In terms of seismic design methods for subway stations in the Shanghai area, both national and local standards have presented several pseudo-static methods, including response displacement, response acceleration, equivalent earthquake acceleration, and equivalent inertial force methods. However, certain issues are encountered when these methods are applied to the seismic design of real subway projects. The load input and results obtained from different calculation methods differ from each other. To address such discrepancies and compare the diversity of different methods, this study performs a comparative analysis based on the project case of a ground station in Shanghai. The seismic design is conducted using five different calculation methods. By referring to the results of the dynamic time history analysis, the causes of errors in the calculation results of the displacement and internal force are analyzed. The applicability of the methods is comprehensively explored in terms of a calculation model, determination of the equivalent load, error in the results, and project application. The results show that the response acceleration method exhibits the least error compared to the dynamic time history method. Therefore, the response acceleration method is recommended as the preferred method for the seismic design of underground stations in Shanghai.
Read full abstract