The view of the state of Ireland does not seem to change much in the century that intervenes between the documents bearing that same name produced by Edmund Spenser and Jonathan Swift. Spenser's A View of the Present State of Ireland (1596) and Swift's A Short View of the State of Ireland (1727) agree that the condition of Ireland is dismal in roughly the same ways: poverty, starvation, unemployment, ignorance.' Furthermore, both locate the roots of +these problems in English imperial rule. Here, however, the similarities would seem necessarily to end, because while Spenser faults English rule for not being strict enough to contain what are native Irish problems, Swift argues that its greedfuelled strictness has created these problems. Their respective positions on this issue reflect the larger political trends that mark each writer's career: Spenser is an apologist for English imperialism, and Swift is famous for exposing its social and political injustices.' In spite of this difference, I want to make a case for a fundamental similarity between the two indicated by their use of a common form and metaphor. Both men were part of the English imperial presence in Ireland, and they both channeled their frustration from that experience into the construction of Utopian and dystopian spaces in which whoredom becomes one of the operative metaphors for the empire/colony relationship. My argument will suggest that these parallels stem from the larger assumptions about the power of writers and writing that Spenser and Swift hold in common. In making it, I will look beyond what these writers are saying in order to concentrate on how they say it and more importantly, why they feel they have the authority to do so. Swift may indicate in his writings a greater awareness than Spenser demonstrates of the inequalities created by imperial rule. However, in the act of publishing his views, Swift actually amplifies and extends the argument implicit in Spenser's publication of his advice to Elizabeth in both the View and The Faerie Queene: the arts create the defining characteristics of a culture, including ultimately its political institutions. Although this statement reverses conventional wisdom, both then and now,
Read full abstract