Dynamic Needle Tip Positioning Research Articles

A Randomized Study Comparing Ultrasound-Guided Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation Using Two Techniques: Short-Axis Out-of-Plane With Dynamic Needle Tip Positioning Versus Long-Axis In-Plane.

Introduction Internal jugular vein (IJV) cannulation is a routine procedure in operating rooms, critical care units, and perioperative settings. Ultrasound guidance has notably increased the success rates of IJV cannulation. A modified ultrasound technique known as the short-axis out-of-plane method with dynamic needle tip positioning (DNTP) allows for continuous visualization of the needle tip throughout the procedure. This study aims to compare the first-pass success rate of IJV cannulation using the DNTP and long-axis in-plane (LAIP) approaches. Methods One hundred patients between 18 and 70 years undergoing elective surgery requiring IJV cannulation were recruited.Patients were assigned randomly to the DNTP group (n = 50) or the LAIP group (n = 50). We recorded the first-pass success rate, time to achieve successful cannulation, number of skin punctures, overall success rate within five minutes, and potential complications such as pneumothorax and hematoma. Results The first pass success rate was higher in the DNTP group (48/50, 96%) as compared to the LAIP group (38/50, 76%, relative risk, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.039-0.707; p = 0.008). The cannulation time was shorter in DNTP (116.98 ± 22.90 seconds) versus the LAIP group (213.04 ± 52.08 seconds; p < 0.001). No complications like pneumothorax or hematoma were noted in both groups. Conclusion We conclude that the ultrasound-guided DNTP technique for IJV cannulation, as compared with the LAIP technique, may significantly improve the first attempt cannulation, number of attempts, and cannulation time.

Radial Arterial Cannulation by Ultrasound-Guided Dynamic Needle-Tip Positioning Using the Short-Axis Out-of-Plane Approach Versus the Long-Axis In-Plane Approach: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Introduction Radial artery cannulation is a commonly performed invasive procedure for assessing a patient's hemodynamic status and collecting blood samples. Ultrasound guidance has shown benefits in improving the success rate of first-attempt cannulation. Two main approaches, short-axis out-of-plane (SAOOP) and long-axis in-plane (LAIP), are commonly used. A modified technique called dynamic needle-tip positioning (DNTP) using the short-axis out-of-plane approach has been reported to enhance arterial catheterization. This study aims to compare the first-attempt success rates of radial artery cannulation using the two techniques, DNTP versus LAIP, along with overall success rates, cannulation time, and number of attempts. Methods This prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical study was conducted after obtaining clearance from the Institute Ethics Committee of AIIMS, Raipur. Ninety-six patients between the ages of 18 and 50 years, undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia, and required radial arterial cannulationwere randomized and equally allocated into two groups as the LAIP and DNTP approaches. The first-pass success rate, time to achieve successful cannulation, number of attempts needed, overall success rate within five minutes, and potential complications, such as thrombosis, vasospasm, and hematoma, were recorded. Results A total of 96 patients were included, with 48 in the LAIP group and 48 in the DNTP group. The DNTP group showed statistically significant advantages over the LAIP group, with a higher first-pass success rate (97.9% vs. 83.3%; p = 0.014) and shorter time to achieve successful cannulation (9.29±3.79 vs. 26.16±20.22 seconds; p = 0.001). Conclusion The ultrasound-guided short-axis DNTP technique for radial artery cannulation demonstrated a significant advantage as compared to the LAIP technique. The DNTP technique resulted in higher first-attempt cannulation success and shorter cannulation time.

Letter: Comment on the comparison between ultrasound-guided dynamic needle tip positioning and acoustic shadowing technique with palpation technique for radial arterial cannulation

Letter: Comment on the comparison between ultrasound-guided dynamic needle tip positioning and acoustic shadowing technique with palpation technique for radial arterial cannulation

Comparison of an Ultrasound-Guided Dynamic Needle Tip Positioning Technique and a Long-Axis In-Plane Technique for Radial Artery Cannulation in Older Patients: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study

