length of stay. Overall, 82 controls and 81 ERAS patients were recruited. ERAS protocols were observed in over 80% of patients for almost items. Median length of hospital stay was significantly lower in the ERAS group (- 3 [95% confidence interval: -2; -4] days). Median morphine consumption was reduced by 25% and 35% on days 2 and 3, respectively. The incidence of PONV did not differ between the two groups, and the incidence of constipation decreased slightly but significantly in the ERAS group on day 2. Pain intensity at rest and movement were lower in the ERAS group at day 2 and 3. The current study suggests an ERAS protocol after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery is associated with reduced hospital length of stay and improved postoperative care.

Feasibility of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway for major head and neck oncologic surgery.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are gaining traction in the field of head and neck surgery following success in other specialties. Various institutions have reported on the feasibility of implementation and early outcomes in their centers. We report our experience of setting up an ERAS program in a high-volume tertiary cancer care center, including the challenges faced and overcome. With multidisciplinary input, an ERAS protocol was developed consisting of pre-, intra-, and post-operative interventions based on current evidence. We then assessed an initial series of 104 patients on the ERAS protocol and tracked the compliance rates for various interventions. Compliance rates to interventions including pre-operative medication (84.6%), multimodal analgesia (84.6%95.1%), early removal of urinary catheters (76.0%) and early mobilization (56.7%) show a wide variation. However, response rates in the assessment of patient-reported outcomes are low. We discuss factors surrounding the feasibility of implementing an ERAS protocol and tracking outcomes in a diverse, high volume center. While there are challenges in implementation, results indicate that a successful ERAS pathway in major head and neck oncologic surgery is feasible. Engaging shareholders and making full use of technology in the form of electronic medical systems are essential to this success. ERAS pathways should be encouraged in head and neck surgery, given their proven feasibility in a range of institutions. Further study is needed to confirm this program's impact on outcomes.

Early removal of indwelling urinary catheter after radical surgery for early-stage cervical cancer-A cohort study.

To evaluate the difference between early and delayed removal of indwelling urinary catheter after radical hysterectomy (RH) or radical trachelectomy (RT). An ambispective study was conducted in early-stage cervical cancer patients who underwent RH or RT. Delayed indwelling urinary catheter removal occurred on a postoperative day (POD) 7 in the retrospective group (January 2012-November 2013), and early removal occurred on POD 1 in the prospective group (May 2014-June 2017).The postvoid residual (PVR) test was performed after indwelling catheter removal in both groups. Our sample included 47 patients in the delayed group and 48 in the early one. There was no difference in age, body mass index, tumor size, histology, stage, surgical approach, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. Indwelling urinary catheter reinsertion was needed in 16 (34%) patients in the delayed group and 12 (25%) in the early group (P = .37), with no statistical difference between the median PVR volumes -82.5 and 45 mL (P = .06), respectively. Seven (14.9%) patients in the delayed group presented with 30-day urinary tract infection vs two (4.2%) in the early group (P = .09). Early indwelling urinary catheter removal, in regard to the rate of catheter reinsertion and PVR volume, does not differ from delayed removal.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in gynecologic oncology: an international survey of peri-operative practice

IntroductionEnhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs have been shown to improve clinical outcomes in gynecologic oncology, with the majority of published reports originating from a small number of specialized centers....

Outcomes after Early versus Delayed Urinary Bladder Catheter Removal after Proctectomy for Benign and Malignant Disease in 2,429 Patients: An Observational Cohort Study.

