Durable Clinical Benefit Research Articles

Decision model for durable clinical benefit from front- or late-line immunotherapy alone or with chemotherapy in large population of non-small cell lung cancer.

e20533 Background: Predictive biomarkers and models of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been extensively studied in NSCLC. However, evidence for many biomarkers remains inconclusive, and the opaqueness of machine learning models hinders their practicality. We aimed to provide compelling evidence for biomarkers and develop a transparent decision-tree model. Methods: We consolidated data from ICI-treated patients with NSCLC (n = 3,288) across real-world multicentre studies, public cohorts, and the Choice-01 trial (NCT03607539). Over 50 features were gathered to examine the predictive capacity of durable clinical benefits (DCB) from mono-ICIs and ICIs plus chemotherapy. Noteworthy biomarkers were identified to establish a decision tree model. We also explored the tumour microenvironment and peripheral PD-1+ CD8+ T-cell receptor profiles. Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified tumour histology, PD-L1 expression, tumour mutational burden, line, and regimen of ICI treatment as significant factors. Mutation subtypes of EGFR, KRAS, KEAP1, STK11, and disruptive TP53 mutations demonstrated significant association with DCB. The decision-tree (DT10) model, using the aforementioned five clinicopathological markers and five genomic mutations, predicted DCB with superior performance in the training set (N = 286, AUC = 0.82), and consistently outperformed the logistic regression, random forest, and support vector machine models, as well as FDA-approved biomarkers of PD-L1 and TMB in the internal and three external test sets (Table). We visualized the decision routes for DCB from ICI-based treatment based on the DT10 model, which was interpretable for clinical use. Furthermore, DT10 predicted-DCB patients manifested significantly longer progression-free survival and overall survival than -NDB patients across the train and test tests (HR < 1, p < 0.05). Additionally, the DT10 predicted-DCB group presented an enriched inflamed tumour immune phenotype (67%) and higher peripheral TCR diversity, whereas the -NDB group showed an enriched desert immune phenotype (86%) and higher peripheral TCR clonality. Conclusions: Based on the large population, we provided persuasive evidence for the predictive reliability of biomarkers in NSCLC. The development of the DT10 model introducing an easily interpretable, visually engaging, and clinically relevant model, which assisted the decision making in varied clinical scenarios. [Table: see text]

A phase 1, open-label, dose escalation and dose expansion study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of PF-07799544 (ARRY-134) as a single agent and in combination with PF-07799933 BRAF dimer inhibitor, in participants 16 years and older with advanced solid tumors.

TPS3180 Background: The MAPK pathway plays a role in several key signaling and phosphorylation events that contribute to tumorigenesis. Inhibition of MEK, along with RAF kinases, has proven to be a successful transformative strategy for melanoma and other MAPK pathway-altered tumors. However, the duration of clinical benefit is limited by a narrow therapeutic index, de novo and acquired resistance and poor brain penetration. PF-07799544 is a next-generation, fully brain penetrant MEK inhibitor. PF-07799933 is an oral selective ATP-competitive small-molecule RAF kinase inhibitor that suppresses BRAF signaling in BRAF V600-mutant and non-V600-BRAF mutant tumors. It displays significantly less paradoxical activation than approved BRAFi and is not “pan RAF” as it spares non-BRAF mutated-containing RAF dimers. We describe here the design of the Phase 1 study of PF-07799544 as Monotherapy or in Combination with a next generation BRAF dimer inhibitor PF-07799933 in participants with BRAF mutated (BRAFm) advanced solid tumors. Methods: The purpose of this first-in-human study is to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and potential clinical benefits of PF-07799544 administered as a single agent in participants with advanced solid tumors (Phase 1a) and in combination with PF-07799933 in participants with BRAF Class 1, 2 and 3 mutated solid tumors with or without brain involvement (Phase 1b). Phase 1a will enroll participants with advanced solid tumors who have progressed on standard of care. The primary objective is to determine monotherapy MTD/RDE of PF-07799544. Once PK measurements indicate the potential for significant WT MEK mutation target coverage, participants with untreated and symptomatic brain metastases (bm) will be allowed to enroll. Phase 1b is comprised of multiple sub-studies, all of which evaluate PF-07799544 in combination with PF-07799933 in participants with BRAFm solid tumors who have progressed on standard of care therapies, including Class 1 BRAFi where indicated. Sub-study B: BRAFm melanoma (V600 and non-V600) will determine the MTDc/RDEc of the combination (Part 1 primary objective), followed by dose expansion cohorts (Part 2) (~80 participants): Cohort 1: BRAF V600 melanoma (asymptomatic and untreated bm permitted), Cohort 2: BRAF V600 melanoma (symptomatic bm), Cohort 3 BRAFm Class 2/3 melanoma (asymptomatic and untreated bm permitted); Sub-study C: BRAFm Class 2 or 3 advanced solid tumor Cohort 1 (asymptomatic and untreated bm permitted and Cohort 2 (symptomatic bm) (~20 each cohort). The main objectives of the dose expansion cohorts in all substudies, will be to evaluate anti-tumor activity, safety, PK and PD. Clinical trial information: NCT05538130 .