The authors compared the dynamic needle tip positioning (DNTP) technique and the long-axis in-plane (LAIP) technique in older patients. This was a prospective randomized controlled study. The study was conducted at a single institution (Hanyang University hospital). One hundred sixty patients participated in this study. This study was conducted on patients aged 75 years or older who underwent general anesthesia requiring placement of an arterial catheter. A total of 160 patients were allocated randomly to the DNTP group or the LAIP group. The primary outcome was the success rate of the first attempt. Additionally, overall success rate, cannulation time, number of total redirections and attempts, and occurrence of complications were investigated. In the DNTP group, the success rate of the first attempt (85% v 48.8%, p < 0.001, relative risk=1.74, 95% CI 1.37-2.22) and the overall success rate (97.5% v 86.3%, p=0.01, relative risk=1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.24) were significantly higher than in the LAIP group. Fewer redirections (p < 0.001) and attempts (p < 0.001), and a decreased cannulation time (58.8 ± 22.4 s v 89.6 ± 37.9 s, p < 0.001) were detected in the DNTP group. A decreased occurrence of hematoma in the DNTP group also was detected (7.5% v 18.8%, p=0.035, relative risk=0.40, 95% CI=0.16-0.98). The DNTP technique has better efficiency and safety than the LAIP technique for radial artery catheterization in the older population.

Comparison of radial, dorsalis pedis, and posterior tibial arteries for ultrasound-guided arterial catheterisation with dynamic needle tip positioning in paediatric patients: a randomised controlled trial

BackgroundArterial catheterisation in children can be challenging and time-consuming. We aimed to compare the success rates of ultrasound-guided arterial catheterisation utilising the short-axis out-of-plane approach with dynamic needle tip positioning in the radial, dorsalis pedis, and posterior tibial arteries in paediatric patients. We also examined the factors influencing the catheterisation success using dynamic needle tip positioning. MethodsPaediatric patients (aged <3 yr) undergoing cardiac surgery were randomly assigned to three groups based on puncture sites: radial artery (Group R), dorsalis pedis artery (Group D), and posterior tibial artery (Group P). The first-attempt and overall success rates of arterial catheterisation were compared, followed by multiple logistic regression analysis (dependent variable: first-attempt success; independent variables: body weight, diameter and depth of the artery, targeted artery, and trisomy 21). ResultsThe study included 270 subjects (n=90 per group). There was no significant difference in the first-attempt (Group R: 82%, Group D: 76%, and Group P: 81%) and overall success rates (Group R: 94%, Group D: 93%, and Group P: 91%) among the three groups. The diameter of the artery (per 0.1 mm) (odds ratio: 1.32, 95% confidence interval: 1.09–1.60) and trisomy 21 (odds ratio: 0.43, 95% confidence interval: 0.20–0.92) were independent predictors of first-attempt success or failure. ConclusionThe first-attempt and overall success rates of arterial catheterisation of the dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial arteries were not inferior to those in the radial artery when using dynamic needle tip positioning. These two lower extremity peripheral arteries present viable alternative catheterisation sites in paediatric patients. Clinical trial registrationUMIN000042847.

Comparison of ultrasound-guided dynamic needle tip positioning and acoustic shadowing technique with palpation technique for radial arterial cannulation by experienced clinicians: A randomized controlled trial.

Radial artery cannulation is usually done for monitoring invasive blood pressure during intraoperative period. The dynamic needle tip positioning approach allows continuous visualization of the needle tip during ultrasound-guided cannulation. The acoustic shadowing technique, using two lines on the ultrasound probe, might be used to facilitate radial artery puncture. We aimed to compare these two ultrasound-guided techniques of radial artery cannulation with the traditional palpation method in adult patients. In this trial, 180 adult patients requiring arterial cannulation were randomized into three groups (Traditional palpation (TP), Dynamic needle tip positioning (DNTP), and acoustic shadow technique (AST)). All cannulations were carried out by experienced anesthetists. Data was analyzed for the success rate of arterial cannulation in the first attempt, total number of attempts in 5 min, time taken to cannulate, number of cannulas used, and complications related to the procedure. The first attempt success rates among TP, DNTP, and AST were 66.7%, 66.7%, and 71.7%, respectively (p = 0.794). The median time taken for cannulation was 60.5 (37.0, 129.5) s, 71.0 (50.0, 170.0) s, and 108.0 (58.0, 181.0) s, respectively (p = 0.066) and the median number of cannulation attempts was 1, in all the three groups (p = 0.684). There was also no difference in the total number of cannulas used, the overall success rate of cannulation, and complications related to the procedure in the three groups. The TP, DNTP, and AST technique for radial artery cannulation had comparable first attempt success rate, the time taken for cannulation, the number of cannulas used, and overall complications. We conclude that radial arterial cannulation by palpation, as well as ultrasound-guided DNTP and AST techniques performed by experienced clinicians in hemodynamically stable adult patients are equally advantageous.

