Early Clinical Development Research Articles

Abstract 6264: NUV-868, a novel BD2-selective BET inhibitor, in combination with enzalutamide or olaparib, inhibits growth of solid tumor xenografts

Abstract The bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) family of proteins play a vital role in gene transcription, making it an attractive therapeutic target for cancer. BET inhibitors can also combine with many anticancer agents to enhance activity. The bromodomains of the BET protein, BD1 and BD2, have unique functions and inhibiting either domain can result in differential responses. To date, non-selective BET inhibitors have failed during early clinical development due to significant on-target toxicity and limited benefit; however, selectively targeting specific bromodomains may result in a more favorable benefit/risk profile. NUV-868 is a novel and highly selective BD2 inhibitor of the BET protein family with ~1500-fold selectivity for BRD4-BD2 relative to BRD4-BD1. Herein, we describe NUV-868 and its activity in multiple in vitro and in vivo solid tumor models. Target engagement, selectivity of bromodomain inhibition, and regulation of BET-mediated gene expression were examined. Additionally, the antitumor activity of NUV-868 in combination with enzalutamide or olaparib was studied in tumor xenograft models of prostate, breast, and pancreatic cancer. NUV-868 demonstrated high selectivity for BD2 and regulated expression of several BET target genes. NUV-868 in combination with enzalutamide inhibited growth of several prostate cancer cell line- and patient-derived xenografts. NUV-868 in combination with olaparib inhibited tumor growth in models of breast, ovarian and pancreatic cancer. Our preclinical data demonstrate that NUV-868, a BD2-selective BET inhibitor, inhibits growth of tumor xenografts in combination with enzalutamide or olaparib and provides rationale for examination of these combinations in the clinic. An ongoing, phase 1 clinical study (NCT05252390) is evaluating NUV-868 as a monotherapy and in combination with olaparib or enzalutamide in patients with advanced solid tumors. Citation Format: Hitisha Patel, Jennifer Hertzog, Laura Heller, Spandana Vootukuri, Yan Zhang, Chris Miller, Gary Hattersley. NUV-868, a novel BD2-selective BET inhibitor, in combination with enzalutamide or olaparib, inhibits growth of solid tumor xenografts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 6264.

Abstract 5664: A novel immunotherapy for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)

Abstract Successful treatment of ALL has been a major feat of modern medicine. Overall, 5-year survival in pediatric ALL patients approaches 90%, but 10-15% of patients will relapse. In relapse, ALL is still challenging to cure with 5-year overall survival rates being at or just below 50% and traditional therapies in this space have been highly toxic. Novel immunotherapies such as blinatumomab, inotuzumab and CAR T-cells have improved outcomes and reduced toxicities but are not curated to some of the most vulnerable patients in relapse including T-cell ALL (for which there are no FDA approved immunotherapies) and Philadelphia-like B-ALL. Thus, unmet needs remain in relapsed/refractory (r/r) ALL. The IL-7 and TSLP axes play an important role in B-ALL and T-ALL including in chemotherapy resistance. CD127 (IL7RA) is an attractive target due to limited expression in normal tissues, as confirmed with a GLP. We are developing 4A10, a novel monoclonal antibody against CD127 which labels ALL cells for degradation via antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) and inhibiting IL-7 signaling in T-ALL. 4A10 has demonstrated robust in-vitro and in-vivo anti-cancer activity in pre-clinical PDX models. The antibody substantially reduces circulating tumor burden and organ infiltration, and prolongs overall survival in both naïve and chemotherapy resistant PDX models. Thus, 4A10 holds promise as a novel agent in patients with r/r ALL. 4A10 manufacturing has been successfully scaled up, with a stable master cell bank and good yields at the 200L scale. Our clinical formulation showed no refrigerated or frozen degradation over 3 months and minimal degradation or aggregation at 25°C. In their pre-IND guidance, FDA confirmed that our approach to physicochemical and biological characterization of 4A10 and our proposed analytical methods and tests appear acceptable for early clinical development. 4A10 was well-tolerated in rodent and non-human primate (NHP) toxicological studies with a No Observable Adverse Event Level (NOAEL) in NHPs well in excess of the expected therapeutic dose. Repeat dose NHP pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies support weekly dosing and do not indicate dose accumulation. Although pivotal GLP toxicology studies have yet to be completed, initial NHP studies do not provide any indications of concern. We plan to initiate a Phase I/IIA study in 2023 to assess 4A10 in patients with r/r ALL. The Phase I portion of the study will determine the recommended Phase II dose, and the Phase IIA expansion cohorts have been designed to provide clinical proof of concept. The clinical study will be conducted in partnership with the Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia and Lymphoma (TACL) consortium and key adult centers. If our Phase I/IIA is successful, we expect to follow with a single pivotal Phase II trial for marketing approval. Citation Format: Uksha Saini, Julie Hixon, Gisele Rodrigues, Christopher Foley, Leniher Castan Chibas, Ross Hamilton, Wenqing Li, Eric S. Schafer, Susan Rheingold, Michael Heffernan, Philip Breitfeld, Scott Durum, Atul Varadhachary. A novel immunotherapy for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 5664.

