Early-stage Triple-negative Breast Cancer Research Articles

HER2-Low Status Was Associated With Better Breast Cancer-Specific Survival in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Based on the association between the hormone receptor and the status of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low, we investigated the clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics of the HER2-low status in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We collected the data of patients with TNBC who received treatment at our hospital and compared the pathological complete response (pCR) rate, overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) between the HER2-0 and HER2-low subtypes. A total of 1445 patients were included in the study, of which 698 patients (48.3%) showed HER2-low status. A similar pCR rate was observed between HER2-0 and HER2-low patients (34.9% vs. 37.4%; P = .549). T staging, N staging, and HER2 status were associated with BCSS, whereas T staging and N staging were associated with OS. Patients with the HER2-low status showed better BCSS than those with the HER2-0 status (96.6% vs. 93.7%; log-rank P = .027). In patients with non-pCR, the BCSS of the HER2-low subgroup was better than that of the HER2-0 subgroup (log-rank P = .047); however, no similar result was observed in patients with pCR. In patients with stage III, the BCSS and OS of the HER2-low subgroup were better than those of the HER2-0 subgroup (BCSS, log-rank P = .010; OS, log-rank P = .047). No similar results were observed in patients with stages I and II. The HER2-low expression was associated with better BCSS in TNBC, especially in the high-risk groups, suggesting that HER2-low breast cancer is a potential independent biological subtype.

Application value of DNA damage repair variants in adjuvant therapy of triple negative breast cancer

Objective: To investigate the correlation between adjuvant chemotherapy with platinum-containing regimens and DNA damage repair (DDR) defects in early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), and to provide a basis for precise treatment of TNBC. Methods: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing was performed on postoperative breast cancer specimens selected from the Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from June 2009 to October 2015 to analyze the correlation between DDR gene variants and the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with TNBC platinum-containing regimens, and thus to screen the superior population for adjuvant chemotherapy with TNBC platinum-containing regimens. The study used t-test, χ(2) test, Fisher's exact test, rank sum test and multifactorial logistic analysis to assess the associations between mutated genes and clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis, and Log-rank test and Cox proportional risk model were used for survival and correlation analysis. Results: NGS results were successfully obtained in 149 patients (74 in the platinum-containing group and 75 in the platinum-free group), with a 97.3% (145/149) DDR gene mutation rate and a median number of 4 mutations in all patients. 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 85.4% and 75.0% for patients with DDR gene mutations and DDR gene wild-type, respectively, without statistical difference (P=0.825). The 5-year DFS rates of patients with homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway mutation were 84.6% in platinum-containing (TCb) group and 84.9% in platinum-free (EC-T) group (P=0.554), respectively. The 5-year DFS rates of patients with and without mutations in the platinite-containing HRR pathway were 84.9% and 85.0%, respectively (P=0.751). The number of DDR pathways with mutations and the number of DDR gene mutations were not associated with prognosis (both P>0.05). PIK3CA mutation patients in TCb group had a worse prognosis than wild-type patients (5-year DFS were 71.4% and 88.1%, P=0.037), and KMT2D mutation patients in EC-T group had a worse prognosis than wild-type patients (5-year DFS were 76.9% and 86.8%, P=0.039). Conclusions: DDR gene variation is common in TNBC, more clinical studies are needed to prove whether DDR variation can serve as effective biomarkers for treatment with platinum.

Adding fasting-mimicking diet to first-line carboplatin-based chemotherapy is associated with better overall survival in advanced triple-negative breast cancer patients: A subanalysis of the NCT03340935 trial.

