Despite the increasing availability of novel agents for RRMM, many patients run out of treatment options due to disease refractoriness and/or progressive toxicities, both hematological (cytopenia) and non-hematological (cachexia, asthenia, renal and cardiopulmonary).Patients who are refractory to both proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory agents (IMIDs) carry an ominous prognosis with a median overall survival (OS) of 9 months (Leukemia, Kumar 2013). We previously reported on the efficacy and toxicity profiles of a metronomically scheduled chemotherapy regimen administered over the course of 16 days (Haematologica, Papanikolaou 2014). Encouraged by the results of that treatment, we have since modified metronomic chemotherapy to cover a 28-day period (metro28). The regimen consisted largely of bortezomib 1.0mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 7, 10, 13,16,19, 22,25,28; along with dexamethasone 12mg on days 1-4, 7-10, 13-16, 19-22, 25-28; thalidomide 100mg days 1-28, continuous 28 day infusion of doxorubicin 1.0mg/m2 (0.5mg/m2 for Ejection Fraction <40%) and cis-platinum 1.0mg/m2 (0.5mg/m2 for creatinine >2mg/dL), with the addition of arsenic trioxide (ATO) at 0.1mg/kg on each day after bortezomib; and lately vincristine (VCR) at 0.07mg daily dose by continuous infusion for 28 days. Patient characteristics included age >65yr, 46%; female, 33%; cytogenetic abnormalities at any time prior to therapy (CA), 86%; Gene Expression Profile (GEP) 70-defined high risk, 44%. The median number of prior therapies was 8 (1-64), prior transplants, 83% (1, 2, >=3), 20%, 32%, 31%; prior exposure to novel agents including Carfilzomib/Pomalidomide was 81%. Thrombocytopenia prior to treatment was present in 75% including thrombocytopenia <50,000/uL in 15%. Clinical outcomes are depicted in Figure 1. At a median follow up of 8.1 months, the median number of metro 28 cycles administered was 1 (1-5), with 37% achieving a partial response and median OS not yet reached. Interestingly, the 6 month - partial response duration estimate for the patients achieving PR was 53% (Figure 1A), while the one year OS estimate for all patients receiving metro 28 was 59% (Figure 1B). Prognostic factors that held statistical significance in univariate analysis for overall survival were albumin <3.5 g/dl (HR 2.56, P=0.009), beta-2-microglobulin (B2M) ≥3.5 mg/L (HR 3.03, P=0.003), LDH≥ 190 U/L (HR 2.81, P=0.003), GEP-70 High Risk (HR 2.32, P=0.048), GEP-5 High Risk (HR 5.75, P<0.001) (Figure 1C) and GEP PR subgroup designation (HR 3.71, P=0.003). In multivariate analysis, albumin < 3.5 g/dL (HR 2.81, P=0.035), B2M≥ 3.5 mg/L (HR 3.4, P=0.017), GEP PR subgroup (HR 3.8, P=0.012), and GEP-5 High Risk (HR 8.58, P<0.001) (Figure 1C) achieved statistical significance. The majority of cycles administered in the patient population were done in the outpatient setting (81%), while secondary admissions due to regimen toxicity occurred in 36% of the cycles administered. Grade 3 & 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia within 3 months from the start of the metronomic treatment were evident in 64% and 78% respectively of the cases. Treatment related mortality was 2%, due to one instance each of grade 5 infection and cerebrovascular event. In conclusion 28 day metronomic therapy is a feasible treatment with acceptable toxicity and encouraging preliminary results both in terms of ORR and OS for RRMM.Table 1:Patient characteristics at start of Metro28 therapyFactorn/N (%)Age >= 65 yr56/122 (46%)IgA Isotype28/110 (25%)Female40/122 (33%)White108/122 (89%)Albumin < 3.5 g/dL47/122 (39%)B2M >= 3.5 mg/L46/93 (49%)B2M > 5.5 mg/L26/93 (28%)CRP >= 8 mg/L54/122 (44%)Creatinine >= 2 mg/dL15/122 (12%)Hb < 10 g/dL57/122 (47%)LDH >= 190 U/L36/121 (30%)Platelet Count < 150 x 10^9/L92/122 (75%)Cytogenetic abnormalities105/122 (86%)CA within 1 year of therapy84/121 (69%)CA within 90 days of therapy65/119 (55%)New Kit GEP Sample91/91 (100%)GEP 70 High Risk40/91 (44%)GEP 5 High Risk39/91 (43%)GEP CD-1 subgroup5/91 (5%)GEP CD-2 subgroup17/91 (19%)GEP HY subgroup14/91 (15%)GEP LB subgroup6/91 (7%)GEP MF subgroup9/91 (10%)GEP MS subgroup9/91 (10%)GEP PR subgroup31/91 (34%)GEP proliferation index >= 1028/91 (31%)GEP centrosome index >= 326/91 (29%)n/N (%): n- Number with factor, N- Number with valid data for factor ND: No valid observations for factor [Display omitted] [Display omitted] [Display omitted] DisclosuresZangari:Norvartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding. van Rhee:Janssen: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Morgan:Celgene Corp: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Myeloma UK: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; International Myeloma Foundation: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; The Binding Site: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; MMRF: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.