Early Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Research Articles

Early dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with minor ischemic stroke after intravenous thrombolysis

ObjectivesMinor stroke is defined by a score of 5 or less on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Prior trials have shown efficacy of short term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in secondary prevention of stroke among patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor ischemic stroke, but no randomized clinical trials have studied this benefit after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Our aim was to investigate the safety of DAPT within 90 days after IVT in patients with acute minor ischemic stroke. Patients and methodsWe reviewed medical records of patients older than 18 years that received IVT between January 2015 and December 2022. Patients had a diagnosis of acute minor stroke or averted stroke (complete recovery and negative image on follow-up). Single or dual antiplatelet treatment was started 24 hours after thrombolysis according to the physician's judgment. Patients were divided in two groups: single and dual antiplatelet therapy. We assessed clinical outcome using the modified Rankin scale (mRS), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) and mortality at 90 days. ResultsFifty-three patients met the inclusion criteria, 68% men aged 64±16,5 years. Seventy five percent had an ischemic stroke and 25% had an averted stroke. Median door-to-needle time was 50 minutes. Fifty one percent were in the single antiplatelet group and 49% in the dual antiplatelet therapy group. There were no differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between groups. The 90-day mRS did not show significant difference between groups. No patients had SICH nor died during follow-up. One patient in the single antiplatelet group had stroke recurrence. ConclusionsDual antiplatelet therapy after IVT with rtPA for acute minor ischemic stroke appears not to increase the risk of bleeding and mortality compared to single antiplatelet therapy in the first three months after the event. This is the first study to assess this subject in a Latin American population.

Intravenous thrombolysis versus dual antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute minor ischaemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with acute minor ischaemic stroke (AMIS) remains unclear. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of IVT and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with AMIS. The Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were searched up to 10 October, 2023. Prospective and retrospective studies comparing the clinical outcomes of IVT and DAPT were included. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for early neurological deterioration (END), excellent and favourable functional outcomes, recurrent ischaemic stroke at 3months, mortality at 3months, and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) were pooled using a random-effects model. Of the five included studies, 6,340 patients were included. In patients with AMIS, IVT was not significantly associated with excellent and favourable functional outcomes, recurrent ischaemic stroke, or all-cause mortality at 3months compared to early DAPT. However, a higher risk of symptomatic ICH (OR, 9.31; 95% CI, 3.39-25.57) and END (OR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.76-4.30) were observed with IVT. This meta-analysis indicated that IVT was not superior to DAPT in patients with AMIS, especially in those with nondisabling AIS. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution and have some limitations. Further, well-designed randomised controlled trials are warranted.

Author Response: IV Thrombolysis vs Early Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Mild Noncardioembolic Ischemic Stroke.

Author Response: IV Thrombolysis vs Early Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Mild Noncardioembolic Ischemic Stroke.

Preliminary results on temporal evolution and clinical implications of atherosclerotic plaque in branch atheromatous disease after statin treatment.

Branch atheromatous disease (BAD) is a primary cause of early neurological deterioration (END) in penetrating artery occlusion, leading to poor functional outcomes. While it has been proposed to classify BAD under large artery atherosclerosis, uncertainty exists regarding the optimal treatment strategy, including cholesterol-lowering targets. We aimed to assess the clinical implications and temporal changes of atherosclerotic plaques before and after high-intensity statin treatment. This is a high-resolution vessel-wall imaging sub-analysis of the trial of Statin and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Preventing Early Neurological Deterioration in Branch Atheromatous Disease (SATBRAD). In this prospective, single-group cohort study, participants in the treatment arm of the SATBRAD trial received early dual antiplatelet therapy and high-intensity statin treatment. The majority of these participants subsequently underwent high-resolution vessel-wall magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Those with atheromatous plaques in the parent artery continued high-intensity statin treatment for 6 months, followed by a repeat MRI to monitor plaque changes. There were 57 patients who underwent vessel-wall imaging and 24 exhibited contrast-enhanced plaques. Patients with contrast-enhanced plaques showed higher rates of END (29.2% vs 6.1%, p = 0.027), perfusion defects (62.5% vs 24.2%, p = 0.004), and lower rates of good outcomes at 3 months (50.0% vs 81.8%, p = 0.011). After adjusting for confounding factors, contrast-enhanced plaque had a negative impact on achieving a good outcome at 3 months (adjusted odds ratio = 0.04; 95% confidence interval = <0.01-0.60). Following high-intensity statin treatment in 36 patients, there was a notable reduction in stenosis (33.7% vs 29.3%, p = 0.005) and contrast-enhanced plaque volume (16.3 vs 11.6 mm3, p = 0.015). The study highlighted the association between contrast-enhanced atherosclerotic plaques, END, and poor functional outcomes, with high-intensity treatment leading to plaque volume reduction. These results underscore the shared pathology between BAD and intracranial atherosclerosis, emphasizing the necessity for further research and tailored treatment strategies for BAD. ClinicalTrials.gov; Identifier: NCT04824911 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04824911).