Severe calorie restriction, in the form of cyclic fasting or fasting-mimicking diets (FMDs), boosts the antitumor activity of cytotoxic chemotherapy in mouse models of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). This effect is mostly mediated by fasting/FMD-induced reduction of plasma glucose concentration and by a boost in antitumor immunity. However, clinical evidence that cyclic FMD may impact on the outcomes of advanced TNBC (aTNBC) patients is lacking. We compared the overall survival (OS) of 14 aTNBC patients receiving first-line carboplatin-gemcitabine plus cyclic FMD in the context of the NCT03340935 trial with the OS of 76 consecutive aTNBC patients treated with carboplatin-based chemotherapy alone at Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to adjust the prognostic impact of FMD for other prognostic variables. Patients undergoing cyclic FMD in combination with carboplatin-gemcitabine had better OS when compared to patients receiving chemotherapy alone (median OS 30.3 months, 95% CI 18-NR, vs 17.2 months, 95% CI 15.3-25.1, log-rank P value .041). Multivariable analysis confirmed an association between FMD use and better OS (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.19-0.86; P = .019) also after propensity score-based matching according to patient ECOG PS and the presence of de novo metastatic disease (HR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.21-0.83; P = .013). Cyclic FMD in combination with first-line chemotherapy may improve clinical outcomes in aTNBC patients. Our study paves the way for conducting phase II trials to investigate if cyclic FMD can increase the antitumor activity/efficacy of chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy in patients with early-stage TNBC or aTNBC.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of high-risk, early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BackgroundPatients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are generally younger and more likely to experience disease recurrence and have the shortest survival among all breast cancer patients. Recently, neoadjuvant delivery of the programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab was approved for patients with high-risk, early-stage TNBC, but this treatment regimen has not been evaluated in head-to-head trials with other neoadjuvant treatment regimens. Therefore, the objective of this study was to estimate the relative efficacy of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab + chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab versus other neoadjuvant treatments for early-stage TNBC through a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA).MethodsEMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, conference abstracts, and clinical trial registries were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating neoadjuvant treatments for early-stage TNBC. NMA was performed to estimate relative treatment effects among evaluated interventions.ResultsFive trials met the inclusion criteria and were included in the NMA. The relative efficacy of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab + chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab was favorable to paclitaxel followed by anthracycline + cyclophosphamide in terms of pathologic complete response (pCR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival; paclitaxel + carboplatin followed by anthracycline + cyclophosphamide in terms of pCR and EFS; paclitaxel + bevacizumab followed by anthracycline + cyclophosphamide + bevacizumab in terms of pCR; and paclitaxel + carboplatin + veliparib followed by anthracycline + cyclophosphamide in terms of EFS.ConclusionsNeoadjuvant pembrolizumab + chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab confers benefits in response and survival outcomes versus alternative neoadjuvant treatments for early-stage TNBC.

18F]FDG PET/CT for predicting triple-negative breast cancer outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab.

To determine if pretreatment [18F]FDG PET/CT could contribute to predicting complete pathological complete response (pCR) in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab. In this retrospective bicentric study, we included TNBC patients who underwent [18F]FDG PET/CT before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or chemo-immunotherapy (NACI) between March 2017 and August 2022. Clinical, biological, and pathological data were collected. Tumor SUVmax and total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) were measured from the PET images. Cut-off values were determined using ROC curves and a multivariable model was developed using logistic regression to predict pCR. N = 191 patients were included. pCR rates were 53 and 70% in patients treated with NAC (N = 91) and NACI (N = 100), respectively (p < 0.01). In univariable analysis, high Ki67, high tumor SUVmax (> 12.3), and low TMTV (≤ 3.0 cm3) were predictors of pCR in the NAC cohort while tumor staging classification (< T3), BRCA1/2 germline mutation, high tumor SUVmax (> 17.2), and low TMTV (≤ 7.3 cm3) correlated with pCR in the NACI cohort. In multivariable analysis, only high tumor SUVmax (NAC: OR 8.8, p < 0.01; NACI: OR 3.7, p = 0.02) and low TMTV (NAC: OR 6.6, p < 0.01; NACI: OR 3.5, p = 0.03) were independent factors for pCR in both cohorts, albeit at different thresholds. High tumor metabolism (SUVmax) and low tumor burden (TMTV) could predict pCR after NAC regardless of the addition of pembrolizumab. Further studies are warranted to validate such findings and determine how these biomarkers could be used to guide neoadjuvant therapy in TNBC patients.

Association between event-free survival and overall survival in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer.

Aim: This study evaluated event-free survival (EFS) as a surrogate outcome for overall survival (OS) in neoadjuvant therapy for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (eTNBC). Methods: Meta-regression analyses based on a targeted literature review were used to evaluate the individual- and trial-level associations between EFS and OS. Results: In the individual-level analyses, 3-year EFS was a significant predictor of 5-year OS (p<0.01; coefficient of determinations [R2]: 0.82 [95% CI: 0.68-0.91]). Additionally, there was a statistically significant association between the treatment effect on EFS and OS at the trial level (p<0.001; R2: 0.64 [95% CI: 0.45-0.82]). Conclusion: This study demonstrates significant associations between EFS and OS and suggests that EFS is a valid surrogate for OS following neoadjuvant therapy for eTNBC.