The Fifth Bioelectronic Medicine Summit Hosted by the Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research (Manhasset, NY) and Columbia Engineering (NY, NY) at The Garden City Hotel, Garden City, NY 11530 on October 11-12th, 2022- Bioelectronic Medicine: Today’s Tools, Tomorrow’s Therapies

The Fifth Bioelectronic Medicine Summit Hosted by the Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research (Manhasset, NY) and Columbia Engineering (NY, NY) at The Garden City Hotel, Garden City, NY 11530 on October 11-12th, 2022- Bioelectronic Medicine: Today’s Tools, Tomorrow’s Therapies

Project Optimus, an FDA initiative: Considerations for cancer drug development internationally, from an academic perspective.

Modern cancer therapeutics are increasingly targeted, bringing the promise of new and improved activity, alongside better tolerability. However, while many are indeed resulting in dramatic improvements in disease control and patient survival, short- and long-term tolerability has not always accompanied it. The choice of dose and schedule is often in the upper range of the therapeutic window, driven by the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) model of previous cytotoxic agents. There is increasing recognition that this needs to change, by taking a more holistic approach to determine the optimal dose for desired biological effects and tolerability early in clinical development. In the US, the FDA's Oncology Centre of Excellence is addressing this via the Project Optimus initiative: aiming to reform dose optimisation studies so that they can demonstrate the most appropriate dose selection. Early clinical development will need to demonstrate the dose-exposure, -pharmacodynamic, -toxicity and -activity relationships, including randomised evaluations for dose selection. Regulatory agencies outside the US are similarly exploring this. Along with Australia, Brazil, Canada, Israel, Singapore and Switzerland, the UK participates in Project Orbis, a collaborative program with the FDA to accelerate patient access to new cancer medicines through coordinated regulatory review. Close alignment with Project Optimus will be important internationally and will require changes across industry, including for academic units and small biotech. We discuss our perspective on the implications, and opportunities, for early phase oncology trials as a uniquely charity-funded drug development facility, the Centre for Drug Development within the Cancer Research UK charity.

Characterization and impact of Wnt5A signaling on outcomes of urothelial carcinoma.

