Early-onset Rectal Cancer Research Articles

Early-onset rectal cancer: Experience of a single-center, high-volume unit.

The incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer among the young (<50 years) has been reported to have risen in last decades. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the characteristics of early-onset rectal cancers (EO-RCs) and potential changes in proportion of EO-RCs, and further to report the mortality and recurrence rates of EO-RCs. In the years 2007-2021, 2557 rectal cancer (RC) patients were operated in Helsinki University Hospital and of them 147 were 18-49 years old. Cumulative overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival, and disease-free survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis. The percentual amount of the EO-RCs varied between 2.5% and 11.3% annually and there was no perceivable trend. Majority were adenocarcinomas (98.7%), of which 8.8% were mucinous. Predisposing factors such as Lynch syndrome, polyposis, or ulcerative colitis were seen in 26 patients (17.7%) and in 10 of 22 patients (45.5%) under 35 years. The cumulative 5-year OS was 91.9% in stage I, 93.3% in stage II, 86.7% in stage III, and 50.0% in stage IV disease. Metastatic recurrence was found in 22 cases (18.4%) and local recurrence in 8 patients (5.4%) and 6 patients had both. In our cohort of 147 EO-RC patients, OS was good and the clinical course did not seem to differ much from the course of RC in general population.

MRI-based radiomics for stratifying recurrence risk of early-onset rectal cancer: a multicenter study

Early-onset rectal cancer (EORC) is characterized by a unique disease process with different clinicopathological features compared with late-onset rectal cancer (LORC). Research on the risk of recurrence in EORC patients, however, is limited. We aim to develop a predictive model to accurately predict EORC recurrence risk. Rectal cancer patients who underwent radical surgery and T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were retrospectively enrolled from three medical institutions from November 2012 to November 2018. Differences in clinicopathological characteristics between EORC and LORC were compared. Five prediction models for disease-free survival were constructed based on clinicopathological variables and five radiomic features from pretreatment MRI of the EORC. A fixed cut-off value calculated in the training set was used to stratify EORC patients into high-risk and low-risk groups of post-operative recurrence. Model performance was evaluated by concordance index (C-index) and receiver operating characteristic curve. A total of 264 EORC patients (median age, 43 years, 163 males) and 778 LORC patients (median age, 62 years, 520 males) were enrolled. Pretreatment positive carcinoembryonic antigen [hazard ratio (HR)= 2.84, P= 0.006], pathological positive lymph node status (pN positive) [HR= 2.86, P= 0.011] and MRI-based radiomics score [HR= 2.72, P < 0.001] are independent risk factors for disease-free survival in EORC patients. The EORC-ClinPathRadiom model, constructed by integrating the clinicopathological characteristics and MRI-based radiomics features of EORC, showed C-index of 0.82, 0.82, and 0.81 in the training, internal, and external test sets, respectively. This model effectively stratified EORC patients into high risk and low risk of recurrence (HRs for the training, internal, and external test sets were 8.96, 6.81, and 7.46, respectively). The EORC-ClinPathRadiom model can effectively predict and stratify the risk of post-operative recurrence in EORC patients.

266P Incidence of early-onset rectal cancer in Kazakhstan

266P Incidence of early-onset rectal cancer in Kazakhstan

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is noninferior to chemoradiotherapy for early-onset locally advanced rectal cancer in the FOWARC trial.

The early-onset rectal cancer with rapidly increasing incidence is considered to have distinct clinicopathological and molecular profiles with high-risk features. This leads to challenges in developing specific treatment strategies for early-onset rectal cancer patients and questions of whether early-onset locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) needs aggressive neoadjuvant treatment. In this post hoc analysis of FOWARC trial, we investigated the role of preoperative radiation in early-onset LARC by comparing the clinicopathological profiles and short-term and long-term outcomes between the early-onset and late-onset LARCs. We revealed an inter-tumor heterogeneity of clinical profiles and treatment outcomes between the early-onset and late-onset LARCs. The high-risk features were more prevalent in early-onset LARC. The neoadjuvant radiation brought less benefits of tumor response and more risk of complications in early-onset group (pCR: OR = 3.75, 95% CI = 1.37-10.27; complications: HR = 11.35, 95% CI = 1.46-88.31) compared with late-onset group (pCR: OR = 5.33, 95% CI = 1.83-15.58; complications: HR = 5.80, 95% CI = 2.32-14.49). Furthermore, the addition of radiation to neoadjuvant chemotherapy didn't improve long-term OS (HR = 1.37, 95% CI = 0.49-3.87) and DFS (HR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.58-1.90) for early-onset patients. Preoperative radiation plus chemotherapy may not be superior to the chemotherapy alone in the early-onset LARC. Our findings provide insight into the treatment of early-onset LARC by interrogating the aggressive treatment and alternative regimens.

