Earlier Lines Of Treatment Research Articles

Real-World Renal Function Among Patients with Multiple Myeloma in the United States

Background Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematologic malignancy and is associated with significant patient burden. Renal impairment has been shown to affect up to 50% of patients (pts) with MM. Renal impairment is an independent predictor of poor survival outcomes for pts with MM, with a median survival of approximately half that of pts without renal impairment. Aims To assess change in renal function by treatment line and drug class among pts with MM and renal impairment (defined as eGFR <50 mL/min/1.73 m2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation [eGFR-MDRD]), and to assess real-world outcomes by baseline renal status, renal response, and drug class. Methods Using the nationwide Flatiron Health EHR-derived de-identified database based in the United States, we identified MM pts diagnosed and treated between January 2011 and November 2019 who received ≥1 line of MM therapy and had information on race. We assessed the distribution of pts by eGFR-MDRD level at the start of the first and second line of therapy and the distribution of therapy use (ie, proteasome inhibitor [PI], immunomodulatory drug [IMiD], monoclonal antibody [mAb]). We also evaluated overall survival (OS) by treatment line, stratified by eGFR at the start of each treatment line. Complete renal response (CRR) was assessed in pts with eGFR-MDRD <50 mL/min/1.73 m2; using International Myeloma Working Group recommendations, responders were defined as pts with ≥1 eGFR measurement ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 during the treatment line. Logistic regression models were used to examine the association between treatment class and complete renal responder status adjusted for other treatment classes received, age, sex, race, practice type, year of therapy line, and cytogenetic risk. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine OS by treatment and renal response, adjusted for other treatment classes received, age, sex, race, practice type, year of therapy line, and cytogenetic risk. Flatiron Health, Inc., did not participate in the analysis of this data. Results For the 6990 pts included in the analysis, the mean age at start of initial therapy was 68 years, 46% were female, and 17% were Black. At start of treatment lines 1 and 2, approximately 25% had eGFR-MDRD <50 mL/min/1.73 m2. At treatment initiation, pts with renal impairment were older (71 vs 67 years) and were more likely to present with ISS stage III at diagnosis (38% vs 10%). Pts with renal impairment at the start of each treatment line exhibited decreased OS. Among pts with renal impairment, pts with PI use in first (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.36; 95% CI, 1.04-1.77) or second line (aOR 2.09; 95% CI, 1.38-3.16) were significantly more likely to have a CRR than those without PI use. Pts with IMiD use in first (aOR 2.14; 95% CI, 1.68-2.72) and second (aOR 1.61; 95% CI, 1.10-2.36) line were significantly more likely to have a CRR than those without IMiD use. When classified by both PI and IMiD use, pts with both PI and IMiD use were significantly more likely to have a CRR than those without use of either in the first (aOR 2.35; 95% CI, 1.54-3.60) and second line (aOR 3.89; 95% CI, 1.71-8.86). Pts with PI and IMiD use as well as a CRR also had greater OS in the first (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37-0.73) and second line (aHR 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32-0.88) vs pts without either PI or IMiD use and no CRR. The use of available mAbs in line 1 or line 2 was not significantly associated with renal response. Lower mAb use, especially in earlier treatment lines, prevented further analyses by mAb combination therapies. Conclusion In this study, MM pts with renal impairment were more likely to be older and to present with ISS stage III at diagnosis. Pts with decreased renal function exhibited decreased OS compared with non-renally impaired pts. Pts who were treated with combination therapy that included PIs and IMiDs together in early treatment lines were more likely to have a CRR and OS was prolonged among these pts, highlighting the benefits of combination therapy. These data suggest that treatment inducing a renal response may result in improved outcomes. Future investigations with larger datasets may improve the understanding of the prognostic value of renal impairment and optimal combination treatment regimens for these pts. Disclosures Mikhael: Amgen, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm, Sanofi, Takeda: Honoraria. Singh:Sanofi-Genzyme: Current Employment. Rice:Sanofi: Current Employment.

Real-world treatment attrition rates in advanced esophagogastric cancer.

BACKGROUNDOver the last decade, multiple agents have demonstrated efficacy for advanced esophagogastric cancer (EGC). Despite the availability of later lines of therapy, there remains limited real-world data about the treatment attrition rates between lines of therapy.AIMTo characterize the use and attrition rates between lines of therapy for patients with advanced EGC.METHODSWe identified patients who received at least one cycle of chemotherapy for advanced EGC between July 1, 2017 and July 31, 2018 across six regional centers in British Columbia (BC), Canada. Clinicopathologic, treatment, and outcomes data were extracted.RESULTSOf 245 patients who received at least one line of therapy, median age was 66 years (IQR 58.2-72.3) and 186 (76%) were male, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0/1 (80%), gastric vs GEJ (36% vs 64%). Histologies included adenocarcinoma (78%), squamous cell carcinoma (8%), and signet ring (14%), with 31% HER2 positive. 72% presented with de novo disease, and 25% had received previous chemoradiation. There was a high level of treatment attrition, with patients receiving only one line of therapy n = 122, 50%), two lines n = 83, 34%), three lines n = 34, 14%), and four lines n = 6, 2%). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated improved survival with increasing lines of therapy (median overall survival 7.7 vs 16.6 vs 22.8 vs 40.4 mo, P < 0.05). On multivariable Cox regression, improved survival was associated with better baseline ECOG and increased lines of therapy (P < 0.05).CONCLUSIONThe steep attrition rates between therapies highlight the unmet need for more efficacious early-line treatment options for patients with advanced EGC.

The Emerging Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Focused Ultrasound in Functional Neurosurgery.