Comparison of two ultrasound-guided techniques for radial arterial cannulation in adults - Observational cross-sectional study.

Short axis, out of plane (SAOOP) and long axis, in-plane (LAIP) are two approaches employed under ultrasound-guided radial arterial cannulation. Dynamic needle tip positioning (DNTP) is a recently introduced approach which integrates the features of both. A total of 114 adult patients from American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I-IV were studied in this hospital-based cross-sectional study after getting Institutional Ethical approval, CTRI registration and prior written informed consent. The primary objective was to compare the success rates among LAIP and DNTP techniques. The radial arterial diameter and its depth were correlated to the success rates in both. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 23.0. Success rates were similar in both (P value-0.094). Ultrasonographic location time (in seconds) was shorter in DNTP (4.351 ± 0.9727) compared to LAIP (7.140 ± 1.0763) (P value-0.0001). The mean overall diameter and depth of radial artery (in mm) were found to be 2.36 ± 0.02 and 2.51 ± 0.12, respectively. Pearson's correlation coefficient between cannulation time and diameter was found to be -0.602 (P value-0.0001) and with depth of the radial artery was 0.034 (P value 0.723). The success rates were similar in both techniques. Ultrasonographic location time of the radial artery was more in LAIP although cannulation time was similar in both. Cannulation time decreased with an increase in the diameter of radial artery but was unaffected by the depth of the radial artery.

Long-axis in-plane combined with short-axis out-of-plane technique in ultrasound-guided arterial catheterization in infants: A randomized controlled trial

Study objectiveTo determine whether the long-axis in-plane (LAX-IP) combined with short-axis out-of-plane (SAX-OOP) technique is more suitable than modified dynamic needle tip positioning (MDNTP) technique for ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization in infants. DesignA randomized controlled trial. SettingDepartment of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. PatientsOverall, 72 patients, aged 1–12 months old, who were primarily undergoing thoracic or cardiac surgery in the Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University between July 1, 2021, and March 31, 2022, were selected. These patients were randomly divided into two groups: i) the MDNTP group and ii) the LAX-IP combined with SAX-OOP group. InterventionsRadial artery cannulation in the two groups was performed using ultrasound-guided MDNTP or LAX-IP combined with SAX-OOP technique. MeasurementsThe primary outcome was first-time success rate, and the secondary outcomes included total success rate, cannulation time, and incidence of complications. Main resultsIn the LAX-IP combined with SAX-OOP group, the first-time success rate was 75.0% (n = 27), total success rate was 97.2% (n = 35), cannulation time was 91.39 ± 102.60 s, puncture attempts was 1.5 ± 1.3 times, and local hematoma was formed on the first day in one (2.8%) infant. In the MDNTP group, the first-time success rate was 36.1% (n = 13) (P = 0.001; RR, 2.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.29–3.34), total success rate was 91.7% (n = 33) (P = 0.303; RR, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.95–1.19), cannulation time was 181.00 ± 146.72 s(P = 0.047; Median difference,-89.61; 95% confidence interval, −149.12 to −30.10), puncture attempts was 2.3 ± 1.6 times (P = 0.133; Median difference,-0.81), and local hematoma was formed on the first day in nine (25%) infants (P = 0.006; RR, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.01–0.83). No thrombosis occurred in any group. ConclusionsThe ultrasound-guided LAX-IP combined with SAX-OOP technique for radial arterial catheterization in infants, which was performed by anesthesia residents, exhibited an increased first-time success rate, reduced cannulation time, and lower incidence of complications than the MDNTP technique.

Ultrasound-Guided Dynamic Needle-Tip Positioning Method Is Superior to Conventional Palpation and Ultrasound Method in Arterial Catheterization.