IV Thrombolysis vs Early Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Mild Noncardioembolic Ischemic Stroke.

It is unclear whether IV thrombolysis (IVT) outperforms early dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in the acute setting of mild ischemic stroke. The aim of this study was to compare the early safety and efficacy of IVT with that of DAPT. Data of mild noncardioembolic stroke patients with admission NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≤3 who received IVT or early DAPT in the period 2018-2021 were extracted from a nationwide, prospective stroke unit registry. Study endpoints included symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), early neurologic deterioration ≥4 NIHSS points (END), and 3-month functional outcome by modified Rankin scale (mRS). A total of 1,195 mild stroke patients treated with IVT and 2,625 patients treated with DAPT were included. IVT patients were younger (68.1 vs 70.8 years), had less hypertension (72.8% vs 83.5%), diabetes (19% vs 28.8%), and a history of myocardial infarction (7.6% vs 9.2%), and slightly higher admission NIHSS scores (median 2 vs median 1) when compared with DAPT patients. After propensity score matching and multivariable adjustment, IVT was associated with sICH (4 [1.2%] vs 0) and END (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.8, 95% CI 1.1-7.5), and there was no difference in mRS 0-1 at 3 months (aOR 1.3, 95% CI 0.7-2.6). This analysis from a prospective nationwide stroke unit network indicates that IVT is not superior to DAPT in the setting of mild noncardioembolic stroke and may eventually be associated with harm. Further research focusing on acute therapy of mild stroke is highly warranted. This study provides Class III evidence that IVT is not superior to DAPT in patients with acute mild (NIHSS score ≤3) noncardioembolic stroke. The study lacks the statistical precision to exclude clinically important superiority of either therapy.

Safety and feasibility of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery early after drug-eluting stent implantation due to acute coronary syndrome.

The evidence on performing minimally invasive coronary artery surgery early after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation due to acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is limited. The study aimed to determine the safety and feasibility of this approach. This registry included 115 (78% male) patients treated from 2013 to 2018, who underwent non-left anterior descending (LAD) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) due to ACS with contemporary DES implantation (39% diagnosed with myocardial infarction at baseline), followed by endoscopic atraumatic coronary artery bypass (EACAB) surgery within 180 days, after temporary P2Y12 inhibitor discontinuation. Primary composite endpoint of MACCE (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events), defined as death, myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular incident, and repeat revascularization was evaluated in long-term follow-up. The follow-up was collected via a telephone survey and in line with National Registry for Cardiac Surgery Procedures. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) time interval separating both procedures was 100.0 (62.0-136.0) days. Median (IQR) follow-up duration was 1338.5 (753.0-2093.0) days and was completed for all patients with regard to mortality. Eight patients (7%) died; 2 (1.7%) had a stroke; 6 (5.2%) suffered from MI, and 12 (10.4%) required repeat revascularization. Overall, the incidence of MACCE was 20 (17.4%). EACAB is a safe and feasible method of LAD revascularization in patients who received DES for ACS within 180 days before surgery despite early dual antiplatelet therapy discontinuation. The adverse event rate is low and acceptable.

