Early-stage Cervical Cancer Patients Research Articles

MRI radiomics nomogram integrating postoperative adjuvant treatments in recurrence risk prediction for patients with early-stage cervical cancer

Background and purposeAdjuvant treatments are valuable to decrease the recurrence rate and improve survival for early-stage cervical cancer patients (ESCC), Therefore, recurrence risk evaluation is critical for the choice of postoperative treatment. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based radiomics nomogram integrating postoperative adjuvant treatments was constructed and validated externally to improve the recurrence risk prediction for ESCC. Material and methods212 ESCC patients underwent surgery and adjuvant treatments from three centers were enrolled and divided into the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts. Their clinical data, pretreatment T2-weighted images (T2WI) were retrieved and analyzed. Radiomics models were constructed using machine learning methods with features extracted and screen from sagittal and axial T2WI. A nomogram for recurrence prediction was build and evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analysis integrating radiomic signature and adjuvant treatments. ResultsA total of 8 radiomic features were screened out of 1020 extracted features. The extreme gradient boosting (XGboost) model based on MRI radiomic features performed best in recurrence prediction with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.833, 0.822 in the internal and external validation cohorts, respectively. The nomogram integrating radiomic signature and clinical factors achieved an AUC of 0.806, 0.718 in the internal and external validation cohorts, respectively, for recurrence risk prediction for ESCC. ConclusionIn this study, the nomogram integrating T2WI radiomic signature and clinical factors is valuable to predict the recurrence risk, thereby allowing timely planning for effective treatments for ESCC with high risk of recurrence.

Reducing radicality in fertility-sparing surgery is associated with improved in vitro fertilization outcome in early-stage cervical cancer: A national retrospective study

ObjectiveFertility-sparing surgery (FSS) aims to achieve oncological outcomes that are non-inferior to radical treatment while preserving fertility and optimizing reproductive results. This study assesses in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer survivors following FSS, comparing radical and non-radical approaches. MethodsThis retrospective analysis used data from Hungary's National Health Insurance Fund (2004–2022) on patients who underwent IVF treatment following FSS for early-stage cervical cancer at ten Hungarian fertility clinics. Patients were classified into radical and non-radical surgical groups, with the uterine arteries being spared in the non-radical procedures. RStudio (R software version: 4.2.2) was used for statistical analysis. Student's t-test was used to compare group means, and Fisher's exact test was applied to assess independence and distributions between categorical variables, and to estimate odds. ResultsThe study analyzed data from 122 IVF treatment cycles involving 36 patients. The non-radical group had a significantly higher live birth rate (83%, 5/6 compared to the radical group (17%, 5/30). Additionally, the non-radical group had a significantly higher implantation rate and cumulative live birth rate per oocyte retrieval (37%, 7/19 and 55%, 6/11 respectively) compared to the radical group (8%, 12/148 and 6%, 5/80 respectively). ConclusionThis is the largest study to evaluate IVF outcomes in young cervical cancer survivors who have undergone FSS. The findings suggest that less radical procedures are associated with significantly better IVF outcomes. These results emphasize the importance of considering oncological safety and reproductive outcomes together when choosing FSS for early-stage cervical cancer patients. It also highlights the reproductive benefits of performing less radical surgery.

Benefits of sentinel node detection in cervical cancer.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a widely used technique in other gynaecological tumours but has not yet been implemented as the gold standard technique for nodal staging in cervical cancer. Since the majority of evidence is derived from retrospective studies, this review aims to summarize the most recent evidence on this relevant topic. SLNB has demonstrated to be a well tolerated technique for lymph node staging in early-stage cervical cancer patients with promising future as exclusive lymph node assessment method avoiding full lymphadenectomy. Moreover, it allows ultrastaging and unfrequent drainage identification, which enables the detection of patients at a high risk of recurrence who would otherwise remain unnoticed. When compared with pelvic lymphadenectomy, SLNB is also associated with less intraoperative and postoperative complications, especially in terms of lymphedema formation. The available evidence suggests that SLNB offers numerous advantages over the standard pelvic lymphadenectomy reducing morbidity rates and increasing diagnostic accuracy. Three ongoing prospective trials will likely answer the controversies over these questions.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: The more experienced the bedside assistant, the better?