Functional disorders of the central nervous system (CNS) are diverse in terms of their etiology and symptoms, however, they can be quite debilitating. Many functional neurological disorders can progress to a level where pharmaceuticals and other early lines of treatment can no longer optimally treat the condition, therefore requiring surgical intervention. A variety of stereotactic and functional neurosurgical approaches exist, including deep brain stimulation, implantation, stereotaxic lesions, and radiosurgery, among others. Most techniques are invasive or minimally invasive forms of surgical intervention and require immense precision to effectively modulate CNS circuitry. Focused ultrasound (FUS) is a relatively new, safe, non-invasive neurosurgical approach that has demonstrated efficacy in treating a range of functional neurological diseases. It can function reversibly, through mechanical stimulation causing circuitry changes, or irreversibly, through thermal ablation at low and high frequencies respectively. In preliminary studies, magnetic resonance imaging-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU) has been shown to have long-lasting treatment effects in several disease types. The technology has been approved by the FDA and internationally for a number of treatment-resistant neurological disorders and currently clinical trials are underway for several other neurological conditions. In this review, the authors discuss the potential applications and emerging role of MRgHIFU in functional neurosurgery in the coming years.

Long-term results of selective internal radioembolization (SIRT) to control progressive liver metastases of gastro-intestinal stromal tumors (GIST) beyond treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI).

11538 Background: Liver and peritoneum are the main area of metastatic spread in GIST. Liver resection does not play a role for hepatic metastases in comparison to f.e. colorectal cancer. If hepatic metastases are the only or major area of tumor progression and are resistant to available TKIs due to a missing mutation in KIT/PDGFRA/SDH ( ‘wildtype’) or after treatment with 1st/2nd/3rd/4th line therapy, interventional radioembolization with yttrium-90 (90Y) microspheres are promising treatment options, as radiation doses as high as 200Gy can be applied locally. We analyzed the long-term results of SIRT with respect to hepatic-progression-free survival (HEP-PFS) in a consecutive cohort of patients.. Methods: From 1/2008 to 1/2018, 25 pts (12f, 13m) with biopsy proven liver metastases of GIST which were the only (n = 13) or the dominant site of progression (n = 12) were treated by SIRT. Median age at GIST diagnosis had been 51.8 yrs and when receiving SIRT was 57.6yrs (range, 18–75yrs). The mutational status was ‘wildtype’ (n = 7, 2 NF-1), exon 11 (n = 7), exon 11+2nd mutation (n = 6), exon 9 (n = 3), exon 9+2ndmut (n = 1), and, exon 13 (n = 1). All patients except of two had prior TKI therapy: 1 line n = 3, 2 lines n = 11, 3-4 lines n = 9. Follow-up after SIRT was done via dynamic MRI and contrast-enhanced (CE)-CT, the median follow-up is 30.6 mos (range, 12-100mos) and all patients were followed until death. Results: The median hepatic-progression free survival (HEP-PFS) after SIRT was 17 months (range, 5-53+, 95%CI 11.8-22.1 mos). Of the patients with concomitant extrahepatic disease, the extraHEP-PFS was median 10 months. Twelve patients received next-line TKI therapy for progressive extrahepatic disease, whereas six patients required this for progressive liver metastases. When comparing the results according to the mutational status, patients with a ‘wildtype’ tumor showed a better median HEP-PFS of 19 mos (range, 12-53+, 95%CI 16.7-21.2 mos.) in comparison to KIT exon 9/11/13 mutated patients with only 14 months (range, 4-34 mos., 95%CI 6.5-21.4 mos), p &lt; 0.11 (Wilcoxon). Conclusions: 90Y radioembolization (SIRT) offers a safe and effective treatment for patients with liver metastases of GISTs being the dominant site of tumor progression and with no drug treatment options available. In patients known to have no mutation in KIT/PDGFRA (wt, also NF-1 associated) it looks whether the results might be even more promising and SIRT could be used in early treatment lines.

Fracture risk and survival outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients (pts) sequentially treated with abiraterone acetate (AA) and radium-223 (RA223).

e17593 Background: The increased incidence of bone fractures found in pts who received the AA-RA223 combination compared to those treated with AA alone in the ERA223 trial led to restrictive recommendations by the European Medicines Agency which limited the use of RA223 to pts who have received at least two previous treatments for mCRPC or who cannot receive any other treatment. Moreover, clinicians started to debate the risk of RA223-related fractures associated with the sequential administration of AA and RA223. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the safety of administering RA223 to pts who have progressed during AA treatment mainly in terms of the rate of skeletal fractures. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of mCRPC pts who received RA223 after progressing during an AA treatment line in everyday clinical practice in ten Italian Hospitals. Results: We reviewed data of a consecutive series of 94 mCRPC pts. Most of the pts (85.1%) received RA223 as second- or third-line treatment and had a Soloway score 2 or 3 (90%). RA223 treatment was well-tolerated: there were only four cases of grade 3 anemia, two case of grade 3 leukopenia, and one case of grade 3 neutropenia. The overall fracture rate of 2.1%: one fracture was recorded during the course of RA223 treatment, and one was recorded one month after its end. The fractures both occurred at metastatic sites in pts who were not treated with antiresorptive agents. Median overall survival (OS) from RA223 start was more than 14 mos and the pts who received Ra223 in second line (which is not allowed today in Europe) had the same median OS as those who received this agent in later lines. Conclusions: The findings of this study showed that the treatment with RA223 as subsequent treatment line after AA was active and safe with a very low risk of a fracture. The OS outcomes indicated that the administration of RA223 in early treatment lines is not detrimental, even after AA. Thus the present observational report makes a valuable contribution to the current debate concerning the risks and benefits of including RA223 in the therapeutic algorithm.