560 Background: Active Wnt signaling via WNT5A through ROR1 and its partner, ROR2, or WNT5A/frizzled 2 (FZD2) is linked to processes driving tumorigenesis, disease progression and therapy resistance. The role of this pathway in the pathogenesis of urothelial carcinoma (UC) is not fully elucidated. In adult tissue, ROR1 is largely absent, which makes it ideal for targeted therapies, with several ROR1 targeting agents in early clinical development. We utilized a large dataset of molecularly characterized UC tumors to investigate the significance of Wnt5a/ ROR1, ROR2 or FZD2 transcriptional expression. Methods: NextGen Sequencing of DNA (592 genes or WES)/RNA (WTS) was performed for 4743 UC tumors submitted to Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ). PD-L1 expression (SP142; Positive (+): ³2+, ³%5) was tested by IHC. Gene expression profiles were analyzed for a transcriptional signature predictive of response to immunotherapy (T cell-inflamed; Bao, 2020). WNT5a, ROR1, ROR2, and FZD2-high and -low expression were defined as ³ top and < bottom quartile of transcripts per million (TPM), respectively. Mann-Whitney U and X2/Fisher-Exact tests were applied where appropriate, with P-values adjusted for multiple comparisons ( q < .05). Real-world overall survival (OS) information was obtained from insurance claims data and Kaplan Meier estimates were calculated for molecularly defined cohorts. Results: We observed similar expression of these WNT5A signaling pathway genes between upper (N=795) and lower tract UC (N=3,204): WNT5A (22.7 v. 22.2 median TMP (mTPM), q = .18), FZD2 (3.4 v 3.5, q = .93), ROR1 (2.0 v. 1.7, q = .05), and ROR2 (2.1 v 2.5, q < .01). WNT family gene expression varied significantly between primary (N=2,756) and metastatic sites (N=1,361): WTN5A (25.2 v 16.8 mTPM), FZD2 (3.2 v 4.05), ROR1 (1.7 v 2.1), and ROR2 (2.4 v 2.6) for primary vs. metastatic sites respectively ( q < .05 for all). Comparison of high- and low-expression subgroups revealed variation in the prevalence of TP53, FGFR3 and RB1 mutations, as well as PDL1+ staining and T cell-inflamed scores (Table). High gene expression for ROR2 (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.56-0.78, p < .001) and FZD2 (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63-0.89, p < .001) was associated with worse OS compared to low gene expression. No significant difference in OS was observed for WNT5A (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.82-1.15, p < .76) and ROR1 (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.72-1.01, p < .068). Conclusions: Distinct genomic and immune landscapes for the four investigated WNT pathway components were observed and should be leveraged to identify combination therapies that complement the current pipeline of WNT pathway-targeting drugs. [Table: see text]

Early Clinical Development of Lufotrelvir as a Potential Therapy for COVID-19.

Lufotrelvir was designed as a first in class 3CL protease inhibitor to treat COVID-19. Development of lufotrelvir was challenged by its relatively poor stability due to its propensity to epimerize and degrade. Key elements of process development included improvement of the supply routes to the indole and lactam fragments, a Claisen addition to homologate the lactam, and a subsequent phosphorylation reaction to prepare the prodrug as well as identification of a DMSO solvated form of lufotrelvir to enable long-term storage. As a new approach to preparing the indole fragment, a Cu-catalyzed C-O coupling using oxalamide ligands was demonstrated. The control of process-related impurities was essential to accommodate the parenteral formulation. Isolation of an MEK solvate followed by the DMSO solvate ensured that all impurities were controlled appropriately.

International consortium for innovation and quality: An industry perspective on the nonclinical and early clinical development of intravitreal drugs.

The eye, which is under constant exposure to environmental pathogens, has evolved various anatomic and immunological barriers critical to the protection of tissues lacking regenerative capacity, and the maintenance of a clear optic pathway essential to vision. By bypassing the ocular barriers, intravitreal (IVT) injection has become the mainstay for the delivery of drugs to treat conditions that affect the back of the eye. Both small molecules and biotherapeutics have been successfully administered intravitreally, and several drugs have been approved for the treatment of (wet) age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema. However, IVT injection is an invasive procedure, which requires sufficient technical expertise from the healthcare professional administering the drug. Potential side effects include bleeding, retinal tear, cataracts, infection, uveitis, loss of vision, and increased ocular pressure. Pharmaceutical companies often differ in their drug development plan, including drug administration techniques, collection of ocular tissues and fluids, ophthalmology monitoring, and overall conduct of nonclinical and clinical studies. The present effort, under the aegis of the Innovation & Quality Ophthalmic Working Group, aims at understanding these differences, identifying pros and cons of the various approaches, determining the gaps in knowledge, and suggesting feasible good practices for nonclinical and early clinical IVT drug development.

