Through the Corruption Reporting System, corruption in the public sector can be prevented, and the basic rights of the people can be protected and the adequacy of administration can be secured. However, issues regarding conflicts between organizations and members or between members through corruption reporting, and explicit or implied disadvantages to corruption reporters(whistleblower) are constantly being raised. Therefore, in order to solve this problem, Article 62-2 of the Anti-Corruption Rights and Civil Rights Commission Act allows corruption reporters to apply for measures such as guaranteeing their status to the Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission if they have received or are expected to receive disadvantageous measures for reporting. By the way, it is clear that the Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission's decision on measures such as guaranteeing the status of the head of the agency to which the reporter belongs is a measure to protect the rights and interests of the reporter, but on the other hand, it would violate the constitutional or statutory authority of the head of the affiliated agency. Therefore, an in-depth study on this is required. First, the Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission's decision to guarantee status is an internal act between administrative agencies and not an act regulating the rights or duties of citizens, so it cannot be regarded as an administrative disposition as a subject of an appeal lawsuit. Accordingly, a lawsuit in which the head of an affiliated agency contests a decision on to guarantee status against the Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission should be regarded as an institutional lawsuit, which is a lawsuit about the exercise of authority between administrative agencies, not an appeal lawsuit. In this way, if the administrative litigation regarding the decision to guarantee status is regarded as an institutional litigation, there is no problem in theory that Article 62-4 of the Anti-Corruption Rights Commission Act limits the eligibility of plaintiffs and the subject of suit, and sets the filing period very short. However, the current regulation limiting the filing period to 30 days due to excessive focus on the protection of whistleblower is not appropriate in light of the nature of institutional litigation aimed at resolving disputes over authority between institutions. Therefore, it is reasonable to amend the Act so that a lawsuit can be filed within 60 days from the date of notification of the decision to guarantee status. In addition, the current regulations do not have a separate objection provision in case the whistleblower's application for guarantee of status is rejected or rejected. So, it is necessary to establish a new regulation on the whistleblower's right to file a lawsuit so that he can file a lawsuit with the court.
Read full abstract