CheMo4METPANC: A randomized phase 2 study with combination chemotherapy (gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel), chemokine (C-X-C) motif receptor 4 inhibitor (motixafortide), and immune checkpoint blockade (cemiplimab) compared to chemotherapy alone in metastatic treatment-naïve pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

TPS4208 Background: Metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) carries a 5-year relative survival of 3%. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have thus far failed to improve outcomes due to an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Signaling through the C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4)/C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12) axis results in exclusion of anti-tumor immune cells in mouse PDAC models. Longitudinal survival studies testing combinations of CXCR4i, aPD-1, and gemcitabine in the KPC mouse model of PDAC demonstrated a survival benefit with the combination of all three agents. Results from a multicenter, investigator-initiated, single arm pilot study evaluating the preliminary safety and efficacy ofMotixafortide (CXCR4i), Cemiplimab (aPD1), Gemcitabine, and Nab-paclitaxel (MCGN) in 11 patients with treatment-naïve mPDAC were recently presented. Seven patients (64%) achieved a partial response, including 6 confirmed partial responses, and 10 patients (91%) had disease control, compared to historic partial response and disease control rates of 23% and 48%, respectively, with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GN). Preliminary median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.6 months compared to historic median PFS of 5.5 months with GN. Analysis of paired pre- and on-treatment biopsy samples from demonstrated an increase in CD8+ T-cell density in tumors from all 11 patients treated with MCGN (p=0.007). Based on these promising results, the protocol was amended from a single arm expansion totaling 40 patients to a randomized phase 2 study. Methods: This is an open-label, multicenter, investigator-initiated phase 2 clinical trial. Patients are randomized 2:1 to receive MCGN or GNalone (N=108). The primary endpoint is progression free survival. The study has 80% power to detect an improvement in PFS from 6 to 9.2 months (HR 0.65) with a one-sided alpha of 0.20. One interim analysis for futility is planned when 50% of the PFS events are observed. Secondary objectives include response rate, disease control rate, duration of clinical benefit and overall survival. Patients will undergo optional paired biopsies which will be analyzed in conjunction with samples collected from the phase I pilot study. Exploratory studies include interrogation of the TME using quantitative multiplex immunofluorescence and single-cell RNA sequencing. The randomized phase 2 trial is open to enrollment and one patient has been randomized as of 1/29/2024. Clinical trial information: NCT04543071 .

What is a bad ALK? A scoping review of molecular markers of poor prognosis.

e20530 Background: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK) rearrangements derive a significant and durable clinical benefit from tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). However, a portion of patients have progressive disease as their best response and progress to death much earlier than expected which is termed primary resistance. This scoping review aims to summarize the known molecular mechanisms that underlie this lethal ALK phenotype. Methods: We performed a systematic scoping review from scientific databases such as Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Data was extracted from the database inception to March 13, 2023. Studies included molecular markers of poor prognosis, with a focus on TP53, variant 3 re-arrangements, and reports of poor clinical response to TKIs (defined as progression-free survival less than 3 months on 1st line TKI or overall survival less than 2 years from exposure to 1st line TKI). 2nd generation and 3rd generation ALK TKI clinical trial data were also included. Results: A total of 4360 studies were screened and 136 studies were included. Numerous studies implicated the negative prognostic role of variant 3 likely mediated through the acquisition of on-target resistance mutations compared to other variants. TP53 mutations were also associated with a worse prognosis and implicated with greater chromosomal instability and mutational burden. Furthermore, reports of both variant 3 and TP53 mutations together were associated with even worse survival suggesting both molecular mechanisms combined can confer primary resistance phenotype. Other mediators of primary resistance included aberrations in cell cycle regulators such as CDKN2A/B loss, mutations in cell signalling pathways such as the PI3K/ AKT/mTOR pathway, deficiencies in DNA repair mechanisms, and uncommon fusion partners. Consistent with these prior studies, comprehensive genomic analysis from clinical trial data of 2nd generation and 3rd generation TKIs was unable to identify a singular genomic signature that underlies this lethal phenotype. However, a general trend from the literature suggested that the combination of multiple aberrations is likely necessary to confer a primary resistance phenotype, though the relative contribution of each somatic mutation likely will vary. Conclusions: This scoping review highlights that in NSCLC, the lethal ALK phenotype is likely composed of a heterogeneous population of various combinations of poor prognostic factors including variant 3, mutations in cell cycle regulators and other aberrations in cell signalling pathways. There remains an unmet need for a genomic assay to integrate all these various molecular markers to predict the lethal ALK phenotype.

A phase I/II open label, multicenter study to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of HB0028 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2528 Background: HB0028 is a bifunctional fusion protein consisting of an anti-PD-L1 IgG1 single domain antibody and TGF-β RII receptor extracellular domain (TGFβRII-ECD). This is the first dose escalation and expansion phase I/II study to evaluate the safety and preliminary anti-tumor activity of HB0028 in advanced solid tumors. Methods: In the phase I portion of the study, the patients (pts) with advanced solid tumor were enrolled, and an accelerated titration followed by a standard 3+3 design was applied to dose escalation. The objectives were toxicity evaluation, maximum tolerable dose (MTD), and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Eligible pts with advanced solid cancers of any histologic subtype, and ECOG performance status ≤ 1 were treated with HB0028 (0.3mg, 1mg, 3mg, 10mg, 20mg, Q3W), until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Radiologic tumor assessments (by RECIST v1.1) were performed every 6 weeks while on treatment. Results: 16 pts [12 females and 4 males; ECOG 0/1, 9/7; median age 52 years (range 36 – 60)] were enrolled in phase I (0.3 mg/kg [n = 1], 1 mg/kg [n = 3], 3 mg/kg [n = 3], 10 mg/kg [n = 3], 20 mg/kg [n = 6]). Median number of prior lines of systemic therapy was 2 (range 1-4). 8(50%) pts received and progressed upon prior anti-PD-1/L1 therapy. All pts had measurable metastatic disease. No DLT and Death occurred. MTD was not reached. As of DEC 25,2023, among 16 patients' safety data are evaluable for toxicity. Any grade treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 15 subjects (93.8%), with 2 subjects (12.5%) reported with ≥ Grade 3 (G3 Anemia and G3 γ-glutamyltransferase). The most common TRAEs (all grades) were AST increased (n = 4, 25%), anemia (n = 7, 43.8%) and infusion-related response (n = 5, 31.3%). Two SAEs (G2 AST increased and G3 Neoplastic fevers) were reported, only AST increased was considered as possibly related to study drug, but recovered shortly. The efficacy data cutoff date of DEC 25,2023, 16 patients are evaluable for radiologic response. 1 subject with cervical cancer in HB0028 20 mg/kg group had a partial response (PR), 3 subjects (liver cancer, lung cancer, left submandibular gland cancer) had stable disease (SD) and 12 subjects had progressive disease (PD). The ORR per RECIST 1.1 by investigator was 6.25% (1/16; 95% CI, 0%-30.2%), and the DCR was 25% (4/16; 95% CI, 7.3%-52.4%). Durable clinical benefit (SD for > 32 weeks) was seen in 1 subject with malignant tumor in the left submandibular gland. To date, 2 responders are still on treatment. Conclusions: HB0028 was generally well tolerated, and therapy provided modest antitumor activity in patients with heavily pretreated advanced solid tumors. Based on these data, a phase II prospective clinical trial is being planned in specific cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT06223308 .