BackgroundAim to investigate the impact of bedside assistant's work experience and learning curve on the short-term safety and efficacy in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. MethodsOur research retrospectively retrieved 120 cases of early-stage cervical cancer patients who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University. According to the different work experiences of the two bedside assistants (BA), patients were divided into a research group (inexperienced BA 1) and a control group (experienced BA 2). Furthermore, the learning curves of these BAs were plotted separately and divided into two distinct phases by cumulative summation: the first learning phase and the second master phase. ResultIn terms of work experience, comparing BA 1 with BA 2 who was more experienced, although the average operative time was prolonged by 29 min (P＜0.001), it did not increase the incidence of operative complication [24.4 % VS 29.1 %, P = 0.583], positive resection margin [4.9 % VS 7.6 %, P = 0.714], intraoperative organ damage [0 % VS 2.5 %, P = 0.546] and there was no significant difference in the number of lymph nodes [19 VS 15, P = 0.103]. Additionally, comparing two distinct phases of the same bedside assistant, there was no significant increasing rate in terms of operative complication, positive resection margin, intraoperative organ damage, and the number of lymph nodes (P＞0.05) neither BA 1 nor BA 2, except for a slight extension of operative time about 20 min in learning phase (P＜0.05). ConclusionIn robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer, work inexperience and the learning phase of BA only result in a slight extension of operative time, without causing worse short-term surgical outcomes.

Evaluating the clinical efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin and nab-paclitaxel in postoperative early-stage cervical cancer

ObjectiveA preclinical study showed that nab-paclitaxel acted as a radiosensitizer and improved tumor radiotherapy in a supra-additive manner. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with cisplatin and nab-paclitaxel in postoperative early-stage cervical cancer with an unfavorable prognosis.MethodsEligible patients with stage IB1-IIA2 (FIGO 2009) cervical carcinoma were recruited retrospectively between August 2018 to May 2021. Patients in both the cisplatin and nab-paclitaxel groups received postoperative radiotherapy and weekly intravenous cisplatin 40 mg/m2 or nab-paclitaxel 100 mg concurrently. An analysis of overall survival, progression-free survival, and adverse reactions was conducted.ResultsA total of 105 early-stage cervical cancer patients were included into our study. The median follow-up time was 38.7 months. The 3-year overall survival and progression-free survival in both group was similar. The cycles of chemotherapy in the cisplatin group were less than those in the nab-paclitaxel group (4.5 vs. 5.0; p = 0.001). Patients in the cisplatin group had a significantly higher frequency of hematological adverse events than patients in the nab-paclitaxel group (P < 0.05). Patients in the cisplatin group had a significantly higher frequency of grade 3–4 leukopenia (46.1% vs. 18.9%; P = 0.03), grade 1–2 thrombocytopenia (32.7% vs. 9.5%; P = 0.014) than patients in the nab-paclitaxel group. Gastrointestinal reactions, such as vomiting, nausea, and anorexia were significantly reduced in the nab-paclitaxel group compared with those in the cisplatin group. Regarding the effects on alopecia, the incidence rate of the nab-paclitaxel group was higher than that of the cisplatin group (P = 0.001). There were no differences between the groups in terms of other adverse reactions.ConclusionThe results of this study indicate that nab-paclitaxel-based concurrent radiotherapy is tolerable and effective, and can be considered an alternative to cisplatin chemotherapy.

Comparison of outcomes between early-stage cervical cancer patients without high-risk factors undergoing adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy alone after radical surgery.

For patients with early-stagecervical cancer without high-risk factors, there is no consensus regarding the optimal postoperative treatment regimen and whether postoperative concurrent radiochemotherapy (CCRT) is superior to radiotherapy (RT) alone. The medical records of patients with stage I-IIA cervical cancer, who underwent radical surgery and postoperative RT or CCRT between June 2012 and December 2017, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with any high-risk factors, including positive pelvic lymph node(s), positive resection margin(s), and parametrial invasion, were excluded. Patients with large tumors (≥ 4 cm), deep stromal invasion (≥ 1/2), and lymphovascular space involvement were categorized as the intermediate-risk group. Patients without intermediate-risk factors were categorized as the low-risk group. A total of 403 patients were enrolled and divided into 2 groups according to postoperative treatment: RT alone (n = 105); and CCRT (n = 298). For risk stratification, patients were also divided into 2 groups: intermediate-risk (n = 350); and low-risk (n = 53). The median follow-up was 51.7 months. Patients in the intermediate-risk group and those with multiple intermediate-risk factors were more likely to undergo CCRT. For patients who underwent RT alone or CCRT in the intermediate-risk group, 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 93.4% and 93.8% (p = 0.741), and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 90.6% and 91.4%, respectively (p = 0.733). Similarly, for patients who underwent RT alone or CCRT in the low-risk group, the 5-year OS rates were 100.0% and 93.5% (p = 0.241), and 5-year DFS rateswere 94.4% and 93.5%, respectively (p = 0.736). Adjuvant CCRT or RT were not independent risk factors for either OS or DFS. Patients who underwent CCRT appeared to develop a higher proportion of grade ≥ 3 acute hematological toxicities than those in the RT group (44.0% versus 11.4%, respectively; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in grade ≥ 3 chronic toxicities of the urogenital and gastrointestinal systems between the CCRT and RT groups. There was no significant difference in 5-year OS and DFS rates between patients with early-stage cervical cancer without high-risk factors undergoing postoperative CCRT versus RT alone. Patients who underwent CCRT appeared to develop a higher proportion of grade ≥ 3 acute hematological toxicities than those who underwent RT alone.

