Duration Of Thromboprophylaxis Research Articles

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after total knee or hip replacement: treatment pattern and outcomes

To determine the thromboprophylactic treatment pattern and occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), major bleeding, and wound infections in patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR) or total hip replacement (THR). From the PHARMO database, all patients ≥ 18 years hospitalized for TKR or THR between January 2003 and September 2008 were selected. Patients with pharmacy data up to 3 months after hospitalization were included in the study cohort. Duration and type of thromboprophylaxis were assessed. VTE, major bleeding, and wound infections were identified by hospitalizations. Regarding VTE, timing of event in relation to thromboprophylaxis was determined. The study population included 2930 patients with TKR, 5332 patients with THR without hip fracture, and 289 patients with THR and hip fracture. Mean duration of thromboprophylaxis was about 30 (± 20) days for all procedures, with low-molecular-weight heparin being the most frequently used drug. During 3 months of follow-up, 1% to 2% of patients were hospitalized for an event. The most observed event was wound infection (58%), followed by major bleeding (29%), and VTE (13%). For wound infection and major bleeding, median time after surgery was about 19 days. Median time between surgery and VTE was 24 days for TKR and 60 days for THR. Eighteen of 23 VTE occurred during thromboprophylaxis. Although patients are often treated for fewer days than recommended, thromboprophylaxis after TKR and THR in the Netherlands is adequate. Only 5 of 23 VTE hospitalizations occurred off-treatment and might have been prevented. Furthermore, fewer than 1% of patients were hospitalized for bleeding.

Real-world practices to prevent venous thromboembolism with pharmacological prophylaxis in US orthopedic surgery patients: an analysis of an integrated healthcare database

Major orthopedic surgery patients are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in-hospital and post-discharge. This study assessed real-world inpatient and outpatient thromboprophylaxis practices following knee or hip arthroplasty. Patients from the Henry Ford Health System aged ≥18 years undergoing knee and hip arthroplasty (January 1997-June 2007) were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes from administrative databases. Patients with <18 months of continuous enrollment in the system's health maintenance organization or with a current diagnosis of atrial fibrillation were excluded. Both inpatient and outpatient pharmacological prophylaxis was assessed. The analysis included 1393 (58.5%) patients following knee arthroplasty and 989 (41.5%) following hip arthroplasty. Average length of hospitalization was 4.9 days over the study period, although the median stay decreased from 5 days in 1997 to 3 days in 2007. Of patients included, 72.7% received pharmacological prophylaxis only in the inpatient setting following knee arthroplasty and 73.9% following hip arthroplasty. Both inpatient and outpatient pharmacological prophylaxis was received by 12.5% of knee and 12.3% of hip arthroplasty patients. Total length of pharmacological prophylaxis fluctuated between 2 to 4 days between 1997 and 2005, but increased to 11.5 ± 9.0 days in 2007. Although the duration of prophylaxis has recently increased, considerable numbers of hip and knee arthroplasty patients only receive prophylaxis for part of the time period recommended by guidelines. Further efforts are required to ensure the recommended duration of thromboprophylaxis is prescribed to all patients and continued outpatient VTE prophylaxis is provided.

Topical Issues in Venous Thromboembolism

Despite clear guidelines and the availability of effective treatments, venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains relatively common, particularly in the hospital setting. This paper reviews topical issues in VTE, in terms of treatments, data and guidelines. Existing anticoagulants have several limitations. Bleeding risk is a concern with all anticoagulants. Vitamin K antagonists are the mainstay of oral anticoagulant therapy, but they are limited by the need for frequent monitoring. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is limited by an inconvenient route of administration (continuous intravenous infusion) and a higher risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and bleeding compared with low molecular weight heparins (LMWH). LMWH have a more predictable pharmacokinetic profile and greater bioavailability than UFH, which permits weight-adjusted LMWH dosing without the need for monitoring in most patients. LMWH also have a more convenient dosing strategy than UFH (once-daily subcutaneous injection). Fondaparinux is a selective inhibitor of factor Xa and, like LMWH, does not require monitoring. The efficacy of fondaparinux in long-term VTE treatment remains to be established. The optimal time to initiate thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery remains controversial. Initiating thromboprophylaxis just before or soon after surgery (the 'just-in-time' strategy) achieves better thromboprophylaxis but could increase the risk of bleeding complications. Balancing the need for extended thromboprophylaxis after major surgery with the need to minimize bleeding remains an important consideration. Despite clear guidelines, thromboprophylaxis is widely underused, particularly in medical patients, in whom rates as low as 28% have been reported. Electronic alert systems may be of value for increasing the use of adequate thromboprophylaxis. The use of different definitions of VTE and bleeding in clinical trials, together with missing venography data, conflicting guidelines in patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty, and the limited amount of data in children, also make VTE prevention and management more difficult. Administering thromboprophylaxis to a wider group of patients, employing the 'just-in-time' protocols, ensuring adequate duration of thromboprophylaxis, combining different methods of thromboprophylaxis and developing new anticoagulants should help to improve thromboprophylaxis.