OBX-115, an interleukin 2 (IL2)-sparing engineered tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) cell therapy, in patients (pts) with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-resistant unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

9515 Background: Investigational unengineered TIL cell therapy has shown promising activity in ICI-resistant metastatic melanoma but requires systemic high-dose IL2, which has well-described high-grade toxicity frequently requiring specialized management and limiting pt eligibility. OBX-115 autologous engineered TIL cell therapy does not require co-administration of IL2 due to its regulatable expression of membrane-bound IL15 (mbIL15) using the FDA-approved small-molecule drug acetazolamide (ACZ) to provide cytokine support for TIL expansion and persistence. Methods: This Phase 1 study (NCT05470283) assesses the OBX-115 regimen in pts with ICI-resistant unresectable/metastatic melanoma. OBX-115 is manufactured from the pt’s tumor tissue (surgical excision or core needle biopsy [CNB]). After lymphodepletion (cyclophosphamide, fludarabine), pts receive OBX-115 followed by ACZ once daily for up to 7 days; ACZ redosing (up to 7 days) is permitted at Wk 6 for non-responders. No systemic IL2 is administered. Peripheral blood and tumor tissue is collected for longitudinal immune profiling. Results: As of 02 Jan 2024, 9 pts (median age, 50 y) with ICI-resistant metastatic melanoma were infused with OBX-115 (median study follow up, 17 wks; range, 2–58 wks). Median lines of prior therapy was 3 (range, 1–6). OBX-115 was successfully manufactured for all pts, including from CNB tumor tissue (n = 5). The infusion product had a high proportion of CD8+ cells (≥96%) and stem-like cells (CD8+CD39-CD69-; median 76%) with very low PD-1 expression in the CD8+ population ( < 1%). Post-infusion safety included no DLTs, 3 Gr 3 nonhematologic TEAEs in 2 pts (abdominal pain, ALT elevation, syncope), and no Gr 4 nonhematologic TEAEs. ACZ was redosed and well-tolerated in 4 of 5 eligible pts. Among patients with minimum 12-wk follow-up (n = 6), ORR per RECIST v1.1 was 50% (2 CR, 1 PR, 3 SD); all responses occurred between Wk 6–18 and were ongoing, with longest response sustained > 12 mo. One pt developed new metastatic disease (liver) and progressed at Wk 24, despite continued target lesion reduction; no pt developed brain metastasis. Post-infusion ctDNA was not detectable in any of the responders at Day 14 or 42. Though OBX-115 had minimal NK cells ( < 1%), post-infusion peripheral blood and tumor biopsies showed NK cell expansion, consistent with trans-presentation of mbIL15 to circulating NK cells. Updated efficacy data on all infused pts will be presented. Conclusions: OBX-115regulatableengineeredTIL cell therapy was well-tolerated and produced consistently deepening and durable responses, indicating that OBX-115 may mediate CRs and durable clinical benefit in ICI-resistant metastatic melanoma without high-dose IL2. OBX-115 investigation continues in this and an ongoing Phase 1/2 multicenter study (NCT06060613). Clinical trial information: NCT05470283 .

A phase I/II, open-label, multicenter study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of HB0036 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

