Dysphagia Severity Scale Research Articles

Impact of Prehabilitation With Preoperative Swallowing Exercises on Postoperative Swallowing Morbidity in Oral Cavity Cancer: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Oral cancer surgery and the associated reconstructive procedures cause mechanical and neurological impairment of swallowing. Despite postoperative rehabilitation, functional impairment of swallowing remains a concern. This study is to investigate the potential benefits of prehabilitation with preoperative swallowing exercises to patients undergoing composite resections and compartmental tongue resections so that it results in better swallowing outcomes and improved quality of life after surgery. Sixty patients included in the study were randomized into an exercise and control group of 30 each. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity undergoing composite resection or compartmental tongue resections were included, and patients with severe trismus at presentation were excluded. Patients in the exercise group were instructed on a set of six active exercises to be followed strictly for a period of at least 1week before surgery. Preoperative swallowing exercises comprised of evidence-based exercises targeting the muscle groups involved in swallowing. Postoperative swallowing rehabilitation was the same as that of the control group. Patients were assessed after 6months of surgery. Outcomes were assessed both subjectively and objectively. Objective assessment was done by inexpensive, novel clinical methods of repetitive saliva swallow test (RSST), water swallow test (WST) and food swallow test (FST) to and graded using dysphagia severity scale (1-7). Average oral intake scale (1-Oral solids, 2-Oral semisolids/easy to chew foods, 3-Oral liquids only and 4-Non-oral, orogastric tube dependent) assessed subjectively was significantly lower in exercise arm, and the control arm had a significantly higher OIS score. Exercise arm had higher number of patients in DSS scores of 5, 6 and 7. The control arm had a higher number of patients in DSS scores of 3 and 4. The differences between the two groups were found to be statistically significant taking into consideration the confounding factors of radiation, wound morbidity and tongue resections. Preoperative swallowing exercises have shown a positive impact on postoperative swallowing ability. This is the first randomized trial to assess the effect of PSE in postoperative oral cancer patients. Our exercise protocol needs standardization, and clinical objective method of dysphagia assessment requires further validation. However, prehabilitation with PSE has the potential to improve the quality of life in oral cancer patients.

Oropharyngeal reconstruction with buccinator myomucosal island flaps: Functional outcomes and quality of life. A retrospective observational study.

The buccinator myomucosal island flaps are an excellent option for "like with like" oropharyngeal reconstruction in selected cases. We report a series of 15 patients and discuss the functional outcomes. From January 1, 2020 to February 31, 2023, 15 patients underwent oropharyngeal tumor resection and reconstruction with myomucosal island flaps. Buccal artery myomucosal island flap and tunnelized facial artery myomucosal island flap were used in 10 and 5 patients, respectively. In four cases, a total soft palate reconstruction was performed. Before removing the nasogastric tube, a videoendoscopy was performed in all cases to assess postoperative swallowing. Functional assessment was evaluated after a follow-up of at least 12 months. Speech intelligibility and patient speech perception were assessed using the Hirose's 10-point scoring system and the Voice Handicap Index. Dysphagia was assessed using the Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale and the Dysphagia Handicap Index. Finally, donor site morbidity was analyzed, and quality of life was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). The median length of hospital stay was 10.5 days. Nasal feeding tube was removed on average in 8.6 days after surgery, and all patients were able to tolerate an oral soft diet. Intelligibility was very good in all cases. No major complications were detected, and donor site morbidity was low. Global quality of life was acceptable in all cases. Buccinator myomucosal island flaps represent a very interesting and versatile option for the functional reconstruction of oropharyngeal defects up to 7-8 cm. IV.

Validity and Reliability of Dysphagia Outcome Severity Scale (DOSS) When Used to Rate Flexible Endoscopic Evaluations of Swallowing (FEES).

The Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale is used both clinically and within dysphagia research, internationally. Although it was developed using videofluoroscopic swallowing studies, it is frequently used to rate Flexible Endoscopic Evaluations of Swallowing. The validity and reliability of DOSS-use with FEES, however, has not previously been evaluated. This study investigated the validity and rater reliability of clinicians using DOSS to rate FEES. Eleven Speech-Language Pathologists (SLPs) with varied dysphagia experience were recruited to review and DOSS-rate 17 soundless FEES (198 bolus swallows) recorded from 11 heterogenic dysphagic patients (2 cases with repeat FEES) and 4 healthy adults. The SLPs DOSS-ratings were compared against the initial comprehensive dysphagia evaluation (including patient diagnosis, interview, cranial nerve and complete FEES assessment) with Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) and DOSS outcome measures. The SLPs were blinded to patient details and comprehensive dysphagia examination. Re-randomised rating of FEES cases occurred two weeks later (intra rater reliability). Criterion validity for DOSS-ratings (compared against comprehensive dysphagia evaluation with FOIS and DOSS) were strong-very strong (rs=0.858 and 0.936 respectively; p < 0.001). Inter rater reliability demonstrated high agreement (α = 0.891), also intra rater reliability demonstrated almost perfect agreement (Kw = 0.945). This study's results, with strong-very strong criterion validity and high rater reliability by SLPs, adds to the evidence for DOSS-use with FEES. Future validity research comparing DOSS with both FEES and VFSS simultaneously is recommended.

Evidence for Intermittent Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Dysphagia after Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Dysphagia is the most common serious complication after stroke, with an incidence of about 37-78%, which seriously affects the independence of patients in daily life and clinical recovery. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), as a non-invasive neuromodulation technique, is an emerging option for post-stroke dysphagia. Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is a new mode of transcranial magnetic stimulation that simulates the frequency of pulses released in the hippocampus.Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) has been shown to increase cortical excitability and improve swallowing function in patients. Our study sought to summarize existing clinical randomized controlled trials to provide evidence-based medical evidence for the clinical use of iTBS. A computer search was conducted on 4 Chinese (Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, VIP Information Resource System, CNKI, and Wanfang Medical Science) and 4 English (including Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science) databases to retrieve all randomized controlled trials in Chinese and English that explored the effects of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation for post-stroke dysphagia. The retrieval years are from database construction to 23 November 2023. The primary outcome measure was a change in Penetration/Aspiration Scale (PAS), Standardized Swallowing Assessment (SSA) and Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), Secondary outcomes included Fiberoptic Endoscopic Dysphagia Severity Scale (FEDSS), water-swallowing test (WST) etc. A meta-analysis by Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was performed with RevMan 5.3. we appraise risk of bias(RoB) of each study with the Cochrane RoB tool. Detailed instructions for using the Cochrane RoB tool are provided in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (The Cochrane Handbook). Nine studies were obtained from eight databases after screening by inclusion and exclusion criteria, 567 patients from 9 studies were included in the meta-analysis, and one study was included in the qualitative analysis due to different control groups. Two of the nine studies had an unclear risk of bias, and four studies were at low risk. The results showed that iTBS significantly improved SSA, PAS, FOIS, and PAS scores in stroke patients compared to the control group(P < 0.05), and promoted swallowing function recovery. Our systematic review provides the first evidence of the efficacy of iTBS in improving dysphagia in stroke patients. However, the number of available studies limits the persuasiveness of the evidence and further validation by additional randomized controlled trials is needed.

Perceived benefit of antibiotics irrigation before pharyngeal repair of severe cut-throat injuries

IntroductionWound irrigation has been employed as an important surgical step to remove bacteria, devitalized tissues, and foreign bodies from surgical sites to prevent infection and confer to the wound maximum potential of healing. MethodA prospective study was conducted at Federal Medical Centre, Gusau, between January 2019- August 2023 to assess the benefit of antibiotics as additives in irrigation of dirty wounds.Seven (7) patients in total were presented with severe cut-throat injuries that require laryngopharyngoplasty. A combination of injection ciprofloxacin and metronidazole were used as additives into 1 L of normal saline, low pressure irrigation was done using 20mls syringe fitted to a broken needle or canular. Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale (DOSS) was used to assess return of pharyngeal function. ResultThe mean time of presentation of the patients was 34 ± 29 h (µ ± standard deviation) and a range of 6–72 h. The mean repair time was 58.3 ± 38.4 h with a range of 24–120 h. Most of the patients (85.7 %) had dysphagia outcome and severity scale of level 5 when per oral feeding was started with steady progress until discharge day. ConclusionWound irrigation is one of the most crucial steps in treating severe cut-throat injuries. Based on our experience, adding antibiotics to the irrigant has shown potential in the control of local infection, particularly where patients present late.