The effectiveness of deep vein thrombosis prevention

The effectiveness of deep vein thrombosis prevention

Short versus extended thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty: A randomized comparison

Introduction The optimal duration of thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty remains uncertain. Material and Methods We performed a randomized, open trial to determine whether to stop thromboprophylactic therapy at Day 10 ± 2 (‘short thromboprophylaxis’) was non-inferior to continue thromboprophylactic therapy up to Day 35 ± 5 (‘extended thromboprophylaxis’) after total knee arthroplasty. At Day 7 ± 2, subjects were screened by ultrasonography for asymptomatic deep-vein thrombosis and randomized. The primary outcome was a composite of proximal deep-vein thrombosis, any symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis, non-fatal symptomatic pulmonary embolism, major bleeding, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, or all-cause death up to Day 35 ± 5. The secondary outcome was ultrasonographic (extension or new onset) distal deep-vein thrombosis at Day 35 ± 5. Results Twenty-one patients (2.4%) were not randomized, because of asymptomatic proximal deep-vein thrombosis on systematic ultrasonography at Day 7 ± 2. Among the 857 randomized patients, mean (SD) duration of anticoagulant treatment was 11.2 (6.7) and 33.9 (3.7) days in the short and extended thromboprophylaxis groups, respectively. The respective rates of the primary outcome were 4.0% (17/420) and 2.4% (10/422), with an absolute difference of 1.7% (90% confidence interval, -0.3 to 3.7). In 285 patients with asymptomatic distal deep-vein thrombosis at Day 7 ± 2, the respective rates of the primary outcome were 7.8% and 2.8% (p = 0.067). The rates of the secondary outcome were 14.8% (62/420) and 4.5% (19/422), respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusions Short thromboprophylaxis was not non-inferior to extended thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty. In this setting, the thromboembolic risk persisted longer than seven days, notably in patients with asymptomatic distal deep-vein thrombosis at discharge. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00362492

Extended prophylaxis with bemiparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after abdominal or pelvic surgery for cancer: the CANBESURE randomized study.

There is not enough clinical evidence to make a strong recommendation on the optimal duration of thromboprophylaxis using low-molecular weight heparins (LMWH) in patients undergoing major cancer surgery. CANBESURE is a randomized, double-blind study which enrolled patients admitted for abdominal or pelvic surgery for cancer. They received 3500 IU of bemiparin subcutaneously once daily for 8 days and were then randomized to receive either bemiparin or placebo for 20 additional days. Bilateral venography was performed after 20 days and evaluated blinded. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), non-fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) and all-cause mortality at the end of double-blind period. Major venous thromboembolism (proximal deep-vein thrombosis, non-fatal pulmonary embolism and venous thromboembolism-related deaths) was also evaluated. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Six hundred and twenty-five and 488 patients were included in the safety and main efficacy analyzes, respectively. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 25 out of 248 patients (10.1%) in the bemiparin group and 32 out of 240 (13.3%) in the placebo group (relative risk reduction 24.4%; 95% CI: -23.7-53.8%; P = 0.26). At the end of double-blind period, major venous thromboembolism occurred in 2 (0.8%) and 11 (4.6%) patients, respectively (relative risk reduction 82.4%; 95% CI: 21.5-96.1%; P = 0.010). No significant difference was found in major bleedings. Four weeks compared with 1 week of prophylaxis with bemiparin after abdominal or pelvic cancer surgery did not significantly reduce the primary efficacy outcome, but decreased major venous thromboembolism (VTE) without increasing hemorrhagic complications.

