Early Initiation Of Enteral Feeding Research Articles

A new technique for bedside placement of enteral feeding tubes: a prospective cohort study

IntroductionTo accomplish early enteral feeding in the critically ill patient a new transnasal endoscopic approach to the placement of postpyloric feeding tubes by intensive care physicians was evaluated.MethodsThis was a prospective cohort study in 27 critically ill patients subjected to transnasal endoscopy and intubation of the pylorus. Attending intensive care physicians were trained in the handling of the new endoscope for transnasal gastroenteroscopy for two days. A jejunal feeding tube was advanced via the instrument channel and the correct position assessed by contrast radiography. The primary outcome measure was successful postpyloric placement of the tube. Secondary outcome measures were time needed for the placement, complications such as bleeding and formation of loops, and the score of the placement difficulty graded from 1 (easy) to 4 (difficult). Data are given as mean values and standard deviation.ResultsOut of 34 attempted jejunal tube placements, 28 tubes (82%) were placed correctly in the jejunum. The duration of the procedure was 28 ± 12 minutes. The difficulty of the tube placement was judged as follows: grade 1: 17 patients, grade 2: 8 patients, grade 3: 7 patients, grade 4: 2 patients. In three cases, the tube position was incorrect, and in another three cases, the procedure had to be aborted. In one patient bleeding occurred that required no further treatment.ConclusionsFast and reliable transnasal insertion of postpyloric feeding tubes can be accomplished by trained intensive care physicians at the bedside using the presented procedure. This new technique may facilitate early initiation of enteral feeding in intensive care patients.

Small bowel endoscopic enteral access

Small bowel endoscopic enteral access is perceived as difficult. However, small bowel access is necessary for patients who are unable to tolerate gastric feedings. This review discusses the successes and challenges involved with endoscopic small bowel tube placement in various populations using a variety of placement techniques. In general, direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (DPEJ) is becoming a more common procedure performed to obtain small bowel enteral access. BMI may be a useful predictor of DPEJ tube placement success and complication rates. A retrospective review determined that DPEJ tube placement significantly decreased the incidence of aspiration pneumonia in patients with previous recurrent aspiration pneumonia episodes. DPEJ is an effective method of providing enteral nutrition for patients when percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is not indicated because of anatomical or gastric function abnormalities. However, there are known complications of DPEJ, including small bowel volvulus. Nasojejunal tubes also can provide enteral access to the small intestine. Endoscopic insertion of nasojejunal tubes promotes decreased length of hospital stay and early initiation of enteral feedings as compared with bedside self-migrating jejunal tubes in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Endoscopically placed small bowel feeding tubes can safely deliver enteral nutrition to patients when gastric feedings are not indicated. Continued evaluation of endoscopic jejunal tube placement methods and associated clinical outcomes in assorted populations is necessary to determine the safest and most effective technique.

Treatment of Acute Pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis has an incidence of about 300 per 1 million individuals per year, of which 10-15% of patients develop the severe form of the disease. Novel management options, which have the potential to improve outcome, include initial proper fluid resuscitation, which maintains microcirculation and thereby potentially decreases ischaemia and reperfusion injury. The traditional treatment concept in acute pancreatitis, fasting and parenteral nutrition, has been challenged and early initiation of enteral feeding in severe pancreatitis and oral intake in mild acute pancreatitis is both feasible and provides some benefits. There are at present no data supporting immunonutritional supplements and probiotics should be avoided in patients with acute pancreatitis. There is also no evidence of any benefits provided by prophylactic antibacterials in patients with predicted severe acute pancreatitis. A variety of specific medical interventions have been investigated (e.g. intense blood glucose monitoring by insulin) but none has become clinically useful. Lessons can probably be learned from critical care in general, but studies are needed to verify these interventions in acute pancreatitis.

Review of ICU nutrition support practices: implementing the nurse‐led enteral feeding algorithm

Many intensive care units (ICUs) have standard feeding protocols which promote safe early initiation of enteral feeding. The use of these protocols has been shown to increase the incidence of enteral feeding and achieve greater adequacy of nutrition support. A multidisciplinary working party developed and implemented a nurse-led enteral feeding algorithm which enabled senior nursing staff to set safe and nutritionally adequate target feed volumes based upon patient body weight. The algorithm incorporated best practice-based referral criteria so that patients at nutritional risk were referred for tailored dietetic assessment. The aims were to determine compliance with the ICU nurse-led enteral feeding algorithm and to ascertain its safety and efficacy. A 3-month prospective audit was conducted by specialist ICU dietitians. Data were obtained from electronic patient records and through observing feeding practices. Data collected included prescribed feed type and infusion rate versus volume received, frequency of gastric aspiration and prokinetic usage. In all, 90% (n = 43) of referrals received by the dietitian met the referral criteria. Absolute compliance with patients receiving correct type and volumes of feed, with a correct feed prescription and an accurate documented weight was just 2% (n = 1). Despite this finding, 60% of patients were actually receiving the correct feed regimen. If the nurse-led enteral feeding algorithm is wholly adhered to, the ICU dietitian need not formally assess every ICU patient. Nursing staff require further support in assessing patient body weight alongside an ongoing intensive educational programme for the multidisciplinary team and regular reaudit.