Background: There currently is no standard practice for optimal urinary catheter removal after rectal resection (proctectomy). Delayed removal may increase urinary tract infection risk, an important hospital quality metric. This study aimed to assess the effect of catheter duration on urinary tract infection rate. We hypothesized that early removal would be associated with fewer infections. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent proctectomy from January 2007 to December 2017 with urinary catheter placement in our colorectal surgery department. The main outcome measures were urinary tract infection, post-operative urinary retention, and length of stay. Patients were divided into early (post-operative day one or two) and late (day three or later) removal groups. Results: A series of 2,429 patients were included; 1,176 in the early and 1,253 in the late group. The early group had a shorter median length of stay (5.26 versus 7 days). The urinary tract infection (n = 77) multivariable logistic regression model showed no association between timing of removal and infection; however, females had more infections (odds ratio [OR] 2.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.65-4.41). The post-operative urinary retention model (n = 280) showed no association between the timing of removal and retention; however, patients who underwent pre-operative radiation (OR 1.55; 95% CI 1.15-2.09) or total proctocolectomy (OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.21-2.49) or were male (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.02-1.78) were more likely to have retention. When analyzed by specific removal day, each one-day delay in removal increased the odds of infection by 21% (OR 1.21; 95% CI 1.09-1.35] and decreased the odds of retention by 12% (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.80-0.97] with a cross-over at 9 days. Patients who experienced retention were not more likely to have infection. Conclusion: Early urinary catheter removal after proctectomy was associated with a lower urinary tract infection rate and a shorter hospital stay.

Impact of Enhanced Recovery Pathways and early urinary catheter removal on post-operative urinary retention

BackgroundPost-operative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication after colorectal surgery. Enhanced recovery pathways (ERP) typically include early catheter removal but may place patients at risk for POUR. MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort analysis of patients undergoing colorectal surgery at a single institution between April 2014 and November 2017. Patients were stratified into non-ERP and ERP cohorts and post-operative outcomes were compared. ResultsOf 284 patients studied, ERP was applied to 161 (57%) while the remaining 123 (43%) recovered under standard care. Median duration of indwelling Foleys was 1 day for ERP and 2 days for non-ERP patients (p < 0.001). ERP patients experienced higher rates of straight catheterization (22% vs 12%,p = 0.036), Foley reinsertion (14% vs 7%,p = 0.07), and initiation of alpha antagonists (12% vs 5%,p = 0.04). Significant independent predictors of POUR were age (OR 1.03, p = 0.002), male gender (OR 2.79, p = 0.001), surgery duration (OR 1.27, p = 0.027), and ERP (OR 1.96, p = 0.025). ConclusionERP following colorectal surgery that include routine early Foley catheter removal on post-operative day one is associated with increased rates of POUR; however, this did not lead to increased rates of catheter-associated urinary tract infections during the index admission in the population studied.

Early urinary catheter removal after rectal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BackgroundUrinary catheters are placed after rectal surgery to prevent urinary retention, but prolonged use may increase the risk of urinary tract infection (UTI). This review evaluated the non‐inferiority of early urinary catheter removal compared with late removal for acute urinary retention risk after rectal surgery.MethodsMEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from January 1980 to February 2019. RCTs comparing early versus late catheter removal after rectal surgery were eligible. Primary outcomes were acute urinary retention and UTI; the secondary outcome was length of hospital stay. Early catheter removal was defined as removal up to 2 days after surgery, with late removal after postoperative day 2. The non‐inferiority margin from an included trial was used for analysis of change in urinary retention (ΔNI = 15 per cent). Pooled estimates of risk differences (RDs) were derived from random‐effects models. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Cochrane risk‐of‐bias tool.ResultsFour trials were included, consisting of 409 patients. There was insufficient evidence to conclude non‐inferiority of early versus late catheter removal for acute urinary retention (RD 9 (90 per cent c.i. −1 to 19) per cent; P NI = 0·31). Early catheter removal was superior for UTI (RD −11 (95 per cent c.i. −17 to −4) per cent; P = 0·001). Results for length of stay were mixed. There were insufficient data to conduct subgroup analyses.ConclusionThe existing literature is inconclusive for non‐inferiority of early versus late urinary catheter removal for acute urinary retention. Early catheter removal is superior in terms of reducing the risk of UTI.

Postoperative Complications After Colorectal Surgery: Where Are We in the Era of Enhanced Recovery?

