116 BOOK REVIEWS highlyreadable,mercifully jargon-free and unencumbered bylengthy footnotes.G. is, in general,admirablyscepticalin dealing with his ancientsources (thediscussion ofevidence fortheso-calledcarmina convivalia in theIntroduction, forinstance,is a model ofscrupulous care,and will offer an interesting counter-blast to Thomas Habinek's recently-published TheWorldofRomanSong2-forwhich see thereviews by D. Feeneyand J.Katz in JRS96 (2006) 240-2,and J.Zetzel in CJ102 (2006) 88-91). G. is equally sensitiveto thecomplexitiesof interactionbetween literatureand criticism.While one may find mattersof detail to quibble with,the overarchingargumentis both important and persuasive,and studentsofRepublicanliterature will findthe volume equally valuable forits nuanced and stimulating readingsoflateRepublicantextsand theirintertextual relations. MONICA R. GALE Trinity College, Dublin 2JohnsHopkinsUniversity Press,2005. Representing Agrippina: Constructions ofFemale PowerintheEarly Roman Empire. ByJUDITH GINSBURG. Oxfordand New York:OxfordUniversity Press,2005.Pp. 160.Cloth,$45.00.ISBN 0-19-518141-7. AgrippinatheYoungerhas been an intriguing subjectforhistoriansoftheearlyRomanEmpirefromthetimeofTacitustoourown . A powerfulwoman in a world controlledby men, the sister,wife and mother ofCaligula,Claudius and Nerorespectively, shehas generallybeen viewed as manipulativeand ruthless.Yet, as Anthony Barrett' notedinhisrecent biography,"The actualrecord... suggests verystrongly thatbothancientand modernwritersoffer a lop-sided portrait."Barrettrevised thatportraitby illuminatingAgrippina's accomplishments withinthecontextoftheopportunities available to her.In Representing Agrippina, JudithGinsburghas shiftedattention totheevidenceitself, askingwhyand how thepositiveimagesofthe materialevidence and Agrippina's contrasting negative characterization in ancientwritersdeveloped, and what the implicationsof Agrippina: Sex,PowerandPoliticsintheEarlyRomanEmpire (New Haven, 1996) X111ii. BOOK REVIEWS 117 theserepresentations mightbe. To answerthesequestions,G. examines theliterary evidence,thevisual portrayals and rhetorical stereotypesinthreeseparatechapters .Bythebook's end,thereadercansee how thosewriting about Agrippina,especiallyTacitus,conflatedher actionswiththestereotypes ofschemingwomen,partlyto denigrate overly-ambitious women and partlyto criticizeimperial rule. The visual remains,on the otherhand, reveal the imperialhousehold's use of Agrippina's links to theJulio-Claudianpast and futureand herassimilationtoDemetertobolsterlegitimacy and stability. Chapter One, "Agrippina in the LiteraryTradition,"reviews Agrippina'smanipulativecharacterin theliterature. G. uses theevidence ofTacitusprimarily, withoccasional pertinent passages from Dio or Suetonius.The exceptionalsensitivity withwhich G. has always analyzed Tacitus' writings, and which continuesin thiswork, allows the reader to gain even greaterawareness of the author's carefuluse of rhetoricaland stylistic devices, vocabularyand even elementsfromcomedy.Withastuteanalysis,G. shows thatTacitus depictsAgrippinaas a woman whose everyactionwas attributable to political ambition.Actions that involve step-motherly intrigue, hypocrisy,femalejealousy and a public display of dominance all expose "herown desireforpower" (p. 33). Because ofTacitus' compelling rhetoric, most scholarshave accepted thisliterary image of Agrippinaas genuine. The emperorsthemselvesutilized Agrippina differently, as G. shows in ChapterTwo, "VisualizingAgrippina."Here, G. separates the visual materialinto threesections: coinage (convincinglysubdivided intoRoman and provincial),sculptureand cameos. G. first reviewsthehistory and influence ofimperialwomen on Romancoins beforefocusingon Agrippinaherself. She includesbothobverseand reverseimages of coins thatillustratethe messages of the imperial household and supporther challenge to those who hold the view thatAgrippina'spoliticalcloutalone explainsherextraordinary presence on official coins(p. 57). (T)hecomplex rolesthat Agrippina's imageplaysonthecoinage, whilethey might wellbe an accurate reflection ofAgrippina's realpowerinthestate, equallyservedthepolitical interests ofthethree emperors withwhomshe wasconnected. All threeemperorsused Agrippinato emphasize concordia between Julianand Claudian lines and to add validityto theirown reigns. Her designationas Augusta and assimilationto Ceres on Claudian coins also underscoredherroleas themotherofthefuture emperor. 118 BOOK REVIEWS The gold and silverissues of54 and 55 CE,whereAgrippinaappears on the obverse with Nero, provide additional confirmation of her value totheimperialhousehold. G.'s denial thattheselasttwoissues illustrate a weakeningin Agrippina'spoliticalpositionin 55 and her claim thatsuch an interpretation reliestoo heavilyon Tacitus' Ann. 13.12-13,however,requiresubstantiation. Turningto sculpture, G. makesa strongcase forthepoliticalsignificanceof Agrippina's presence in statuarygroups, especially at theSebasteionat Aphrodisias,whereAgrippinaappears twice,first with Claudius and then with Nero (figuresof both included). On bothpanels, althoughin different ways, Agrippinais assimilatedto Demeterand fertility, and as such she represents"the continuation ofthedynastyand a secureand orderlysuccession,theprerequisite forthepeace and prosperity ofRoman societyat large" (p. 71). The more private cameos, especially the Gemma Claudia, illustrate themes and ideological interestssimilar to those on coinage and sculpture. Ginsburg'suntimelydeath fouryearsago did notpermitherto finish Representing Agrippina. ErichGruen,NatalieKampen,Elizabeth Keiteland BethSevery-Hovenhave added clearlymarked,insightful introductions, conclusionsand occasional references. In the overall introduction, however,Gruenacknowledgesthata "somewhatunfinished qualityremains"(p. 4). This is mostevidentin ChapterThree, "Agrippinaand thePower of RhetoricalStereotypes," where G. returnsto theliterary evidence to assess theculturalassumptionsthat led to the powerful rhetoricalstereotypesattached to Agrippina. Withmoretime,G. would likelyhave edited her claimsabout stepmothersand the duxfeminathat are repeated fromChapter One (as well as removingrepetitive statements there)and morefullydeveloped her argumentsto cover evidence beyond Tacitus. Nonetheless ,what G. says...