Lenvatinib (LEN) plus pembrolizumab (PEMBRO) for early-line treatment of advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer (EC).

6083 Background: As part of an ongoing phase Ib/II study (NCT02501096) in patients (pts) with selected solid tumors, LEN (20 mg PO QD) + PEMBRO (200 mg IV Q3W) displayed substantial and durable antitumor activity in advanced EC. In previously treated EC that was not microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR; n=94 pts), the objective response rate (ORR) by independent imaging review (IIR) per RECIST 1.1 was 38.3% (95% CI 28.5–48.9). In this post hoc analysis, we assessed 2 subgroups of pts with previously treated, advanced, non MSI-H or dMMR EC who received LEN + PEMBRO in an early-treatment setting. Methods: Pts were examined in 2 subgroups: (1) Pts with only 1 prior line of cytotoxic therapy regardless of surgical stage or setting (adjuvant treatment for local-regional disease or treatment for metastatic disease); and (2) pts from subgroup 1 with local-regional disease at diagnosis who received only adjuvant cytotoxic therapy. There were no restrictions on prior hormonal or chemoradiation therapies in either subgroup. Tumor responses were assessed by IIR per RECIST 1.1. Results: Subgroup 1 included 63 pts and subgroup 2 had 21 pts. ORR (95% CI) was 41.3% (29.0–54.4) for subgroup 1 and 57.1% (34.0–78.2) for subgroup 2. Additional efficacy outcomes are summarized in the table. In subgroup 1, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 62 (98%) pts (42 [67%] ≥ grade 3). TRAEs led to study-drug interruption of one or both drugs in 43 (68%) pts and dose reductions of LEN in 42 (67%) pts; 12 (19%) pts discontinued one or both drugs due to a TRAE. Serious TRAEs occurred in 18 (29%) pts and 2 (3%) pts died from a TRAE. The safety profile for subgroup 2 was generally similar to the profile for subgroup 1. Conclusions: The efficacy of LEN + PEMBRO for early-line treatment of advanced non MSI-H or dMMR EC appears promising. No new safety signals have emerged. A phase III study of LEN + PEMBRO vs paclitaxel + carboplatin for first-line treatment in advanced or recurrent EC is underway. Clinical trial information: NCT02501096. [Table: see text]

Pomalidomide, dexamethasone, and daratumumab in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma after lenalidomide treatment

Patients with multiple myeloma who have relapsed after or become refractory to lenalidomide in early treatment lines represent a clinically important population in need of effective therapies. The safety and efficacy of pomalidomide, low-dose dexamethasone, and daratumumab was evaluated in lenalidomide-pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) after one to two prior treatment lines in the phase 2 MM-014 study. Patients received pomalidomide 4 mg daily from days 1–21 and dexamethasone 40 mg weekly (28-day cycles). Daratumumab 16 mg/kg was administered per label. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Per protocol, all patients (N = 112) had received lenalidomide in their most recent prior regimen (75.0% lenalidomide refractory). ORR was 77.7% (76.2% in lenalidomide-refractory patients); median follow-up was 17.2 months. Median PFS was not reached (1-year PFS rate 75.1%). The most common hematologic grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse event was neutropenia (62.5%). Grade 3/4 infections were reported in 31.3% of patients, including 13.4% with grade 3/4 pneumonia. These results demonstrate the safety and efficacy of pomalidomide-based therapy as early as second line in patients with RRMM, even immediately after lenalidomide failure, indicating that switching from the immunomodulatory agent class is not necessary.

Outcome with immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma across different treatment lines.

651 Background: The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPI) has led to a paradigm change in the management of metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC). Prospective trials focused on ICPI treatment in first- or second-line. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the benefit of ICPI across different treatment lines. Methods: This is a single center retrospective study from the Medical University of Vienna which included all mRCC patients who received ICPIs in various treatment lines. Overall response rates (ORR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated for the entire cohort and by treatment line. Results: Between January 2014 and October 2019, a total of 113 patients received ICPIs. Ninety-four patients were eligible for full evaluation (83% clear cell and 17% non-clear cell). 26.8%, 61.6% and 14.8% were classified good, intermediate and poor IMDC-risk, respectively. 59%, 20% and 21% were treated with ICPI monotherapy, dual ICPI therapy and ICPI + tyrosine kinase inhibitor, respectively. ORR, median PFS and median OS for the entire cohort was 39.4%, 9.67 months (95%CI: 6.9-12.4 months) and 23.6 months (95%CI: 13.3-33.9 months), respectively. The ORR by treatment line was: 33% in first-line (9 patients), 40.4%, in second- (42 patients), 35% in third- (20 patients) and 43.5% in fourth and beyond-fourth-line (23 patients). The median PFS by treatment line was: 8.6 months, 10.3 months, 7.9 months and 7.23 months, respectively. The median OS was not reached (NR) in first-line and 26.2 months, 18.1 months and 20.7 months in second-, third-, and fourth and beyond- ICPI treatment line, respectively. The global OS for the whole patient cohort calculated from diagnosis of metastasis was 80 months (CL 95%: 50.5 – 109.5 months). Conclusions: ICPIs are active in all treatment lines and should also be offered in heavily pre-treated patients, who have not had access in earlier treatment lines.

Loss of skeletal muscle index and survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Secondary analysis of the phase 3 CAIRO3 trial.