Concept and application of the probability of pharmacological success (PoPS) as a decision tool in drug development: a position paper

BackgroundIn drug development, few molecules from a large pool of early candidates become successful medicines after demonstrating a favourable benefit-risk ratio. Many decisions are made along the way to continue or stop the development of a molecule. The probability of pharmacological success, or PoPS, is a tool for informing early-stage decisions based on benefit and risk data available at the time.ResultsThe PoPS is the probability that most patients can achieve adequate pharmacology for the intended indication while minimising the number of subjects exposed to safety risk. This probability is usually a function of dose; hence its computation typically requires exposure–response models for pharmacology and safety. The levels of adequate pharmacology and acceptable risk must be specified. The uncertainties in these levels, in the exposure–response relationships, and in relevant translation all need to be identified. Several examples of different indications are used to illustrate how this approach can facilitate molecule progression decisions for preclinical and early clinical development. The examples show that PoPS assessment is an effective mechanism for integrating multi-source data, identifying knowledge gaps, and forcing transparency of assumptions. With its application, translational modelling becomes more meaningful and dose prediction more rigorous. Its successful implementation calls for early planning, sound understanding of the disease-drug system, and cross-discipline collaboration. Furthermore, the PoPS evolves as relevant knowledge grows.ConclusionThe PoPS is a powerful evidence-based framework to formally capture multiple uncertainties into a single probability term for assessing benefit-risk ratio. In GSK, it is now expected for governance review at all early-phase decision gates.

In Vitro Activity of Ceftibuten-Avibactam against β-Lactamase-Positive Enterobacterales from the ATLAS Global Surveillance Program.

Ceftibuten is an established, oral, third-generation cephalosporin in early clinical development in combination with an oral prodrug of avibactam for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, including acute pyelonephritis. We evaluated the in vitro activity of ceftibuten-avibactam against 1,165 Enterobacterales isolates selected from the 2016-2020 ATLAS global surveillance program based upon their β-lactamase genotype, β-lactam-susceptible phenotype, species identification, and specimen source (95.8% urine). MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution. Avibactam was tested at a fixed concentration of 4 μg/mL. Molecular methods were used to identify β-lactamase genes. Ceftibuten-avibactam inhibited 90% (MIC90) of ESBL-producing (n = 645), KPC-producing (n = 60), chromosomal AmpC-positive (n = 100), OXA-48-like-producing (n = 50), and acquired AmpC-producing (n = 110) isolates at concentrations of 0.12, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 μg/mL, respectively. At concentrations of ≤1 and ≤8 μg/mL, ceftibuten-avibactam inhibited 98.4 and 99.2% of ESBL-positive isolates; 96.7 and 100% of KPC-positive isolates; 91.0 and 99.0% of chromosomal AmpC-positive isolates; 86.0 and 96.0% of OXA-48-like-positive isolates; and 85.5 and 91.8% of acquired AmpC-positive isolates. Against ESBL-producing, KPC-producing, chromosomal AmpC-positive, OXA-48-like-producing, and acquired AmpC-producing isolates, ceftibuten-avibactam was 256-, 128-, >64-, >32-, and > 16-fold more potent than ceftibuten alone. The potency of ceftibuten-avibactam was 4-fold greater than ceftazidime-avibactam against ESBL-producing (ceftibuten-avibactam MIC90, 0.12 μg/mL; ceftazidime-avibactam MIC90, 0.5 μg/mL) and KPC-producing (0.5 μg/mL; 2 μg/mL) isolates, equivalent to ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC90, 2 μg/mL) against OXA-48-like-producing isolates, 2-fold less active than ceftazidime-avibactam (1 μg/mL; 0.5 μg/mL) against chromosomal AmpC-positive isolates, and 4-fold less active than ceftazidime-avibactam (4 μg/mL; 1 μg/mL) against acquired AmpC-producing isolates. Continued development of ceftibuten-avibactam appears justified.

