Body Combinations, Discussions by J.P. Giesing, Analytic Methods in Aircraft Aerodynamics, NASASP-228, 1969. Hink, G.R., Bills, G.R., and Dornfeld, G.M., A Method for Predicting the Characteristics of Control Configured Vehicles. Vol. H-Flexstab User's Manual, Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, Rept. AFFDL-TR-74-91,Nov. 1974. Dillenius, M.F.E. and Nielsen, J.N., Prediction of Aerodynamics of Missiles at High Angles of Attack in Supersonic Flow, Nielsen Engineering and Research, Inc., Mountain View, Calif., Rept. NEAR TR-99, Oct. 1975. Lan, C.E., Calculation of Lateral-Directional Derivatives for Wing-Body Combinations With and Without Jet Interaction Effects, NASA CR-145251,1977. Lan, C.E., A Quasi Vortex-Lattice Method in Thin Wing Theory, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 11, Sept. 1974, pp. 518-527. Lan, C.E. and Mehrotra, S.C., An Improved Woodward's Panel Method for Calculating Leading-Edge and Side-Edge Suction Forces, The University of Kansas Center for Research, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas, Tech. Rept. CRINC-FRL-266-3, Feb., 1979. Lamar, J.E., Extension of Leading-Edge-Suction Analogy to Wings with Separated Flow Around the Side Edges at Subsonic Speeds, NASA TR R-428, Oct. 1974. Margolis, K., Theoretical Calculations of the Lateral Force and Yawing Moment Due to Rolling at Supersonic Speeds for Sweptback Tapered Wings with Stream wise Tips. Subsonic Leading Edges, NACATN 2122, June 1950. Harmon, S.M., Stability Derivatives at Supersonic Speeds of Thin Rectangular Wings with Diagonals Ahead of Tip Mach Lines, NACA Rept. 925, 1949. flying qualities, such effects should not be overlooked in calculations or analyses directed toward investigation of compliance with the requirements of this specification. The specification is concerned mainly with desirable ranges of values on rigid body static and dynamic response parameters. There are methods available for estimating static aeroelastic corrections to rigid body aerodynamic stability derivatives; however, these are then used in rigid aircraft equations of motion. It seems quite possible that the desirable ranges of parameter values could be significantly affected by elastic mode degrees of freedom—particularly when some of the modes have natural frequencies of the same order of magnitude as the frequencies of the rigid body alone. It is not clear at all that the handling qualities should be specified by rigid body dynamic parameters when such mode interaction is present. In fact, the pilot would find it difficult to tell, for example, how much of a given pitch angle response to command input is due to rigid body and how much to lowfrequency elastic modes.
Read full abstract