Duration and clinical outcome of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective cohort study using a medical information database from Japanese hospitals

In this real-world, retrospective cohort study of 9753 patients in Japan prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), we investigated DAPT duration and determined factors associated with early DAPT discontinuation and with event rates in patients who discontinued DAPT. The study period was April 1, 2012–March 31, 2018; endpoints comprised composite efficacy [death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke] and bleeding (intracranial, gastrointestinal, and requiring transfusion) endpoints. Overall, 68.8% of patients were continuing DAPT at 3 months post-PCI. Patients without major efficacy or safety events within 3 months after index PCI were included in a landmark analysis set (LAS; n = 7056), and categorized as DAPT ≥ 3 months (continuation) versus < 3 months (discontinuation). In the two LAS analysis groups, there was no difference in the composite bleeding endpoint (P = 0.067), although the incidence of the composite efficacy endpoint was higher in the discontinuation group (P < 0.001). In multivariate regression analysis, age ≥ 75 years, minor bleeding after PCI, history of cerebral infarction, history of cerebral or gastrointestinal bleeding, atrial fibrillation, dialysis, and anticoagulant use after PCI were associated with early DAPT discontinuation. Acute coronary syndrome, history of MI, kidney disorder, and anticoagulant use after PCI were associated with the composite efficacy endpoint in the discontinuation group. In conclusion, early DAPT discontinuation is more likely in patients at high bleeding risk, but may influence the occurrence of ischemic events in these patients. Determination of DAPT duration should take into account potential ischemic risk, even in patients at high bleeding risk.

Pharmacodynamic Effects of Pre-Hospital Administered Crushed Prasugrel in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

This study sought to compare the pharmacodynamic effects of pre-hospitally administered P2Y12 inhibitor prasugrel in crushed versus integral tablet formulation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Early dual antiplatelet therapy is recommended in STEMI patients. Yet, onset of oral P2Y12 inhibitor effect is delayed and varies according to formulation administered. The COMPARE CRUSH (Comparison of Pre-hospital Crushed Versus Uncrushed Prasugrel Tablets in Patients With STEMI Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions) trial randomized patients with suspected STEMI to crushed or integral prasugrel 60-mg loading dose in the ambulance. Pharmacodynamic measurements were performed at 4 time points: before antiplatelet treatment, at the beginning and end of pPCI, and 4h after study treatment onset. The primary endpoint was high platelet reactivity at the end of pPCI. The secondary endpoint was impact of platelet reactivity status on markers of coronary reperfusion. A total of 441 patients were included. In patients with crushed prasugrel, the occurrence of high platelet reactivity at the end of pPCI was reduced by almost one-half (crushed 34.7% vs. uncrushed 61.6%; odds ratio [OR]=0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.22 to 0.50; p<0.01). Platelet reactivity<150 P2Y12 reactivity units at the beginning of coronary angiography correlated with improved Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade 3 in the infarct artery pre-pPCI (OR: 1.78; 95%CI: 1.08 to 2.94; p=0.02) but not ST-segment resolution (OR: 0.80; 95%CI: 0.48 to 1.34; p=0.40). Oral administration of crushed compared with integral prasugrel significantly improves platelet inhibition during the acute phase in STEMI patients undergoing pPCI. However, a considerable number of patients still exhibit inadequate platelet inhibition at the end of pPCI, suggesting the need for alternative agents to bridge the gap in platelet inhibition.

Early Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy at the Emergency Department Is Associated with Lower In-Hospital Major Adverse Cardiac Event Risk among Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Background Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is a standard treatment in non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). However, the timing of initiation of DAPT in the Emergency Department (ED) is not well established. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the correlation between the different timings of DAPT initiation in ED and the outcomes in patients with NSTEMI. Method We retrospectively collected data of patients who were diagnosed as NSTEMI in the ED of China Medical University Hospital during 2016 to 2019. All NSTEMI patients who required coronary stenting or ballooning were enrolled into the study, which means NSTEMI patients who received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were included. The time interval between ED arrival and DAPT given was recorded. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether they received DAPT within 6 hours after arrival to the ED. The primary outcomes were in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The secondary outcomes were unexpected return to the ED within 72 hours, readmission within 14 days, and revascularization procedures performed within the first 30 days. Results 938 NSTEMI patients with PCI were enrolled. Patients who received DAPT beyond 6 hours were relatively old (65.70 ± 14.13 versus 63.16 ± 13.31, p=0.014) and had relatively more comorbidities and higher Killip scores than those who received DAPT within 6 hours. The group that received DAPT within 6 hours had lower in-hospital MACE rate (3.52% versus 8.37%, p=0.009). Multivariate logistic regression showed the group beyond 6 hours was independently associated with higher risk for in-hospital MACE rate (OR : 2.09, 95% CI 1.07–4.07, p=0.030). Conclusion Among patients with NSTEMI, DAPT beyond 6 hours after ED arrival have higher in-hospital MACE rate than those within 6 hours.