BackgroundLow skeletal muscle index (SMI) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients is associated with poor outcomes. The prognostic impact of SMI changes during consecutive palliative systemic treatments is unknown.MethodsThis is a retrospective analysis of the phase 3 CAIRO3 study. The CAIRO3 study randomized 557 patients between maintenance capecitabine + bevacizumab (CAP‐B) or observation, after six cycles capecitabine + oxaliplatin + bevacizumab (CAPOX‐B). Upon first disease progression (PD1), CAPOX‐B was reintroduced until second progression (PD2). SMI was assessed by computed tomography (CT) (total 1355 scans). SMI and body mass index (BMI) changes were analyzed for three time‐periods; p1: during initial CAPOX‐B, p2: randomization to PD1, and p3: PD1 to PD2. The association between absolute and change in SMI and BMI (both per 1 standard deviation) during p1‐p3, with PD1, PD2, and survival was studied by Cox regression models.ResultsThis analysis included 450 of the 557 patients randomized in the CAIRO3 study. Mean SMI decreased during p1: mean −0.6 SMI units [95% CI −1.07;‐0.26] and p3: −2.2 units [−2.7;‐1.8], whereas during p2, SMI increased + 1.2 units [0.8‐1.6]. BMI changes did not reflect changes in SMI. SMI loss during p2 and p3 was significantly associated with shorter survival (HR 1.19 [1.09‐1.35]; 1.54 [1.31‐1.79], respectively). Sarcopenia at PD1 was significantly associated with early PD2 (HR 1.40 [1.10‐1.70]). BMI loss independent of SMI loss was only associated with shorter overall survival during p3 (HR 1.35 [1.14‐1.63]).ConclusionsIn mCRC patients, SMI loss during palliative systemic treatment was related with early disease progression and reduced survival. BMI did not reflect changes in SMI and could not identify patients at risk of poor outcome during early treatment lines.

Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma Treated with Idelalisib in a Community Oncology Setting

Introduction: Idelalisib (IDELA, Zydelig®) is the first-in-class PI3Kδ inhibitor and is approved in the U.S. as an oral monotherapy for relapsed / refractory follicular lymphoma (R/R FL) after at least two prior lines of systemic therapy. IDELA's regulatory approval was based on a phase 2, open-label clinical trial in 125 patients with R/R indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (Gopal et al., NEJM, 2014) and outcomes in the FL subgroup were published by Salles et al. (Haematologica, 2017). The current study evaluates the characteristics and treatment patterns of patients treated with IDELA for R/R FL in a real-world setting. Methods: Adult patients diagnosed with R/R FL (grades 1, 2, and 3a) and treated with IDELA within the US Oncology Network (USON) between 7/1/2014 to 6/30/2018 were analyzed retrospectively. Patient data were obtained from USON's structured electronic health records' system, iKnowMed (iKM)TM. Manual chart review (ChR) was used to determine physician response and to confirm IDELA treatment patterns. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Descriptive statistics were generated for outcomes of interest, including duration of therapy (DoT), median follow-up, and adverse event (AE) frequency. Results: A total of 124 patients with FL and prescribed IDELA were identified in iKM TM. After Chr confirming the diagnosis of follicular lymphoma diagnosis and initiation of IDELA, 88 patients were retained for analysis. Median age of patients was 68.9 years, with 52.3% female and the majority white and non-Hispanic (90.9% and 93.2%, respectively, Table 1). The most common regimens immediately prior to IDELA initiation were bendamustine + rituximab (22.7%), rituximab (17%), and rituximab maintenance (11.4%). Eighty-six (97.7%) patients had co-morbidities categorized as vascular (50%), endocrine (33%), respiratory (13.6%), or cardiac (12.5%). Thirteen (14.8%), 21 (23.9%), and 54 (61.4%) patients initiated IDELA in second line (2L), 3L, and &gt;4L, respectively. Baseline lab values at IDELA initiation were similar regardless of line of therapy (LOT). mDOT was 5.5 mos. for the entire population and was similar across all LOTs (4.1 mos., 6.1 mos., and 5.5 mos. in 2L, 3L, and &gt;4L, respectively). AEs were noted in 45.5% with the most common being gastrointestinal (31.8%) and dermatologic (10.2%). Respiratory and infectious AEs were noted in 2.3% and 1.1%, respectively, although Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis was rarely prescribed (2.3%). Toxicity as a reason for IDELA discontinuation varied in frequency across LOT and was more common in 2L compared to 3L and &gt;4L (91.7% compared to 43.8% and 46.9%, respectively). With a median follow-up of 18.6 months for the population, the mPFS was 11.4 mos. [95%CI: 8.5,17.0] and mOS was 32.5 mos. [95% CI: 25.3,NR]. Stratified by LOT, median follow-up time, mOS, and mPFS were greater in 2L (30.8 mos., NR [95% CI: 27.37,NR], and 29.0 mos. [95% CI: 8.6,NR], respectively) than in 3L or &gt;4L (3L: 17.9 mos., 29.4 mos. [95%CI: 18.6,NR], and 17.5 mos. [95% CI: 6.1,NR]; &gt;4L: 16.5 mos., 25.3 mos. [95%CI: 13.5.,NR], and 8.6 mos. [95% CI: 6.1,12.6], respectively, Figures 1 and 2). Conclusion: Findings from this analysis suggest that R/R FL patients treated with IDELA in a real-world setting experience a similar mDOT and mPFS as those treated in the clinical trial setting (Salles et al., Haematologica, 2017). Patients treated in 2L demonstrated longer PFS and OS compared to later lines, but also experienced increased IDELA discontinuation due to toxicity, perhaps reflecting a lower incidence of progressive disease in earlier treatment lines, or a more immunocompetent population leading to higher rates of autoimmune AEs. Use of PJP prophylaxis in IDELA-treated patients was uncommon, an observation suggesting an opportunity for provider education. Our findings enhance available data on relapsed FL patient outcomes in real-world clinical practice and support the use of IDELA in patients with R/R FL after at least 2 systemic therapies. Disclosures Andorsky: Gilead: Research Funding; Genetech: Research Funding; CTI: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding. Chan:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Clark:McKesson: Consultancy, Employment, Equity Ownership. Ruzicka:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment. Robert:McKesson: Employment. Awan:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Idelalisib is a PI3 kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with relapsed follicular B-cell lymphoma who have received at least two prior systemic therapies. Some patients in this observational study used Idelalisib after one prior systemic treatment.