Endoscopic repair of gastrostomy after inadvertent removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement has become the preferred method of enteral feeding for many patients. Neurologic disease and cancer are the most frequent indications for PEG tube placement. PEG tubes are also becoming more frequent in trauma patients for early initiation of enteral feeding. Inadvertent PEG tube removal is a well-known complication of PEG tubes. Patients undergoing PEG tube placement are frequently malnourished and in poor general medical condition, making them relatively high risk for surgical intervention. In the past, after early inadvertent PEG removal, patients underwent laparotomy for surgical repair of the gastrostomy site. Recently, laparoscopic replacement of the PEG tube has been described. We present a new technique of endoscopic repair of the gastrostomy site with hemoclip placement followed by later PEG tube placement.

Early feeding after necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants

ObjectiveTo report our experience with an early initiation of enteral feedings after necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Study designOver a 4-year period, all inborn infants with NEC Bell stage II or greater received enteral feedings, increased by 20 mL/kg/d, once no portal vein gas had been detected on ultrasound for 3 consecutive days (group 1). Infants were compared with a historic comparison group (group 2). ResultsNecrotizing enterocolitis rates were 5% (26/523) in the early feeding group and 4% (18/436) in the comparison group. One early feeding infant and two comparison group infants died of NEC, whereas two and one, respectively, had recurrent NEC. Enteral feedings were restarted at a median of 4 days (range, 3-14) versus 10 days (range, 8-22) after onset of NEC. Early feeding was associated with shorter time to reach full enteral feedings (10 days [range, 7-31] vs 19 days [range, 9-76], P<.001), a reduced duration of central venous access (13.5 days [range, 8-24] vs 26.0 days [range, 8-39], P<.01), less catheter-related septicemia (18% vs 29%, P<.01), and a shorter duration of hospital stay (63 days [range, 28-133] vs 69 days [range, 36-150], P<.05). ConclusionEarly enteral feeding after NEC was associated with significant benefits and no apparent adverse effects. This study was underpowered, however, to exclude a higher NEC recurrence risk potentially associated with this change in practice.

Early Initiation of Enteral Feeding After Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement

Enteral feeding through the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube is usually initiated about 12 to 24 hours after insertion of the tube. There have been earlier studies evaluating the efficacy of early initiation of enteral feedings that had encouraging results. However, delayed initiation of feeding following PEG placement continues to be practiced widely. We believe that feeding can be done earlier without any increase in associated morbidity or mortality and with obvious reduction in the need for parenteral nutrition and healthcare costs. We evaluated a protocol to initiate enteral nutrition 4 hours after the PEG tube insertion with subsequent discharge of the outpatients on the same day. We conducted a prospective study to assess the efficacy of early initiation of PEG feeding. We enrolled 77 patients in our study who were having PEG tubes placed for enteral feeding. Only patients who had a PEG placed for gastric venting procedures were excluded from our study. During the course of our study, no patient had to be excluded for the latter reason. Patients were evaluated by the physician performing the procedure, 4 hours after the tube was inserted. Their vital signs were checked, and a thorough abdominal examination was performed. Minimal tenderness around the PEG site was the most frequent finding. Otherwise, all the patients had a benign abdominal examination. The tube was flushed with 60 mL of sterile water. Following the examination, orders were given to restart the feedings. These patients were followed for a 30-day period to evaluate complications associated with PEG tube placement and early initiation of PEG feeding. There was one case of aspiration pneumonia (1.3%) and one death that was attributed to the underlying disease out of our 77 patients. Early initiation of enteral feeding after PEG tube placement can be successfully completed with a systematic protocol and close observation. Not only was this protocol found to be safe, it can also have significant cost savings by eliminating the need for inpatient hospitalization for the procedure.

Parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis.

Cholestasis is a major complication that occurs frequently in patients with the short bowel syndrome and accounts for the majority of morbidity and mortality in this group of patients. The exact cause of this condition is not known and the etiology is likely multifactorial. Many new mechanistic insights into this disease are discussed and have paved the way for future investigation. For now, prompt recognition, early initiation of enteral feeding, prevention of overfeeding with parenteral nutrition, and agents that induce bile flow may be useful to prevent this catastrophic morbidity.

Principles and practice of parenteral nutrition in the neonatal period.

In extremely preterm or critically ill infants, the parenteral route for maintaining nutritional integrity has to be relied upon before successful transition to the enteral route of feeding is achieved. Parenteral nutrition is now a fundamental part of neonatal intensive care. Fluid intake volumes vary from 60-150 ml/kg/d, depending on maturity of the infant and environmental conditions influencing insensible water loss from the skin. Parenteral nitrogen requirements are 30-35 mmol/kg/d, equivalent to 3.0-3.5 mg/kg/d of amino acids. Hyperglycaemia during parenteral nutrition can be minimised by starting glucose infusion at a rate of 6-8 g/kg/d with progressive increase to 18-20 g/kg/d by 2-3 weeks after birth. Parenteral fat is introduced at 1 g/kg/d, gradually increasing to 3 g/kg/d, given as a continuous infusion. An energy intake of 50 kcal/kg/d is adequate to match ongoing expenditure but an additional energy intake of 70 kcal/kg/d is required to achieve optimal growth. Minerals and trace elements delivered with parenteral nutrition are calculated to meet in-utero accretion rates. Multivitamins available for parenteral use should also be included. Improved techniques for the preparation, administration and monitoring of parenteral nutrition have helped minimise catheter-related and metabolic complications. In neonatal intensive care units where appropriate medical, nursing, pharmacy and laboratory expertise are available, the potential benefits of parenteral nutrition outweigh its hazards. Nevertheless, early initiation of enteral feeding in small subnutritional quantities to supplement parenteral nutrition is of major importance to enhance the growth and development of the gastrointestinal tract.