Prognostic nomogram for early-stage cervical cancer in the elderly: A SEER database analysis

BackgroundTo identify key clinical factors affecting the survival of elderly patients with early-stage cervical cancer and to construct a nomogram for predicting their prognosis. MethodsPatients (aged ≥ 65 years old) diagnosed with cervical cancer between 2004 and 2015 at clinical stages IA to IIA were included in this study. Diagnosis was confirmed via pathological examination, and the cases were randomly divided into a training or a validation group in a 7:3 ratio. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify independent factors affecting the prognosis of elderly early-stage cervical cancer patients, based on which a nomogram was constructed to predict their 12-, 24- and 36-month overall survival (OS). The nomogram's performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) curves. ResultsA total of 686 patients were identified as eligible and assessed. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis revealed that age, tumor diameter, marital status and surgical intervention were independent prognostic factors for elderly individuals with early-stage cervical cancer, which were then used to construct the nomogram. The calibration curves showed a strong correlation between predicted and observed survival rates, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves for different risk subgroups demonstrated significant survival differences (P < 0.001). DCA confirmed the nomogram's clinical utility in predicting the prognosis of elderly patients with early-stage cervical cancer. ConclusionThe prognostic model developed in this study can accurately predict the OS of elderly patients with early-stage cervical cancer, showing high concordance with actual clinical outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of consolidation chemotherapy after adjuvant therapy in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer patients with risk factors: a retrospective single-center study.

Accumulated evidence has suggested a relatively high recurrence rate in early-stage cervical cancer (CC) patients with risk factors. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of consolidation chemotherapy following adjuvant therapy (concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) or radiotherapy (RT) alone) in stage IB-IIA CC patients with risk factors. A total of 237 stage IB-IIA CC patients who received radical surgery between January 2014 and December 2021 were included in the retrospective study. According to the types of adjuvant therapies, the patients were classified into the control group (CCRT or RT alone) and the study group (consolidation chemotherapy following CCRT or RT alone). The propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics between the two groups. The primary end points of the study were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). For the entire cohort, no significant difference was observed in the DFS or OS between the study and control group, which was also confirmed in the PSM cohort (n=124). The multivariate analysis identified the high-risk factor type was an independent adverse prognostic factor for the patients. In patients with high risk factors, consolidation chemotherapy following adjuvant therapy was significantly associated with better clinical outcomes and identified as an independent prognostic favorable factor. Moreover, this association remained statistically significant in high-risk patients with ≥2 metastatic lymph nodes. In patients with intermediate risk factors, consolidation chemotherapy following adjuvant therapy was unrelated to DFS or OS. The safe assessment demonstrated consolidation chemotherapy following adjuvant therapy was significantly correlated with higher rates of ≥ grade 3 hematologic toxicities in both the global and subgroup analysis stratified by risk factor type. Consolidation chemotherapy after adjuvant therapy provided survival benefits in stage IB-IIA CC patients with high risk factors, particularly those with ≥2 metastatic lymph nodes. However, related hematologic toxicities should be alerted in patient management. The actual efficacy and safety of consolidation chemotherapy still need to be investigated in more well-designed clinical trials.