Hemodynamic signal changes during volitional swallowing in dysphagia patients with different unilateral hemispheric stroke and brainstem stroke: A near-infrared spectroscopy study

Background and objectivesStrokes will result in decreased in cortical excitability and changed in the balance between the affected and unaffected hemispheres. Previous studies have focused on cortical changes in healthy subjects during swallowing, while they remain unknown in patients with stroke at different locations. Thus, the purpose of this study was to research cortical activation patterns of swallowing in patients with dysphagia and healthy subjects by the functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). We also focus on the comparability of brain activation areas associated with swallowing between patients with different stroke locations and healthy subjects. Methodstotal of 104 participants were invited to our study, involving 86 patients with dysphagic unilateral hemispheric stroke and 18 age and sex matched healthy controls. The stroke patients were categorized into patients with left unilateral stroke lesions (n = 30), patients with right unilateral stroke lesions (n = 32) and patients with brainstem injury (n = 24) according to different stroke sites. All patients underwent a series of clinical swallowing function assessments, such as the Fiberoptic endoscopic dysphagia severity scale (FEDSS), penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) of Rosenbek, the gugging swallowing screen (GUSS) and the functional oral Intake scale (FOIS) after informed consent has been signed. All participants received the fNIRS system assessment. ResultsThe results showed that extensive areas of the cerebral cortex activated during the swallowing tasks in healthy participants (P < FDR 0.05). For patients with left unilateral stroke lesions, the HbO concentration were strongest over the right hemisphere (P < FDR 0.05). In addition, a less severe activation was also observed in the left hemisphere. Comparable to patients with left unilateral stroke lesions, the strongest activation during swallowing task were found in the left hemisphere in patients with right unilateral stroke lesions (P < FDR 0.05). Similarly, the right hemisphere also has activated less. In contrast, patients with brain stem injury showed more bilaterally activation patterns. ConclusionOur finding states that cortical activation areas differ between patients with different stroke locations and healthy subjects during swallowing. There was a more bilateral activation in healthy participants and patients with lesions in the brainstem while more cortical activation in unaffected hemisphere in patients with unilateral hemispheric stroke. It also provides a basis for the future treatment of dysphagia after stroke.

Translation, and validation of Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale (DOSS): Swedish version

BackgroundSwallowing dysfunction (dysphagia) significantly impacts patient and medical outcomes. In Sweden, there is no comprehensive outcome measure for dysphagia that incorporates holistic assessment and dysphagia impact on a person’s impairment, function and participation. The Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale (DOSS) was developed and validated (in English) and incorporates the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) aforementioned, International Classification of Functioning (ICF) aspects. This study translated then evaluated the validity and reliability of the Swedish version, DOSS-S.MethodTranslation occurred based on WHO recommendations. The Content Validity Index (CVI) of the translated version (DOSS-S) was assessed twice by 11 (multi-professional) dysphagia experts. Criterion validity and rater reliability was calculated using 18 Speech Pathologists assessing patient cases from International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative—Functional Diet Scale (IDDS-FDS) research.ResultsVery high CVI values (0.96–0.99) for the linguistic correlation, and high CVI values (0.84–0.94) for applicability correlation were achieved. High criterion validity of DOSS-S with IDDSI-FDS was demonstrated (rs = 0.89, p < 0.01), with very high inter and intra rater reliabilities (ICC > 0.90).ConclusionThe DOSS-S demonstrated very high validity values, and very high inter and intra rater reliability. This research contributes to improved dysphagia management by providing interprofessional dysphagia clinicians with a validated scale to identify patient progression, communicate dysphagia status between regions and countries, and document patient outcomes using an ICF framework.

Postoperative Measurement of the Retropharyngeal Space Predicts the Risk of Dysphagia After Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion.

Postoperative dysphagia is a common complication of anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF), although its pathophysiology remains poorly understood. Patients with severe dysphagia may suffer from serious complications such as aspiration pneumonia, in addition to difficulty with oral intake or malnutrition; therefore, a prompt indicator for postoperative management would be helpful. We quantitatively evaluated the retropharyngeal space (RS) after ACDF and investigated its association with postoperative dysphagia. This multicenter retrospective study analyzed the clinical data of 82 consecutive patients who underwent ACDF. The anteroposterior distance (APD) of the RS was measured at the C2 level using a lateral radiographic view on postoperative day 1. Postoperative dysphagia was subjectively assessed using the Bazaz-Yoo Dysphagia Severity Scale. We statistically evaluated the association between the APD of the RS and postoperative dysphagia. The mean APD of the RS in all 82 patients was 3.6 mm preoperatively and significantly increased to 8.2 mm postoperatively (P < .0001). Twenty-two patients (26.8%) had postoperative dysphagia. Multivariable analysis revealed that the postoperative APD was associated with postoperative dysphagia (odds ratio 1.27, 95% CI 1.10-1.50, P = .0007). The receiver operating characteristic curve (area under the curve 0.70, 95% CI 0.58-0.83) demonstrated that the postoperative APD of the RS cutoff value was 6.1 mm, with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 35%. With this cutoff value, the positive and negative predictive values for postoperative dysphagia were 36% and 100%, respectively. Our data demonstrate that a value of 6.1 mm for the APD of the RS is an effective indicator for dysphagia after ACDF, which contributes to optimizing the patient management in the acute postoperative period.