e14504 Background: HB0036 is a bispecific IgG1 antibody targeting both human programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and the T cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT). Here we report the initial results from the first-in human study ofHB0036 in patients with advanced malignancies. Methods: This is a first-in-human, phase I/II, multicenter, dose escalation and dose expansion study of HB0036 administered intravenously to adult pts with resistant/ refractory advanced or metastatic solid tumors who had failed standard therapies. Monotherapy of HB0036 will be conducted in 72 enrolled subjects. In the dose escalation phase (phase I), an accelerated titration followed by a 3+3 design was used to dose escalation by assessing the safety and tolerability of HB0036 monotherapy (dose range 0.04 mg/kg to 30 mg/kg), and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). HB0036 was administered Q3w on a 21-day treatment cycle and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed in first treatment cycle. Tumor assessments per RECIST v1.1 were performed once every 6 weeks (2 cycles). HB0036 PK and PD analyses were performed. Results: At cutoff date of Jan 2, 2024, 19 pts (11 females and 8 males; ECOG 0/1, 3/16) with advanced refractory solid tumors have been enrolled in phase I (0.04 mg/kg [n = 1], 0.12 mg/kg [n = 1], 0.36 mg/kg [n = 1], 1 mg/kg [n = 3], 3 mg/kg [n = 3], 6 mg/kg [n = 3], 10 mg/kg [n = 4], 20 mg/kg [n = 3]). The median age was 59 (range 29-80) years. The pts were heavily pretreated with a median of 2 (range 1-4) prior lines of therapy. No DLT was observed. 13 (68.4%) pts experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), with 1 pt (5.3%) experienced grade ≥3 TRAEs. No grade 5 TRAE occurred. The incidence or severity of AE was not associated with the dose. The most common TRAEs (≥10%) were blood bilirubin increased, anemia, infusion-related reaction, AST elevated, ALT elevated, bilirubin conjugated increased, fever, hypertriglyceridemia, hypoalbuminemia, hypothyroidism and pyrexia. No SAEs related to HB0036 have been reported. As of DEC 25,2023, in 13 pts who had undergone at least 1 post-baseline tumor assessment, the investigator-assessed best response included 9 SDs and 4 PDs. The DCR was 69% (9/14, 95% CI, 38.6%-90.9%). Durable clinical benefit (SD for > 36 weeks) was seen in 1 subject (3 mg/kg) with lung sarcomatoid carcinoma. HB0036 has presented safe and well-tolerated profile up to doses of 20 mg/kg. To date, 5 responders are still on treatment. The dose escalation is still in progress. Conclusions: HB0036 showed an acceptable safety profile and promising anti-tumor activity in advanced solid tumors, which supports further studies to explore the safety and efficacy of HB0036 as a monotherapy and combination with other anti-tumor agents. Based on these data, phase II monotherapy and combination studies are in preparation. Clinical trial information: NCT05417321 .

Effect of body mass index and cholesterol-rich apolipoprotein-B-containing lipoproteins on clinical outcome in NSCLC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors-based therapy: A retrospective analysis.

Obesity and hypercholesterolemia are linked to unfavor clinical outcomes. Recent studies declared the paradox that high body mass index (BMI) and serum cholesterol were independently connected to better clinical outcome of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) monotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of the study is to investigate the prognosis of BMI and serum cholesterol in ICIs-based therapy. This is a retrospective study of 95 NSCLC patients treated with ICIs-based therapy at the Department of Oncology and Lung Cancer Center of China-Japan Friendship Hospital. Treatment efficacy was assessed using durable clinical benefit (DCB) versus nondurable benefit (NDB), best response (active vs. nonactive), and progression-free survival (PFS). The prognostic value of BMI, LDL-C, and RC was determined by multivariate regression analyses, while controlling for confounding factors including age, gender, diabetes status, smoking history, and statin usage. BMI was considered a confounding factor in the analysis when examining the impact of lipoproteins. In our study, we found that in the whole group, BMI ≥25 kg/m2 was linked to a higher risk of poor therapeutic response (OR = 5.92, 95% CI 1.99-19.51, p.val = 0.002) and shorter progression-free survival (HR = 3.00, 95% CI 1.59-5.68, p.val = 0.001). In addition, low levels of RC were associated with better therapeutic response (OR = 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.64, p.val = 0.019), while low levels of serum LDL-C were found to predict longer PFS (HR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.82, p.val = 0.012). These associations were consistent in advanced NSCLC patients receiving ICIs and chemotherapy. Our study suggest that BMI ≥25 kg/m2 and elevated levels of apoB-containing lipoproteins, including LDL-C and RC, could potentially serve as useful prognostic markers for predicting poor treatment outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients treated with the combination of chemotherapy and ICIs.

Nivolumab plus relatlimab in patients with previously treated microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: the phase II CheckMate 142 study

BackgroundProgrammed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors, including nivolumab, have demonstrated long-term survival benefit in previously treated patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). PD-1 and lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3)...

Resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer with deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability: misdiagnosis, pseudoprogression and/or tumor heterogeneity?

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) with deficiency of the deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) pathway/microsatellite instability (MSI) is characterized by a high mutation load and infiltration of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. In agreement with these findings, clinical trials have demonstrated a significant activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in dMMR/MSI metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients and, more recently, in CRC patients with early disease undergoing neoadjuvant therapy. However, despite high response rates and durable clinical benefits, a fraction of mCRC patients, up to 30%, showed progressive disease when treated with single agent anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibody. This article discusses the three main causes that have been associated with early progression of dMMR/MSI mCRC patients while on treatment with ICIs, i.e., misdiagnosis, pseudoprogression and tumor heterogeneity. While pseudoprogression probably does not play a relevant role, data from clinical studies demonstrate that some dMMR/MSI CRC cases with rapid progression on ICIs may be misdiagnosed, underlining the importance of correct diagnostics. More importantly, evidence suggests that dMMR/MSI mCRC is a heterogeneous group of tumors with different sensitivity to ICIs. Therefore, we propose novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies to improve the outcome of dMMR/MSI CRC patients.

Discovery of the Clinical Candidate Sonrotoclax (BGB-11417), a Highly Potent and Selective Inhibitor for Both WT and G101V Mutant Bcl-2.

