1120 Reviews whereas the materialists of Documents insist on art-as-process. Adamowicz addresses Aragon's fractured narrative of collage (1923-75), exposing the ideological reading that led him to condemn Ernst's collages as frivolous, and to vaunt John Heartfield's satirical photomontages fortheir collectivist political freight.Adamowicz's critique of the erasure of collage in Aragon's slavish socio-realist writings of 1935-60 opens the way for a corrective engagement with Ernst's mesmerically poetic assault on establishment values. The study concludes with a consideration of the post-war struggle to reaffirmSurrealism under pressure from abstract experimentalism. As Breton's voice falters, a new generation deploys esoteric discourse to chart the processes of lyrical abstraction in painting: in this respect the metaphoric texts of the 1950s reprise the rhetorical strategies of the 1930s. This admirably paced study, combining close read? ing and lucid synthesis, offersan incisive examination of textual figurations that lose sight?product ively,provocatively?ofthe art works that were their catalyst. University of Wales Swansea Susan Harrow Encounters with Levinas. Ed. by Thomas Trezise. (Yale French Studies, 104) Lon? don: Yale University Press. 2004. 146 pp. ?15. ISBN 0-300-10216-x. In the useful but tantalizingly short 'Editor's Preface' to this collection of essays Thomas Trezise ascribes Levinas's now uncontested status and influence to the fact that the ethical relation to the other raises more questions than it answers. Trezise goes on to outline some of these questions (p. 2). Does Levinas's philosophical dis? course essentialize the very other whose singularity he wishes to champion? Might not discourses other than philosophy be more appropriate to the preservation of alterity ? How can the purely dyadic encounter of self and other be reconciled with issues such as justice and politics? And might not Levinas's perceived originality derive at least in part from the work of other thinkers, or from long-standing religious, philosophical, or cultural traditions? Rather than offering direct or comprehensive responses to these pertinent questions, the following essays are conceived as a series of encounters which explore some of the intellectual contexts and philosophical resonance of Levinas's work. Interesting and accomplished essays analyse Levinas's defence of subjectivity and trace its Cartesian roots (Leora Batnitzky), unravel the importance of Kierkegaard and Dostoevsky in his work (Samuel Moyn and Alain Toumayan respectively), and discuss his equivocations on the image and figuration (Philippe Crignon). If there is no startling new reading of Levinas in these essays, they nevertheless offernumerous fresh insights into aspects of his writing which have been misunderstood or neglected. Of the remaining essays, Paul Ricoeur's discussion of Otherwise than Being or Beyond Essence is already published in French, though it was certainly worthwhile to make his typically courteous but probing engagement available to anglophone scholars; and Edith Wyschogrod breaks new ground by confronting Levinas's thought with recent developments in genetic theory. Most ofthe contributors are happy to correct or criticize Levinas on occasion, but easily the most overt and challenging attack comes in Luce Irigaray's essay, 'What Other are We Talking About?', which builds upon and clarifies her chapter on Levinas mAn Ethics of Sexual Difference. She vigorously distances herself from Levinas's work, accusing him of understanding subjectivity in exclusively masculine terms and thereby silently appropriating the feminine other despite his desire to avoid fusion or pos? session. Irigaray's reading may be limited by the fact that it is based here primarily on the lectures from the 1940s published as Time and the Other, rather than taking account of Levinas's later self-revisions in, for example, Otherwise than Being or Be? yond Essence. Even so, her lively, provocative engagement is at least as much in the MLRy 100.4, 2005 1121 spirit of Levinasian encounter as the more respectful excavations of Levinas's thought and contexts, and it is to be regretted that Levinas was unwilling to respond in kind during his lifetime. In summary, this is a varied collection of essays, all of which make valuable contributions to the now massive body of secondary material on Levinas. Royal Holloway, University of London Colin Davis Andrei Makine: la rencontrede I'Est et...