Pharyngeal Structure and Dysphagia in Patients with Parkinson's Disease and Related Disorders.

Pharyngeal muscle changes occur in patients with Parkinson's disease and related disorders (PRD); however, the association between the structural alterations in the pharynx and the symptoms of dysphagia remains unclear. We assessed structural changes and contractile forces by measuring pharyngeal wall thickness and width. We aimed to define the pharyngeal measurements and determine their value as diagnostic tools for dysphagia.The pharyngeal wall thickness (PWT), pharyngeal width at rest (PWR), and shortest pharyngeal width at swallowing (PWS) were measured using lateral neck roentgenograms and videofluoroscopic swallowing study. We compared the PWR and PWT between the PRD and control groups using an independent t-test. The Kendall correlation test was performed on the radiological data of the pharynx (PWT, PWR and PWS), dysphagia scales (Penetration-Aspiration scale [PAS] and Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale [DOSS]), and Hoehn and Yahr scale (HY scale).The PWT was smaller and the PWR greater in the PRD than in the control group (p < 0.05). The dysphagia scales (PAS and DOSS) were correlated with the radiological data (PWT and PWS) and the HY scale (p < 0.05). The HY scale score also correlated with the PWT (p < 0.05). The optimal cutoff points of the PWT and PWR for predicting aspiration were 4.05 and 16.05mm in the PRD group, respectively.Using the PWT, PWR and PWS, muscle atrophy and contractile strength of the pharynx can be estimated. The combination of the PWT and PWR can be a simple indicator for predicting swallowing disorders at the bedside.

Concurrent and Predictive Validity of the Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability in Belgian Acute Stroke Patients Based on a 1-Year Follow-Up Study.

The Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability (MASA) is a standardized clinical swallowing examination, specifically developed as a diagnostic test for the presence of oropharyngeal dysphagia and aspiration in the early period after stroke onset. In the original validation study, cutoff scores of &lt;178 and &lt;170 points, respectively, for the identification of dysphagia and aspiration risk are reported. However, a literature search revealed that alternative cutoff scores for dysphagia and/or aspiration provide better diagnostic accuracy. The aim of this secondary data analysis study was to evaluate the concurrent and predictive validity of the MASA. Data were derived from a Belgian cohort study of an acute stroke population (n = 151). The MASA total score (MASA-TS), which is the sum of weighted scores on the 24 items, was evaluated against the Fiberoptic Endoscopic Dysphagia Severity Scale (FEDSS) to assess concurrent validity. To assess predictive validity of the MASA-TS, pneumonia during hospitalization and over 1 year and mortality acted as a future criterion. Analyses included receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC). Diagnostic accuracy of the MASA-TS was good for dysphagia (AUC = 0.85) and for the presence of relevant aspiration risk (AUC = 0.84). Using the original cutoff scores, the MASA-TS showed perfect sensitivity (Se = 1.00) for the identification of dysphagia and aspiration but inadequate specificity (Sp) for dysphagia (Sp = 0.16) and aspiration (Sp = 0.43). After determining new MASA cutoff scores, the optimal MASA cutoff scores were ≤146 for both dysphagia and aspiration with adequate thresholds (Se = 0.71 and Sp = 0.81 for dysphagia; Se = 0.73 and Sp = 0.80 for aspiration). The MASA-TS was a significant predictor of pneumonia during hospitalization (AUC = 0.85) and 1-year follow-up (AUC = 0.86), and of mortality (AUC = 0.79). The MASA-TS showed good concurrent validity with the FEDSS. Furthermore, using new cutoff scores (≤146 for the identification of dysphagia and aspiration) lead in general to more accurate diagnostic indexes. The MASA-TS is a good predictor of aspiration pneumonia during hospitalization and 1-year follow-up and of mortality.