IMMUNOREACT 6: weak immune surveillance characterizes early-onset rectal cancer.

Colon cancer in young patients is often associated with hereditary syndromes; however, in early-onset rectal cancer, mutations of these genes are rarely observed. The aim of this study was to analyse the features of the local immune microenvironment and the mutational pattern in early-onset rectal cancer. Commonly mutated genes were analysed within a rectal cancer series from the University Hospital of Padova. Mutation frequency and immune gene expression in a cohort from The Cancer Genome Atlas ('TCGA') were compared and immune-cell infiltration levels in the healthy rectal mucosa adjacent to rectal cancers were evaluated in the IMMUNOlogical microenvironment in REctal AdenoCarcinoma Treatment 1 and 2 ('IMMUNOREACT') series. In the authors' series, the mutation frequency of BRAF, KRAS, and NRAS, as well as microsatellite instability frequency, were not different between early- and late-onset rectal cancer. In The Cancer Genome Atlas series, among the genes with the most considerable difference in mutation frequency between young and older patients, seven genes are involved in the immune response and CD69, CD3, and CD8β expression was lower in early-onset rectal cancer. In the IMMUNOlogical microenvironment in REctal AdenoCarcinoma Treatment 1 and 2 series, young patients had a lower rate of CD4+ T cells, but higher T regulator infiltration in the rectal mucosa. Early-onset rectal cancer is rarely associated with common hereditary syndromes. The tumour microenvironment is characterized by a high frequency of mutations impairing the local immune surveillance mechanisms and low expression of immune editing-related genes. A constitutively low number of CD4 T cells associated with a high number of T regulators indicates an imbalance in the immune surveillance mechanisms.

Survival analysis of early-onset locally advanced rectal cancer: a retrospective study based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database

Objective: To investigate the factors influencing tumor-specific survival of early-onset locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: All-age patients with primary locally advanced rectal cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2010 to 2019) were included in this study. Early- and late-onset locally advanced rectal cancer was defined according to age of 50 years at diagnosis. Early-onset locally advanced rectal cancer was divided into five age groups for subgroup analyses. Age, sex, tumor-specific survival time and survival status of patients at diagnosis, pathological grade, TNM stage, perineural invasion, tumor deposits, tumor size, pretreatment CEA , radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and number of lymph node dissections were included. Progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed and compared between patients with early- and late-onset rectal cancer. Results: A total of 5,048 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were included in the study (aged 27-70 years): 1,290 (25.55%) patients with early-onset rectal cancer and 3,758 (74.45%) patients with late-onset rectal cancer. Patients with early-onset rectal cancer had a higher rate of perineural invasion (P<0.001), more positive lymph nodes dissected (P<0.001), higher positive lymph node ratios (P<0.001), and a higher proportion receiving preoperative radiotherapy (P=0.002). Patients with early-onset rectal cancer had slightly better short-term survival than those with late-onset rectal cancer (median (IQR ): 54 (33-83) vs 50 (31-79) months, χ2=5.192, P=0.023). Multivariate Cox regression for all patients with locally advanced rectal cancer showed that age (P=0.008), grade of tumor differentiation (P=0.002), pretreatment CEA (P=0.008), perineural invasion (P=0.021), positive number (P=0.004) and positive ratio (P=0.001) of dissected lymph nodes, and sequence of surgery and radiotherapy (P=0.005) influenced PFS. This suggests that the Cox regression results for all patients may not be applicable to patients with early-onset cancer. Cox analysis showed tumor differentiation grade (patients with low differentiation had a higher risk of death, P=0.027), TNM stage (stage III patients had a higher risk of death, P=0.025), T stage (higher risk of death in stage T4, P<0.001), pretreatment CEA (P=0.002), perineural invasion (P<0.001), tumor deposits (P=0.005), number of dissected lymph nodes (patients with removal of 12-20 lymph nodes had a lower risk of death, P<0.001), and positive number of dissected lymph nodes (P<0.001) were independent factors influencing PFS of patients with early-onset locally advanced rectal cancer. Conclusion: Patients with early-onset locally advanced rectal cancer were more likely to have adverse prognostic factors, but an adequate number of lymph node dissections (12-20) resulted in better survival outcomes.

