ABSTRACT Works of “book club fiction” like Jessie Burton’s The Miniaturist and Melissa Ashley’s The Naturalist of Amsterdam often are destined to reach a wide non-academic audience, potentially becoming the primary conduit through which that audience is exposed to the histories of so-called “minor empires.” For this reason, it is critical that we think carefully about exactly what stories are being told in narratives of this type. While The Miniaturist has ironically attracted criticism from reviewers for coming across as almost too aware of and engaged with social justice issues, a careful reading of both Burton’s and Ashley’s novels reveals pressing questions about how well they address colonial histories. Although Burton and Ashley confront the usurpation of women’s agency in various forms and imagine anti-patriarchal resistance in a rich array of guises, both texts also reproduce persisting mythologies of empire that oversimplify and occlude the challenging relationships between gender, race, and imperial power. A paired reading of Burton’s and Ashley’s novels illustrates the continuing vulnerability of the histories of “minor empires” to being suppressed, sanitized, and made palatable for white Anglophone readers from former or current colonizer societies – including in ostensibly feminist texts where intersectional perspectives are missing or are incompletely rendered.
Read full abstract