Correlation between Respiratory Dysfunction and Dysphagia in Individuals with Acute Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

Aspiration pneumonia is one of the most frequent and fatal life-threatening complications among individuals with acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI). However, the mechanism of dysphagia among individuals with CSCI is not well understood. Morbidity and mortality associated with CSCI may result from the interplay between respiratory dysfunction and dysphagia. This study aimed to elucidate the effect of respiratory dysfunction on the swallowing function of individuals with acute traumatic CSCI. A prospective cohort study was conducted involving 54 individuals with acute traumatic CSCI who were admitted within 2 weeks following injury. Dysphagia was evaluated using the Dysphagia Severity Scale (DSS) and the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS). Respiratory function was evaluated by measuring the cough peak flow (CPF), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1.0), FEV1.0/forced vital capacity (FEV1.0%), and percent vital capacity (%VC). We recorded these parameters at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 following injury and analyzed pertinent changes over time and significant correlations. Among 54 individuals (46 men and 8 women) recruited in this study, 48 (88.9%) had restrictive ventilatory impairment and 17 (31.5%) had severe dysphagia (DSS level 1-4) 2 weeks following injury. However, respiratory function and swallowing function significantly improved thereafter. CPF, FEV1.0, and %VC were significantly correlated with the severity of dysphagia during each period. Restrictive ventilatory impairment, poor cough force, and dysphagia are closely related, and the evaluation of respiratory function plays an important role in evaluating dysphagia.

Consistencies among miscellaneous scales for evaluation of post-stroke dysphagia.

Post-stroke dysphagia (PSD) is the most common type of dysphagia. Stroke patients with sustained dysphagia have poorer outcomes. The severity of PSD is assessed using miscellaneous scales with unknown consistencies. We aim to investigate the consistencies among miscellaneous scales, which could aid in the assessment of PSD. A total of 49 PSD patients were enrolled. Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), Dysphagia Severity Scale (DSS), Ohkuma Questionnaire, Eating Assessment Tool-10, and Repetitive Saliva Swallowing Test were performed. FOIS was performed by physicians, and DSS was conducted by both the physicians and nurses; the physicians used either videofluoroscopy (VF) or videoendoscopy (VE) for evaluation; while, the nurses assessed PSD by observation and subjective judgment. When using VF (VF-DSS and VF-FOIS) as the gold standard for the evaluation, VE-FOIS (κ = 0.625, 95% CI 0.300-0.950, p < 0.001) has a substantial agreement with VF-FOIS, and VE-DSS (κ = 0.381, 95% CI 0.127-0.636, p = 0.007) has a fair agreement with VF-DSS. The weighted kappa of FOIS to DSS in VE (weighted κ = 0.577, 95% CI 0.414-0.740, p < 0.001) is not lower than that in VF (weighted kappa = 0.249, 95% CI 0.136-0.362, p < 0.001). For both DSS and FOIS, only VE has a statistically significant agreement with VF. Though VF has been viewed as the traditional gold standard of dysphagia screening, it has the limitations of being invasive and equipment dependent. For PSD, VE could be considered as a substitution when VF is not available or suitable.

Effects of bilateral cerebellar repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in poststroke dysphagia: A randomized sham-controlled trial.

Although increasing evidence indicates that cerebellar repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) may be beneficial in the treatment of dysphagia, its clinical efficacy is still uncertain. To evaluate the effect of high-frequency cerebellar rTMS on poststroke dysphagia. This was a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind trial. A total of eighty-four study participants were randomly assigned into the cerebellum and control groups. The cerebellum group received bilateral 10 Hz rTMS treatment of the pharyngeal motor area of the cerebellum. The control group was administered with sham rTMS of the pharyngeal motor area of the cerebellum. All patients underwent the same conventional swallowing rehabilitation training after the intervention 5 days a week for a total of 10 days. Assessment of swallowing function was done before treatment (baseline), after treatment (2 weeks), and during follow-up (2 weeks after treatment) using the Fiberoptic Endoscopic Dysphagia Severity Scale (FEDSS) and the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS). The interaction between time and intervention had a significant effect on PAS (P < 0.001) and FEDSS (P < 0.001). Compared to the control group, the cerebellum group exhibited significantly improved clinical swallowing function scores (PAS: P = 0.007, FEDSS: P = 0.002). Bilateral cerebellar rTMS is a potential new neurorehabilitation technique for post-stroke dysphagia. Studies should aim at investigating the therapeutic mechanism of cerebellar rTMS and improve this technique.