Diagnosis and Management of Rectal Cancer in Patients Younger Than 50 Years: Rising Global Incidence and Unique Challenges.

The global incidence of colorectal adenocarcinoma is stable or decreasing overall; however, the incidence of colorectal cancer in patients aged &lt;50 years is increasing. Although some of this increase is due to hereditary cancer syndromes, this is not the sole explanation. Patients with early-onset rectal cancer in particular have unique disease patterns and face distinct challenges in their treatment. Molecular patterns of disease in this patient cohort are noteworthy and often represent an opportunity to target these cancers more effectively. Recent and ongoing trials focusing on minimizing toxicities and necessary therapy modalities and maximizing response and patient outcome are of paramount importance in this patient population. Additional resources are needed for this patient population, including fertility counseling and preservation, financial guidance, genetic counseling, and psychosocial support.

Clinical spectrum of rectal cancer identifies hallmarks of early-onset patients and next-generation treatment strategies.

The incidence of colorectal cancer is increasing among young adults and more rectal cancers are reported. This study aimed to identify the clinical features specific for early-onset rectal cancer and provide insights on cancer management. Early-onset (<50 years) and late-onset (≥50 years) rectal cancer patients from a referral tertiary care center (SYSU cohort) and Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database (SEER cohort) were included to perform a comprehensive comparison on clinical information. A total of 552 and 80,341 patients with stages I-III rectal cancer were included in the SYSU and SEER cohorts, respectively. In the SYSU cohort, early-onset diseases had significantly higher prevalence of family history of cancer and history of HBV infection and lower incidence of comorbidities (p < 0.05). In addition, early-onset patients presented more frequently with advanced node stage (N2 stage: 16.9 vs. 9.3%, p=0.017) and high-risk features, including mucinous or signet cell carcinomas (21.8 vs. 12.9%, p=0.014), poorly differentiated tumors (28.8 vs. 15.4%, p=0.002), and perineural invasion (14.5 vs. 7.9%, p=0.027) compared with late-onset patients. However, early-onset patients received more neoadjuvant (18.5 vs. 11.2%, p=0.032) and adjuvant treatments (71.0 vs. 45.8%, p < 0.001), and they had better overall survival in both SYSU (HR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.34-0.95; p=0.029) and SEER (HR 0.38, 95% CI: 0.37-0.40; p < 0.001) cohorts. Early-onset rectal cancers are distinct from late-onset cases in clinicopathological features, treatment modalities, and outcomes. The clinical trials and studies that are specific for young populations are needed to develop optimal strategies for cancer screening, treatment, and surveillance.

Post-Operative Functional Outcomes in Early Age Onset Rectal Cancer.

BackgroundImpairment of bowel, urogenital and fertility-related function in patients treated for rectal cancer is common. While the rate of rectal cancer in the young (<50 years) is rising, there is little data on functional outcomes in this group.MethodsThe REACCT international collaborative database was reviewed and data on eligible patients analysed. Inclusion criteria comprised patients with a histologically confirmed rectal cancer, <50 years of age at time of diagnosis and with documented follow-up including functional outcomes.ResultsA total of 1428 (n=1428) patients met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final analysis. Metastatic disease was present at diagnosis in 13%. Of these, 40% received neoadjuvant therapy and 50% adjuvant chemotherapy. The incidence of post-operative major morbidity was 10%. A defunctioning stoma was placed for 621 patients (43%); 534 of these proceeded to elective restoration of bowel continuity. The median follow-up time was 42 months. Of this cohort, a total of 415 (29%) reported persistent impairment of functional outcomes, the most frequent of which was bowel dysfunction (16%), followed by bladder dysfunction (7%), sexual dysfunction (4.5%) and infertility (1%).ConclusionA substantial proportion of patients with early-onset rectal cancer who undergo surgery report persistent impairment of functional status. Patients should be involved in the discussion regarding their treatment options and potential impact on quality of life. Functional outcomes should be routinely recorded as part of follow up alongside oncological parameters.