Individual elements in enhanced recovery pathways may be associated with specific complication risks. In this review, we highlight three areas of controversy surrounding complications in enhanced recovery: (1) whether enhanced recovery is associated with increased rates of acute kidney injury, (2) whether NSAID use is associated with anastomotic leaks, and (3) whether early urinary catheter removal is justified following colorectal surgery. Acute kidney injury has been reported at several institutions following implementation of enhanced recovery pathways highlighting the importance of institutional data tracking. NSAID use has been implicated in anastomotic leak rates for non-elective colorectal procedures, and criteria for its use should be implemented. Early urinary catheter removal has been supported despite increased urinary retention rates in order to decrease urinary tract infections. Enhanced recovery protocols will continue to evolve, and risk profiles associated with individual elements should continue to be evaluated.

Removal of a urinary catheter before discontinuation of epidural analgesia is associated with an increased risk of postoperative urinary retention and hospital episode costs in patients undergoing surgical correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

In adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients undergoing posterior spinal instrumented fusion (PSIF), we aimed to answer these questions: (1) is there a difference in postoperative urinary retention (UR) rates among patients who had removal of their Foley catheters before vs. after discontinuation of epidural analgesia (EA)? (2) Can the timing of Foley catheter removal be an independent risk factor for postoperative UR requiring recatheterization? (3) Is there an incurred cost related to treating UR? Retrospective cohort. EA has been widely used for postoperative pain control after PSIF for AIS. In these patients, removing the Foley catheter, inserted for intraoperative monitoring of urine output, is indicated in the early postoperative period. However, a controversy exists as to whether it should be removed before or after the EA has been discontinued. A single-institution, longitudinally maintained database was queried to identify 297 patients who met specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patient characteristics and the order and timing of removing the urinary and epidural catheters were collected. Rates of UR were statistically compared in patients who had early vs. late urinary catheter removal. A univariate and multivariate regression analysis was conducted to identify independent risk factors. Hospital episode costs were analyzed. Patients who had early (n = 66, 22%) vs. late (n = 231, 78%) urinary catheter removal had a significantly higher incidence of UR requiring recatheterization (15 vs. 4.7%, p = 0.007). Patient with early removal were almost 4 times more likely to develop UR requiring recatheterization [odds ratio (OR) 3.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-9.7, p = 0.005]. UR incurred additional costs averaging $15,000/patient (p = 0.204). In patients who had PSIF for AIS, removal of a urinary catheter before discontinuation of EA is an independent risk factor for UR, requiring recatheterization and associated with increased cost. III.

Enhanced Recovery After Intraspinal Tumor Surgery: A Single-Institutional Randomized Controlled Study

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program for intraspinal tumors in a single-institutional prospective randomized controlled trial. A multimodal and multidisciplinary ERAS protocol for intraspinal tumor surgery was developed. A total of 94 enrolled patients were randomized into 2 groups: 48 were managed following the ERAS protocol (ERAS group), and 46 received conventional perioperative care (control group). The primary end point was postoperative length of stay (LOS). The secondary outcomes included postoperative pain score and pain medication use, urinary catheterization, ambulation, mortality, reoperation/readmission rates, complication rates, patient satisfaction, and overall cost. A significant reduction in LOS was achieved in patients undergoing ERAS protocol compared with the controls (5 vs. 8 days; P < 0.0001). Moreover, patients in the ERAS group had better postoperative pain scores (1.0 ± 1.3 vs. 1.9 ± 1.3; P= 0.007), decreased use of patient-controlled analgesia (4.2% vs. 19.6%; P= 0.020) and oral opioid (37.5% vs. 58.7%; P= 0.040), early urinary catheter removal (58.3% vs. 6.5%; P < 0.0001), greater ambulation (68.8% vs. 17.4%; P < 0.0001), and higher satisfaction scores (91.8 ± 4.4 vs. 88.2 ± 6.8; P= 0.022) than did the control group. There were no deaths or 30-day readmission/reoperation in both groups, nor did the postoperative complication rates differ between groups. The ERAS protocol for intraspinal tumor surgery seems to be feasible, effective, and safe in shortening postoperative LOS, improving postoperative pain control with reduced opioid use, and accelerating functional recovery without increasing rates of complications or reoperation/readmission. Adoption of spine ERAS programs could be encouraged in practice, although validation with larger-scale multicenter trials is warranted.