Advances in the Management of Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer with both inter- and intratumor heterogeneity, thought to result in a more aggressive course and worse outcomes. Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has become the preferred treatment modality of early-stage TNBC as it allows for the downstaging of tumors in the breast and axilla, monitoring early treatment response, and most importantly, provides important prognostic information that is essential to determining post-surgical therapies to improve outcomes. It focuses on combinations of systemic drugs to optimize pathologic complete response (pCR). Excellent response to NAT has allowed surgical de-escalation in ideal candidates. Further, treatment algorithms guide the systemic management of patients based on their pCR status following surgery. The expanding knowledge of molecular pathways, genomic sequencing, and the immunological profile of TNBC has led to the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted agents, including PARP inhibitors, further revolutionizing the therapeutic landscape of this clinical entity. However, subgroups most likely to benefit from these novel approaches in TNBC remain elusive and are being extensively studied. In this review, we describe current practices and promising therapeutic options on the horizon for TNBC, surgical advances, and future trends in molecular determinants of response to therapy in early-stage TNBC.

Barriers to gBRCA Testing in High-Risk HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer.

Despite the OlympiA trial demonstrating that early-stage, high-risk, HER2- germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation (gBRCAm) positive breast cancer patients can benefit from PARPi in the adjuvant setting, the gBRCA testing rate in early-stage HR+/HER2- patients remains suboptimal compared to that in early-stage TNBC patients. To better understand the perceived barriers associated with gBRCA testing in HR+/HER2- disease, a quantitative survey was conducted across stakeholders (n = 430) including medical oncologists, surgeons, nurses, physician assistants, payers, and patients. This study revealed that while payers claim to cover gBRCA testing, poor clinician documentation and overutilization are key challenges. Therefore, payers place utilization management controls on gBRCA testing due to their impression that clinicians overtest. These controls have led to healthcare professionals experiencing payer pushback in the form of reimbursement limitations and denials. The perceived challenges to gBRCA testing stem from the lack of consensus dictating which patients are high risk and should be tested. While payers define high risk based on the CPS + EG score from the OlympiA trial, HCPs adopt a broader definition including genomic risk scores, lymph node involvement, and tumor grade and size. A dialogue to harmonize risk classification and testing eligibility across stakeholders is critical to address this disconnect and increase gBRCA testing in appropriate patients.

Computational reactive–diffusive modeling for stratification and prognosis determination of patients with breast cancer receiving Olaparib

Mathematical models based on partial differential equations (PDEs) can be exploited to handle clinical data with space/time dimensions, e.g. tumor growth challenged by neoadjuvant therapy. A model based on simplified assessment of tumor malignancy and pharmacodynamics efficiency was exercised to discover new metrics of patient prognosis in the OLTRE trial. We tested in a 17-patients cohort affected by early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with 3 weeks of olaparib, the capability of a PDEs-based reactive–diffusive model of tumor growth to efficiently predict the response to olaparib in terms of SUVmax detected at 18FDG-PET/CT scan, by using specific terms to characterize tumor diffusion and proliferation. Computations were performed with COMSOL Multiphysics. Driving parameters governing the mathematical model were selected with Pearson's correlations. Discrepancies between actual and computed SUVmax values were assessed with Student’s t test and Wilcoxon rank sum test. The correlation between post-olaparib true and computed SUVmax was assessed with Pearson’s r and Spearman’s rho. After defining the proper mathematical assumptions, the nominal drug efficiency (εPD) and tumor malignancy (rc) were computationally evaluated. The former parameter reflected the activity of olaparib on the tumor, while the latter represented the growth rate of metabolic activity as detected by SUVmax. εPD was found to be directly dependent on basal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and Ki67% and was detectable through proper linear regression functions according to TILs values, while rc was represented by the baseline Ki67-to-TILs ratio. Predicted post-olaparib SUV*max did not significantly differ from original post-olaparib SUVmax in the overall, gBRCA-mutant and gBRCA-wild-type subpopulations (p > 0.05 in all cases), showing strong positive correlation (r = 0.9 and rho = 0.9, p < 0.0001 both). A model of simplified tumor dynamics was exercised to effectively produce an upfront prediction of efficacy of 3-week neoadjuvant olaparib in terms of SUVmax. Prospective evaluation in independent cohorts and correlation of these outcomes with more recognized efficacy endpoints is now warranted for model confirmation and tailoring of escalated/de-escalated therapeutic strategies for early-TNBC patients.