Triangle: Autologous Transplantation after a Rituximab/Ibrutinib/ara-c Containing Induction in Generalized Mantle Cell Lymphoma - a Randomized European MCL Network Trial

Background: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a distinct subtype of lymphoma with a wide variation of clinical course. Based on randomized trials of our network, current standard of care is a cytarabine-containing immunochemotherapy induction (Hermine, Lancet 2016) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT; Zöllner, ICML 2019) and rituximab maintenance for 3 years (Le Gouill, NEJM 2018). In relapsed MCL the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib achieves high response rates and ongoing remissions (Wang, NEJM 2013; Dreyling, Lancet 2016). This approach achieved especially longer remission durations in earlier treatment lines (Rule, Hamatologica 2019). We aim to clarify whether ibrutinib added to induction and as maintenance with or without autologous stem cell transplantation might improve outcome. Study design and methods: In this international, randomized three-arm phase III trial (EudraCT-no. 2014-001363-12) young, fit patients ( up to 65 years) with histologically confirmed, untreated mantle cell lymphoma advanced stage II-IV qualify for 1:1:1 randomization after written informed consent according to ICH/EU GCP. In the control arm A, patients receive an alternating R-CHOP/R-DHAP induction followed by myeloablative consolidation (either BEAM or THAM: TBI, high dose Ara-C and melphalan). In arm A+I Ibrutinib is added to the R-CHOP cycles (560 mg day 1-19) and applied as maintenance (continuous dosing) for 2 years. In arm I the same induction and maintenance is applied but high dose consolidation and autologous SCT is skipped. A rituximab maintenance (single doses every 2 months up to 3 years) may be added in all study arms according to national clinical routine. The primary study aim is to show superiority of one of three study arms as future standard of care based on the comparison of the investigator-assessed failure-free survival (FFS), i.e. to investigate if the addition of ibrutinib improves the efficacy of standard 1st line treatment, and can even challenge the use of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous SCT. Secondary study aims include the efficacy of the three treatment arms and the safety and tolerability of ibrutinib during induction immuno-chemotherapy and maintenance. Accordingly, overall and complete response rates, progression-free and overall survival will be determined as well as adverse events during induction immuno-chemotherapy and follow-up including the cumulative incidence rates of SPMs. In addition, minimal residual disease is regularly determined based on patient-specific PCR assay according to the standardized Biomed-2 procedure. Results: As of July 30th, 511 of up to 870 patients have been randomized from 12 different European countries. In a meanwhile completed safety run-in of the initial 50 patients, feasibility of the two experimental arms was confirmed with no major differences in hematological and other toxicities and no major delays during induction. Disclosures Dreyling: Acerta: Other: Scientific advisory board; Novartis: Other: Scientific advisory board; Mundipharma: Other: Scientific advisory board, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Other: Scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Other: Scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Other: Scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Other: Scientific advisory board; Roche: Other: Scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Ladetto:Roche: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; J&amp;J: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria. Doorduijn:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Gine:Janssen: Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Gilead: Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Roche: Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding. Jerkeman:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mey:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding. Hutchings:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Kolstad:Merck: Research Funding; Nordic Nanovector: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Trneny:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gomes da Silva:AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Travel support; Roche: Consultancy, Other: Travel support; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Other: Travel support; Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead Siences: Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Klapper:Roche, Takeda, Amgen, Regeneron: Honoraria, Research Funding. Unterhalt:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding. Hoster:Janssen: Research Funding; Roche Pharma AG: Other: Travel Support.

Subsequent Treatments, Responses and Survival in the Real World for Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Following Treatment with Lenalidomide

Subsequent Treatments, Responses and Survival in the Real World for Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Following Treatment with Lenalidomide

520P - A phase II study to evaluate abscopal effect by palliative radiation therapy in nivolumab treatment for pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (HANSHIN 0116)