Relationship between post-stroke dysphagia and pharyngeal sensory impairment

BackgroundPost-stroke dysphagia (PSD) is common and can lead to serious complications. Pharyngeal sensory impairment is assumed to contribute to PSD. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between PSD and pharyngeal hypesthesia and to compare different assessment methods for pharyngeal sensation.MethodsIn this prospective observational study, fifty-seven stroke patients were examined in the acute stage of the disease using Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES). The Fiberoptic Endoscopic Dysphagia Severity Scale (FEDSS) and impaired secretion management according to the Murray-Secretion Scale were determined, as well as premature bolus spillage, pharyngeal residue and delayed or absent swallowing reflex. A multimodal sensory assessment was performed, including touch-technique and a previously established FEES-based swallowing provocation test with different volumes of liquid to determine the latency of swallowing response (FEES-LSR-Test). Predictors of FEDSS, Murray-Secretion Scale, premature bolus spillage, pharyngeal residue, and delayed or absent swallowing reflex were examined with ordinal logistic regression analyses.ResultsSensory impairment using the touch-technique and the FEES-LSR-Test were independent predictors of higher FEDSS, Murray-Secretion Scale, and delayed or absent swallowing reflex. Decreased sensitivity according to the touch-technique correlated with the FEES-LSR-Test at 0.3 ml and 0.4 ml, but not at 0.2 ml and 0.5 ml trigger volumes.ConclusionsPharyngeal hypesthesia is a crucial factor in the development of PSD, leading to impaired secretion management and delayed or absent swallowing reflex. It can be investigated using both the touch-technique and the FEES-LSR-Test. In the latter procedure, trigger volumes of 0.4 ml are particularly suitable.

Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing in the Breastfeeding Infant.

To demonstrate the importance of utilizing fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) when evaluating breastfeeding infants with suspected dysphagia. Failure to recognize and account for the fundamentally different physiology of the primarily breastfed infant can lead to false assumptions about the safety of breastfeeding in this understudied patient population. Case-series. The medical records of patients referred to an urban, university-based, pediatric hospital for FEES from February 2017 to October 2020 were reviewed. Their presenting symptoms, dysphagia severity, comorbidity, dysphagia workup, and management were analyzed. The standardized Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale was used to appraise dysphagia severity. 204 FEES exams were reviewed. 35 were conducted on breastfed infants. 34 of the 35 infants calmed for the FEES exam while breastfeeding. Cohorts were defined by a particular presenting sign (cough, laryngeal congestion, choking, and respiratory illness) and anatomical characteristic (laryngomalacia, vocal cord paralysis, aspiration, penetration, etc.) and then compared to all other exams. The average dysphagia score for all the exams was 2.37. Patients presenting with laryngeal congestion had an average dysphagia score of 2.81. There was no difference in dysphagia score based on comorbidities or anatomy. FEES is the instrumental exam of choice when evaluating a primarily breastfed infant who has suspected dysphagia. The exam is well tolerated and provides accurate, objective information while accounting for this population's unique swallowing physiology. Primarily breastfed infants presenting with laryngeal congestion are more likely to have clinically worse dysphagia than those presenting with other clinical symptoms. 4 Laryngoscope, 133:2803-2807, 2023.

Videofluoroscopy dysphagia severity scale is predictive of subsequent remote pneumonia in dysphagia patients.

Introduction: Dysphagia-associated pneumonia is a critical health issue especially in the elders and stroke patients which carries a poorer prognosis. Therefore, we aim to identify methods with the potentials to predict subsequent pneumonia in dysphagia patients, which will be of great value in the prevention and early management of pneumonia. Methods: One-hundred dysphagia patients were enrolled and measurements including Dysphagia Severity Scale (DSS), Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), Ohkuma Questionnaire, and Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) were assessed by either videofluoroscopy (VF), videoendoscopy (VE), or the study nurse. The patients were categorized into mild or severe groups based on each screening method. All the patients were assessed for pneumonia at 1, 3, 6, and 20 months after the examinations. Results: VF-DSS (p=0.001) is the only measurement being significantly associated with subsequent pneumonia with sensitivity and specificity of 0.857 and 0.486. The Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that significant differences between the mild/severe groups start to emerge 3 months after VF-DSS (p=0.013). Cox regression models used for adjusted hazard ratio of severe VF-DSS in association with subsequent pneumonia of different timepoints after controlling the important covariates showed the following results: 3 months, p=0.026, HR=5.341, 95%CI=1.219-23.405; 6 months, p=0.015, HR=4.557, 95%CI=1.338-15.522; 20 months, p=0.004, HR=4.832, 95%CI=1.670-13.984. Conclusions: Dysphagia severity evaluated by VE-DSS, VE-FOIS, VF-FOIS, Ohkuma Questionnaire, and EAT-10 is not associated with subsequent pneumonia. Only VF-DSS is associated with both short-term and long-term subsequent pneumonia. In patients with dysphagia, VF-DSS is predictive of subsequent pneumonia.