Role of Perirectal Fat in the Carcinogenesis and Development of Early-Onset Rectal Cancer.

Purpose The incidence of early-onset rectal cancer (EORC) has been increasing since the past decade, while its underlying cause remained unknown. This study was aimed at clarifying the relationship between perirectal fat area (PFA) and EORC. Patients and Methods. All patients with rectal cancer who received radical excision between January 2016 and December 2017 at our hospital were included. The fat series images of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging scans were obtained and PFA at the ischial spine level was calculated using the ImageJ software. Results A total of 303 patients were finally included and divided into two groups according to the median PFA: Group 1 (<20.2 cm2, n = 151) and Group 2 (≥20.2 cm2, n = 152). PFA positively correlated with body weight and body mass index. PFA increased with invasion depth, lymph node metastasis, TNM stage, tumor deposits, and vascular invasion. Patients with EORC had higher PFA than those with late-onset rectal cancer (LORC; P = 0.009). Among patients with stage I–III rectal cancers, those in Group 2 had significantly shorter disease-free survival (P = 0.010) and overall survival (P = 0.034) than those in Group 1, and PFA was an independent predictor of disease-free survival (OR: 1.683 [1.126-3.015], P = 0.035) and overall survival (OR: 1.678 [1.022-2.639], P = 0.046). Conclusions Patients with EORC had significantly higher PFA than those with LORC. PFA is positively correlated with T stage, N stage, TNM stage, tumor deposit, and vascular invasion and is an independent predictor of disease-free survival and overall survival. Therefore, perirectal fat may be involved in the carcinogenesis and development of EORC.

A comparative analysis of the clinicopathological profile of early-onset versus late-onset rectal cancer patients.

IntroductionColorectal cancer has been primarily considered a disease of the elderly, but recent data have shown an alarming rise among young people. It has been also suggested that young age is associated with aggressive histopathological characteristics and advanced stages of the disease at diagnosis. As there are few studies and none from our part of the country evaluating the clinicopathological profile of early-onset versus late-onset rectal cancer patients, this analysis was conducted to assess and compare the clinical and pathological characteristics of patients with rectal cancer diagnosed with ages over and below 50 years.Materials and methodThe relevant details of all biopsy proven rectal cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy at a tertiary cancer hospital, from January 2017 to December 2019, were collected. All the data were categorised into two groups, an early-onset group (age <50 years) and a late-onset group (age ≥50 years), and comparison of the clinicopathological characteristics between the two groups was made.ResultsA total of 224 patients with rectal cancer, 150 male and 74 female, were included in the study. About two-thirds of the patients were less than 50 years of age, with an average age of 42 years. The comparative analysis showed a significantly higher number of young patients presenting with bleeding and pain. Patients below 50 years also had a significantly higher number of adenocarcinoma grade III and clinical stage III than those in the late-onset group.ConclusionOur study revealed a significant number of early-onset rectal cancer patients. There should be a high index of suspicion in any young patient presenting with symptoms suggestive of rectal malignancy and they should be evaluated promptly.

Microsatellite instability in young patients with rectal cancer: molecular findings and treatment response.

In this study of 400 patients with early-onset rectal cancer, 12.5 per cent demonstrated microsatellite instability (MSI). MSI was associated with a reduced likelihood of nodal positivity, an increased rate of pathological complete response, and improved disease-specific survival.

Early age of onset is an independent predictor for worse disease-free survival in sporadic rectal cancer patients. A comparative analysis of 980 consecutive patients