Towards 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) as a reliable pharmacodynamic in early phase clinical drug development: a validation study in healthy volunteers

Towards 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) as a reliable pharmacodynamic in early phase clinical drug development: a validation study in healthy volunteers

Potential Errors and Corrections in Early Phase Drug Development

Many foreign and small companies trying to enter the United States biopharmaceutical market make avoidable errors in their early clinical phase drug development and clinical trials. They need to first understand the risks that they must endure with patent law, regulatory hurdles, the complexity and duration of the necessary clinical trials, and the large cost of drug development, which often necessitates raising substantial capital from investors. If appropriate capital for these clinical studies must be raised, then the company must be able to clearly articulate a realistic expected return on investment to these individuals. So, they must also understand the market, its exclusivity, and the competition. This must all be put together in a sleek pitch deck. Early errors frequently begin with too few, inadequate, or poorly constructed patents. These and other risks and errors may be prevented by the use of an experienced product development team. Many of these errors could be avoided if companies used more experienced drug development professionals to assist them in selecting the optimum patent strategy, regulatory plan, budget, contract research organization (CRO), clinical investigators, and etc. It is hoped that this opinion piece will help make early clinical trials more effective and save time and money.

Arbaclofen extended-release tablets for spasticity in multiple sclerosis: open-label extension study.

Baclofen, a racemic γ-aminobutyric acid B receptor agonist, is commonly used for the management of multiple sclerosis-related spasticity but is associated with frequent dosing and poor tolerability. Arbaclofen, the active R-enantiomer of baclofen, exhibits 100- to 1000-fold greater specificity for the γ-aminobutyric acid B receptor compared with the S-enantiomer and ∼5-fold greater potency compared with racemic baclofen. Arbaclofen extended-release tablets allow a dosing interval of 12 h and have shown a favourable safety and efficacy profile in early clinical development. A 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 3 trial in adults with multiple sclerosis-related spasticity demonstrated that arbaclofen extended-release 40 mg/day significantly reduced spasticity symptoms compared with placebo and was safe and well tolerated. The current study is an open-label extension of the Phase 3 trial designed to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of arbaclofen extended-release. In a 52-week, open-label, multicentre study, adults with a Total Numeric-transformed Modified Ashworth Scale score ≥2 in the most affected limb received oral arbaclofen extended-release titrated over 9 days up to 80 mg/day based on tolerability. The primary objective was assessment of arbaclofen extended-release safety and tolerability. Secondary objectives included an assessment of efficacy using the Total Numeric-transformed Modified Ashworth Scale-most affected limb, the Patient Global Impression of Change and Expanded Disability Status Scale. Of 323 patients enrolled, 218 (67.5%) completed 1 year of treatment. Most patients (74.0%) achieved an arbaclofen extended-release maintenance dose of 80 mg/day. At least one treatment-emergent adverse event was reported by 278 patients (86.1%). The most common adverse events were [n patients (%)]: urinary tract disorder [112 (34.7)], muscle weakness [77 (23.8)], asthenia [61 (18.9)], nausea [70 (21.7)], dizziness [52 (16.1)], somnolence [41 (12.7)], vomiting [29 (9.0)], headache [24 (7.4)] and gait disturbance [20 (6.2)]. Most adverse events were of mild-moderate severity. Twenty-eight serious adverse events were reported. One death occurred during the study, a myocardial infarction that was considered by investigators as unlikely to be related to treatment. Overall, 14.9% of patients discontinued due to adverse events, primarily muscle weakness, multiple sclerosis relapse, asthenia and nausea. Evidence of improvement in multiple sclerosis-related spasticity was observed across arbaclofen extended-release dosages. Arbaclofen extended-release treatment (up to 80 mg/day) was well tolerated and reduced symptoms of spasticity in adult patients with multiple sclerosis for 1 year. Clinical Trial Identifier: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03319732.