Application of non-invasive brain stimulation with the use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of dysphagia following an ischemic stroke – analysis of research reports

Stroke is one of the significant problems and causes of death, in particular in highly developed countries. It is also the most common cause of dysphagia. This study is devoted to the analysis of publications from the last decade concerning research on the use of non-invasive brain stimulation (TMS, tDCS) in the treatment of dysphagia following an ischemic stroke. The following databases were searched for publications: PUBMED, Polish Scientific Journals Database, EBSCO, ScienceDirect. Out of 358 articles found, only two met all the inclusion conditions. The studies discussed in this article included patients who had their first unilateral ischemic stroke, followed by dysphagia. Findings from pilot studies on the effectiveness of the use of tDCS in the treatment of dysphagia following an ischemic stroke were analysed. Fourteen patients aged 50-92 were randomly assigned to two groups. The study group was treated with anodic stimulation, and the control group with sham brain stimulation. The results showed that patients in the study group obtained a statistically significant result, indicating an improvement in the swallowing function as measured by the Dysphagia Score and Severity Scale. The above data may indicate the effectiveness of the use of tDCS in the treatment of dysphagia. Fifty patients were qualified for the research on the effectiveness of rTMS in the treatment of dysphagia. Three groups were created: the first group treated with high frequency rTMS, where patients received rTMS stimulation – 3Hz; the second group with low frequency rTMS – 1Hz; and the control group. The effectiveness of the therapy used was assessed on the fifth day and after 1, 2 and 3 months. After 5 days the groups where active rTMS stimulation was used showed greater improvement in the swallowing function compared to the sham stimulation group. Improved results in the Standardized Swallowing Assessment were also recorded after 3 months in the 1Hz and 3Hz groups, but this did not apply to the control group. In three groups, the results of the water swallow test and the degree of dysphagia improved after 3 months. This analysis shows that non-invasive brain stimulation using tDCS and rTMS in the treatment of dysphagia is associated with improved swallowing function. However, the small number of studies conducted in this area does not allow for extrapolation of their results.

Costs of post-stroke dysphagia during acute hospitalization from a health-insurance perspective.

Oropharyngeal dysphagia is a common and complication-prone symptom after stroke and is assumed to increase medical expenses. The purpose of this study was therefore to examine acute hospitalization costs associated with post-stroke dysphagia. This retrospective study included patients with acute stroke who had been examined by Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES). Health insurance expenditures were determined for the patient cases according to the 2021 revenue criteria. Multiple linear regression was used to examine predictors of health insurance spending including age, sex, stroke severity, stroke characteristics, comorbidity, therapeutic interventions, duration of artificial ventilation, length of hospital stay, and severity of dysphagia, as assessed by the Fiberoptic Endoscopic Dysphagia Severity Scale (FEDSS), ranging from 1 (best) to 6 (worst). Six hundred seventy four patients (men/women: 367/307; mean age: 71.1 ± 12.8 years; mean National Institute of Health Stroke Scale: 11.2 ± 6.2; FEDSS 1/2/3/4/5/6: 113/73/144/119/124/101; mean health-insurance costs 11,521.5 ± 12,950.5€) were included in the analysis. Advanced age (p = 0.007; B = 57.6), catheter interventions (p < 0.001; B = 4105.6), tracheotomy (p = 0.006; B = 5195.2), duration of artificial ventilation (p < 0.001; B = 388.6), length of hospital stay (p < 0.001; B = 441.9), and severe dysphagia with an FEDSS of 6 (p = 0.004, B = 2554.3) were independent predictors of increased health insurance expenditures (p < 0.001, R-squared = adjusted-R-squared = 0.83). The results of this study show an association between severe dysphagia and health care costs for acute hospitalization from a health-insurance perspective. Therefore, therapies that target severe dysphagia with impaired secretion management may have the potential to reduce costs.