Early Aspirin Discontinuation After Coronary Stenting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BackgroundThe clinical impact of early aspirin discontinuation compared with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting remains poorly studied. We investigated the clinical outcomes of patients assigned to either early aspirin discontinuation or DAPT after percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting.Methods and ResultsWe performed a meta‐analysis of aggregate data from randomized clinical trials enrolling participants receiving a percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting and assigned to either early aspirin discontinuation or DAPT. Scientific databases were searched from inception through March 30, 2020. Trial‐level hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were pooled using a random effects model with inverse variance weighting. The primary outcome was all‐cause death. Secondary outcomes were myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, and major bleeding. Overall, 36 206 participants were allocated to either early aspirin discontinuation (experimental therapy, n=18 088) or DAPT (control therapy, n=18 118) in 7 trials. Median follow‐up was 12 months. All‐cause death occurred in 2.5% of patients assigned to experimental and 2.9% of patients assigned control therapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.91, 95% CI, 0.75–1.11; P=0.37). Overall, patients treated with experimental versus control therapy showed no significant difference in terms of myocardial infarction (HR, 1.02 [0.85–1.22], P=0.81), stent thrombosis (HR, 1.02 [0.87–1.20], P=0.83), or stroke (HR, 1.01 [0.68–1.49], P=0.96). However, the risk for major bleeding (HR, 0.58 [0.43–0.77], P<0.01) was significantly reduced by experimental as compared with control therapy.ConclusionsIn patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting, assigned to a strategy of early aspirin discontinuation versus DAPT, the risk of death and ischemic events is not significantly different but the risk of bleeding is lower.

The 2020 breakthroughs in early secondary prevention: dual antiplatelet therapy versus single antiplatelet therapy.

Single antiplatelet therapy represents an established treatment in secondary prevention of ischemic strokes and transient ischemic attacks (TIAs). In contrast with coronary artery disease, the use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for secondary prevention in patients with acute cerebral ischemia (ACI) remains under debate. In this narrative review, we present and analyse the most recent findings concerning the potential efficacy and safety of DAPT therapy after ischemic strokes or TIA. Following the publication of the three (CHANCE, POINT and THALES) large, randomized-controlled, clinical trials (RCTs) that showed efficacy of early DAPT for the secondary prevention after minor AIS or TIA, short-term DAPT use is becoming the most prevalent choice of treatment. Notably, DAPT is even more popular after AIS attributed to large artery atherosclerosis given randomized data from small RCTs supporting the use of DAPT in patients with extracranial or intracranial atherosclerosis and microembolization detected by transcranial Doppler. Recent subanalysis of data from the randomized trials aim to identify specific patient subgroups, which are determined by genetic, imaging or clinical characteristics, and for whom DAPT appears to be more beneficial. The potential role of different antiplatelet agents (aspirin, clopidogrel, ticagrelor) is also discussed. DAPT has recently proven its efficacy for the early secondary prevention of AIS patients with minor stroke severity and high-risk TIA patients. However, the length of DAPT is still controversial, as well as the individualized selection of AIS or TIA patients with the lower risk of bleeding and with the greater benefit in prevention of ischemic cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events.

Early dual antiplatelet therapy versus acetylsalicylic acid monotherapy after CABG: propensity score analysis addressing survival and safety outcomes

