Abstract Background Better electrical synchronization and left ventricular (LV) systolic function was recently reported in left bundle branch–optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy ( Lot-CRT ) when compared with conventional CRT. The implantation of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is less expensive, easier to operate and has shorter exposure time to X-ray than Lot-CRT. Purpose To observe whether there are negative changes in dyssynchrony and LV systolic function when switched from Lot-CRT to LBBP. determine whether LBBP pacing alone can replace CRT therapy. Methods 30 patients (21 males, 64.4±9.5 years, 43% with persistent atrial fibrillation) who fulfilled the criteria of CRT implantation received Lot-CRT. The right atrial electrode of the patients with atrial fibrillation or the right ventricular electrode of those with sinus rhythm was implanted into the left bundle branch area. After six months, 20 patients whose LV ejection fraction (LVEF) increased by more than 5% and New York Heart Association functional class increased by at least 1 grade were selected for further investigation. Right and left ventricular pacemaker electrodes were programmed to shut off, leaving only the left bundle branch area pacing for one month. The LV size, systolic function, interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD), and LV mechanical dyssynchrony (LVMD) were compared by using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. Results It was found that QRS duration slightly widened, the LA size increased, the LV size slightly increased and LVEF decreased, p<0.05. There was no statistical significance in the IVMD (p=0.064). The LV mechanical dyssynchrony increased significantly, p<0.001. Conclusions Deteriotation of LV dyssynchrony and systolic function was recorded when Lot-CRT to LBBP for a short period in recovering patients with systolic dysfunction. It indicates that LBBP may not yet maintain the benefits of Lot-CRT in this group of patients.The comparison between Lot-CRT and LBBP
Read full abstract