A pan-serotype antiviral to prevent and treat dengue: A journey from discovery to clinical development driven by public-private partnerships

While progress has been made in fighting diseases disproportionally affecting underserved populations, unmet medical needs persist for many neglected tropical diseases. The World Health Organization has encouraged strong public-private partnerships to address this issue and several public and private organizations have set an example in the past showing a strong commitment to combat these diseases. Pharmaceutical companies are contributing in different ways to address the imbalance in research efforts. With this review, we exemplify the role of a public-private partnership in research and development by the journey of our dengue antiviral molecule that is now in early clinical development. We detail the different steps of drug development and outline the contribution of each partner to this process. Years of intensive collaboration resulted in the identification of two antiviral compounds, JNJ-A07 and JNJ-1802, the latter of which has advanced to clinical development.

Translating atherosclerosis research from bench to bedside: navigating the barriers for effective preclinical drug discovery.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death worldwide. An ongoing challenge remains the development of novel pharmacotherapies to treat CVD, particularly atherosclerosis. Effective mechanism-informed development and translation of new drugs requires a deep understanding of the known and currently unknown biological mechanisms underpinning atherosclerosis, accompanied by optimization of traditional drug discovery approaches. Current animal models do not precisely recapitulate the pathobiology underpinning human CVD. Accordingly, a fundamental limitation in early-stage drug discovery has been the lack of consensus regarding an appropriate experimental in vivo model that can mimic human atherosclerosis. However, when coupled with a clear understanding of the specific advantages and limitations of the model employed, preclinical animal models remain a crucial component for evaluating pharmacological interventions. Within this perspective, we will provide an overview of the mechanisms and modalities of atherosclerotic drugs, including those in the preclinical and early clinical development stage. Additionally, we highlight recent preclinical models that have improved our understanding of atherosclerosis and associated clinical consequences and propose model adaptations to facilitate the development of new and effective treatments.

Cell therapy 101 (part 1)Challenges of early clinical development: a ‘thumbnail sketch’

Cell therapy has long been regarded as a possible therapeutic panacea, having potential to restore structure and function of damaged and diseased tissue and whole organ systems. Historically, therapeutic targets have included treatment of diabetes, liver failure, kidney disease, CNS disorders, connective tissue disorders, and more recently, cancer. Casual observers will see cell therapies as a ‘bright new shiny toy’, a potential cure for cancer, based on some of the CAR-T data recently generated. This, however, is not the case: those of us working in the cell therapy space back in the late 80s remember the days when such products were classified as medical devices, and the first autologous and allogeneic products were starting to emerge from companies such as Advanced Tissue Sciences and Organogenesis. Many of the challenges we faced in those early days still exist. We are still grappling with logistics of shipping cell-based products from clean room to clinic, regulatory uncertainty, patient-to-patient variability with autologous approaches, donor-to-donor variation of allogeneic products, and high cost of goods. Moreover, uptake of cell therapies by established pharmaceutical companies has been slow, as cell-based products fail to achieve the requirements around scalability, reproducibility, and cost that many major corporations see as mandatory. Numerous academic and industry-based groups around the world are working on a wide variety of cell-based projects; however, not all of these groups understand the complexities of commercializing the technology from bench to bedside. In addition to gaining appropriate funding to enable progression from the laboratory to clinic, all of these companies face the challenge of navigating a complex regulatory landscape, plus transitioning to GMP manufacture. Particular issues which need to be addressed include: Transfer from research to a clinical-grade productManufacture product to GMPQuality testing – what needs to be done and how?What are the regulations, and how do we adhere to them?What are the challenges for commercialization? This article aims to address the above in a broad-brush manner, subsequent ‘Cell therapy 101’ will review specific areas in more detail. 