Optimal timing of urinary catheter removal following pelvic colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Acute urinary retention (AUR) is a common postoperative complication in colorectal surgery. In pelvic colorectal operations, the optimal duration for postoperative urinary catheter use is controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare early (POD 1), intermediate (POD 3), and late (POD 5) urinary catheter removal. Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and PubMed databases were searched. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they compared patients with urinary catheter removal on POD 1 or earlier to patients with urinary catheter removal on POD 2 or later in major pelvic colorectal surgeries. The primary outcome was rate of postoperative AUR. The secondary outcome was rates of postoperative urinary tract infection (UTI). From 691 relevant citations, five studies with 928 patients were included. Comparison of urinary catheter removal on POD 1 versus POD 3 demonstrated no significant difference in rate of urinary retention (RR 1.36, 95%CI 0.83-2.21, P = 0.22); however, compared to POD 5, rates of AUR were significantly higher (RR 2.58, 95%CI 1.51-4.40, P = 0.0005). Rates of UTI were not significantly different between POD 1 and POD 3 urinary catheter removal (RR 0.40, 95%CI 0.05-3.71, P = 0.45), but removal on POD 5 significantly increased risk of UTI compared to POD 1 (RR 0.50, 95%CI 0.31-0.81, P = 0.005). Risk of AUR can be minimized with late postoperative urinary catheter removal compared to early removal, but at the cost of increased risk of UTI. Patient-specific factors should be taken into consideration when deciding upon optimal duration of postoperative urinary catheterization.

Early removal of urinary drainage in patients receiving epidural analgesia after colorectal surgery within an ERAS protocol is feasible.

ERAS guidelines recommend early removal of urinary drainage after colorectal surgery to reduce the risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI). Another recommendation is the postoperative use of epidural analgesia (EA). In many types of surgery, EA was shown to increase the risk of postoperative urinary retention (POUR). This study determines the impact of early urinary catheter removal on the incidence of POUR and CAUTI under EA after colorectal surgery. Eligible patients were scheduled for colorectal surgery within the local ERAS protocol between April 2015 and September 2016. Urinary drainage was removed on the first postoperative day while EA was still in place (early removal group (ER)). The incidences of POUR and CAUTIs were recorded prospectively. Results were compared with a historical control (CG), which was operated between October 2013 and March 2015. POUR occurred significantly more often in the ER (ER 7.8%; CG 2.6%), while CAUTIs were significantly less frequent in the ER (13.8%) compared with the CG (30.4%). Patients who developed POUR were characterised by a significantly higher rate of abdominoperineal resections, by a higher frequency of rectal cancer, and a higher male-to-female ratio compared with patients who did not develop POUR. Early removal of urinary drainage after colorectal surgery while EA is still in place is feasible; it reduces the incidence of CAUTI but increases the risk of POUR. Thus, screening for POUR in patients with failure to void after six to 8 h is mandatory under these clinical conditions.

Early removal of catheters in an Enhanced Recovery Pathway (ERP) with intrathecal opioid injection does not affect postoperative urinary outcomes

BackgroundPostoperative urinary retention (POUR) and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) are associated with significantly longer hospital length-of-stay and increased costs.1 This study investigates the effect of early removal of urinary catheters on POUR and CAUTI in patients undergoing an ERP with a preoperative intrathecal injection. MethodsRetrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery in an Enhanced Recovery pathway was compared to historical National Surgical Quality Improvement Program cohort of patients. Primary outcomes measured are 30-day POUR and postoperative CAUTI rates. ResultsThe overall POUR rate of ERP patients compared to non-ERP patients was significantly less (8% vs. 13%, p < 0.05). CAUTI rates were not significantly different between pre-ERP and ERP patients (1.2 vs 2.3%, p = 0.19). ConclusionsFor patients undergoing ERP with a preoperative intrathecal opioid injection, early removal of urinary catheter significantly decreased POUR and did not significantly affect CAUTI rates. SummaryThe effect of early removal of urinary catheters on postoperative urinary retention and catheter-associated UTI rates in patients undergoing an ERP with a single preoperative intrathecal opioid injection was studied. Early urinary catheter removal after intrathecal injection was associated with decreased rates of POUR and equivalent CAUTI rates.