Surgical, oncologic, and obstetric outcomes of radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: results from a retrospective cohort study at Brazil National Cancer Institute.

to analyze oncological, obstetrical, and surgical results of young early-stage cervical cancer patients who underwent radical trachelectomy (RT) surgery and wished to maintain their fertility. a retrospective cohort study was carried out concerning cases attended at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute Gynecology Oncology Service. Patients who underwent RT between January 2005 and January 2021 were included. A total of 32 patients with median age of 32 years old, 62.5% of whom were nulliparous, were assessed. Concerning cancer type, 65.6% squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cases, 31.2% adenocarcinoma cases and 3.1% adenosquamous carcinoma cases were verified. Stage IA2 was evidenced in 12.5% of the patients and stage IB < 4cm in 87.5%. Regarding surgical approaches, 68.25% of the patients underwent vaginal RT (VRT), 18.75%, abdominal RT (ART), 9.3%, the robotic radical trachelectomy (RORT) and 3.1%, video laparoscopy radical trachelectomy (VLRT). The median number of removed lymph nodes was 14, with only two detected as positive. Two cases of positive surgical margins were noted. A total of 3.1% intraoperative and 31.25% postoperative complications were observed, with cervical stenosis being the most common. The recurrence rate of the study was 3.1%, with a median follow-up time of 87 months, where 3.1% deaths occurred. The pregnancy rate of the study was 17.85% (5/28), with 54.5% evolving to live births and 45.5% evolving to abortion. Radical trachelectomy is a feasible procedure presenting good oncological results and acceptable pregnancy rates.

A nomogram of preoperative indicators predicting lymph vascular space invasion in cervical cancer.

To develop predictive nomograms of lymph vascular space invasion (LVSI) in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. We identified 403 patients with cervical cancer from the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University from January 2015 to December 2019. Patients were divided into the training set (n = 242) and the validation set (n = 161), with patients in the training set subdivided into LVSI (+) and LVSI (-) groups according to postoperative pathology. Preoperative hematologic indexes were compared between the two subgroups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the independent risk factors for LVSI, from which a nomogram was constructed using the R package. LVSI (+) was present in 94 out of 242 patients in the training set, accompanied by a significant increase in the preoperative squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC), white blood cells (WBC), neutrophil (NE), platelet (PLT), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic inflammation index (SII), and tumor size (P < 0.05). Univariate analysis showed that SCC, WBC, NE, NLR, PLR, SII, and tumor size were correlated with LVSI (P < 0.05), and multivariate analysis showed that tumor size, SCC, WBC, and NLR were independent risk factors for LVSI (P < 0.05). A nomogram was correspondingly established with good performance in predicting LVSI [training: ROC-AUC = 0.845 (95% CI: 0.731-0.843) and external validation: ROC-AUC = 0.704 (95% CI: 0.683-0.835)] and high accuracy (training: C-index = 0.787; external validation: C-index = 0.759). The nomogram based on preoperative tumor size, SCC, WBC, and NLR had excellent accuracy and discriminative capability to assess the risk of LVSI in early-stage cervical cancer patients.

Predictive Role of Preoperative Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT for Risk Stratification of Early-Stage (FIGO I-IIA) Cervical Cancer Patients Treated by Surgery.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the predictive value of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured on preoperative 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO 2009) stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients who were treated with radical hysterectomy. A total of 47 patients with FIGO stage I-IIA cervical cancer who were evaluated preoperatively with biopsy and 18F-FDG PET/CT followed by radical hysterectomy were included in the study. Correlation between SUVmax and pathological risk factors or survival was studied. The mean SUVmax was significantly higher in patients with large tumor size (≥4 cm), advanced stage (IIA>IB>IA) and depth of invasion >50%. No significant difference was noted in SUVmaxbetween patients with and without pelvic lymph node involvement (P=0.639). SUVmax of the primary tumor with and without lymph-vascular invasion were 12.95 and 10.35, respectively (P=0.5). No significant difference was noted between patients with high SUVmax and low SUVmax with regards to overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), using an optimal cut-off value of 7.65 for OS and DFS obtained from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Patient with tumor size >4cm had 5.9 times more probability of mortality compared to tumor size <4cm (P=0.09). The present study observations showed that although SUVmaxis associated with pathological variables, it does not independently predict oncological outcomes in FIGO stage IA-IIA cervical cancer patients who were treated with radical hysterectomy. These findings suggest that SUVmax of primary tumor may be used for risk stratification, but not for prognostication insurgically treated early-stage cervical cancer patients. Not using other parameters of 18F-FDG PET/CT like metabolic tumor volume (MTV), tumor lysis glycolysis (TLG), small sample size,variation in calculation of SUVmax, histopathologic heterogeneity, inclusion of stage IA patients in the study were constraints of present study. Furtherstudies with large sample size using multi metabolic parameters of 18F-FDG PET/CT, including the SUVmax,SUVmean,SUVpeak, MTV and TLG are needed.