Clinical significancy of WNT pathway inhibition in various cancers

The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays an important role in the cell cycle. There is a correlation between the Wnt/B–catenin signaling pathway and TME. This article reviews methods of inhibiting Wnt Pathway, a useful process in the treatment of various cancers. Compounds of Wnt/β–Catenin Signaling Pathway, such as TCF–1, have an impact on the differentiation and migration of CD8+ T cells. CCL4 expression is regulated by the beta–catenin protein to recruit CD103+ dendritic cells, which enables CD8+ T cell activation. Inhibition of the Wnt/β–catenin pathway has an impact on ovarian cancer patients’ prognosis, reducing the development of ovarian cancer. Research shows that inhibition of the pathway with the use of the LGK974 inhibitor may boost immunity, especially when applied with a Paclitaxel mix. After treatment, expression of the inhibitory receptors CTLA–4, TIM3, PD–1 on CD8+ T cells decreased. The combination of LGK974 and Paclitaxel can cause the death of tumor cells and significantly inhibit their proliferation. The application of dose–dense Paclitaxel avoids toxicity related to the maximum dose needed to protect the patient's immune system by increasing CD8+ TILs. There are concerns regarding toxicity of the LGK 974, especially for cells dependent on the Wnt/β–catenin pathway to maintain homeostasis. Many Wnt/β–catenin pathway inhibitors are tested against colorectal cancer (CRC) with successful results. These include NSAIDs, porcupine inhibitors, tankyrase inhibitors, Wnt5A inhibitors, and disheveled protein inhibitors.The Wnt/β–catenin pathway, when expressed in Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC), leads to the transition of epithelial to mesenchymal cells. In early clinical development, there are multiple inhibitors (ex. KYA1797K) targeting the Wnt/β–catenin pathway in TNBC cells, which could become a viable anticancer strategy.

Early-Phase Clinical Trials of Bio-Artificial Organ Technology: A Systematic Review of Ethical Issues

Regenerative medicine has emerged as a novel alternative solution to organ failure which circumvents the issue of organ shortage. In preclinical research settings bio-artificial organs are being developed. It is anticipated that eventually it will be possible to launch first-in-human transplantation trials to test safety and efficacy in human recipients. In early-phase transplantation trials, however, research participants could be exposed to serious risks, such as toxicity, infections and tumorigenesis. So far, there is no ethical guidance for the safe and responsible design and conduct of early-phase clinical trials of bio-artificial organs. Therefore, research ethics review committees will need to look to related adjacent fields of research, including for example cell-based therapy, for guidance. In this systematic review, we examined the literature on early-phase clinical trials in these adjacent fields and undertook a thematic analysis of relevant ethical points to consider for early-phase clinical trials of transplantable bio-artificial organs. Six themes were identified: cell source, risk-benefit assessment, patient selection, trial design, informed consent, and oversight and accountability. Further empirical research is needed to provide insight in patient perspectives, as this may serve as valuable input in determining the conditions for ethically responsible and acceptable early clinical development of bio-artificial organs.

Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of a new class of 7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives as Mps1 inhibitors for the treatment of breast cancer

Monopolar spindle kinase 1 (Mps1), a core component of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), plays a crucial role in the transition of cells from mid-to late mitosis. As an attractive therapeutic target, inhibition of Mps1 induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in a variety of tumors, including breast cancer. However, early clinical development of Mps1 inhibitors remains unsatisfactory. Here, we designed and synthesized a new class of Mps1 inhibitors with 7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine structure using a scaffold hopping approach. Structure–activity relationship (SAR) revealed that 12 is a potent Mps1 inhibitor (IC50 = 29 nM), which inhibited phosphorylation of Mps1 in vitro and in vivo. Treatment with 12 not only impeded proliferation of breast cancer cell lines, but also induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of MCF-7 and 4T1 cells. 12 suppressed tumor growth in vivo, and no obvious toxicities were observed. These results demonstrated the potential of Mps1 inhibitor 12 for the treatment of breast cancer.

Preclinical development of ZED8, an 89Zr immuno-PET reagent for monitoring tumor CD8 status in patients undergoing cancer immunotherapy.