Rivaroxaban and dabigatran etexilate: two new oral anticoagulants for extended postoperative prevention of venous thromboembolism after elective total hip arthroplasty

Extended thromboprophylaxis is vital in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) because of the prolonged risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Despite evidence that extended prophylaxis can reduce the incidence of symptomatic VTE in this high-risk patient population and the evidence-based guideline recommendations, a large proportion of patients still do not receive an adequate duration of thromboprophylaxis. This is partly due to the limitations of conventional anticoagulants, such as the subcutaneous route of administration or the requirement for routine coagulation monitoring and dose adjustment. New oral anticoagulants (such as the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate and the Factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban) could address the current unmet need. Phase III clinical studies in VTE prevention in patients undergoing THA and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) showed that dabigatran etexilate was non-inferior to the EU regimen of enoxaparin, but did not achieve non-inferiority to the US regimen of enoxaparin. In contrast, rivaroxaban demonstrated superiority to both enoxaparin regimens for the prevention of VTE after THA and TKA, without a significant increase in major bleeding rates. Their convenient, once-daily, fixed dosing, with no need for routine coagulation monitoring, could facilitate adherence to evidence-based guideline recommendations of extended thromboprophylaxis after THA.

Are hospitals delivering appropriate VTE prevention? The venous thromboembolism study to assess the rate of thromboprophylaxis (VTE start)

The 7th conference of the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP7) provides recommendations on the type, dose, and duration of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients at risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), but the extent to which hospitals follow these criteria has not been well studied. Discharge and billing records for patients admitted to any of 16 acute-care hospitals from January 2005 to December 2006 were obtained. Patients 18 years or older who had an inpatient stay ≥2 days and no apparent contraindications for thromboprophylaxis were grouped into the categories of critical care, surgery and medically ill before being assessed for additional VTE risk factors based on the diagnostic criteria outlined in ACCP7. For patients at risk, the recommended type (mechanical or pharmacologic), dose, and duration of thromboprophylaxis was identified based on the guidelines and compared to the regimen actually received, if any. Among the 258,556 hospitalized patients, 68,278 (26.4%) were determined to be at risk of VTE without apparent contraindications for thromboprophylaxis. The proportions of patients who received the appropriate type, dose, and duration of thromboprophylaxis were 10.5, 9.8, and 17.9% for critical care, medical, and surgical patients, respectively. Of those at risk, 36.8% received no thromboprophylaxis and an additional 50.2% received thromboprophylaxis deemed inappropriate for one or more reasons. The implementation of ACCP7 guidelines for type, dosage, and duration of thromboprophylaxis is low in patients at risk of VTE. There is a need for physicians and health systems to improve awareness and implementation of recommended thromboprophylaxis.

Thromboprophylaxis following Surgery for Colorectal Cancer — Is it Worthwhile after Hospital Discharge?

The efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) after surgery for colorectal cancer is well documented, but the optimal duration of postoperative thromboprophylaxis is not known. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the occurrence of symptomatic VTE after surgery for colorectal cancer in patients in whom LMWH was continued only until hospital discharge. During 2003-2006 a total of 494 patients underwent abdominal surgery for colorectal cancer at our institution. Enoxaparin (Klexane 40mg s.c.) prophylaxis was started 12 hours before surgery and continued once a day until hospital discharge. The median duration of thromboprophylaxis was 11 days. The follow-up data were collected retrospectively from electronic archives and analyzed up to three months after the operation. Only three (0.6%) symptomatic VTEs occurred during the follow-up period. One patient presented with pulmonary embolism, while the remaining two had proximal deep-vein thrombosis. The 30-day-mortality was 1.6%. None of the deaths were obviously associated with VTE. LMWH given for a median of 11 days until hospital discharge seems to provide sufficient thromboprophylaxis after surgery for colorectal cancer combined with the use of graded compression stockings and early mobilization.