ASO Author Reflections: Immunotherapy and Breast Cancer-Spotlight on Early Stage TNBC.

ASO Author Reflections: Immunotherapy and Breast Cancer-Spotlight on Early Stage TNBC.

Loss of ANCO1 Expression Regulates Chromatin Accessibility and Drives Progression of Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Mutations in the gene ankyrin repeat domain containing 11 (ANKRD11/ANCO1) play a role in neurodegenerative disorders, and its loss of heterozygosity and low expression are seen in some cancers. Here, we show that low ANCO1 mRNA and protein expression levels are prognostic markers for poor clinical outcomes in breast cancer and that loss of nuclear ANCO1 protein expression predicts lower overall survival of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Knockdown of ANCO1 in early-stage TNBC cells led to aneuploidy, cellular senescence, and enhanced invasion in a 3D matrix. The presence of a subpopulation of ANCO1-depleted cells enabled invasion of the overall cell population in vitro and they converted more rapidly to invasive lesions in a xenograft mouse model. In ANCO1-depleted cells, ChIP-seq analysis showed a global increase in H3K27Ac signals that were enriched for AP-1, TEAD, STAT3, and NFκB motifs. ANCO1-regulated H3K27Ac peaks had a significantly higher overlap with known breast cancer enhancers compared to ANCO1-independent ones. H3K27Ac engagement was associated with transcriptional activation of genes in the PI3K-AKT, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and senescence pathways. In conclusion, ANCO1 has hallmarks of a tumor suppressor whose loss of expression activates breast-cancer-specific enhancers and oncogenic pathways that can accelerate the early-stage progression of breast cancer.

The Immunomodulatory Effects of Dexamethasone on Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

The immunomodulatory impact of corticosteroids and concurrent chemotherapy is poorly understood within triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). On a biochemical level, steroids have been linked to the signaling of chemotherapy-resistant pathways. However, on a clinical level, steroids play an essential role in chemotherapy tolerance through the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and hypersensitivity reactions. Given these conflicting roles, we wanted to evaluate this interplay more rigorously in the context of early-stage TNBC. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with operable TNBC who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) between January 2012 and November 2018, with the primary goal of examining the dose-dependent relationship between pathological complete response (pCR) rates and corticosteroid use. Secondary endpoints included the impact of steroid dosing on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), along with a breakdown in pCR rates based on steroid doses provided during each chemotherapy phase. Further adjusted analyses were performed based on patient age, diabetic status, and anatomical stage. Finally, we explored the relationship between tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) seen on tissue samples at baseline and dexamethasone doses in terms of pCR rates. In total, of the 174 patients screened within this study period, 116 met full eligibility criteria. Of these eligible patients, all were female, with a median age of 51.5years (27.0 to 74.0) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 29.7 [standard deviation (SD) 7.04]. The majority were nondiabetic (80.2%). For cancer stage, 69.8% (n = 81) had stage 2 breast cancer. We found no statistically significant association between pCR rates and dexamethasone use, both in terms of the total dose (p = 0.55) and mean dose per NAC cycle (p = 0.74). Similarly, no difference was noted when adjusting for diabetic status, metformin use, or age at diagnosis, regardless of the total steroid dose provided (p = 0.72) or mean dose per cycle (p = 0.49). No meaningful changes to pCR rate were seen with higher mean or higher total steroid doses during the paclitaxel (T) phase (adjusted p = 0.16 and p = 0.76, respectively) or doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) phase (adjusted p = 0.83 and p = 0.77, respectively). Furthermore, we found no clinically significant association between dexamethasone dose and either RFS (p = 0.45) or OS (p = 0.89). Of the 56 patients who had available pre-treatment biopsy tissue samples, 27 achieved pCR, with higher TILs at baseline being associated with higher pCR rates, regardless of the mean dexamethasone dose used. Our findings demonstrate that dexamethasone has no clinically significant impact on pCR, RFS, or OS when given concurrently with NAC in patients with curative TNBC, regardless of diabetic status.