Backgroundwhile interest on early-onset colorectal cancer (age ≤49) is on the rise, studies on early-onset rectal cancer (EORC) are limited. The aim of this study was to compare predictors for disease progression/recurrence between sporadic EORC and late-onset RC patients (LORC). Methods163 EORC and 830 LORC operated between January 1st, 2010 and April 30th, 2021 at a tertiary center were included. Demographics, tumor characteristics, microsatellite status, gene mutations (KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, PI3Kca) and oncologic outcomes were compared. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to ascertain the effect of variables on recurrence/progression and death. Recurrence/Progression free survival (R/PFS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier estimator. ResultsMean age of EORC was 42.16, (46% aged 45–49). A majority of EORC patients had a family history for CRC (p = 0.01) and underwent total neoadjuvant treatment (p = 0.01). EORC patients showed a higher rate of low-grade tumor differentiation (p < 0.0001), stage III-IV (p = 0.001), microsatellite instability (p = 0.02), locoregional nodal (p = 0.001) and distant metastases (p < 0.0001). Accordingly, more EORC patients underwent adjuvant treatment (p < 0.0001). Mutations were mostly reported among LORC cases (p = 0.04), whereas EORC patients showed a worse R/PFS (p = 0.02), even at stage I (p = 0.04). CSS did not differ (p = 0.11) across groups. Multivariate analysis indicated age of onset (p = 0.04) was an independent predictor for progression/recurrence. ConclusionsAge of onset was shown to be an independent unfavorable predictor. Delayed diagnosis could explain this effect in the more advanced stages, while the worse outcomes in stage I may suggest a more aggressive disease behavior.

Early Onset Rectal Cancer Is Indeed Aggressive and Resistant to Chemotherapy: a National Profile

Early Onset Rectal Cancer Is Indeed Aggressive and Resistant to Chemotherapy: a National Profile

Increasing Colorectal Cancer Incidence Before and After Age 50: Implications for Screening Initiation and Promotion of “On-Time” Screening

BackgroundEarly onset colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence is rising under age 50, with a birth cohort effect for increasing incidence among individuals born 1950 and later. It is unclear whether increasing incidence trends will confer increased risk beyond age 50, the previously most commonly recommended age to initiate screening, when screening availability might modify incidence trends.AimEvaluate US trends in colorectal cancer (CRC) for ages 40–59 years.MethodsWe analyzed counts and incidence rates for CRC, including by anatomic subsite, using the US Cancer Statistics dataset covering 100% of the population 2003–2017. Joinpoint regression was used to quantify Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) in cancer incidence by age subgroup.Results470,458 CRC cases were observed age 40–59, with absolute numbers of rectal (n = 4173) and distal cases (n = 3327) per year for age 50–54 approaching age 55–59 cases for rectal (n = 4566) and distal (n = 3682) cancer by 2017. Increasing early onset rectal cancer incidence per 100,000 occuring under age 50 was observed to extend to age 50–54, from 4.9 to 6.3 for age 40–44 (AAPC 2.1; 95% CI 1.5–2.7), 9.3 to 12.0 for age 45–49 (AAPC 1.5; 95% CI 1.1–1.4), and from 16.7 to 19.5 for age 50–54 (AAPC 1.0; 95% CI 0.7–1.3).ConclusionsCRC trends suggest observed increased risks under age 50 are also present after age 50, despite prior availability of screening for this group. Recent CRC trends support initiation of screening earlier than age 50, and promotion of “on-time” screening initiation.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer in the ColoCare Study: Differences by Age of Onset.

Simple SummaryThe number of new colorectal cancer cases continues to increase in individuals under 50 years of age in the Western world. Underlying reasons for this observation remain unclear. Here, we compare demographic, clinical, and lifestyle characteristics by age at diagnosis in a large cohort of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients. We aim to identify potential risk factors and clinical characteristics of colorectal cancer patients diagnosed under the age of 50 years, compared to those over 50. The results of this study will help elucidate factors related to colorectal cancer in younger patients, and may help guide future research on colorectal cancer in younger patients.Early-onset colorectal cancer has been on the rise in Western populations. Here, we compare patient characteristics between those with early- (<50 years) vs. late-onset (≥50 years) disease in a large multinational cohort of colorectal cancer patients (n = 2193). We calculated descriptive statistics and assessed associations of clinicodemographic factors with age of onset using mutually-adjusted logistic regression models. Patients were on average 60 years old, with BMI of 29 kg/m2, 52% colon cancers, 21% early-onset, and presented with stage II or III (60%) disease. Early-onset patients presented with more advanced disease (stages III–IV: 63% vs. 51%, respectively), and received more neo and adjuvant treatment compared to late-onset patients, after controlling for stage (odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) = 2.30 (1.82–3.83) and 2.00 (1.43–2.81), respectively). Early-onset rectal cancer patients across all stages more commonly received neoadjuvant treatment, even when not indicated as the standard of care, e.g., during stage I disease. The odds of early-onset disease were higher among never smokers and lower among overweight patients (1.55 (1.21–1.98) and 0.56 (0.41–0.76), respectively). Patients with early-onset colorectal cancer were more likely to be diagnosed with advanced stage disease, to have received systemic treatments regardless of stage at diagnosis, and were less likely to be ever smokers or overweight.