Evaluation of the frequency of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in a selected population of patients hospitalized in nonsurgical wards. Results of the all‑Poland EPID Registry

The results of the Prophylaxis in Medical Patients with Enoxoparin (MEDENOX) trial demonstrated the benefit of thromboprophylaxis in patients hospitalized because of acute heart failure, respiratory failure and rheumatic disease. Analysis of clinical practice shows that thromboprophylaxis is rarely used in these patients. To assess thromboprophylaxis use in a selected population of patients hospitalized in internal departments in Poland. Between the years 2002 and 2006, 14,707 hospitalized patients were included into the EPID Registry. The study population, selected for the purpose of this analysis, involved 5246 patients (mean age 71, 95% CI: 70.6 -71.4 years), reported by 60 internal wards, who met the entry criteria of the MEDENOX study. Patients receiving long-term antithrombotic treatment and patients with indications for initiating antithrombotic treatment were not enrolled. Thromboprophylaxis was administered in 63% of patients. The average duration of thromboprophylaxis was 8.1 days (95% CI: 7.8-8.4). In the group of patients admitted to the intensive care unit thromoprophylaxis was administered in 81% of cases compared with 58% in nonsurgical departments (p < 0.0001). Low-molecular-weight heparins were used in 93% of patients receiving prophylaxis. The risk of hemorrhage (9.5%) and lack of indications for thromboprophylaxis (27%) according to the physicians were the main reasons for not using prophylaxis. The frequency of thromboprophylaxis use varied from 35% to 89% between different regions of Poland. Hemorrhagic complications were reported in 0.8% of patients receiving prophylaxis. Administration of thromboprophylaxis in the MEDENOX-like population is of great importance from an epidemiological point of view because this patient group accounts for 31% of in-patients. Thromboprophylaxis is underused with large differences between regions, which should be improved by an adequate educational program for physicians from internal wards.

Prolonged thromboprophylaxis with Low Molecular Weight heparin for abdominal or pelvic surgery

Major abdominal and pelvic surgery carries a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The efficacy of thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) administered during the in-hospital period is well documented, but the optimal duration of thromboprophylaxis after surgery remains controversial. Some studies suggest that patients undergoing major abdominal surgery benefit from prolongation of the thromboprophylaxis to 1 month after surgery. No systematic review on prolonged thromboprophylaxis after major abdominal or pelvic surgery has been published. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of prolonged thromboprophylaxis with LMWH for at least 1 month after abdominal or pelvic surgery with thromboprophylaxis administered during the in-hospital period only in preventing late VTE. Electronic searches were performed January 2008 in the Medline, Embase, Lilacs, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Abstract books from major congresses addressing thromboembolism were hand searched, as were reference lists from studies of relevance. We assessed both randomised and non-randomised controlled clinical trials comparing prolonged thromboprophylaxis with any anti-thrombotic agent with placebo and/or thromboprophylaxis during the admission period only. The patient population in the trials were patients undergoing abdominal or pelvic surgery. The outcome measures included VTE (deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE)) as assessed by objective means (ascending bilateral venography, ultrasonography, pulmonary ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy, spiral CT scan or autopsy). Studies exclusively reporting on clinical diagnosis of VTE, without objective confirmation were excluded. The identification of studies and data extraction were performed by the authors. Outcomes were VTE (DVT or PE) assessed by objective means. Safety outcome were defined as bleeding complications and mortality within 3 months after surgery. The search exclusively detected trials evaluating prolonged thromboprophylaxis with LMWH as compared to control or placebo. 133 studies were found in the searches, of which only 4 were found eligible for inclusion, and 129 were excluded. The incidence of overall VTE after major abdominal or pelvic surgery was 14.3% (95% confidence interval 11.2% - 17.8%) in the control group as compared to 6.1% (95% CI 4.0% - 8.7%) in the patients receiving out-of-hospital LMWH. This difference was statistically significant, Peto Odds Ratio 0.41 (95% CI 0.26 -0.63), P < 0.0005. Prolonged thromboprophylaxis with LMWH was also associated with a statistically significant reduction of even the incidence of symptomatic VTE from 1.7% (95% CI 0.8% - 3.4%) in the control group to 0.2 % (95% CI 0.0% - 1.2%) in patients receiving prolonged thromboprophylaxis, Peto Odds ratio 0.22 (95% CI 0.06 -0.80), P = 0.02. The respective incidence of bleeding in the control and LMWH group were 3.7% (95% CI 2.4% -5.5%) and 4.1% (95% CI 2.7% - 6.0%), Peto Odds ratio 1.11 (95% CI 0.62 - 1.97), P = 0.73. There was no significant heterogeneity detected as regards to outcome parameters reported in the included trials. Prolonged thromboprophylaxis with LMWH significantly reduces the risk of VTE compared to thromboprophylaxis during hospital admittance only, without increasing bleeding complications after major abdominal or pelvic surgery.