ZED8 is a novel monovalent antibody labeled with zirconium-89 for the molecular imaging of CD8. This work describes nonclinical studies performed in part to provide rationale for and to inform expectations in the early clinical development of ZED8, such as in the studies outlined in clinical trial registry NCT04029181 [1]. Surface plasmon resonance, X-ray crystallography, and flow cytometry were used to characterize the ZED8-CD8 binding interaction, its specificity, and its impact on T cell function. Immuno-PET with ZED8 was assessed in huCD8+ tumor-bearing mice and in non-human primates. Plasma antibody levels were measured by ELISA to determine pharmacokinetic parameters, and OLINDA 1.0 was used to estimate radiation dosimetry from image-derived biodistribution data. ZED8 selectively binds to human CD8α at a binding site approximately 9Å from that of MHCI making mutual interference unlikely. The equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) is 5nM. ZED8 binds to cynomolgus CD8 with reduced affinity (66nM) but it has no measurable affinity for rat or mouse CD8. In a series of lymphoma xenografts, ZED8 imaging was able to identify different CD8 levels concordant with flow cytometry. In cynomolgus monkeyswith tool compound89Zr-aCD8v17, lymph nodes were conspicuous by imaging 24h post-injection, and the pharmacokinetics suggested a flat-fixed first-in-human dose of 4mg per subject. The whole-body effective dose for an adult human was estimated to be 0.48mSv/MBq, comparable to existing 89Zr immuno-PET reagents. 89Zr immuno-PET with ZED8 appears to be a promising biomarker of tissue CD8 levels suitable for clinical evaluation in cancer patients eligible for immunotherapy.

Overcoming high level adenosine-mediated immunosuppression by DZD2269, a potent and selective A2aR antagonist

BackgroundAdenosine is a potent immunosuppressant whose levels in the tumor microenvironment (TME) are often much higher than those in normal tissues. Binding of adenosine to its receptor A2aR activates a cascade of genes and leads to immunosuppression. In addition, immune checkpoint blockage markedly increases A2aR expression in T cells, which could dampen their anti-tumor response. Several A2aR antagonists are under clinical development, but with limited clinical benefit reported so far. These A2aR antagonists showed much diminished activity at high adenosine levels found in TME, which may explain their clinical underperformance. We report the discovery and early clinical development of DZD2269, a novel A2aR antagonist which can fully block A2aR mediated immunosuppression commonly found in TME. Adenosine stimulates phosphorylation of cyclic AMP response element binding protein (CREB) in T cells and inhibits anti-tumor cytokine secretion in PBMCs in a dose-dependent manner. DZD2269 was able to reverse the immunosuppression induced by high concentrations of adenosine, as demonstrated by inhibiting CREB phosphorylation in T cells, restoring Th1 cytokine secretion in PBMCs, and stimulating dendritic cells (DCs) maturation. As a single agent, DZD2269 showed anti-tumor growth in multiple syngeneic mouse tumor models, and more profound anti-tumor effects were observed when DZD2269 was in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy. A good PK/PD relationship was observed in these animal models. In the phase 1 clinical study, downregulation of pCREB was detected in human T cells, consistent with preclinical prediction. Our data support further clinical development of DZD2269 in patients with cancer.MethodsThe selectivity of DZD2269 for adenosine receptors was tested in engineered cell lines, and its efficacy in blocking A2aR signaling and reversing adenosine-mediated immunosuppression was assessed in human T cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). The anti-tumor effects of DZD2269 were evaluated in multiple syngeneic mouse models as a single agent as well as in combination with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or immune checkpoint inhibitors. A phase 1 study in healthy volunteers (NCT04932005) has been initiated to assess safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of DZD2269.ResultsAdenosine stimulates phosphorylation of cyclic AMP response element binding protein (CREB) in T cells and inhibits anti-tumor cytokine secretion in PBMCs in a dose-dependent manner. DZD2269 was able to reverse the immunosuppression induced by high concentrations of adenosine, as demonstrated by inhibiting CREB phosphorylation in T cells, restoring Th1 cytokine secretion in PBMCs, and stimulating dendritic cells (DCs) maturation. As a single agent, DZD2269 showed anti-tumor growth in multiple syngeneic mouse tumor models, and more profound anti-tumor effects were observed when DZD2269 was in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy. A good PK/PD relationship was observed in these animal models. In the phase 1 clinical study, downregulation of pCREB was detected in human T cells, consistent with preclinical prediction.ConclusionDZD2269 is a novel A2aR antagonist which can fully block A2aR mediated immunosuppression commonly found in TME. Clinical development of DZD2269 in patients with cancer is warranted (NCT04634344).