Comparison of an Ultrasound-Guided Dynamic Needle Tip Positioning Technique and a Long-Axis In-Plane Technique for Radial Artery Cannulation in Older Patients: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study

Abstract

The authors compared the dynamic needle tip positioning (DNTP) technique and the long-axis in-plane (LAIP) technique in older patients. This was a prospective randomized controlled study. The study was conducted at a single institution (Hanyang University hospital). One hundred sixty patients participated in this study. This study was conducted on patients aged 75 years or older who underwent general anesthesia requiring placement of an arterial catheter. A total of 160 patients were allocated randomly to the DNTP group or the LAIP group. The primary outcome was the success rate of the first attempt. Additionally, overall success rate, cannulation time, number of total redirections and attempts, and occurrence of complications were investigated. In the DNTP group, the success rate of the first attempt (85% v 48.8%, p < 0.001, relative risk=1.74, 95% CI 1.37-2.22) and the overall success rate (97.5% v 86.3%, p=0.01, relative risk=1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.24) were significantly higher than in the LAIP group. Fewer redirections (p < 0.001) and attempts (p < 0.001), and a decreased cannulation time (58.8 ± 22.4 s v 89.6 ± 37.9 s, p < 0.001) were detected in the DNTP group. A decreased occurrence of hematoma in the DNTP group also was detected (7.5% v 18.8%, p=0.035, relative risk=0.40, 95% CI=0.16-0.98). The DNTP technique has better efficiency and safety than the LAIP technique for radial artery catheterization in the older population.