Abstract Background There is currently conflicting evidence regarding the security profile and outcomes of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Aim We aim to compare the effect of early DAPT in short and long-term survival versus acetylsalicylic acid in a monotherapy regimen (ASA). Therapy's safety was evaluated through immediate or early postoperative outcomes, with particular emphasis on the haemorrhagic. Methods Single-centre retrospective cohort study on consecutive patients undergoing 1st isolated CABG surgery in 2010. Median follow-up time was 9 years. Pre-, peri- and postoperative data was collected through clinical files and digital databases. The DAPT and ASA groups were defined considering the administration of clopidogrel plus acetylsalicylic acid and only acetylsalicylic acid, respectively, within a 24h window after CABG. T-tests and Pearson's chi-squared tests were used for group comparison. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves, Log-Rank test and multivariable Cox regression. Propensity scores (PS) were estimated using a multivariable logistic regression model and included in multivariable regressions as a covariate along with DAPT. Early mortality was defined if occurred before discharge or within the 30 days following the surgery; bleeding was assessed through red blood cells' (RBC) transfusion, re-exploration of thorax and drainage. Results We included 351 patients, 81% were male, and DAPT was performed in 251 patients (72%). DAPT patients were younger (63±10 vs. 66±10 years, p=0.007) but both groups were similar regarding the cardiovascular modifiable risk factors. Kaplan-Meier curves showed similar cumulative survival between groups (75% in DAPT vs. 67% in ASA group, at 9 years of follow-up, Log-rank p=0.103), as well as the PS adjusted analysis (HR DAPT: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.57–1.51). Regarding safety outcomes, we found no differences in early mortality (two cases in the DAPT group and one in the ASA group). Total median cell-saver transfusion (300mL vs. 250mL, p=0.318) and the re-exploration of thorax due to bleeding (1.6% vs. 4% p=0.231) showed no statistical significance either. On the other hand, post-operative total median chest tube drainage was higher in the ASA group (1220mL in DAPT vs. 1300mL in ASA, p=0.043). There was also a lower frequency of DAPT patients requiring 3 or more peri and postoperative RBC transfusions (8.5% vs. 13.3% p&amp;lt;0.001 and 4.8% vs. 13%, p=0.009, respectively) and a shorter in-hospital stay following CABG (median of 7 days for DAPT and 8 days for ASA, P&amp;lt;0.001). Redo-CABG was performed in 3 patients (2 DAPT vs. 1 ASA) during follow-up. Conclusion Compared with ASA, DAPT showed a non-significant impact on long-term survival but demonstrated to be a safe option within the assessed bleeding outcomes. Further studies are needed to provide recommendations on the therapeutical strategy following CABG. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): Universidade do Porto/FMUP, FSE-Fundo Social Europeu, NORTE 2020-Programa Operacional Regional do Norte, Programas Doutorais. Project NetDIAMOND, supported by ESIF under Lisbon Portugal Regional Operational Programme and National Funds through FCT

Timing of dual antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome: a problem of coronary artery bypass grafting accessibility for patients

The feasibility of dual antiplatelet therapy as early as possible in patients with ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome, where percutaneous coronary intervention is recommended, has been proven: it improves treatment outcomes by reducing the risk of adverse ischemic events, including stent thrombosis and myocardial infarction.This article provides a detailed analysis of the evidence data and current recommendations on the validity and timing of dual antiplatelet therapy for acute coronary syndrome. The emphasis is made on the controversy regarding the early dual antiplatelet therapy in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. The rationale for using dual antiplatelet therapy only after coronary angiography and determining the revascularization strategy is described, which should increase the accessibility of coronary artery bypass graft surgery for patients.

The effect of early dual antiplatelet timing on the microvascular resistance and ventricular function in primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Although dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has been shown to improve index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), the importance of the early DAPT administration on IMR and left ventricular function has not been clearly defined. In this study, we aimed to assess whether early DAPT administration affect IMR, epicardial flow, and left ventricular function in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).This was a prospective non-randomized study on STEMI receiving primary PCI in a tertiary hospital. All subjects received loading dose DAPT (Aspirin + Clopidogrel) before primary PCI. Patients were then divided into 2 groups, the first group consists of patients receiving DAPT time ≤2 hours and the second group consists of those with DAPT time >2 hours. The primary endpoint of this study was IMR, a microvasculature function index measured quantitatively by pressure-/temperature-tipped guidewire after balloon dilatation. The secondary endpoint was the mean difference of global longitudinal strain (GLS) change at 6 months follow-up, TIMI flow before, and after PCI between the 2 groups.There were 40 subjects qualified for the study, 20 subjects in each group. There was no significant difference in IMR (50.90 [34.66] vs 58.06 [45.56], P = .579) between the 2 groups. Early administration of DAPT improved ventricular function at 6 months, reflected by statistically significant greater improvement in terms of ΔGLS (–3.48 [2.61] vs –1.23 [2.87], P = .013) and Δejection fraction (10.65% [8.74] vs –0.75% [12.83], P = .002) in the DAPT time ≤2 hours group compared with DAPT time >2 hours group. TIMI flow before PCI (P = .653) and TIMI flow after PCI (P = .205) were similar in the 2 groups.Early DAPT administration ≤2 hours may improve left ventricular function, but not IMR and TIMI flow.