Background: Dynamic needle-tip positioning (DNTP) was shown to improve arterial cannulation efficiency with fewer complications than conventional palpation and ultrasound methods by some studies. However, this is still controversial, and we performed this meta-analysis to comprehensively assess its value in arterial cannulation. Methods: A literature search of randomized controlled trials was conducted, and 11 studies were finally included. Efficiency outcomes (first-attempt success, overall success, and total cannulation time) and complications (hematoma, thrombosis, posterior wall puncture, and vasospasm) were separately analyzed. Subgroup analyses in different populations under cannulation were also performed. Results: DNTP was associated with increased first-attempt success (pooled RR = 1.792, p < 0.001), overall success (pooled RR = 1.368, p = 0.001), and decreased cannulation time (pooled SMD = −1.758, p = 0.001) than palpation. DNTP gained even more advantage in small children and infants. No significant difference in these outcomes between DNTP and conventional ultrasound method was detected. Fewer hematoma occurred in DNTP than palpation (pooled RR = 0.265, p < 0.001) or traditional ultrasound (pooled RR = 0.348, p < 0.001). DNPT was also associated with fewer posterior wall punctures (pooled RR = 0.495, p = 0.001) and vasospasm (pooled RR = 0.267, p = 0.007) than traditional ultrasound. Conclusions: DNTP was a better choice in artery cannulation than conventional palpation and ultrasound method, especially in small children and infants.

Application of the dynamic needle tip positioning method for ultrasound-guided arterial catheterization in elderly patients: A randomized controlled trial.

BackgroundArterial cannulation in elderly patients is difficult because of age-related morphological changes. Applying dynamic needle tip positioning (DNTP) that guides the catheter to position inside the vessel sufficiently may aid in successful cannulation.MethodsThis prospective study enrolled patients aged over 70 years, who were scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia with arterial cannulation. The patients were randomly assigned to the DNTP (group D, n = 76) or the conventional short-axis view(group C, n = 75) group. The arterial depth, diameter, and arterial conditions(calcification, segmental stenosis, and tortuosity) were evaluated using ultrasound, before puncture. We recorded the first attempt success, cannulation time, the number of attempts, and cannulation-related complications.ResultsA total of 151 patients were enrolled in this study. The first attempt success rate in group D was significantly higher than that in group C (89% versus 72%; P = 0.0168). The median cannulation time per last attempt in group D versus group C was 25 versus 30 sec(P = 0.0001), and the overall cannulation time was 25 versus 35 sec(P = 0.0001), respectively. Arterial cannulation per last attempt and overall cannulation time were shorter in group D. The number of attempts was higher in group C (P = 0.0038). The occurrence rate of hematoma was significantly lower in group D (16% versus 47%, relative risk = 3.0, P = 0.0001).ConclusionsThe DNTP method may improve the first attempt success rate of arterial cannulation and reduce complications in elderly patients over 70 years of age.

Effect of ultrasound angle for radial artery cannulation in adults: a randomized controlled trial.

Although the first attempt success rate of radial artery cannulation has been significantly improved by using dynamic needle tip positioning (DNTP) method, there are still problems with long cannulation time. We hereby observe the effect of ultrasound angle for radial artery cannulation in adult patients. Adult patients scheduled to undergo elective surgeries with continuous invasive blood pressure monitoring were included and randomly allocated into either a U-P-artery (ultrasound probe perpendicular to the artery) or U-P-needle (ultrasound probe perpendicular to the needle) group. The primary outcome measure was cannulation time at the first attempt, the secondary outcome measures included the first attempt success rate, number of attempts and the total puncture procedure duration. In addition, the incidence of complications was included as secondary outcomes. Fifty-nine patients were evaluated finally. The cannulation time at the first attempt in U-P-needle group (N.=28) was significantly lower than that in U-P-artery group (N.=31; median [IQR]: 16 [13.5-20] seconds vs. 41 [25.5-54.5] seconds, P<0.001). The total puncture procedure duration in group U-P-needle was also shorter than that in the group U-P-artery (median [IQR]: 17.4 [13.5-20] seconds vs. 52.2 [25.5-54.5] seconds, P<0.001). No significant difference was observed with respect to first-attempt success rate (96.4% vs. 93.5%, relative risk: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.863-1.0907, P=0.615). The number of attempts showed no statistical difference as well. The usage of the U-P-needle approach could remarkably reduce radial arterial cannulation time at the first attempt as well as total puncture procedure duration, comparing with the U-P-artery approach.