Neoadjuvant radiation above NCCN guidelines for rectal cancer is associated with age under 50 and early clinical stage.

Recent data suggest patients with early-onset rectal cancer (EORC) receive neoadjuvant radiation above recommended doses without oncologic benefit. The use of excessive radiation may lead to worse outcomes and patient harm. We sought to evaluate predictors of aggressive neoadjuvant radiation (A-XRT) use in EORC patients and compare this to late-onset rectal cancer (LORC) patients. The National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2014 was queried for rectal adenocarcinoma patients undergoing surgical resection. Patients with stage 0 or IV disease, positive margins, and incomplete data were excluded. Standard neoadjuvant radiation (S-XRT) was based upon NCCN guidelines: 25-50.4 Gray for stage II/III patients and none for stage I. Excess radiation was considered A-XRT. Patients diagnosed at age < 50years were labeled EORC; those ≥ 50years were LORC. Categorical data were analyzed with chi-square test. Logistic regression was used to analyze clinicodemographic associations with A-XRT. 45,403 patients were included: 7999 (17.6%) EORC and 37,404 (82.4%) LORC. Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that A-XRT use among stage I patient was associated with male gender, age under 50, urban location, mucinous histology, and poor tumor differentiation. Among stage II and III patients, A-XRT use was associated with male gender, age under 50, higher education and income, and urban location. Cox hazards did not demonstrate a significant association of A-XRT use with survival. Our data reaffirm that EORC patients more frequently receive A-XRT and that use is based on demographic features independent of tumor characteristics. Reasons for A-XRT, particularly in EORC patients, should be clarified to promote adherence to guidelines and minimize patient harm.

A clinico-pathological and molecular analysis reveals differences between solitary (early and late-onset) and synchronous rectal cancer

Rectal cancer (RC) appears to behave differently compared with colon cancer. We aimed to analyze existence of different subtypes of RC depending on distinct features (age of onset and the presence of synchronous primary malignant neoplasms). We compared the clinicopathological, familial and molecular features of three different populations diagnosed with RC (early-onset RC [EORC], late-onset RC, and synchronous RC [SRC]). Eighty-five RCs were identified and were evaluated according to their microsatellite instability, CpG Island Methylator Phenotype (CIMP) and chromosomal instability, as assessed by Next Generation Sequencing and microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization approaches. The results were subjected to cluster analysis. SRCs displayed the most specific characteristics including a trend for the development of multiple malignant neoplasms, a greater proportion of CIMP-High tumors (75%) and more frequent genomic alterations. These findings were confirmed by a clustering analysis that stratified RCs according to their genomic alterations. We also found that EORCs exhibited their own features including an important familial cancer component and a remarkable rate of mutations in TP53 (53%). Together, heterogeneity in RC characteristics by age of disease-onset and SRC warrants further study to optimize tailored prevention, detection and intervention strategies—particularly among young adults.

Patients with early-onset rectal cancer aged 40 year or less have similar oncologic outcomes to older patients despite presenting in more advanced stage; A retrospective cohort study

BackgroundEarly-onset colon and rectal cancer has increased in alarming rates. The present study reviewed the characteristics and outcome of early-onset rectal cancer in patients aged ≤40 years. MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study on rectal cancer patients who were treated in a tertiary center in the Middle East. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of patients ≤40 years were compared with patients >40 years. Main outcome measures were patients’ and tumor characteristics, local recurrence, distance metastasis, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). ResultsAmong 244 patients with rectal cancer, 81 (33.2%) aged 40 years or less. 56.8% of patients ≤40 years and 49.7% of patients >40 years presented with stage III/IV disease (p = 0.36). Local recurrence and distant metastasis were detected in 10.3% and 13.2% of patients ≤40 years and in 16.9% and 13.9% of patients >40 years (p = 0.29 and 0.88). The 3-year OS and DFS rates of patients ≤40 years were 75% and 80.9% versus 74.2% and 76.5% in patients >40 years (p = 0.9 and 0.59). Patients ≤40 years presented with ulcerative carcinoma (38.3% vs 21.5%, p = 0.01) and signet-ring carcinoma (12.3% vs 2.5%, p = 0.008) more than patients > 40 years. ConclusionEarly-onset rectal cancer accounted for one-third of all patients presenting with rectal cancer. Patients younger than 40 years had higher incidence of mucinous and signet-ring rectal carcinoma, and presented more with advanced stage. The age of patients did not have a significant impact on the oncologic outcome of rectal cancer.

