Early Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Research Articles

A randomized, double‐blind, 24‐week controlled study of low‐dose cyclosporine versus chloroquine for early rheumatoid arthritis

To investigate whether low-dose cyclosporin A (CSA) is safe and effective in comparison with chloroquine (CQ) in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We performed a randomized, double-blind study comparing CSA with CQ in patients with early RA (duration < 2 years) who had had active disease for at least 3 months. Forty-four RA patients with a mean disease duration of 6 months were randomly allocated to receive CSA (initial dosage 2.5 mg/kg/day, maintenance dosage 3.6 mg/kg/day) or CQ (initial dosage 300 mg/day, maintenance dosage 100 mg/day) for 24 weeks. Five patients (2 taking CSA and 3 taking CQ) discontinued the study prematurely. Intention-to-treat analysis disclosed a decrease in the swollen joint count by 7 in both groups. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level did not change significantly. CSA and CQ were tolerated equally well, although mild paraesthesia occurred more frequently in the CSA-treated group. The serum creatinine level increased by 13 mumoles/liter (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 4, 22) in the CSA group and by 6 mumoles/liter (95% CI 1, 11) in the CQ group (difference not statistically significant). Both CSA and CQ are effective in alleviating the symptoms of active early RA. There is only slightly impaired renal function after 24 weeks of drug administration of either drug in patients with early RA.

Class II Major Histocompatibility Complex Antigen Expression on Unstimulated and Gamma-Interferon Stimulated Monocytes from Patients with Multiple Sclerosis, Rheumatoid Arthritis and Normal Controls

HLA-DR, HLA-DQ, and HLA-DP antigen expression was assessed by immunofluorescent flow cytometry on monocytes from 19 patients with active multiple sclerosis (MS), 19 with inactive MS, 7 patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and 19 normal controls. Percentage positivity and median channel fluorescence (MCF) were determined after separation of the monocytes (TO) and following 48 h culture with (T48 + IFN) and without (T48) recombinant gamma interferon (rIFN-gamma). The percentage positivity of the cells was normal at TO for all groups of patients for each of the HLA types but statistically significantly increased above normal, on monocytes from patients with inactive MS, after culture with rIFN-gamma. At TO, the MCF values for HLA-DQ, and HLA-DP were statistically significantly increased above normal on monocytes from patients with active MS indicating some pre-programming of the cells in vivo. After culture, when the carry-over from baseline TO values was eliminated, the increment in MCF for HLA-DR, on monocytes from patients with inactive MS, was statistically significantly lower than normal in the non-gamma-IFN cultures but was normal in the presence of rIFN-gamma. Conversely, the increment in MCF for HLA-DP on monocytes from patients with active MS was significantly lower than normal after culture with rIFN-gamma. Therefore, the stimulation required to increase antigen density on cells already expressing antigen may be different to that required to stimulate de novo expression on negative cells. Both systems appear to be abnormal in MS, possibly reflecting differences in disease activity, while only one system appears abnormal in RA.

Thermal decomposition of portlandite and xonotlite to high pressures and temperatures

<h3>Background</h3> The aim of this work was to summarise the literature evaluating the impact of biopsy procedures, tissue handling, tissue quality and disease-specific aspects including joint biopsied and disease stage, on synovial tissue outcome. <h3>Methods</h3> Two reviewers independently identified eligible studies according to the Patients, Intervention, Comparator and Outcome framework obtained for five research questions formulated during the first EULAR task force meeting to produce points to consider (PtC) for minimal reporting requirements in synovial tissue studies. The databases explored were Medline, Embase, CENTRAL and Cinhal. The risk of bias of each study was evaluated using an adapted version of the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies. <h3>Results</h3> Of the 7654 records yielded, 75 full texts were assessed, leading to the inclusion of 26 manuscripts in the systematic literature review (SLR). Two papers assessed the impact of biopsy procedures on the quality and quantity of tissue retrieved alongside patient tolerability; six papers focused on synovial tissue variability. Four papers studied the impact of sample handling or randomisation and 14 assessed the impact of disease stage and state, namely early or established active rheumatoid arthritis and remission on histopathological and transcriptomic results. <h3>Conclusions</h3> This SLR informs the EULAR PtC for minimal reporting requirements in synovial tissue research in rheumatology. Characteristics related to the study design, population, sample handling, randomisation and analysis can affect the final synovial tissue outcome in the studies reviewed. Thus, accurate reporting of these factors is required in order to ensure the scientific validity of manuscripts describing synovial tissue outcomes.