Presence of low volume metastases does not alter management in node-negative, early-stage cervical cancer patients who underwent postoperative adjuvant therapy: A retrospective cohort study

ObjectiveThis study sought to determine if patients with early stage cervical cancer who possessed intermediate-high risk factors (defined by Peters or Sedlis criteria) and had pathologically negative lymph nodes at the time of surgery had higher rates of low volume metastases (LVM) on retrospective ultrastaging. MethodsThis IRB-approved retrospective cohort study collected data via chart review on early stage, surgically-treated node-negative cervical cancer patients who underwent postoperative adjuvant therapy, treated at a single institution from January 2011 through June 2021. Nodal blocks were retrospectively ultrastaged per standard protocol. Descriptive statistics were performed for analysis. ResultsOver the 10-year study period, n = 20 patients met study inclusion criteria. Most patients were white with squamous cell histology, with a mean number of 25.15 (SD = 12) nodes examined on initial pathologic evaluation. 85 % (n = 17) patients were pathologic stage IB. 85 % of the cohort were recommended for adjuvant radiation, with the remaining 15 % for cisplatin-based chemoradiation. LVM in the form of micrometastasis was retrospectively identified in one patient (5 %) who had received whole pelvic radiation and recurred locally within the irradiated field. ConclusionsThis small retrospective series of surgically managed cervical cancer with intermediate-high risk tumor factors identified only 1 patient with LVM, representing 5% of the total population. The biologic importance of ITC and LVM remains unclear in cervical cancer, however this investigation highlights the low incidence even when all nodes are evaluated in a higher risk cohort. The presence of LVM would not have changed management decisions based on this retrospective analysis.

The potential role of systemic inflammatory markers in predicting recurrence in early-stage cervical cancer

IntroductionThe influence of systemic inflammatory markers on early-stage cervical cancer (ECC) patients is contradictory. No previous study analyzed whether these markers may be suggestive of recurrence. The aim of this study was to assess whether the inflammatory markers level of patients with recurrence during surveillance was different from those of patients without recurrence representing a risk factor for recurrence. MethodsRetrospective, single-center, observational study. Patients with 2009 FIGO EEC surgically treated between 2012 and 2019 were included. Baseline inflammatory markers were evaluated on the results of the complete blood count (CBC) and coagulation tests. Inflammatory markers of relapsed patients were evaluated on the last CBC performed before the relapse diagnosis. Inflammatory markers of patients with no recurrence were evaluated on the available CBC taken at the same median follow-up time as the one from relapsed patients. Results174 patients were included. Baseline Systemic immune inflammation index (SII) > 663 and Systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) > 0.98 were associated with significant risk of recurrence. SII>663 and Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) > 2.41 were associated with increased risk of death. Significant changes between relapsed (n = 23) and non-relapsed (n = 151) patients in median values of SII (615 versus 490, p-value = 0.001), SIRI (0.74 versus 1.05, p-value = 0.005), NRL (2.95 versus 2.15, p-value = 0.0035), and MLR (0.26 versus 0.22 p-value = 0.020), showed that different levels of inflammatory markers could help identifying recurrent disease during surveillance. ConclusionBaseline SII>663 and SIRI>0.98 were associated with increased risk of recurrence. Higher median values of SII, SIRI, NLR and MLR in relapsed patients highlight their potential association with recurrence.

A preoperative nomogram predicting risk of lymph node metastasis for early-stage cervical cancer

ObjectiveThis study aimed to develop a preoperative nomogram based on clinical and pathological characteristics to provide a more individualized and accurate estimation of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.MethodsA total of 7,349 early-stage cervical cancer patients with pathologically confirmed between 1988 and 2015 were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. All the patients were divided into training (n = 5,500) and validation (n = 1,849) cohorts randomly. A cohort of 455 patients from multicenter was used for the external validation. We established a multivariate logistic regression model based on preoperative clinicopathological data, from which a nomogram was developed and validated. A predicted probability of LNM < 5% was defined as low risk.ResultsFrom multivariate logistic regression analysis, age at diagnosis, histologic subtype, tumor grade, tumor size and FIGO stage were identified as preoperative independent risk factors of LNM. The nomogram incorporating these factors demonstrated good discrimination and calibration (concordance index = 0.723; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.707–0.738). In the validation cohort, the discrimination accuracy was 0.745 (95% CI, 0.720–0.770) and 0.747 (95% CI, 0.690–0.804), respectively. The nomogram was well calibrated with a high concordance probability. We also established an R-enabled Internet browser for LNM risk assessment, which tool may be convenient for physicians.ConclusionsWe developed an effective preoperative nomogram based on clinical and pathological characteristics to predict LNM for early-stage cervical cancer. This model could improve clinical trial design and help physicians to decide whether to perform lymphadenectomy or not.

Adjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy vs. Radiotherapy Alone in Cervical Cancer Patients with Intermediate-Risk Factors after Radical Surgery

For early-stage cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors, there is no consensus about whether postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is superior to radiotherapy (RT) alone. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients underwent radical surgery and postoperative RT or CCRT from June 2012 to December 2017. Patients with any of the high-risk factors including positive pelvic lymph node, positive resection margin, and parametrial invasion were excluded. Patients with any of the intermediate-risk factors including large tumor size (≥4cm), deep stromal invasion (≥1/2), and lymphovascular space involvement were included. 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to balance baseline variables between patients receiving RT and CCRT. A total of 350 patients were enrolled (84 underwent RT alone and 266 underwent CCRT). The median follow-up period was 50.4 months. For patients underwent RT alone and CCRT, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 93.4% and 93.8% (p = 0.741), the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 90.6% and 91.4% (p = 0.733), respectively. 83 pairs of patients were enrolled based on propensity score matching. Similarly, there was no significant difference between OS or DFS rates of those matched patients. For patients with single intermediate-risk factor who received RT alone (n = 58) and CCRT (n = 132), the 5-year OS rates were 94.2% and 95.7% (p = 0.636), the 5-year DFS rates were 92.8% and 94.1% (p = 0.637). For patients with multiple intermediate-risk factors who received RT alone (n = 26) and CCRT (n = 134), the 5-year OS rates were 91.8% and 91.7% (p = 0.761), the 5-year DFS rates were 85.4% and 88.4% (p = 0.717). The cox regression analysis also indicated that adjuvant CCRT or RT was not an independent prognostic factor for OS or DFS. Otherwise, patients underwent CCRT seemed to develop a higher proportion of grade 3 or higher acute hematologic toxicities than RT group (45.5% and 14.3%, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in OS and DFS between cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors receiving postoperative CCRT and RT alone. Patients underwent CCRT seemed to develop a higher proportion of severe hematologic toxicities than RT alone. To a certain extent, CCRT is not superior to RT alone for intermediate-risk patients.

A hybrid approach: a safe option for surgical treatment of early-stage cervical cancer.

The aim of the study was to describe the surgical treatment of early-stage cervical cancer (CC) via minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and a sequential hybrid approach combining MIS and mini-Pfannenstiel. Evaluate sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection using a hybrid tracer (ICG-99m Tc nanocolloid). Prospective, observational, descriptive, single-center study conducted at Son Espases University Hospital between January 2019 and September 2021. Patients with early-stage CC (FIGO 2018 IA1 with ILV-IIA1) who underwent surgical treatment with a follow-up of at least one year were included. Thirty early-stage CC patients were included, of whom four (13.3%) were upstaged due to positive SLNs. In these cases, laparotomy was avoided, and paraaortic lymphadenectomy was performed via MIS approach. Twenty-six patients had a radical hysterectomy: 15 underwent a hybrid approach, 10 laparoscopy, and one laparotomy. Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery had a smaller estimated tumor size than those undergoing the hybrid approach. The overall SLN detection rate was 96.1%, with 88.5% of cases occurring bilaterally. Five out of 26 patients (19.2%) presented SLN macrometastases, and five (19.2%) had atypical drainage. Surgery refined staging in 33.3% (10/30) of cases. No recurrences were reported after an average follow-up of 32 months. MIS for SLN avoids laparotomy leading to rapid recovery and early adjuvant treatment initiation in nodal metastasis. In our study, tumor size is an important clinical implication in the surgical approach to be used. The hybrid tracer provided a high detection rate and combined the advantages of the two tracers. The hybrid approach has a quick recovery and optimal results.

A novel predictor for the use of concurrent chemotherapy in early-stage cervical cancer with intermediate-risk factors

ObjectiveFor early-stage cervical cancer patients experiencing radical surgery, postoperative radiotherapy was recommended for patients with a combination of intermediate-risk factors. However, there was no consensus on whether to administer concurrent chemotherapy. The aim of the study was to confirm the clinical value of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score in guiding the use of concurrent chemotherapy during postoperative radiotherapy. MethodsA total of 969 patients with FIGO stage IB-IIA cervical cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to compare disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates between different group. A Cox proportional hazards regression test was used to conduct multivariate analyses. ResultsFor the patients in the high CONUT group (≥3), the addition of concurrent chemotherapy had better 5-year DFS (91.2 % vs. 72.8 %, P = 0.005) and CSS (93.8 % vs. 77.4 %, P = 0.013) than those without it. Meanwhile, the patients with concurrent chemotherapy had less rate of locoregional recurrence (8.5 % vs 16.7 %, P = 0.034) and distant metastases (11.7 % vs 30.4 %, P = 0.015). The multivariate analysis showed that concurrent chemotherapy was detected to be a factor significantly associated with DFS (P = 0.011), local control (P = 0.041), distant metastasis (P = 0.005) and CSS (P = 0.023). For the patients in low CONUT group (<3), there was no difference in prognosis between patients. ConclusionPretreatment CONUT score may be a predictive factor for the use of concurrent chemotherapy in early-stage cervical cancer with intermediate-risk factors during postoperative radiotherapy, and it can be helpful to determine the adjuvant treatment scheme.