The approval of venetoclax, a B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) selective inhibitor, for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia demonstrated that the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2 is a druggable target for B-cell malignancies. However, venetoclax's limited potency cannot produce a strong, durable clinical benefit in other Bcl-2-mediated malignancies (e.g., diffuse large B-cell lymphomas) and multiple recurrent Bcl-2 mutations (e.g., G101V) have been reported to mediate resistance to venetoclax after long-term treatment. Herein, we described novel Bcl-2 inhibitors with increased potency for both wild-type (WT) and mutant Bcl-2. Comprehensive structure optimization led to the clinical candidate BGB-11417 (compound 12e, sonrotoclax), which exhibits strong in vitro and in vivo inhibitory activity against both WT Bcl-2 and the G101V mutant, as well as excellent selectivity over Bcl-xL without obvious cytochrome P450 inhibition. Currently, BGB-11417 is undergoing phase II/III clinical assessments as monotherapy and combination treatment.

Abstract PO3-06-10: Real World Outcomes with Sacituzumab Govitecan in Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patients: A Multi-Institution Study

Abstract Background Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is approved for treatment of metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC) in the second line and beyond. Little is known about the real-world outcomes of SG. We aim to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and toxicity outcomes of SG in heterogenous heavily pretreated mTNBC patients (pts) to investigate the consistency of the outcomes in comparison to the clinical trial population. Methods A multi-center retrospective study of pts with mTNBC treated with SG in the US from January 2021 until May 2023 was conducted. Demographics and clinicopathological variables including site of metastases, prior lines of therapy, relative dose intensity (RDI), adverse events (AEs), HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) score at time of metastasis, clinical response, clinical benefit rate (CBR) defined as (complete response, partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) > 6 months) and last follow-up were collected. For continuous variables, Mann-U Whitney and Kruskal Wallis tests were used to compare mean, median, standard deviation, and range. For categorical variables, Fisher's exact tests and Pearson Chi-square tests were used. Univariate and multivariate cox regression models examined RDI and survival outcomes. SAS v9.4 was used to perform statistical analysis at a significance level of 0.05. Results A total of 111 pts were analyzed. The median age was 58 years (range 29-84). The majority of pts were heavily pretreated: 59.1% received >3 prior lines of treatment (Tx) in the metastatic setting, 54.1% received prior immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), 8.1% received prior olaparib. 55% of pts had significant disease burden defined by >=3 organs involved by metastatic disease, with 22.5% having brain metastasis at the time of initiation of SG. Of note, 51% had primary refractory disease defined as relapse within 12 months of completion of adjuvant chemotherapy. 98.1% experienced any grade AEs, with the most common being anemia 63.1%. Grade 3 AEs occurred in 51.4% pts with neutropenia being the highest 32.4% followed by anemia 14.4%, diarrhea 7.2% and fatigue 7.2%. Tx interruptions and dose reductions due to AEs occurred in 52.3% of patients and Tx discontinuation rate due to AEs was 11.8%. Elderly pts (defined as >65 years) did not have higher rates of dose reductions due to AEs compared to young pts (< = 65 years) (37.8% vs 59.7 %), p=0.043). The median RDI is 92% (interquartile range (IQR) 33%-100%). The median RDI in elderly pts was 94% (IQR 50%-100%). Among pts in which response was assessed, objective response rate (ORR) was 26.6% (25 pts had PR), and 38.3% had SD. Interestingly, the rate of alopecia was higher in pts who had PR as the best response (28%), compared to 5.6% in pts who had SD, and 3% in progressive disease (PD) p=0.004. The median prior line of therapy in pts who had PR and SD as best response was 2 (IQR 1, 5) (IQR1, 12), respectively, compared to a median of 3 (IQR 1, 7) in pts with PD, p< 0.001. The CBR was 49% (46/94). The median duration of clinical benefit was 7 months IQR (2, 16) with median overall survival of 13 months IQR (2.5, 39) compared to 5.7 months IQR (0.03, 27) in pts without clinical benefit (p< 0.001). 56.9% (62/109) of pts had HER2 low disease and the clinical benefit rate in this subgroup was 14.3% (23/62). Conclusion: In a heavily pretreated cohort, SG retains clinical activity and tolerability in mTNBC. This is reassuring given pts on clinical trials tend to be healthier compared to real-world clinical practice. Citation Format: Sabah Alaklabi, Arya Mariam Roy, Paola Zagami, Nicole Held, Saba Shaikh, Lubna Chaudhary, Yara Abdou, Shipra Gandhi. Real World Outcomes with Sacituzumab Govitecan in Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patients: A Multi-Institution Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-06-10.

Abstract PO1-15-06: Serum thymidine kinase activity as a “real-time” clinical biomarker of tumor response to CDK4/6 inhibition in hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer

Abstract Background: CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) plus endocrine therapy (ET) are standard first-line (1L) treatment for hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Despite general improvements in long-term outcome, not all patients benefit equally from these drugs. The average duration of 1L CDK4/6i therapy is ~2 years. However, 10-15% of patients will progress within 6 months of therapy initiation, while others will derive durable clinical benefit of years. Differences in treatment efficacy cannot be easily explained by clinical-pathological features. No predictive biomarkers are currently available to determine tumor sensitivity to CDK4/6i. There is an unmet need for a complementary diagnostic to identify patients that will or will not respond to these treatments in order to better inform therapy management. Thymidine kinase (TK) is an E2F-regulated enzyme that plays a key role in DNA replication during cell division. The expression and activity of TK is strongly linked to the cell cycle. TK is first expressed in late G1, peaks during S-phase, and then is degraded during mitosis. Because of the restricted expression of TK (only during S phase of the cell cycle) combined with the mechanism of action of CDK4/6i, the measurement of TK activity (TKa) may serve as an ideal pharmacodynamic biomarker to assess a tumor’s response to CDK4/6i-based therapy. DiviTum® TKa is an FDA cleared assay that can quantitate TKa from human serum (sTKa) and is intended to be used as a disease progression monitoring tool for patients with HR+, HER2- MBC. TK IMPACT is a prospective, single arm trial designed to assess the impact of incorporation of DiviTum® TKa on the physician’s decision regarding subsequent timing of routine disease monitoring modalities in patients with advanced HR+, HER2- MBC receiving 1L ET plus CDK 4/6i (NCT04968964). As a part of this ongoing study, DiviTum® TKa values are serially assessed relative to imaging findings and other circulating tumor biomarkers, such as CA15-3 and ctDNA. The primary endpoint is any physician-reported intended change in imaging testing interval post TKa by study cohort, within the first 48-week period of study participation, assessments for which are ongoing. Here we report real-world data and examples of the clinical utility of sTKa as a companion diagnostic from patients treated at Washington University Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO. Methods: Patients with HR+, HER2- MBC receiving 1L ET + any FDA-approved CDK 4/6i (palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib) had blood serum samples collected at baseline, weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, every 4 weeks up to week 24, and then every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression. Samples were analyzed for TKa levels in real-time using the DiviTum® TKa assay. Optional repeat TKa within 2-4 wks (+/- 3 days) is permitted in case of rising TKa. Other standard monitoring assessments were carried out according to institutional guidelines and/or treating clinician discretion. Results: Pre-treatment and early on-therapy TKa levels predicted response to CDK4/6i therapy more accurately than a patient’s clinical characteristics. Rising TKa levels also identified patients with clinically occult disease progression ahead of imaging, and in some cases where radiographic interpretation and serum tumor markers such as CA15-3 were ambiguous. Measurement of TKa levels following CDK4/6i dose reduction was able to confirm continued optimal therapy response at the lower dose. A rise in TKa levels aligned with the re-emergence of ESR1 mutation as identified by ctDNA in one patient and may herald molecular progression. Conclusion: sTKa was able to predict tumor sensitivity and resistance (both intrinsic and acquired) to CDK4/6i + ET therapy in patients with HR+, HER2- MBC. We believe these findings help support the role of sTKa as a non-invasive pharmacodynamic biomarker that can assess in real-time a tumor’s response to CDK4/6i based therapy. Citation Format: Nusayba Bagegni, Amy Williams, Isabella Grigsby, Mattias Bergqvist, Katherine Clifton, Cynthia Ma. Serum thymidine kinase activity as a “real-time” clinical biomarker of tumor response to CDK4/6 inhibition in hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-15-06.

Abstract PO3-16-11: Attrition rates from first- to third-line therapy in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer in Europe

Abstract Background: Patients (pts) with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) who experience progression with adjuvant first-line (1L) therapy (trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and a taxane) typically require treatment escalation. Trastuzumab emtansine was standard of care in the second-line (2L) setting until the recent approval (Jul 2022 in the EU) of trastuzumab deruxtecan in ≥2L settings. Receiving optimal targeted therapy in the earliest indicated setting is important to maximize the likelihood of durable clinical benefit. As new therapies become available, understanding subsequent lines of therapy may help guide treatment decision making and inform the optimal treatment paradigm for pts with HER2+ mBC. This study characterizes contemporary attrition rates in pts with HER2+ mBC receiving routine care in Europe. Methods: In this ongoing, multicenter, observational study, electronic medical record (EMR) data were collected from female pts ≥18 years old diagnosed with HER2+ mBC between Jan 1, 2017, and Jun 30, 2021, in the UK, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain. Structured EMR data and manually abstracted unstructured data from oncology centers were curated. Pts were followed for ≥12 months from mBC diagnosis. Data analysis is ongoing. The primary endpoint was attrition rate (percentage of pts who completed a line of therapy [LOT] but did not receive the subsequent LOT after 1L and 2L therapy). Documented reasons for attrition included death or move to end-of-life palliative care, end of study period, loss to follow up, or discontinuation due to toxicity. Reasons were categorized as ‘other’ if they did not meet these criteria, or if death or move to end-of-life palliative care occurred >30 days after treatment discontinuation. This abstract reports interim data from the UK, France, and Germany. Results: This interim analysis included data from 335 pts across five sites in three countries: two sites in the UK, one in France, and two in Germany (Table). Overall, 307 (91.6%) pts started 1L therapy and 172 (51.3%) pts started 2L therapy; overall attrition rates were 28.9% (70/242; 95% CI 23.3, 35.1) after 1L therapy and 33.1% (42/127; 95% CI 25.0, 42.0) after 2L therapy. The proportion of pts starting 1L and 2L therapy and attrition rates for each country are shown in the Table. Overall reasons for attrition were death (1L, n=28 [40.0%]; 2L, n=12 [28.6%]), move to end-of-life palliative care (1L, n=14 [20.0%]; 2L, n=5 [11.9%]), toxicity (1L, n=2 [2.9%]; 2L, n=1 [2.4%]), loss to follow up (1L, n=6 [8.6%]; 2L, n=4 [9.5%]), end of study period (1L, n=1 [1.4%]; 2L, n=4 [9.5%]), and other (1L, n=19 [27.1%]; 2L, n=16 [38.1%]). Further breakdown of results by country and hormone receptor (HR) status is shown in the Table. Conclusions: These data from routine clinical practice in the UK, France, and Germany indicate that a substantial proportion of pts with HER2+ mBC who completed 1L or 2L therapy did not receive a subsequent LOT (2L or 3L, respectively) for reasons other than death or move to end-of-life palliative care. Future analyses will focus on pooled and country-level treatment rates and real-world effectiveness. XX XX Citation Format: Peter Hall, Sue Cheeseman, Paul Cottu, Markus Krebs, Christian Scholz, Mahéva Vallet, Nicolas Niklas, Catherine Hogg, Markus Lucerna, Simon M Collin, Amanda Logue, Gráinne Long. Attrition rates from first- to third-line therapy in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer in Europe [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-16-11.