Are Hospitals Following Guidelines for VTE Prevention? the Veneous Thromoembolism Study to Assess the Rate of Thromboprophylaxis

OBJECTIVE: The 7th conference of the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP7) provides evidence-based guidelines on the type, dose, and duration of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients at risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), but the extent to which hospitals follow these criteria has not been well studied.METHODS: Discharge and billing records for patients admitted to any of 16 rural and urban U.S. acute-care hospitals from January 2005 to December 2006 were obtained. Patients 18 years or older who had an inpatient stay 32 days and no apparent contraindications for thromboprophylaxis were grouped into the categories of critical care, surgery and medically ill before being assessed for additional VTE risk factors based on the diagnostic criteria outlined in ACCP7. For patients considered “at risk”, the recommended type (mechanical or pharmacologic), dose, and duration of thromboprophylaxis was identified based on the guidelines and compared to the regimen actually received, if any.RESULTS: Among the 258,556 hospitalized patients, 68,278 (26.4%) were determined to be at risk of VTE without apparent contraindications for thromboprophylaxis. The proportions of patients who received the appropriate type and dose and duration of thromboprophylaxis were 10.5%, 9.8%, and 17.9% for critical care, medical, and surgical patients, respectively. Of those at risk, 36.8% received no thromboprophylaxis and an additional 50.2% received thromboprophylaxis deemed inappropriate for one or more reasons.CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of ACCP7 guidelines for type, dosage, and duration of thromboprophylaxis is low in patients at risk of VTE. Fewer than 1 in 7 patients received thromboprophylaxis that met criteria for recommended type, dose and duration. The findings demonstrate a worrisome gap in the performance of evidence-based thromboprophylaxis for hospitalized patients. There is a need for physicians and health systems to improve the levels of awareness and implementation of recommended thromboprophylaxis.

Enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis in gastric bypass patients: extended duration, dose stratification, and antifactor Xa activity

Background Morbidly obese patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery are at risk for postoperative venous thromboembolism. Evidence-based recommendations regarding the dosing and duration of thromboprophylaxis are lacking for morbidly obese surgical patients. The aims of this study were to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an extended duration, body mass index (BMI)–stratified enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis regimen in patients undergoing Roux-en- Y gastric bypass and to determine the resultant antifactor Xa (AFXa) activity in morbidly obese surgical patients. Methods In this prospective open trial, 223 patients (75% female, mean BMI 50.4 kg/m 2) undergoing Roux-en- Y gastric bypass were assigned to receive enoxaparin 40 mg (BMI ≤50 kg/m 2, n = 124) or 60 mg (BMI >50 kg/m 2, n = 99) every 12 hours during hospitalization and once daily for 10 days after discharge. The AFXa levels were monitored serially, and dose adjustments were made for results outside the target prophylactic range (.2–.4 IU/mL ± 10%) after the third dose. The safety and efficacy outcomes were major bleeding and venous thromboembolism. Results Roux-en- Y gastric bypass was performed laparoscopically in 208 subjects (93%). The duration of surgery averaged 99.5 ± 31 minutes, and the median length of hospitalization was 3 days. Target prophylactic AFXa concentration was achieved by 74% of patients after the third enoxaparin dose; none reached the full anticoagulation concentration. One patient developed nonfatal venous thromboembolism (.45%). Four patients required transfusion (1.79%). Bleeding was not associated with a high AFXa concentration. Conclusion This BMI-stratified, extended enoxaparin dosing regimen provided well-tolerated, effective prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery.

Thromboprophylaxis rates in US medical centers: success or failure?