Analysis of swallowing function after anterior/posterior surgery for cervical degenerative disorders and factors related to the occurrence of postoperative dysphagia

BACKGROUND CONTEXTDysphagia is one of the postoperative complications of cervical degenerative disorders. However, few studies have evaluated the pre- and postoperative swallowing function in detail. PURPOSETo analyze pre- and postoperative swallowing dynamics kinetically and investigate factors associated with postoperative dysphagia in patients with cervical degenerative disorders. STUDY DESIGNRetrospective review of prospectively collected data. PATIENT SAMPLEA total of 41 consecutive patients who underwent an anterior approach (anterior cervical discectomy/corpectomy and fusion (ACDF, ACCF), hybrid surgery (ACDF+ACCF) and total disc replacement) and 44 consecutive patients who underwent a posterior approach (laminoplasty and laminoplasty/laminectomy with fusion). OUTCOME MEASURESWe compared the pre- and postoperative functional oral intake scale (FOIS), dysphagia severity scale (DSS), esophageal dysphagia, anterior/superior hyoid movement, upper esophageal sphincter (UES) opening, pharyngeal transit time, bolus residue scale (BRS), and the number of swallows. METHODSVideofluoroscopy was performed on the day before surgery and within two weeks after surgery. Data related to age, gender, disease, surgical procedure, surgical site, operative time, and blood loss were collected from the medical records. Pre- and postoperative data were compared for each item in the anterior and posterior approaches. The odds ratio of dysphagia after an anterior approach was also calculated. RESULTSIn the anterior approach, DSS, FOIS, the anterior and superior hyoid movements, maximum UES opening, BRS, and number of swallows worsened postoperatively (p<.05, respectively). In the posterior approach, DSS, FOIS, the anterior hyoid movement, and BRS worsened postoperatively (p<.05, respectively). The factors associated with dysphagia were a proximal surgical site above C3 (OR: 14.40, CI: 2.84−73.02), blood loss >100 mL (OR: 9.60, CI: 2.06−44.74), an operative time >200 minutes (OR: 8.18, CI: 1.51−44.49), and an extensive surgical field of more than three intervertebral levels (OR: 6.72, CI: 1.50−30.07). The decline in swallowing function after the posterior approach was related to aging (p=.045). CONCLUSIONSEach approach may decrease swallowing function, especially because of the limitation on the anterior hyoid movement. Dysphagia after anterior approaches was associated with the operative site, operative time, and blood loss.

Dysphagia assessment in ischemic stroke after mechanical thrombectomy: When and how?

Dysphagia is a frequent symptom in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Endovascular treatment (EVT) has become the standard of care for acute stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion. Although standardized guidelines for poststroke dysphagia (PSD) management exist, they do not account for this setting in which patients receive EVT under general anesthesia. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate PSD prevalence and severity, as well as an appropriate time point for the PSD evaluation, in patients undergoing EVT under general anesthesia (GA). We prospectively included 54 AIS patients undergoing EVT under GA. Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) was performed within 24 h post-extubation in all patients. Patients presenting significant PSD received a second FEES-assessment to determine the course of dysphagia deficits over time. Dysphagia severity was rated according the Fiberoptic Dysphagia Severity Scale (FEDSS). At first FEES (FEES 1) assessment, performed in the median 13 h (IQR 5-17) post-extubation, 49/54 patients (90.7%) with dysphagia were observed with a median FEDSS of 4 (IQR 3-6). Severe dysphagia requiring tube feeding was identified in 28/54 (51.9%) subjects, whereas in 21 (38.9%) patients early oral diet with certain food restrictions could be initiated. In the follow up FEES examination conducted in the median 72 h (IQR 70-97 h) after initial FEES 34/49 (69.4%) patients still presented PSD. Age (p = 0.030) and ventilation time (p = 0.035) were significantly associated with the presence of PSD at the second FEES evaluation. Significant improvement of dysphagia frequency (p = 0.006) and dysphagia severity (p = 0.001) could be detected between the first and second dysphagia assessment. PSD is a frequent finding both immediately within 24 h after extubation, as well as in the short-term course. In contrast to common clinical practice, to delay evaluation of swallowing for at least 24 h post-extubation, we recommend a timely assessment of swallowing function after extubation, as 50% of patients were safe to begin oral intake. Given the high amount of severe dysphagic symptoms, we strongly recommend application of instrumental swallowing diagnostics due to its higher sensitivity, when compared to clinical swallowing examination. Furthermore, advanced age, as well as prolonged intubation, were identified as significant predictors for delayed recovery of swallowing function.