Risk factors for lymph node metastasis and clinical outcomes in cervical cancer patients following primary radical hysterectomy: A single-center analysis of 1495 patients.

e17525 Background: Histopathological information obtained from surgical specimen is important to identify patients at increased risk for disease relapse and mortality. Lymph node metastasis (LNM) carries the highest impact on decreased survival in suspected early-stage cervical cancer. To further identify risk factors for LNM and prognosis in early stage cervical cancer patients is definitely necessary owing to the findings from different centers are inconsistent. Methods: A total 1495 cervical cancer patients were diagnosed with stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer according to clinical stage and underwent radical hysterectomy between April 2009 and December 2020. The stage of all the patients were reclassified after surgery according to FIGO 2018. We analyzed their clinicopathologic data to identify the risk factors for LNM. Among all the patients, the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 1109 patients between 2015 and 2020 were collected and analyzed. Results: The incidence of LNM is 18.8% in all 1495 patients, which increases with depth of cervical stromal invasion, tumor size, lymphovascular space involvement (LVSI) and vaginal wall invasion in univariate analysis. Multivariable analysis shows only stromal invasion (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.7–5.3; P &lt; 0.001) and LVSI (OR, 4.9; 95% CI, 3.6-6.7; P&lt;0.001) are to be independent risk factors for LNM. In addition, the clinical parameters age is a protective factor against LNM in both univariate and multivariable analysis(P&lt;0.001). Among the 1109 patients, the median follow-up time is 49.7 months. Multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazards model show that LNM (HR, 8.5; 95% CI, 3.0-23.9; P&lt;0.001), stromal invasion (HR, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.2-5.4;P&lt;0.001) and special histologic type (HR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.4-7.6; P=0.006) are independent prognostic factors for OS as well as PFS in early stage cervical cancer. Conclusions: The pattern of cervical stromal invasion and presence LVSI, but not the primary tumor size, predict risk of nodal metastasis. Cervical stromal invasion, LNM and special histologic type (non-squamous cell carcinoma; non-Adenocarcinoma) are independent prognostic factors for OS as well as PFS in early stage cervical cancer. [Table: see text]

Incidence of low volume metastases after retrospective ultrastaging of patients with early stage, node negative cervical cancer and receipt of post-operative adjuvant therapy.

e17506 Background: Nodal positivity directs receipt of adjuvant post-operative therapy in early stage cervical cancer; the significance of low-volume metastases (LVM) is unclear. We hypothesized patients with early stage cervical cancer with high risk factors on pathology and negative nodes would have a higher incidence of LVM on retrospective ultrastaging. Methods: This retrospective cohort study collected clinicopathologic data via chart review on early stage cervical cancer patients treated at our institution from January 2011 - June 2021. The study was approved by the IRB. Inclusion criteria included patients &gt;18 years old who underwent a radical hysterectomy/trachelectomy with pathology-proven negative nodes who went on to be recommended for post-operative adjuvant therapy, due to factors defined under Sedlis or Peters criteria. Patients were excluded for rare histology or prior pelvic radiation. Resected nodes were ultrastaged, performed by 4 re-cuts at 20 microns on each lymph node staging, stained with H&amp;E and one level with CK AE1/AE3 to identify presence of any LVM. Analysis was performed via descriptive statistics with Microsoft Excel. Results: 199 patients were treated with radical hysterectomy between 2011-2021; 20 met study criteria. The average age at diagnosis was 51 years: 65% Caucasian, 25% Black, 10% Latino. 75% had Squamous cell carcinoma, 85% (n=17) of the cohort were a 2009 FIGO pathologic Stage 1B. 35% of the cohort underwent a minimally invasive hysterectomy. Tumor size varied: 25% (n=5) of tumors were less than 2 cm, 35% (n=7) of tumors measured greater than or equal to 2 cm, 30% (n=6) measured greater than or equal to 3 cm, and 10% (n=2) measured greater than or equal to 4 cm. Lymphovascular space invasion was noted in 75% (n=15) of samples. Superficial stromal invasion was noted in 5% (n=1), deep stromal invasion was noted in 65% (n=13). 5% (n=1) of patients had parametrial invasion, and 5% (n=1) had positive margins. A full bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed on every patient, with 245 nodal blocks ultrastaged. 80% (n=16) received adjuvant therapy: 3 chemoradiation, 13 radiation, 4 declined. LVM was identified in 5% (n=1) patients; a macrometastases was identified as missed in the initial pathologic evaluation of another. 10% (n=2) patients developed recurrence, one at the pelvic brim and one distant (lung). The patient with the newly identified LVM received adjuvant radiation, and developed recurrence at the pelvic brim. Conclusions: The results of this small study suggest traditional “high risk” factors in surgically managed cervical cancer is associated with positive ultrastaged nodes in 5% of cases. This finding suggests that utilization of sentinel node identification with associated ultrastaging will accurately identify patients who will benefit from adjuvant therapy.