BackgroundWhile immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been shown to be effective for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), their monotherapeutic response rate (RR) is roughly 20%. It has been noted that local radiation therapy (RT) might potentially activate off-target antitumor effect, which is so called “abscopal effect” induced by immune-mediated mechanism. We evaluated whether palliative-RT induced abscopal effect, resulting in improvement of Nivolumab (Nivo) effectiveness. MethodsPretreated advanced NSCLC patients (pts) who were indicated for Nivo and scheduled for palliative-RT were started on RT within 10 days of administration of Nivo 3 mg/kg q2 weeks until attached document was revised to 240 mg/body q2 weeks. The primary endpoint was RR of non-irradiated tumor lesions. ResultsTwenty-eight pts were enrolled from May 2016 to January 2019. The study was terminated before completion of targeted initial sample size (n = 35), because of poor accrual. The median age was 67 years (range: 53-89). 15 pts were male. 21 pts had adenocarcinoma histology, 2 pts squamous histology, and 6 pts driver oncogene alterations. 25 pts were PS0/1, and 3 pts PS2. 14 pts were treated as 2nd-line, 2 pts as 3rd-line, and 12 pts as 4th-line or later. The median number of treatment cycles was 4 (range: 1-6). Median radiation dose was 30 Gy (range: 25-40), and 16 pts were irradiated on the bone, 5 pts on the adrenal grand, and 2 pts on the primary lesion. The objective RR of non-irradiated tumor lesions was 14.3% (95% CI: 1.3–27.2). Partial response (PR) was observed in 3 pts treated as 2nd-line (3/14, 21.4%), and 1 pt as 3rd-line (1/2, 50%). No PR was observed in pts treated as 4th-line or later (0/12, 0%). The median PFS was 2.7 months (95% CI: 1.0–3.5). No severe and specific adverse events (AEs) of Nivo in combination with RT were observed compared to historical data of Nivo monotherapy. ConclusionsAlthough the sample size was small, cleared abscopal effect by palliative-RT was not observed in Nivo treatment. However, some pts well responded to Nivo with palliative-RT during early-lines of treatment (2nd/3rd-line). Further investigations in the early-lines are warranted to evaluate a substantial synergistic effect of RT with ICIs. Clinical trial identificationUMIN000023646. Legal entity responsible for the studyHANSHIN Oncology Group. FundingONO Pharmaceutical Company. DisclosureA. Hata: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer Ingelheim; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Eli Lilly; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Chugai; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD. M. Satouchi: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer Ingelheim; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Chugai; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Eli Lilly; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): ONO; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Takeda; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Taiho. D. Harada: Honoraria (self): ONO; Honoraria (self): BMS. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Abstract P6-18-23: Palbociclib and endocrine therapy in fourth line and beyond for hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: The UK compassionate access program experience

Abstract Background Palbociclib is approved in 1st line for hormone receptor (HR)-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC). A Compassionate Access Program (CAP) previously allowed patients to receive it in 4th line. However, Palbociclib has not been specifically tested in this population. We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy profile of Palbociclib within the CAP across ten institutions in the United Kingdom. Methods We retrospectively identified HR-positive HER2-negative ABC patients on the Palbociclib CAP between December 2015 and September 2017. Demographics, disease characteristics, prior treatments, blood tests, toxicities, treatment delays and responses were recorded. Simple statistics, Fisher's exact test, chi-squared method and Cox regression were used as appropriate. Results 118 patients identified had median age of 59 (32-82). 97 (82.20%) were postmenopausal and 109 (92.37%) had ECOG Performance Status 0-1. 96 (81.36%) had visceral involvement, 19 (16.10%) bony only and 15 (12.71%) visceral only disease. Patients received a median 5 (range 3-11) prior lines of treatment and 3 (range 0-8) prior chemotherapy lines. 105 patients (89.74%) developed neutropenia (grade ≥3 in 59 [56.19%]). 6 experienced febrile neutropenia (5.13%). 57 (48.72%) had a dose reduction, down to 100mg in 48 (41.03%) and 75mg in 9 (7.69%) due to hematologic toxicity in 46 (80.70%). Dose delays were in median 7 days long (range: 0-56). Palbociclib was discontinued due to disease progression in 97 (82.91%) and to toxicity in 5 (4.27%). Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 45 patients (67.16%) who received ≥3 and in 22 (32.84%) who received &amp;lt;3 prior chemotherapies (p 0.351). Palbociclib produced clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 47.52% and overall response rate of 15.84% in 101 patients assessed. CBR was 45.45% with previous endocrine treatment (ET) progression-free survival (PFS) &amp;lt;6 months versus 49.12% if PFS ≥6 months (p 0.714). Overall, median PFS was 4.5 months (95% CI 3.7-5.9). The PFS seen in different subgroups showed no impact in relation to the number of lines of prior chemotherapy (&amp;lt;3 lines: 5.9 months [95% CI 3.7-11.0]; ≥3 lines: 4.3 months [95% CI 3.3-5.5], p 0.159), but was numerically greater in those who had previous benefit from ET (PFS ≥6 months: 5.9 months [95% CI 4.4-8.0]; &amp;lt;6 months: 3.7 months [95% CI 2.8-4.5], p. 0.055) or in those with bone only disease (bone only: 11.0 months [95% CI 2.3-not reached]; other sites involved: 4.4 months [95% CI 3.6-5.5], p 0.024). Median OS was 15.8 months (95% CI 13.3-18.7) for the whole cohort and it was greater in patients who derived longer PFS from prior ET (≥6 months: 18.1 months [95% CI 13.0-NR]; &amp;lt;6 months: 14.4 months [95% CI 7.7-18.3], p. 0.052). Conclusions To date, this is the most extensive analysis of Palbociclib outcomes in ≥4th-line setting. In this heavily pretreated population clinical benefit was confirmed particularly for endocrine-sensitive disease and predominantly involving the bones and in earlier lines of treatment. Grade ≥3 neutropenia rates were similar to PALOMA trials, but the higher incidence of febrile neutropenia need to be carefully considered. Citation Format: Battisti NML, Kingston B, King J, Denton A, Waters S, Sita-Lumsden A, Rehman F, Stavraka C, Kristeleit H, Sawyer E, Houghton D, Davidson N, Howell S, Choy J, Harper P, Roylance R, Fharat R, Mohammed K, Ring A, Johnston S. Palbociclib and endocrine therapy in fourth line and beyond for hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: The UK compassionate access program experience [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-18-23.