Predictive Roles of Baseline Stromal Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Ki-67 in Pathologic Complete Response in an Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Prospective Trial

High stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are associated with improved pathologic complete response (pCR) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We hypothesize that integrating high sTILs and additional clinicopathologic features associated with pCR could enhance our ability to predict the group of patients on whom treatment de-escalation strategies could be tested. In this prospective early-stage TNBC neoadjuvant chemotherapy study, pretreatment biopsies from 408 patients were evaluated for their clinical and demographic features, as well as biomarkers including sTILs, Ki-67, PD-L1 and androgen receptor. Multivariate logistic regression models were developed to generate a computed response score to predict pCR. The pCR rate for the entire cohort was 41%. Recursive partitioning analysis identified ≥20% as the optimal cutoff for sTILs to denote 35% (143/408) of patients as having high sTILs, with a pCR rate of 59%, and 65% (265/408) of patients as having low sTILs, with a pCR rate of 31%. High Ki-67 (cutoff &gt; 35%) was identified as the only predictor of pCR in addition to sTILs in the training set. This finding was verified in the testing set, where the highest computed response score encompassing both high sTILa and high Ki-67 predicted a pCR rate of 65%. Integrating Ki67 and sTIL may refine the selection of early stage TNBC patients for neoadjuvant clinical trials evaluating de-escalation strategies.

Targeting CaMKK2 inhibits actin cytoskeletal assembly to suppress cancer metastasis.

Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) tend to become invasive and metastatic at early stages in their development. Despite some treatment successes in early stage localized TNBC, the rate of distant recurrence remains high, and long-term survival outcomes remain poor. In a search for new therapeutic targets for this disease, we observed that elevated expression of the serine/threonine kinase calcium/calmodulin (CaM)-dependent protein kinase kinase 2 (CaMKK2) is highly correlated with tumor invasiveness. In validation studies, genetic disruption of CaMKK2 expression or inhibition of its activity with small molecule inhibitors disrupted spontaneous metastatic outgrowth from primary tumors in murine xenograft models of TNBC. High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), a high-risk, poor prognosis ovarian cancer subtype, shares many features with TNBC, and CaMKK2 inhibition effectively blocked metastatic progression in a validated xenograft model of this disease. Mechanistically, CaMKK2 increased the expression of the phosphodiesterase PDE1A which hydrolyzed cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) to decrease the cGMP-dependent activity of protein kinase G1 (PKG1). Inhibition of PKG1 resulted in decreased phosphorylation of vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP), which in its hypophosphorylated state binds to and regulates F-actin assembly to facilitate cell movement. Together, these findings establish a targetable CaMKK2-PDE1A-PKG1-VASP signaling pathway that controls cancer cell motility and metastasis by impacting the actin cytoskeleton. Further, it identifies CaMKK2 as a potential therapeutic target that can be exploited to restrict tumor invasiveness in patients diagnosed with early-stage TNBC or localized HGSOC.

Neoadjuvant Talazoparib in Patients With Germline BRCA1/2 Mutation-Positive, Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Results of a Phase II Study.

The undetermined efficacy of the current standard-of-care neoadjuvant treatment, anthracycline/platinum-based chemotherapy, in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and germline BRCA mutations emphasizes the need for biomarker-targeted treatment, such as poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, in this setting. This phase II, single-arm, open-label study evaluated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant talazoparib in patients with germline BRCA1/2-mutated early-stage TNBC. Patients with germline BRCA1/2-mutated early-stage TNBC received talazoparib 1 mg once daily for 24 weeks (0.75 mg for moderate renal impairment) followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR) by independent central review (ICR). Secondary endpoints included residual cancer burden (RCB) by ICR. Safety and tolerability of talazoparib and patient-reported outcomes were assessed. Of 61 patients, 48 received ≥80% talazoparib doses, underwent surgery, and were assessed for pCR or progressed before pCR assessment and considered nonresponders. pCR rate was 45.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32.0%-60.6%) and 49.2% (95% CI, 36.7%-61.6%) in the evaluable and intent-to-treat (ITT) population, respectively. RCB 0/I rate was 45.8% (95% CI, 29.4%-63.2%) and 50.8% (95% CI, 35.5%-66.0%) in the evaluable and ITT population, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were reported in 58 (95.1%) patients. Most common grade 3 and 4 TRAEs were anemia (39.3%) and neutropenia (9.8%). There was no clinically meaningful detriment in quality of life. No deaths occurred during the reporting period; 2 deaths due to progressive disease occurred during long-term follow-up (>400 days after first dose). Neoadjuvant talazoparib monotherapy was active despite pCR rates not meeting the prespecified threshold; these rates were comparable to those observed with combination anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy regimens. Talazoparib was generally well tolerated. NCT03499353.