As hospitalized medical patients may be at risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), evidence-based guidelines are available to help physicians assess patients' risk for VTE, and to recommend prophylaxis options. The rate of appropriate thromboprophylaxis use in at-risk medical inpatients was assessed in accordance with the 6th American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines. Hospital discharge information from the Premier Perspective(trade mark) inpatient data base from January 2002 to September 2005 was used. Included patients were 40 years old or more, with a length of hospital stay of 6 days or more, and had no contraindications for anticoagulation. The appropriateness of VTE thromboprophylaxis was determined in seven groups with acute medical conditions by comparing the daily thromboprophylaxis usage, including type of thromboprophylaxis, dosage of anticoagulant and duration of thromboprophylaxis, with the ACCP recommendations. A total of 196 104 discharges from 227 hospitals met the inclusion criteria. The overall VTE thromboprophylaxis rate was 61.8%, although the appropriate thromboprophylaxis rate was only 33.9%. Of the 66.1% discharged patients who did not receive appropriate thromboprophylaxis, 38.4% received no prophylaxis, 4.7% received mechanical prophylaxis only, 6.3% received an inappropriate dosage, and 16.7% received an inappropriate prophylaxis duration based on ACCP recommendations. This study highlights the low rates of appropriate thromboprophylaxis in US acute-care hospitals, with two-thirds of discharged patients not receiving prophylaxis in accordance with the 6th ACCP guidelines. More effort is required to improve the use of appropriate thromboprophylaxis in accordance with the ACCP recommendations.

Prevention of Pulmonary Embolism in General Surgery Patients

Case Presentation : A 29-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with complaints of pleuritic chest pain, fever, and left ankle swelling and tenderness. Cardiac examination was normal except for tachycardia. A chest computed tomography scan with contrast demonstrated extensive bilateral pulmonary emboli. Thirteen days previously, an intoxicated driver with multiple prior convictions for driving under the influence of alcohol crashed head-on into her car at a high speed. She was 8 months’ pregnant and suffered the loss of the child. She spent 7 days in the hospital and underwent cesarean section, exploratory laparotomy, and splenectomy. No preoperative pharmacological prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism (VTE) was administered. VTE, which includes deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is an important and common complication of general surgery. A new era in the postoperative management of surgical patients began in 1975 when the effectiveness of low-dose heparin in preventing postoperative DVT and PE was established by the pivotal International Multicenter Trial.1 The dose was 5000 U subcutaneously every 8 hours, with the first injection administered 2 hours before the skin incision. Compared with control, the incidence of DVT in patients receiving heparin decreased from 24.6% to 7.7%. Similarly, the incidence of autopsy-proven PE was reduced 8-fold. The results of this trial introduced and validated the concept of using low-dose heparin to prevent postoperative VTE. This trial revolutionized surgical practice. By 1994, 90% of North American general surgeons reported the routine use of thromboprophylaxis.2 Most postoperative DVT originates in the deep calf veins, primarily within the valve cusps. Most thrombi remain confined to the calf. Propagation into the proximal veins increases the risk of PE. Symptoms and signs of postoperative VTE such as mild hypoxia or low-grade fever are frequently nonspecific. Moreover, clinical manifestations of postoperative VTE may not occur until …

Guidelines for prevention of venous thromboembolism in immobile patients secondary to neurological impairment

Background. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients and 7% of these cases are due to immobility secondary to a neurological impairment. Many guidelines are available to guide clinicians dealing with medical or surgical patients. However, and with the exception of spinal injuries, no guidelines are available to deal with other neurologically impaired patients at risk of VTE.Aim. Our study aimed at gathering evidence from the literature to enable us to deal with the main controversial issues of VTE prevention. Guidelines will be formulated.Method. A Clinical Standards Group is responsible for the development of clinical guidelines for the Greater Manchester Neurorehabilitation network with services covering a population of around 3 million. The development of VTE prevention guidelines started with the formulation of the main questions, then gathering evidence from the literature to address these questions. Wide consultation then took place. The guidelines were then put before the group for endorsement.Results. Answers for the main questions such as duration of thromboprophylaxis, TEDS and antiplatelets drugs use were suggested. The resulting document was summarized as a flow chart for use.Conclusion. We feel that the proposed guidelines are a useful tool for clinicians as they reflect the evidence available from the literature at the moment.

Extended duration of thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients: optimizing therapy?