Abstract P6-18-28: Patterns of treatment and outcome of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2 receptor-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC): A real life multicenter Italian study

Abstract Background The CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib combined with endocrine therapy has proven to prolong progression-free survival (PFS) in previously untreated and pretreated women with HR+/HER2- MBC. Few data are available regarding the performance of such a regimen outside the clinical trials, and there is the need to understand its performances in real world. Methods We report a multicenter real-life experience aimed to verify the patterns of treatment and outcome of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy in an unselected population of MBC patients (pts). The primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR: complete response [CR], partial response [PR], or stable disease for longer than 6 months [SD]); secondary aims were median progression-free survival (mPFS) and safety of the combination. Statistical analysis was performed to identify variables potentially predictive of outcomes. Patients received P at 125 mg daily, 3 wk on/1 wk off in a 28d cycle, combined with letrozole administered orally 2.5 mg on a continuous daily dosing schedule (cohort A) or Fulvestrant 500 mg (F500) i.m. q4wks with loading dose (cohort B); treatment was given until disease progression, toxicity or patient's refusal. Results The study enrolled 150 postmenopausal pts (65 in cohort A, 85 in cohort B) treated from December 2016 to April 2018 at 4 Italian Institutions. Median age in the whole population was 62 years (range 47-79; mean age 59 years in cohort A, 64 in cohort B); 13 pts (20%) in cohort A and 23 pts (27%) in cohort B had de novo metastatic disease; 46% of pts in cohort A and 55% had visceral involvement, while 17% and 20% respectively had bone-only disease. The median number of prior lines was 2 in cohort A (range 1-3) and 3 (range 2-5) in cohort B, including ET (median 3) and chemotherapy (median 2); in cohort B 37 pts (43%) had previously received F 500, while 12% (cohort A) and 15% (cohort B) had been pretreated with everolimus. In cohort A a PR as best response was observed in 32% (20 pts), with 14 pts (23%) achieving SD lasting ≥ 6 months for a CBR of 52%. In cohort B CBR was 60%, with 25% PR, 48% SD lasting ≥ 6 months in 35 pts (41%). The most common adverse events in both cohorts were neutropenia (grade 1-2 in 67%, grade 3-4 in 35%), grade 1 anemia (52%) and thrombocytopenia (34%), requiring dose reduction in 27% of cases. At a median follow-up of 12 months (range 1-16), mPFS was 6.3 months in cohort A and 5.5 months in cohort B. In both groups a better mPFS was observed in pts treated as ≤ 3rd versus &amp;gt; 3rd line: 9.6 versus 5.2 in cohort A (p=0.003), 8.8 versus 4.1 months in cohort B, respectively (p= 0.002). No significant outcome differences were observed according to prior endocrine therapy with F500 or everolimus, or dominant metastatic site. Conclusions Our real life data, in line with the results of reported clinical trials, indicate that palbociclib plus letrozolo or F500 is active and safe in HR+/HER2- MBC, also suggesting a better performance of the combinations in earlier treatment lines. Citation Format: Palumbo R, Torrisi R, Quaquarini E, Sottotetti F, Gambaro A, Collovà E, Ferzi A, Fava S, Agostinetto E, Tagliaferri B, Licata L, Teragni C, Bernardo A. Patterns of treatment and outcome of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2 receptor-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC): A real life multicenter Italian study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-18-28.

Significance of monitoring plasma vascular endothelial growth factor signals during treatment of colorectal cancer patients.

577 Background: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signals may change during colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment, but monitoring real time changes has not been conducted. Methods: Blood monitoring was carried out to track changes in the status of VEGF ligands (A, C, and D) in CRC patients. Expression was determined by ELISA. Results: VEGF-A monitoring was performed in 148 CRC patients preoperatively and VEGF-C and -D monitoring was performed in 52 metastatic CRC patients. Patients with high VEGF-A had significantly shorter recurrence free survival (p = 0.00438). Univariate analysis associating with recurrence detected high VEGF-A, high pathological stage, and with lymph node metastasis were risk factors, and high VEGF-A was identified as an independent risk factor of recurrence by multivariate analysis. There was no significant difference in prognosis between metastatic CRC patients with high and low VEGF-D in early-line treatment, however, in late line patients with high VEGF-D had significantly worse prognosis than those with low VEGF-D (p = 0.0121). When they had treatment with bevacizumab, same result was seen in late line (p = 0.0416). VEGF-C showed no significant correlation with prognosis. Conclusions: Preoperative high VEGF-A is an important risk factor of recurrence and VEGF targeting drugs might be useful as an adjuvant chemotherapy for the patients with high VEGF-A. In late line chemotherapy, patients with high VEGF-D had poor prognosis in regardless of bevacizumab, therefore, they will be candidates of other anti-VEGF drugs than bevacizumab in late line chemotherapy. Measurement of plasma VEGF level can have benefit for the treatment of CRC patients to predict their recurrence and prognosis. It would be helpful for VEGF targeting drug selection and provide useful information for better treatment strategy.

Palbociclib and endocrine therapy in heavily pretreated hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: the UK Compassionate Access Programme experience.