National trends in neoadjuvant chemotherapy utilization for cT1-2 N0 triple negative breast cancer: Did the CREATE-X trial impact treatment patterns?

e12599 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for operable breast cancer allows for in-vivo assessment of chemotherapy response with survival and therapeutic implications. In 2017, the Capecitabine for Residual Cancer as Adjuvant Therapy (CREATE-X) trial demonstrated significant improvement in survival with the addition of adjuvant capecitabine in patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and residual disease after NAC. These results provided the rationale for NAC even in early stage TNBC. The aim of this study was to assess U.S. national rates of NAC utilization in early-stage node-negative TNBC patients before and after the release of CREATE-X and to assess factors associated with receiving NAC vs adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for women with cT1-2N0M0 TNBC from 2014–19. NAC utilization was collected and categorized as 2014-15 (pre-CREATE-X), 2016-17 (transition yrs), and 2018-19 (post-CREATE-X). Those who did not receive chemotherapy were excluded. NAC use over time was analyzed via multivariable logistic regression (MLR). Clinical and demographic factors associated with NAC vs AC utilization were assessed using ANOVA, Chi-squared, and Fisher Exact tests. A MLR model was used to determine predictors of receipt of NAC vs AC. Results: 55,633 women were treated from 2014-19: 26.9% with NAC, 52.4% with AC, and 20.7% received no chemotherapy (median ages 53, 59, and 71yrs, respectively, p &lt; 0.01). Most had cT1c (32.7%, n = 18,190) or cT2 (41.95%, n = 23,331) tumors and 99% had invasive ductal pathology. NAC utilization significantly increased over time, 19.5% (n = 3,465 of 17,777) in 2014-15, 27.1% (n = 5,140 of 18,985) in 2016-17, and 33.6% (n = 6,337 of 18,871) in 2018-19 (p &lt; 0.01). On MLR analysis, increased use of NAC was associated with younger age ( &lt; 50yrs), non-Hispanic white patients, having no comorbidities, having a cT2 tumor, grade 2 disease, and care at an academic or integrated network cancer program (p &lt; 0.05 for all). Patients with Medicare and Medicaid insurance were less likely to receive NAC (p &lt; 0.01). Patients who traveled &gt; 60 miles to their treating facility were more likely to receive NAC (p &lt; 0.01). Conclusions: From 2014–19, NAC utilization increased for patients with cT1-2N0M0 TNBC coinciding with the release of the CREATE-X results. Findings demonstrate the significance of the multidisciplinary oncology team in developing individualized treatment plans based on emerging clinical trial evidence. Racial, socioeconomic, and access disparities were observed in NAC utilization and warrants further investigation and interventions to ensure equitable care. [Table: see text]

Social determinants of health and utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) in the community oncology setting.