Summary. Patients who are hospitalized for an acute medical illness are at risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Current evidence-based guidelines recommend prophylaxis with unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin in acutely ill medical patients who are admitted to hospital with congestive heart failure, severe respiratory disease, or who are bedridden with an additional VTE risk factor. The need for thromboprophylaxis is therefore clear in this patient population; however, the optimal duration of prophylaxis in these patients is less clear. In patients undergoing orthopedic or cancer surgery, extended-duration prophylaxis has been shown to be superior to placebo. To date, however, no large-scale clinical trials have assessed the benefits of extended-duration prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients. This review therefore focuses on the VTE risk profile of acutely ill medical patients, examines the currently available literature for evidence of a potential benefit of extended-duration prophylaxis in these patients, and provides a rationale for the testing of such a hypothesis in a randomized clinical trial.

Controversies in thromboprophylaxis for immobile patients secondary to neurological impairment

As venous thromboembolism (VTE) kills 25 000 people in the UK each year, it is not surprising to hear several voices warning about that menace and to find many guidelines suggesting strategies to reduce the risk.1 However, it is hard to find guidance when you are dealing with neurologically impaired, immobile patients who constitute 7% of all VTE patients.2 One of the main points of controversy is the duration of thromboprophylaxis. Medical and surgical patients receive thromboprophylaxis for 1-2 weeks as they usually regain independent mobility by that time. Many of the neurologically impaired immobile patients take a long time to achieve independent mobility, and some of them will never do. So when should one discontinue thromboprophylaxis? The only clear guidelines deal with acute spinal cord injury for which there is a more than 80% risk of suffering VTE in its acute stage.3 That risk drops and becomes comparable to the normal population in 3-4 months. The reason is not completely understood, but femoral artery atrophy and reductions of venous distensibility are well documented.4 Development of spasticity can also improve calf muscle pump.3 These vascular changes are common to any patient with long-term immobility, so theoretically we should expect most immobile patients to behave similarly to spinal injury patients showing significant reduction of risk of VTE 4 months after the onset. To confirm or refute this hypothesis prospective studies will be needed.

Venous Thromboembolism Following Major Orthopedic Surgery: What is the Risk After Discharge?

Guidelines recommend thromboprophylaxis for at least 10 days to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing high-risk orthopedic surgery, such as total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Furthermore, the recently updated ACCP guidelines also recommend extending the duration of thromboprophylaxis for 28 to 35 days following THA or hip fracture surgery as the risk for venous thromboembolism persists for up to 3 months after surgery. Extended-duration thromboprophylaxis (up to 6 weeks) with low-molecular-weight heparin is significantly more effective in preventing venous thromboembolism in orthopedic surgery patients than the recommended practice of at least 10 days. Extended-duration thromboprophylaxis may require risk stratification to identify high-risk patients. Current risk-assessment models have limitations and are not specific to orthopedic surgery patients; therefore, improvements may facilitate the use of extended-duration thromboprophylaxis in high-risk patients, thereby reducing the burden of venous thromboembolism.

Prévention de la maladie thromboembolique veineuse périopératoire en chirurgie cardiaque, vasculaire et thoracique

In the absence of thromboprophylaxis, coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), intrathoracic surgery (thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracoscopy), abdominal aortic surgery and infrainguinal vascular surgery are high-risk surgeries for the development of venous thromboembolic events (VTE). The incidence of VTE following surgery of the intrathoracic aorta, carotid endarterectomy or mediastinoscopy is unknown. Data from the litterature are lacking to draw evidence-based recommandations for venous thromboprophylaxis after these three types of surgeries, and the following guidelines are but experts'opinions (Grade D recommendations). Thromboprophylaxis is recommended after CABG (Grade D), with either subcutaneous (SC) low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or SC or intravenous (i.v.) unfractioned heparin (UH) (PTT target = 1.1–1.5 time control value) (both grade D). This may be combined with the use of intermittent pneumatic compression device (Grade B). After valve surgery. The anticoagulation recommended to prevent valve thrombosis is sufficient in order to prevent VTE. We recommend thromboprophylaxis with either LMWH or low dose UH to prevent VTE after aortic or lower limbs infrainguinal vascular surgery (both grade B and D). Vitamine K antagonists (VKA) are not recommended in this indication (Grade D). We recommend thromprophylaxis following intrathoracic surgery via thoracotomy or videoassisted thoracoscopy (grade C). Either subcutaneous LMWH or subcutaneous or i.v. low dose UH may be used (Grade C). Efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression device has been demonstrated in a study (grade C). VKA are not recommended (grade D). No further recommendation regarding the duration of thromboprophylaxis after these three types of surgeries can be made.