Passivity and dissipativity, in Jan Willems’s sense, are known to be powerful tools for stability analysis and feedback control design. For instance, passive systems in negative feedback interconnection with slope-restricted, static, single-valued, smooth nonlinearities, known as Lur’e systems, have been thoroughly studied in automatic control, yielding the so-called absolute stability problem (with the famous Popov and circle criteria). On the other hand, large classes of nonsmooth systems (complementarity dynamical systems, relay systems, projected dynamical systems, evolution and differential variational inequalities, Moreau’s sweeping processes, and maximal monotone differential inclusions), with applications in circuits, mechanics, and economics, are interpreted as set-valued Lur’e systems, in which the feedback nonlinearity is a multivalued mapping. Therefore, the closed-loop system is a differential inclusion of a certain type, the well posedness of which must be analyzed as a prerequisite for stability and control. This introductory article focuses on the well posedness of such set-valued feedback systems. It is shown how the existence and uniqueness of solutions to these specific differential inclusions benefit a lot from the passivity of the system and the maximal monotonicity (which is a form of incremental passivity) of the feedback set-valued mapping. Available results are reviewed, many illustrative examples are given, and some open issues are highlighted.