Adjuvant Therapy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Patients with Intermediate-Risk Factors, Comparing Between Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Patients with early-stage cervical cancer (ESCC) after radical hysterectomy surgery usually need additional adjuvant treatment, but it depends on the presence or absence of certain risk factors. Factors, such as large tumor size, deep stromal invasion, and lymphovascular space involvement, are classified as intermediate risks. Therefore, postoperative adjuvant concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) or radiotherapy (RT) is recommended for ESCC with risk factors. However, it remains controversial whether CRT is superior to RT as an adjuvant regimen for postoperative with risk factors. METHODS: A systematic search was performed within PubMed, Cochrane, Science Direct, and Google Scholar databases to research the outcome between CRT and RT in ESCC. Three reviewers independently reviewed titles, abstracts, and full article text to identify studies meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria. If there are any discrepancies, it will be resolved by discussion. In this analysis, the Newcastle–Ottawa scale was used to assess the risk of bias of non-randomized studies. We used review manager 5.4 to calculate the result of 95% CI for the outcomes using odds ratio (OR), random effect model was also used if there is heterogeneity. The primary endpoints of interest are recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 14 studies included in qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis with a total of 5.294 patients were identified. Patients who had RT after radical hysterectomy was found to significantly have a more favorable RFS rate with OR 0.57 95% CI (0.38–0.84), p = 0.005; I2 = 63%. Nine studies were found comparing the OS between adjuvant RT and adjuvant CRT in a patient with ESCC with intermediate risk, the result is quite similar favoring adjuvant RT with significantly better OS outcome OR 0.69 95% CI (0.54–0.87), p = 0.002; I2 =34%. 1.526 had hematologic toxicities, 797 were RT and 729 had CRT. The study showed RT had better outcomes with lesser toxicities (OR 0.11, 95% CI [0.03–0.44] p = 0.002; I2 = 91%). Non-hematological toxicity, with a total of 1.463 patients, 799 were RT and 664 had CRT. Random models were used due to heterogeneity. RT is significantly associated with lesser non- hematologic toxicities with OR 0.34, 95% CI (0.18–0.66) p = 0.001; I2 = 65%. DISCUSSION: During the last two decades, there were significant changes in practice to cure uterine cervical cancer. Based on the consistent results generated in several previous randomized controlled trials, cisplatin-based CCRT has become the standard treatment for advanced cervical cancer. A randomized prospective studies by Sedlis et al., randomized FIGO IB patients without residual tumor or involved lymph nodes but with two or more intermediate-risk factors later named the “Sedlis criteria” to receive observation or RT following radical surgery. Adjuvant RT led to a reduction of recurrence rates at the cost of an approximately 4% higher rate of grade 3/4 adverse events. There was no increase in OS but an improvement of long-term RFS. On the other hand, a study found that RFS and OS were significantly improved in the addition of chemotherapy, especially in patients with clinical-stage IA2, IB, and IIA with para-metric invasion, residual tumor and/or lymph node involvement. This study found that RT had better outcomes in RFS and OS, RT also had lesser hematologic toxicity and non-hematologic toxicity. After all, it is prudent to take into account the adverse events as well as the QOL for long-term survivors. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant RT shows a better outcome in RFS and OS. CRT is often associated with greater hematological and non-hematological toxicities. Further high-quality randomized clinical trials with larger sample size comparing the efficacy and toxicity of adjuvant CRT with RT are recommended.