The Improved Catheterization Is Associated With the Deeper Radial Arteries in Ultrasound-Guided Dynamic Needle Tip Positioning Technique.

ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine the associations between the first-attempt success and arterial depth in ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization (RAC) with dynamic needle tip positioning (DNTP) technique. This study also aimed to further explore the cut-off depth correlated to improved first-attempt success catheterization in less time.MethodsThe cases undertaken by RAC within the DNTP technique between March 2019 and July 2020 were extracted from our institutional cohort database. Relevant variables were collected, including patients' demographics and catheterized information. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the association. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the Youden index were used to explore the cut-off values of the arterial depth. Categorized cases according to the cut-off values, the Kaplan-Meier analysis, and the log-rank test were used to determine the difference of first-attempt success with limited catheterized time between groups.ResultsIn this study, 119 patients were enrolled and 98 achieved first-attempt success. The first-attempt success catheterization was observed to be correlated to arterial depth (p < 0.01, odds ratio 6.47). An optimal cut-off depth of 2.25 mm was found using the Youden index (0.53) by ROC curve (area under curve 0.77). Arterial depth of more than 2.25 mm was correlated to improved first-attempt success catheterization in less time (log-rank p < 0.01).ConclusionTo achieve first-attempt success catheterization using the DNTP technique, an arterial depth of more than 2.25 mm was associated with less catheterized time.

Modified Long-Axis In-plane Technique for Radial Artery Cannulation in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundRadial artery catheterization is a challenge for anesthetists in the pediatric population. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the modified long-axis in-plane (MLAX-IP) technique increased the success rate of radial artery catheterization in children.MethodsThis study involved 80 children who required arterial catheterization and were randomly divided into the MLAX-IP group and dynamic needle tip positioning (DNTP) group (40 cases in each group). Radial artery catheterization was performed using either the MLAX-IP technique or the DNTP technique.ResultsThe first-attempt cannulation success rate was higher in the MLAX-IP group than in the DNTP group (95 vs. 80%, P = 0.043). The imaging time of the artery in the MLAX-IP group was longer than in the DNTP group (19.1 ± 3.1 vs. 9.6 ± 2.4 s, P < 0.001). While the total catheterization time was similar between the 2 groups (88.1 ± 23 vs. 86.9 ± 46.1 s, P = 0.475).ConclusionThe first-attempt cannulation success rate with the MLAX-IP technique is increased, while the total catheterization time is similar between the 2 groups and puncture-related complications are fewer.

Modified long-axis in-plane technique for femoral artery cannulation in infants.

Radial arterial cannulation is a challenge for anesthetists in pediatric population.1 The femoral artery catheterization is recommended as an alternative technique for difficult radial artery catheterization.2 Dynamic needle tip positioning (DNTP) technique for catheterization is obviously superior to the short-axis, out of plane (SAX-OOP) as it makes the needle tip visible.

Ultrasound-guided dynamic needle tip positioning technique for radial artery cannulation in elderly patients: A prospective randomized controlled study.

Radial artery cannulation, which is a useful procedure for anesthetic management, is often challenging in elderly patients. Recently, the dynamic needle tip positioning (DNTP) technique was introduced to facilitate ultrasound-guided vascular catheterization. Therefore, we performed this prospective, parallel group, randomized, controlled trial to compare the ultrasound-guided DNTP technique with the palpation method in elderly patients. For this study, 256 patients aged 65 years or older were randomly allocated to the ultrasound-guided DNTP technique group (DNTP group) or the palpation method group (palpation group). The primary outcome was first-attempt success rate. The secondary outcomes were overall success rate, numbers of attempts and redirections, cannulation time, and incidence of complications. The first-attempt success rate (85.9% vs. 72.3%; relative risk [RR], 1.47; 95% CI 1.25-1.72; P<0.001) and the overall success rate (99.2% vs. 93.0%; RR, 1.07; 95% CI 1.02-1.12; P = 0.01) were significantly higher in the DNTP group compared to the palpation group. The numbers of attempts [1 (1,1) vs. 1 (1,3), P<0.001] and redirections [0 (0,1) vs. 2 (0,4), P<0.001] were significantly lower in the DNTP group. The cannulation time for successful attempts was 42 (32,55) seconds in the DNTP group and 53 (36,78) seconds in the palpation group (P<0.001). The incidence of hematoma was significantly lower in the DNTP group (7% vs. 24.2%; RR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.14-0.59; P<0.001). Ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation with the DNTP technique improved the efficiency of radial artery cannulation in elderly patients by increasing the success rate while minimizing complications.