Abstract 2364: Clinical characteristics and outcomes of colorectal cancer in the ColoCare Study: Differences by age of onset

Abstract PURPOSE: The ColoCare Study is an international cohort of men and women (&amp;gt;18 years age) newly diagnosed with stage I-IV colorectal cancer from seven centers in the United States and Germany. Study enrollment is currently ongoing. Here, we describe the clinical and demographic characteristics of this large cohort of prospectively followed colorectal cancer patients and describe differences in demographic, lifestyle, and clinical characteristics by age of onset and tumor site. METHODS: Data on demographics (sex, age, race, ethnicity) and lifestyle factors (smoking, body mass index) collected at baseline are included in this analysis, in addition to information on tumor characteristics (tumor stage and site), treatment (neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy), and clinical outcomes (vital status, recurrence). Patients were categorized into early- (&amp;lt;50 years) vs. late-onset (≥50 years) cancers. Tumor site was categorized into colon and rectal cancers. Frequencies and percentages for categorical variables, and mean and standard deviations for continuous variables were calculated and compared by age of onset and tumor site. Notable differences are described here. RESULTS: Data on 1,933 stage I-IV colorectal cancer cases were included in this study, 19% of which were deceased at the time of this analysis. On average, patients were 60 years old, had a BMI of 29 kg/m2, and were predominantly diagnosed with stage II (25%) and stage III (33%) colorectal cancer. Fifty three percent of cases were diagnosed with colon cancer, while 47% were rectal cancer cases. Twenty percent (n=364) of patients were diagnosed before age 50 (i.e. early-onset cases). The early-onset group presented with a higher percentage of rectal cancer (52%) and more advanced disease (64% stage III-IV cancer) compared to late-onset cases (46% and 48%, respectively). Percentages of ever smokers were higher among late-onset compared to early-onset patients (51% vs. 38%), independent of tumor site. Early-onset cancers were more likely to originate in the rectum compared to colon, particularly among women (61% vs. 51%). Early-onset rectal cancer cases were more likely to be female as compared to late-onset rectal cancer cases (61% vs. 36%). Corresponding with national trends, early-onset cases received more aggressive adjuvant therapy after surgical resection compared to late-onset patients (54% vs. 40%). DISCUSSION: Within this large international multi-center cohort, patients with early-onset colorectal cancer were more likely to be diagnosed with rectal cancer and advanced stage disease. The majority of early-onset cases in the ColoCare Study were non-smokers. As expected, more aggressive treatment modalities were used in patients with early-onset disease. Citation Format: Caroline Himbert, Jane Figueiredo, Lyen Huang, Biljana Gigic, Courtney L. Scaife, Bartley Pickron, Laura Lambert, Jessica Cohan, Mary Bronner, Jolanta Jedrzkiewicz, Esther Herpel, Matthias Kloor, Johanna Nattenmueller, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Alexis Ulrich, Seth Felder, Julian Sanchez, Sophie Dessureault, Nathan Hinkle, Justin Monroe, Matthew Mutch, Cory Bernadt, Deyali Chatterjee, Mika Sinanan, Stacey Cohen, Ulrik Wallin, Deepti Reddi, Mukta Krane, Afshin E. Gabayan, David M. Hoffman, Yosef Y. Nasseri, Robert W. Decker, Karen Zaghiyan, Zuri A. Murrell, Andrew E. Hendifar, Jun Gong, Eiman Firoozmand, Alexandra Gangi, Beth A. Moore, Kyle G. Cologne, Maryliza El-Masry, William Grady, Martin Schneider, Stephanie L. Schmit, Erin Siegel, David Shibata, Adetunji Toriola, Christopher Li, Cornelia Ulrich, Sheetal Hardikar. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of colorectal cancer in the ColoCare Study: Differences by age of onset [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 2364.