75-Year-Old Woman With Chest Pain and Shortness of Breath

75-Year-Old Woman With Chest Pain and Shortness of Breath

Higher early recurrence risk and potential benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy for minor stroke with watershed infarction: subgroup analysis of CHANCE.

The aim was to explore the risk of early stroke recurrence within 3months after watershed infarction and to investigate whether early dual antiplatelet therapy is more effective in decreasing such risk. Patients enrolled in the Clopidogrel in High-risk Patients with Acute Non-disabling Cerebrovascular Events (CHANCE) trial and who had acute infarction on diffusion-weighted imaging were included in this subgroup analysis. All magnetic resonance images were read centrally by two neurologists who were blinded to the patients' baseline and outcome information. The primary outcome was any stroke recurrence within 3months. The hazard ratios were adjusted by known predictors of stroke recurrence. Of the 1089 patients with magnetic resonance imaging data enrolled in CHANCE, 834 (76.58%) patients had acute infarcts on diffusion-weighted imaging. The median and range of duration from randomization to stroke recurrence was 1.5 (1-6) days. Patients with watershed infarction had higher risk of stroke recurrence than those without (17.20% vs. 6.34%) within the first week after initial stroke; the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) was 2.799 (1.536-5.101) adjusted by age, sex, smoking, body mass index, medical history, time to randomization, open-label aspirin dose at first day, single or dual antiplatelet therapy, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at randomization, in-hospital treatment and white matter lesions, P<0.001. There was no interaction between antiplatelet therapy and the presence of watershed infarction (P=0.544). Minor stroke with watershed infarction has high recurrent risk in the first week. Dual antiplatelet therapy may be safely implemented, yet watershed infarction mechanisms of hypoperfusion and emboli may not be addressed.

Status of the clopidogrel use in ACS patients and related factors among county hospitals in China

Objective: To observe the use of clopidogrel and related factors for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in terms of early use, loading dose, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and maintenance dose hospitalized in non-PCI country hospitals in China. Methods: Patients hospitalized for ACS from 101 non-PCI country hospitals across China were recruited prospectively from October 2011 to November 2014. In-hospital clopidogrel use rate, the proportions of early use (within 24 hours), loading dose use (≥300 mg), DAPT (early use combined with aspirin) and maintenance dose use (following dose≥75 mg/d) were analyzed. Generalized estimated equation (GEE) model was used to explore factors associated to in-hospital clopidogrel use and loading dose use in both univariate and multivariate analyses, adjusting for cluster effect. Results: A total of 14 809 ACS patients were included, with an average age of (64.1±11.6) years and 60% (8 888/14 809) were male. The in-hospital clopidogrel use rate was 66.4% (9 828/14 809), which varied across different regions, years and sub-types of ACS (all P<0.05). Among users, the proportions of patients with early use, DAPT and maintenance dose use were 91.3% (8 734/9 562), 89.2% (8 526/9 562) and 95.1% (9 094/9 562), respectively, but the proportion of patients received loading dose was only 41.8% (3 995/9 562). Multivariate analyses showed that patients who admitted to hospital in earlier years and with non-ST elevation ACS, ≥75 years old, female, non-smoking, illiterate, heart rate≥100 beats per minute, atrial fibrillation, not on ECG monitoring, and not using other anti-ACS drugs were less likely to receive clopidogrel (all P<0.05). And those clopidogrel users who with non-ST elevation ACS, ≥75 years old, non-smoking, illiterate, not using other anti-ACS drugs were less likely to receive loading dose (all P<0.05). Conclusion: The use rate of clopidogrel and the loading dose among in-hospital ACS patients are both low and remain to be improved in non-PCI county hospitals in China. Special attention should be paid on non-ST elevation ACS, ≥75 years old, female, and illiterate patients to increase the rational use of clopidogrel and the loading dose.