Dynamic Needle Tip Positioning versus Palpation and Ultrasound for Arteriovenous Puncture: A Meta-analysis

At present, dynamic needle-tip positioning (DNTP) technology is applied in arteriovenous puncture, challenging the use of ultrasound technology alone and palpation. Our goals were to extract data from experimental DNTP, ultrasound and palpation studies, using Review Manager, Version 5.3, for data analysis, and to evaluate whether DNTP has certain advantages in puncture. PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CNKI and WanFang Data Knowledge Service Platform were searched for randomized and non-randomized studies that compared DNTP with conventional ultrasound-guided techniques, no DNTP or palpation. The risk ratio with 95% confidence interval was calculated using the model corresponding to the I² value. Studies were identified to compare clinical indexes. With respect to clinical indexes, DNTP is better in terms of first-attempt success, overall success and complications. However, in infants, first-attempt success, overall success and number of additional punctures did not indicate good efficacy for DNTP compared with palpation. Artery puncture was also not performed well under ultrasound. On the basis of the current evidence, the advantages of DNTP over palpation and ultrasound are reflected in the successful first attempt rate of all groups and in all subgroups except infants. Therefore, for emergencies in elderly patients, DNTP can be used as a general method. Given that some of the studies were of low quality, more trials of high quality should be conducted to further verify the findings.

Distal superficial femoral vein versus axillary vein central catheter placement under ultrasound guidance for neonates with difficult access: A randomized clinical trial.

Epicutaneo-caval catheters (ECCs) are extensively used in premature and ill neonates. This prospective, randomized, observational study aimed to compare the outcomes of ECC placement in the distal superficial femoral and axillary veins in neonates with difficult ECC access. In a neonatal intensive care unit at a tertiary referral center, 60 neonates with difficult ECC access were randomized into two groups with catheters placed using the ultrasound-guided modified dynamic needle tip positioning (MDNTP) technique: distal superficial femoral vein (DSFV) and axillary vein (AV) groups. The first attempt success rate was significantly higher in the DSFV group than in the AV group [23/30 (76.7%) vs 11/30 (36.7%), p = 0.001; odds ratio (OR), 0.176; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.057-0.543]. The mean procedural duration was significantly shorter in the DSFV group than in the AV group [mean: 308.5 (standard deviation: 81.1) s vs 522.74 (134.8) s, t = -7.17, p < 0.001]. The incidence of complications was significantly lower in the DSFV group than in the AV group [4/30 (13.3%) vs 12/30 (40.0%), p = 0.019; OR, 4.333; 95% CI 1.203-15.604]. The number of attempts was significantly fewer in the DSFV group than in the AV group (p = 0.012). The distal superficial femoral and axillary veins are two alternative and safe access points for ECC placement in premature neonates (weight < 2.5 kg) with difficult access. However, access through the distal superficial femoral vein was quicker, easier, and had fewer complications than through the axillary vein.

Comparison of dynamic needle tip positioning versus conventional long-axis in-plane techniques for ultrasound-guided internal jugular venous catheterization: a randomized controlled trial.