Palbociclib is approved in 1st line for hormone receptor (HR)-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC). A Compassionate Access Programme previously allowed patients to receive it in 4th line. However, Palbociclib has not been specifically tested in this population. We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy profile of Palbociclib within the Programme across ten institutions in the United Kingdom. We retrospectively identified HR-positive HER2-negative ABC patients on the Programme between December 2015 and September 2017. Demographics, disease characteristics, prior treatments, blood tests, toxicities, treatment delays and responses were recorded. Simple statistics, Fisher's exact test, χ2 method and Cox regression were used. 118 patients identified had a median age of 59. 82.2% were postmenopausal and 92.4% performance status 0-1. 81.4% had visceral involvement and 6.8% bone-only disease after a median of 5 prior treatments and 3 prior chemotherapies. Clinical benefit rate was 47.5%, overall response rate 15.8%, median PFS 4.5 months and median OS 15.8 months. Longer progression-free survival on prior endocrine therapy was a predictor of longer PFS and OS. 89.7% developed neutropenia (grade ≥ 3 in 56.8%). 5.1% experienced febrile neutropenia. 48.3% had dose reductions and 3.4% discontinued Palbociclib following toxicity. No statistically significant difference in grade ≥ 3 neutropenia was observed according to metastatic sites nor previous treatments. This is the most extensive analysis of palbociclib in ≥ 4th-line setting. Clinical benefit was confirmed particularly for endocrine-sensitive, predominantly bony disease and in earlier lines of treatment. Safety was similar to PALOMA trials with higher febrile neutropenia rate.

Sintilimab: another effective immune checkpoint inhibitor in classical Hodgkin lymphoma

Hodgkin lymphoma is an uncommon B-cell malignancy that can affect not only older patients but also adolescents and young adults. Standard chemotherapy or combined-modality therapy is highly effective for treatment of this disease, and most patients can be cured. 1 Brenner H Gondos A Pulte D Ongoing improvement in long-term survival of patients with Hodgkin disease at all ages and recent catch-up of older patients. Blood. 2008; 111: 2977-2983 Crossref PubMed Scopus (96) Google Scholar Unfortunately, a subset of patients relapse, and the prognosis of those who do not respond to salvage therapy is poor. Novel targeted therapies have proven highly effective in patients with relapsed or refractory disease, and immune checkpoint therapy is particularly promising in this group of patients. Treatment with nivolumab and pembrolizumab—antibodies targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)—has resulted in high response rates and durable benefit, leading to the approval of these agents for patients with relapsed and refractory disease in the USA. 2 Ansell SM Lesokhin AM Borrello I et al. PD-1 blockade with nivolumab in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372: 311-319 Crossref PubMed Scopus (2655) Google Scholar , 3 Younes A Santoro A Shipp M et al. Nivolumab for classical Hodgkin's lymphoma after failure of both autologous stem-cell transplantation and brentuximab vedotin: a multicentre, multicohort, single-arm phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016; 17: 1283-1294 Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (701) Google Scholar , 4 Armand P Engert A Younes A et al. Nivolumab for relapsed/refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma after failure of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation: extended follow-up of the multicohort single-arm phase II CheckMate 205 Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018; 36: 1428-1439 Crossref PubMed Scopus (420) Google Scholar , 5 Armand P Shipp MA Ribrag V et al. Programmed death-1 blockade with pembrolizumab in patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma after brentuximab vedotin failure. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34: 3733-3739 Crossref PubMed Scopus (508) Google Scholar , 6 Chen R Zinzani PL Fanale MA et al. Phase II study of the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab for relapsed/refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35: 2125-2132 Crossref PubMed Scopus (684) Google Scholar These antibodies are now being tested in earlier lines of treatment. Safety and activity of sintilimab in patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (ORIENT-1): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trialSintilimab could be a new treatment option for patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma in China. Full-Text PDF

Palbociclib plus endocrine therapy in HER2 negative, hormonal receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer: A real-world experience.

Data from 423 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), hormone receptor-positive (HR+) advanced breast cancer (aBC) patients treated with palbociclib and endocrine therapy (ET) were provided by 35 Italian cancer centers and analyzed for treatment outcomes. Overall, 158 patients were treated in first line and 265 in second/later lines. We observed 19 complete responses and 112 partial responses. The overall response rate (ORR) was 31% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26.6-35.4) and clinical benefit was 52.7% (95% CI, 48-57.5). ORR was negatively affected by prior exposure to everolimus/exemestane ( p = 0.002) and favorably influenced by early line-treatment ( p < 0.0001). At 6 months, median progression-free survival was 12 months (95% CI, 8-16) and median overall survival was 24 months (95% CI, 17-30). More favorable outcomes were associated with palbociclib in early lines, no visceral metastases and no prior everolimus/exemestane. The main toxicity reported was neutropenia. Our results provide further support to the use of palbociclib with ET in HER2-, HR+ aBC. Differences in outcomes across patients subsets remain largely unexplained.

Therapy of Advanced Prostate Cancer: Targeting the Androgen Receptor Axis in Earlier Lines of Treatment.

With the decrease in PSA screening based on the 2011 United States Preventive Services Task Force guidelines and the potential approval of highly sensitive imaging techniques over the next few years, we are likely to see an increasing trend of metastatic prostate cancer diagnosis. Traditional therapy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer (nmPC) has consisted of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) followed by other hormonal therapy maneuvers, such as anti-androgen withdrawal, herbal preparations, low dose steroids, or ketoconazole. Androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapies (ARAT) were previously only approved for patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This has recently changed after reporting of results from the SPARTAN and PROSPER trials, which were conducted in nonmetastatic CRPC (nmCRPC) patients. These studies demonstrated improved metastasis-free survival with apalutamide and enzalutamide, each compared to placebo in a double blind randomized setting. In 2017, the LATITUDE and STAMPEDE studies demonstrated marked survival benefit with early abiraterone and prednisone in patients with metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) in addition to ADT. Other second-generation AR antagonists are currently in phase 3 trials inmHSPC and nmCRPC. This article summarizes the key clinical trials that led to FDA approval of ARAT in the mHSPC and nmCRPC settings and highlights potential limitations, future directions, and treatment-algorithms when selecting patients for early therapy in mHSPC and NMPC.