Decision model for durable clinical benefit from front- or late-line immunotherapy alone or with chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Predictive biomarkers and models of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been extensively studied in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, evidence for many biomarkers remains inconclusive, and the opaqueness of machine learning models hinders practicality. We aimed to provide compelling evidence for biomarkers and develop a transparent decision tree model. We consolidated data from 3,288 ICI-treated patients with NSCLC across real-world multicenter, public cohorts and the Choice-01 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03856411). Over 50 features were examined for predicting durable clinical benefits (DCBs) from ICIs. Noteworthy biomarkers were identified to establish a decision tree model. Additionally, we explored the tumor microenvironment and peripheral CD8+ programmed death-1 (PD-1)+ Tcell receptor (TCR) profiles. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified tumor histology, PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, tumor mutational burden, line, and regimen of ICI treatment as significant factors. Mutation subtypes of EGFR, KRAS, KEAP1, STK11, and disruptive TP53 mutations were associated with DCB. The decision tree (DT10) model, using the ten clinicopathological and genomic markers, showed superior performance in predicting DCB in the training set (area under the curve [AUC]= 0.82) and consistently outperformed other models in test sets. DT10-predicted-DCB patients manifested longer survival, an enriched inflamed tumor immune phenotype (67%), and higher peripheral TCR diversity, whereas the DT10-predicted-NDB (non-durable benefit) group showed an enriched desert immune phenotype (86%) and higher peripheral TCR clonality. The model effectively predicted DCB after front-/subsequent-line ICI treatment, with or without chemotherapy, for squamous and non-squamous lung cancer, offering clinicians valuable insights into efficacy prediction using cost-effective variables. This study was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China.

The immune response-related genomic alterations in patients with malignant melanoma.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) significantly improve the survival outcomes of patients with advanced melanoma. However, response varies among from patient to patient and predictive biomarkers are urgently needed. We integrated mutational profiles from next-generation sequencing (NGS) data and clinicopathologic characteristics of melanoma patients to investigate whether tumor genomic profiling contribute to clinical benefit of ICIs treatment. The majority of genes identified with high mutation frequency have all been reported as well-known immunotherapy-related genes. Thirty-five patients (43.2%) had at least 1 BRAF/RAS/NF1 mutation. The other 46 (56.8%) melanomas without BRAF/RAS/NF1 mutation were classified as Triple-WT. We identified mutational signature 6 (known as associated with defective DNA mismatch repair) among cases in this cohort. Compared to patients with PD-L1 expression (TPS < 1%), patients with PD-L1 expression (TPS ≥ 1%) had significantly higher median progression-free survival (mPFS), but no significantly higher durable clinical benefit (DCB) rate. In contrast, FAT1, ATM, BRCA2, LRP1B, and PBRM1 mutations only occurred frequently in patients with DCB, irrespective of PD-L1 expression status. Our study explored molecular signatures of melanoma patients who respond to ICIs treatment and identified a series of mutated genes that might serve as predictive biomarker for ICIs responses in melanoma.

Abstract P57: A Transcriptome-Wide Meta-Analysis Reveals Lack Of Cancer-Cell Intrinsic Determinants Of Response To Immune Checkpoint Blockade

Abstract Immune-checkpoint blockade therapy (ICB) has conferred significant and durable clinical benefit to some cancer patients. However, most patients do not respond to ICB, and reliable biomarkers of ICB response are needed to improve patient stratification. Current FDA-approved biomarkers for ICB include PD-L1 expression, microsatellite instability (MSI), and high tumor mutation burden (TMB) of &amp;gt;10mutations/Mb. In addition, gene expression signatures of tumor immune phenotypes have been proposed to predict for ICB response. Despite these efforts, there is a lack of large-scale transcriptome-wide studies to identify and characterize potential biomarkers of ICB response conserved across cancer types in a cell type specific manner. Here, we performed a transcriptome-wide meta-analysis across 1,486 tumors from ICB-treated patients and tumors with expected ICB outcomes based on microsatellite status. Using a robust transcriptome deconvolution approach, we inferred cancer and stroma-specific gene expression differences and identified cell-type specific features of ICB response across cancer types. We identified 59 stroma-specific differentially expressed genes associated with ICB-response, which were strongly enriched in immune-related pathways and processes. Stromal expression of CXCL9, CXCL13, IFNG, and CD274 were among the top positive determinants of ICB response, consistent with current knowledge. Interestingly, we also identified a group of potential immune-suppressive genes, including FCER1A, associated with poor response to ICB. Surprisingly, the unbiased transcriptome-wide analysis failed to identify cancer-cell intrinsic features of ICB response conserved across tumor types. Overall, our results suggest that cancer cells lack tissue-agnostic molecular determinants of ICB response, which has implications for the development of improved ICB diagnostics and treatments. Citation Format: Yu Amanda Guo, Tanmay Kulshrestha, Mei Mei Chang, Irfahan Kassam, Egor Revkov, Simone Rizzetto, Aaron C. Tan, Daniel S.W. Tan, Iain Beehuat Tan, Anders Jacobsen Skanderup. A Transcriptome-Wide Meta-Analysis Reveals Lack Of Cancer-Cell Intrinsic Determinants Of Response To Immune Checkpoint Blockade [abstract]. In: Proceedings of Frontiers in Cancer Science; 2023 Nov 6-8; Singapore. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(8_Suppl):Abstract nr P57.