Continuous visualization of the needle tip is essential for successful ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization, and the dynamic needle tip positioning (DNTP) technique enables it. The aim of this randomized, dual-center trial was to compare the first-attempt success rate of ultrasound-guided internal jugular catheterization between the DNTP and conventional long-axis in-plane (LAX-IP) techniques. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery at two tertiary teaching hospitals were randomly allocated to either the DNTP or LAX-IP group. Internal jugular venous catheterization was performed by four anesthesiologists. The primary outcome was the first-attempt success rate of central venous catheterization. Procedural time and complications related to catheterization were compared as secondary outcomes. In total, 142 patients were analysed. The first-attempt success rate was significantly higher in the DNTP group (59/72, 81.9%) than in the LAX-IP group (46/70, 65.7%; odds ratio, 2.37; 95% confidence interval 1.09-5.15; P=0.028). In addition, the needle was redirected less frequently in the DNTP group than the LAX-IP group (P=0.026). Procedural time was comparable between the groups. No significant differences were observed in complications related to catheterization, including posterior wall puncture, carotid artery puncture, or hematoma. The DNTP technique resulted in a significantly higher success rate on the first attempt at internal jugular venous catheterization and required less frequent redirection of the needle during the procedure than the conventional LAX-IP technique.

Combined short- and long-axis method for internal jugular vein catheterization in premature newborns: A randomized controlled trial.

Rapid central venous catheterization is critical for the rescue and perioperative management of premature infants requiring surgery. Ultrasound-guided dynamic needle tip positioning (DNTP) has been widely used as a very effective technique, especially in paediatric vascular puncture and catheterization. However, for low-weight premature newborns, central vein catheterization still poses greater difficulties for paediatricians and paediatric anaesthesiologists. This prospective randomized control study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of combined short- and long-axis (CSLA) internal jugular vein catheterization for premature newborns in comparison with the DNTP technique. A total of 90 premature newborns (gestational age <37weeks and <28days after birth) who were scheduled for surgery were included in this study. All enrolled premature newborns were randomly divided into two groups (n=45): the CSLA group and the DNTP group. We compared the first-puncture success rate, total success rate, procedure time, number of needle passes, occurrence of complications and other outcome measures between the two groups. The two groups (n=45 per group) were similar in sex, gestational age, weight, mean arterial blood pressure, and vein-related measurements of the internal jugular vein. Total success was achieved in 43 (95.6%) and 36 (80.0%) patients in the CSLA and DNTP groups respectively. Compared with the DNTP group, the CSLA group showed a significantly higher first-attempt success rate (71.1% vs 46.7%, χ2 =5.5533, P=.0184) and significantly fewer needle passes (1.0[1.0-2.0] vs 2.0[1.0-3.0], χ2 =-2.6094, P=.0091). There was no significant difference between the groups in the procedure time (368[304-573] vs 478[324-79]s, Z=-1.7690, P=.0769). Complications occurred in both groups, but the incidence was significantly lower in the CSLA group than in the DNTP group (6.7% vs 22.2%, χ2 =4.4056, P=.0358). Ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein catheterization by the CSLA method is effective and safe. The CSLA method may be superior to the DNTP technique in premature newborns.

Dynamic needle tip positioning versus the angle-distance technique for ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation in adults: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundUltrasound guidance can increase the success rate and reduce the incidence of complications of arterial cannulation. There are few studies on the utility of the dynamic needle tip positioning (DNTP) technique versus the angle-distance (AD) technique for ultrasound-guided radial arterial cannulation in adult surgical patients. We assessed and compared the success rates and incidences of complications of these two short-axis out-of-plane techniques.MethodsA total of 131 adult surgical patients were randomized into DNTP and AD groups to undergo ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation. The primary outcome was first-pass success without posterior wall puncture. The secondary outcomes included the first-pass success rate, 10-min overall success rate, cannulation time, posterior wall puncture, and the number of skin punctures.ResultsThe first-pass success rates without posterior wall puncture were 53.8% in the DNTP group and 44.6% in the AD group (RR = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.86–1.72; P = 0.26). The cannulation time was significantly longer (P = 0.01) in the DNTP group [79.65 (54.3–109.4) seconds] than in the AD group [47.6 (24.9–103.8) seconds]. The posterior wall puncture rate was significantly lower (P = 0.002) in the DNTP group (29.2%) than in the AD group (56.1%; RR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.42–0.82).ConclusionsThere were no significant differences in the first-pass success rate, with or without arterial posterior wall puncture, or in the 10-min overall success rate between the DNTP and AD groups. However, the cannulation time was longer and the posterior wall puncture rate was lower in the DNTP group.Trial registrationThe trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (No: NCT03656978). Registered 4 September 2018.