610 Background: TNBC has a higher incidence in African American women compared to European American, often presents at a younger age or more advanced stage, and is associated with worse outcomes. The use of multi-agent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) improves event-free survival and overall survival in patients with early-stage TNBC and is considered standard of care. Race and other social determinants of health (SDOH) have been shown to affect outcomes in patients with TNBC. Differences in use of NC associated with SDOH may be a contributing factor to inferior outcomes. The aim of this study is to determine if SDOH measures affect utilization of NC in patients with early-stage TNBC. Methods: This retrospective observational cross-sectional study examined patient profiles, treatment patterns and SDOH indicators among patients newly diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer in The US Oncology Network. Using iKnowMed EHR data, patients diagnosed with TNBC between 03/31/2017 and 09/30/2021 with stages II-IIIB disease or tumor size ≥2cm (T2 or higher) were included. The initial TNBC diagnosis date was used as the index date for each patient and records were assessed from 6 months pre- to 6 months post-diagnosis for NC initiation, baseline characteristics, and social determinants, including Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a validated measure of socioeconomic status. Results: 3321 patients with TNBC were identified, with a mean age of 58 years; 59% were White, 15% Black, 3% Asian, and 23% other/unknown; and 2139 (64%) received NC. Patients who received NC relative to those who did not were younger (mean 55.9 vs 61.8; p=0.001), had higher BMIs (70% with BMI&gt;25 vs ≤25, p=0.045), and had commercial or Medicaid insurance (67.5% with commercial insurance or Medicaid vs. 52.5% with Medicare; p=0.001). Regional differences were observed, with proportionally fewer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the south US census regions and more in the west. There was no difference in NC use in Black vs White patients (66% vs 64%). No significant differences in receipt of NC were found for race, ethnicity, or ADI. Conclusions: In the community oncology setting, we did not observe inequities in the use of NC based on social determinants analyzed in this study, such as race, ethnicity, and ADI. Poorer outcomes observed in Black patients with TNBC may not be a result of underutilization of NC.

Prognostic value of systemic inflammatory response in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer.

e14562 Background: Among breast cancer (BC) triple-negative (TN) subtype is the most immunogenic. Host and systemic immune response characterised by tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and immune cells in peripheral blood shape the net anti-tumor immune status. The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) represents an effective indicator of the peripheral immune status. To date, TILs and SII have been largely examined separately. Therefore, in the present study, we investigated the prognostic value and relationship between pretreatment TILs and SII in a large number of unselected patients (pts) with early (e) stage TNBC. Methods: A total of 301 consecutive eTNBC pts treated with curative intent at Oncology Institute Ljubljana from January 2000 till August 2007 were investigated. Histopathological and clinical data were obtained retrospectively from the medical records. TILs were scored as intensive vs others. SII was determined by platelet × neutrophil/lymphocyte. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazard model. The optimal cut-off value of SII was 675 and was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: The median follow-up period was 17,6 years (16.9-18.3), and the entire cohort`s 10-year DFS was 67.5% and 10-year OS 72.1%. The median age was 54 (53-57) years. Most pts were diagnosed node negative (40.7%), with larger tumors (≥ 2 cm, 57.1%), grade 3 (83.5%) and underwent perioperative chemotherapy (cht) (81%). Patients with positive lymph nodes (LN) had higher SII (r=0.21, p=0.003), no correlation between LN and TILs was found. Patients with higher TILs had significantly better OS (HR: 0.40, 95% CI 0.37-0.97, p=00.004), and lower SII predicted significantly better DFS and OS (HR for DFS: 1.65 95% CI 1,03-2.67, p=0.038, HR for OS: 1.72, 95% CI 1.11-2.65, p=0,015). In multivariate analysis, positive LN status retained its independent prognostic value for worse DFS and positive LN and higher SII for worse OS. Conclusions: Our data confirms important role of systemic immune response in the prognosis of eTNBC. The survival of these pts is significantly influenced by the pretreatment SII and TILs, the prognostic value of SII seems to be stronger in our cohort. However, positive lymph node status remains the strongest predictor for worse survival in eTNBC. [Table: see text]

Older patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center experience.