Real-world use of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in percutaneous coronary intervention-treated ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: A single-center registry study

ObjectivesThe primary aim was to investigate the efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) using ticagrelor (T-DAPT) versus clopidogrel (C-DAPT) in a real-world ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) population. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 655 consecutive patients having primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI at Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia (from January 2013 to April 2016). Medical and procedural therapies were at clinician discretion. Patient data were retrieved from hospital records and primary clinicians. ResultsT-DAPT (65%) was used more frequently, and in patients with lower mean CRUSADE (Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes with Early Implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines) score, than C-DAPT (24.6 vs. 32.2; p < 0.0001, respectively). All-cause mortality was 9.0% at 2.7 years follow-up, with fewer deaths for T-DAPT (4.5% vs. 17.2%; p < 0.0001). T-DAPT incurred less BARC (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) 3–5 major bleeding (5.0% vs. 12.4%; p < 0.0001). Multivariate regression showed that C-DAPT, GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Cardiac Events) score, and renal insufficiency were independently associated with mortality. Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and GRACE score independently predicted BARC 3–5 bleeding. Early DAPT discontinuation (1.7%) and ticagrelor intolerance (7.6%) was rare. Switching DAPT regimen was infrequent (21.7%) and mostly attributed to clinician preference (73.2%). Independent determinants of C-DAPT selection were older age, diabetes, prior PCI, IABP, and higher CRUSADE score. ConclusionTicagrelor was preferred in low bleeding risk patients, which may have contributed to less BARC 3–5 bleeding and lower mortality for T-DAPT. Thus, bleeding mitigation is a clinical priority when selecting DAPT for PCI-treated STEMI patients. Continuation of initial DAPT regimen was typical, but early switching from clopidogrel to ticagrelor shows willingness to optimize DAPT. Patients with very low CRUSADE scores (<21.5) may be appropriate for switching to a potent P2Y12 inhibitor.

Understanding operator stent choice in the catheterization laboratory using a pre-procedure survey: Opportunities for quality improvement.

We sought to characterize how the perceived risk of early dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) discontinuation is incorporated into operator decision-making regarding stent choice, using a simple pre-procedure survey screening for clinical variables that may lead to early DAPT discontinuation. Understanding which factors influence operator decision-making regarding stent choice during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) could help identify areas for quality improvement. We retrospectively identified 1202 patients who underwent PCI from July 2008 to January 2013 at the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center. We excluded patients without a complete pre-procedure survey within 14days of PCI, repeat procedures on the same patient and those who received both drug-eluting stents (DES) and bare-metal stents (BMS) or no stent during PCI, leaving 864 patients. The primary outcome was the independent association of "yes" responses to survey items with the odds of DES use during PCI. Of 864 patients, 661 received DES and 203 received BMS. A "yes" response to "planned major surgery or dental work in the next year" (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.11-0.36, p<0.001), "recent bleeding event or bleeding diathesis" (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.14-0.68, p=0.003) or "currently taking Coumadin" (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19-0.78, p=0.007) was independently associated with lower odds of DES use. Responses to 3 items on a simple pre-procedure survey screening for clinical variables that may lead to early DAPT discontinuation were independently associated with stent type used during PCI, suggesting the importance of these factors in an operator's stent choice.

Impact of early (3 months) dual antiplatelet treatment interruption prior to renal transplantation in patients with second-generation DES on perioperative stent thrombosis and MACEs.

Objective:Early cessation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is related to stent thrombosis (ST). The use of second-generation everolimus- and zotarolimus-eluting stents is associated with low restenosis rates and short duration of clopidogrel usage. Non-cardiac surgery in recently stent-implanted patients is associated with major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Chronic renal failure patients awaiting renal transplantation may also undergo coronary stent implantation prior to surgery. Here we aimed to investigate the safety of early (3 months) DAPT interruption in second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES)-implanted renal transplant recipients.Methods:In total, 106 previously stent-implanted chronic renal failure patients who underwent renal transplantation were retrospectively enrolled. Three groups were formed according to stent type and the duration of DAPT: early-interruption (3 months from DES implantation), late-interruption (3–12 months from DES implantation), and bare-metal stent (BMS; at least 1 month from BMS implantation) groups.Results:Comparison among BMS, DES-early and DES-late groups indicated no difference in ST, myocardial infarction, death, and MACEs. In addition, no difference was observed in ST (p=0.998), myocardial infarction (p=0.998), death (p=0.999), and MACEs (p=0.998) between DES-early and DES-late groups.Conclusion:Early (3 months) interruption of antiplatelet treatment with second-generation stents before renal transplantation seems to be safe and does not lead to increase in the occurrence of ST and MACEs.