Predictive factors for category II pressure ulcers in older patients with hip fractures: a prospective study.

To identify the incidence of category II or higher hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPU) and significantly associated factors in older patients with hip fractures. PUs are a frequent complication in hip fracture patients, negatively impacting patients' quality of life, the health-care system and society. A prospective cohort study was conducted. A consecutive sample of patients with pertrochanteric, femoral neck or subtrochanteric fractures requiring surgical treatment, were included. A stepwise, multiple regression was performed to identify factors associated with PU development. A total of 761 patients aged ≥65 years were sampled. The incidence of category II or higher PUs was 12%. The study identified five factors that were significantly, independently associated with category II or higher PU development, including a higher preoperative Braden score (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 0.884; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.806-0.969), surgical procedure with osteosynthesis (HR 1.876; 95%CI: 1.183-2.975), a higher percentage of days with the presence of foam valve before surgery (HR: 1.010; 95%CI: 1.010-1.023) and a urinary catheter (HR: 1.013; 95%CI: 1.006-1.019) and diaper (HR: 1.007; 95% CI 1.001-1.013) in the postoperative period. Attention should be given by clinical staff to avoiding the use of foam valves, to limiting the use of diapers and to early removal of urinary catheters.

Effects of early removal of urinary catheter on postoperative rehabilitation among patients with gynecological laparoscopy surgery

Objective To explore the effects of early removal of urinary catheter on postoperative rehabilitation among patients with gynecological laparoscopy surgery. Methods From January 2017 to June 2018, we selected 600 patients with gynecological laparoscopy surgery at Jiaxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Zhejiang Province. All of the patients were divided into group of early stage (removal of urinary catheter four hours after surgery) and group of late stage (removal of urinary catheter eight hours after surgery) with the method of random number table, 300 cases in each group. We observed the incidence of urinary tract infection and rehabilitation of patients between two groups. Results The incidences of urinary tract infection of group of early stage and group of late stage were 2.67% and 9.33% respectively with a statistical difference (χ2=11.820, P<0.01) . The hospital stay and time of get out of bed and anus exhaust of group of early stage were shorter than those of group of with statistical differences (P<0.01) . Conclusions Early removal of urinary catheter helps to reduce the incidence of urinary tract infection among patients after gynecological laparoscopy surgery and promote recovery after surgery. Key words: Gynecologic surgical procedures; Laparoscopy; Postoperative rehabilitation; Urinary tract infections; Removal of urinary catheter

Early removal of urinary catheters after colorectal surgery is associated with a low incidence of recatheterization due to urinary retention

Early removal of urinary catheters after colorectal surgery is associated with a low incidence of recatheterization due to urinary retention

Urinary tract infections after early removal of urinary catheter in total joint arthroplasty.

Postoperative urine retention (POUR) is a well-known complication after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). POUR is most commonly managed with an indwelling catheter. However, indwelling catheters have been associated with a substantial risk of urinary tract infection (UTI). The purpose of this study was to (1) evaluate the incidence of UTI and POUR in patient with indwelling urinary catheter after TJA, (2) identify the microorganisms responsible for catheter colonization, and (3) assess preoperative risk factors (gender, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking) associated with catheter colonization. Patients undergoing primary TJA with no preoperative bacteriuria were enrolled. Prior to the draping of the surgical site, each patient received an indwelling catheter that was inserted under sterile conditions and remained in place for 24 hours. Urine and tip catheter cultures were performed after catheter removal. 55 patients (38 females and 17 males) were recruited (26 total knee and 29 total hip arthroplasties). POUR was not reported in any patient, and only 1 patient (1.8%) had UTI. Cultures of catheter tips were positive in 16 patients (29.1%). Only 1 of these patients had a positive urine culture. Enterococcus faecalis was the most common pathogen isolated. None of the preoperative variables was associated with the risk of catheter colonization. Data from this study support early catheter removal after TJA. Predominant catheter-isolated bacteria are enteric species. The culture of a catheter tip specimen should be discouraged for the diagnosis of UTI within the firsts 24 hours after surgery.

Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in pancreatic surgery, critical factors for rapid patient recovery

Background: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is an evidence-based pathway with the purpose of optimizing recovery from surgery and potentially decreasing postoperative pain, reducing complications, and shortening hospital stay. With ERAS implementation multiple variables are changed simultaneously and identification of the factor(s) that drive improvement can be difficult. The aim of this study is to determine which ERAS factors are most impact on length of stay (LOS). Methods: All patients undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) at a quaternary referral center from Jan 2014 to Jun 2018 were identified. Patients were divided in two groups, pre-ERAS and ERAS. For the purposes of this analysis all patients who had minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and vascular reconstructions (VR) were excluded. Perioperative data was collected for clinicopathological features and ERAS adherence. Postoperative data was collected including, length of stay at the hospital (LOS), readmission rate 30 days after surgery, morbidity, and mortality. We used the ERAS guideline’s evidence levels and recommendation grades (Lassen et al) to assign a score for each factor from our institutional ERAS protocol. Factors with the highest scores were identified to form a core group with the most impact. (Table 1) Results: 191 patients underwent PD during this study period. We excluded 87 patients who had 22 MIS, 53 VR, and 12 having both, thus 104 patients were included in this study. Among these patients 56 (54%) were pre–ERAS and 48 (46%) were in the ERAS group. Patients’ median LOS was 10.5 days in pre-ERAS vs 7 days in the ERAS group (p < 0.001). The factors whose adherence was associated with favorable impact on LOS include: IV fluid balance during OR; starting a clear liquid diet POD#1; full liquid diet POD#2 and 3; early removal of urinary catheter (UC) POD#2; starting regular diet POD#4; and continuing regular diet on POD#5. In the ERAS group, the patients who adhered to these factors had a median LOS of 5 days compared to 7 days with statistical trend towards significance. (p = 0.1). Statistical analysis was performed utilizing Student’s T, Mann Whitney U, and Chi Square. Conclusion: The implementation of ERAS principles reduced LOS without harm to the postoperative recovery of patients. Strict fluid balance in the OR, early urinary catheter removal; early liquid intake; and a rapid progression to a regular diet were associated with a decreased LOS. This study showed that

Early Urinary Catheter Removal in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery with an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathway

Early Urinary Catheter Removal in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery with an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathway

Implementation of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Program in Perioperative Management of Gastric Cancer Surgery: a Nationwide Survey in Korea.

PurposeDespite its clinical benefits, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is less widely implemented for gastric cancer surgery. This nationwide survey investigated the current status of the implementation of ERAS in perioperative care for gastric cancer surgery in South Korea.Materials and MethodsThis survey enrolled 89 gastric surgeons from 52 institutions in South Korea. The questionnaire consisted of 24 questions about the implementation of the ERAS protocols in the management of gastric cancer surgery. The survey was carried out using an electronic form sent via email.ResultsOf the 89 gastric surgeons, 58 (65.2%) answered that they have knowledge of the concept and details of ERAS, 45 (50.6%) of whom were currently applying ERAS for their patients. Of the ERAS protocols, preoperative education (91.0%), avoidance of preoperative fasting (68.5%), maintenance of intraoperative normothermia (79.8%), thromboprophylaxis (96.5%), early active ambulation (64.4%), and early removal of urinary catheter (68.5%) were relatively well adopted in perioperative care. However, other practices, such as avoidance of preoperative bowel preparation (41.6%), provision of preoperative carbohydrate-rich drink (10.1%), avoidance of routine abdominal drainage (31.4%), epidural anesthesia (15.9%), single-dose prophylactic antibiotics (19.3%), postoperative high oxygen therapy (36.8%), early postoperative diet (14.6%), restricted intravenous fluid administration (53.9%), and application of discharge criteria (57.3%) were not very well adopted for patients.ConclusionsPerioperative management of gastric cancer surgery is largely heterogeneous among gastric surgeons in South Korea. Standard perioperative care based on scientific evidence needs to be established to improve the quality of surgical care and patient outcomes.