12063 Background: Approximately 15% of cases of early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are diagnosed in individuals over the age of 70. Despite studies indicating that older patients derive similar benefits from polychemotherapy as younger patients, breast cancer specific mortality among older patients remains disproportionately high. Use of the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and individualized risk tools can help tailor treatment and minimize negative side effects while preserving quality of life. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients ≥ 70 years of age diagnosed with stage I-III TNBC at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 2015 and 2019 to describe clinical practices for managing this population. Methods: Demographics, CGA, systemic therapy data were collected from electronic medical records. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify factors that were independently associated with the probability of receiving chemotherapy. Results: We included 159 women, with a median age of 74.5 years (range 70-96). 67 (42%) had stage I disease, 71 (45%) had stage II, and 21 (13%) had stage III. 29 (18%) reported difficulty in Activities of Daily Living (ADL), 34 (21%) reported difficulties in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (iADL), and 40 (26%) were identified as having a high risk for falls. 25 (17%) patients underwent CGA per physician’s choice. The prevalence of cardiac risk factors was as follows: hypertension in 80 patients (50%), diabetes in 25 (16%), obesity in 7 (4.4%), heart failure in 1 (0.6%). 147 underwent breast surgery, with 106 (67%) receiving lumpectomy and 41 (26%) mastectomy. 97 (61%) patients received chemotherapy: 35 (22%) neoadjuvant and 62 (40%) adjuvant. Anthracycline, Cyclophosphamide, Paclitaxel (AC-T) and Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, Fluorouracil (CMF) were the most common regimens. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, use of chemotherapy was associated with younger age (odds ratio [OR] 0.84 for one year increase in age, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-0.93, p = 0.001) and higher disease stage (stage II vs. I OR 4.97, 95% CI 1.66-16.4, p = 0.006; stage III vs. I OR 22.0, 95% CI 3.3-312, p = 0.006). No significant difference was found in geriatric referrals, cardiovascular risk factors, or difficulties with ADL or iADL between those receiving or not receiving chemotherapy. Conclusions: In our single center experience, 61% of older patients with early-stage TNBC received chemotherapy, with AC-T and CMF being the most common regimens. The referral rate for CGA was low. Age &lt; 75 years and higher disease stage were significantly associated with receiving chemotherapy. Overcoming barriers to incorporating CGA and toxicity prediction into routine clinical practice is crucial for personalized treatment in this population.

Comparison of immune microenvironment between primary and metastatic breast tumors.

1030 Background: Immune evasion is one of the mechanisms by which cancer cells gain the ability to metastasize from the primary tumor to distant sites. In triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), metastatic tumors are shown to be more immunologically silent than primary tumors. As a result, there are varying degrees of responses to immunotherapy between early-stage and metastatic tumors. Positive clinical responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are seen in patients with early-stage TNBC regardless of PD-L1 expression. In this study, we investigated the differences in the immune signatures of primary and metastatic breast cancer in a real-world patient population. Methods: We analyzed retrospective comprehensive genomic and immune profiling (CGIP) results from 529 breast tumors tested in the real-world clinical setting. Tumor specimens were classified as primary breast (PB), any lymph nodes (LN; regional and non-regional) or metastatic visceral (MV) sites. LN samples were chosen as positive controls due to expected elevated inflammatory signaling. PD-L1 (CPS positive ≥10) and TMB (high ≥10 Mut/Mb) were determined using IHC and DNA sequencing, respectively. mRNA expression signatures of tumor inflammation (TIGS, strong/moderate/weak) and expression of LAG3, TIGIT and TIM3 were determined by RNA-sequencing from a 395-gene panel. LAG3, TIGIT and TIM3 were selected due to emerging clinical trials in solid tumors. We used over-representation and proportion analysis using chi-squared test to determine the association of specimen sites to various genomic and immune correlates. Results: Among 529 cases, the median patient age was 63.2 years (25.5-93.5). The majority of patients were female (519, 98%), and the most common tumor histology was invasive ductal carcinoma (287, 54%). A total of 224 (42%), 72 (14%), and 232 (44%) of patients had specimens from PB, LN, MV, respectively, while 1 (0.19%) patient had an unknown source. Samples of PB harbored greater degree of immune infiltration, demonstrating higher TIGS score than MV (p=0.014). Primary lesions also demonstrated a greater proportion of PD-L1 positive than metastatic lesions (44% vs 21%, p &lt; 0.001) and higher expressions of immune checkpoints such as TIGIT (p&lt;0.001), LAG3 (p=0.037) and TIM3 (p&lt;0.001). Conclusions: We found that non-lymph node breast cancer metastases harbor a less active immune response than primary breast lesions, showing a lower degree of immune cell infiltration and decreased expression of immune checkpoint markers. These findings support the notion that the immune microenvironment of breast cancer metastases is immunosuppressive and may exhibit a tempered response to ICIs. Therefore, combination treatments of ICIs with chemotherapy, targeted therapies or cancer vaccines may be promising therapeutic approaches to enhance the immune responses and potentially overcome resistance to ICIs in metastatic breast cancer.