Abstract CT082: Phase I study of autologous CD8+ and CD4+ transgenic T cells expressing high-affinity KRAS G12V mutation-specific T cell receptors (FH-A11KRASG12V-TCR) in patients with metastatic pancreatic, colorectal and non-small cell lung cancers with KRAS G12V mutations

Abstract Background: KRAS, the most common driver oncogene in human malignancies, has predictable mutations. 85% of RAS mutations occur at the Glycine (G) 12 position with G12V being amongst the most common. Cancers driven by mutant KRAS include pancreatic (PDAC), colorectal (CRC), and non-small cell lung (NSCLC) malignancies. The prognosis of patients with activating KRAS mutations remains poor. Preliminary anti-tumor activity has been observed in the clinic with T cell receptor (TCR) T cell therapies targeting KRAS mutations, but durable clinical benefit is lacking. Rationale: FH-A11KRASG12V-TCR is an autologous CD8+ and CD4+ transgenic T cell product expressing (1) an HLA-A11-restricted, high affinity KRASG12V mutation-specific T cell receptor (TCR) and (2) the wildtype CD8α/β coreceptor enabling CD4+ T cell recognition of KRAS G12V presented on an MHC class I allele mediating helper T cell activity and cytotoxicity. The TCR sequence is derived from the peripheral blood of a healthy HLA-A11+ adult based on a strong pre-clinical dataset. Methods: This is an ongoing, investigator-initiated, Phase 1, first-in-human, single-center, open-label dose escalation study of FH-A11KRASG12V-TCR. The aims are to evaluate the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and preliminary anti-tumor activity of FH-A11KRASG12V-TCR in patients with advanced PDAC, CRC, and NSCLC who express the HLA-A11-restricted KRAS G12V mutation. Dose modification will be guided by the Bayesian Optimal Interval design (BOIN). Patients will initially be treated in cohorts of 3 at each dose level (DL). BOIN will be used to identify the recommended dose for subsequent patients. The planned target doses are 5 x 109 transgenic TCR T cells in DL 1 with dose escalation up to 15 x 109 transgenic TCR T cells in DL 3. This study enrolls patients who are 18 years or older, HLA-A*11:01-positive, with KRAS G12V mutated metastatic PDAC, CRC, or NSCLC. Patients must have progressed on or be intolerant of at least two lines of prior therapies including any targeted therapies indicated for their current malignancy. Patients undergo leukapheresis prior to treatment and receive lymphodepleting chemotherapy with either cyclophosphamide intravenously (IV) and fludarabine IV on days -6, -5, -4, and -3 or bendamustine IV on days -4 and -3. FHA11KRASG12V-TCR is administered IV on day 0. The dose-limiting toxicity observation period is 28 days. Patients may receive an additional FHA11KRASG12V-TCR IV infusion at the same or lower dose as soon as 28 days or up to 1 year after the first infusion. One patient enrolled to date and the study is actively recruiting (NCT06043713). Citation Format: Elena Gabriela Chiorean, Andrew Coveler, Rachael Safyan, Stacey Cohen, Sylvia Lee, Cecilia Yeung, Mary Redman, Thomas Schmitt, Aude Chapuis, Philip D. Greenberg. Phase I study of autologous CD8+ and CD4+ transgenic T cells expressing high-affinity KRAS G12V mutation-specific T cell receptors (FH-A11KRASG12V-TCR) in patients with metastatic pancreatic, colorectal and non-small cell lung cancers with KRAS G12V mutations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT082.

Abstract 6557: Longitudinal cell-free tumor load dynamics represent an early endpoint for immunotherapy response in non-small cell lung cancer

Abstract Background: Liquid biopsies can inform treatment strategies by rapidly and accurately assessing tumor burden; with emerging data supporting the clinical utility of circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) as an early endpoint of immunotherapy response. Methods: We performed targeted error-correction sequencing of ctDNA (n=330) and matched white blood cell (WBC) DNA (n=109) from 109 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy (n=79) or immunotherapy-containing combination regimens (n=30). Variant cellular origin was determined using a tumor-independent WBC DNA-informed approach. The maximum mutant allele fraction (maxMAF) of tumor-derived mutations was tracked longitudinally to assess changes in total cell-free tumor load (cfTL). Results: Among 3,418 variants with resolved cellular origin, 2,452 (72%) were tumor-derived, 125 (4%) were germline, while 841 (25%) were related to clonal haematopoiesis (CH). Cell-free DNA fragments harbouring tumor-derived mutations were significantly shorter than fragments containing wild-type alleles; however, fragment length alone was insufficient to distinguish CH variants from wild-type. Overall, 97 (89%) patients with &amp;gt;1 detectable tumor mutation were considered for cfTL tracking and molecular response assessment. Clearance of cfTL indicated molecular response (mR) whereas persistence indicated molecular progression (mPD). Time-course analyses, aiming to establish the optimal timing for molecular response assessment, revealed that early cfTL clearance within 3-9 weeks was significantly linked to improved survival outcomes. Notably, blood tumor mutation burden above or below 16 mutations/megabase showed no association with overall survival (OS; log rank p=0.98) or progression-free survival (PFS; log rank p=0.95). Of 81 patients evaluated for early on-therapy molecular responses, 28 (35%) were classified as having an mR, while 53 (65%) patients were classified in the mPD category. The median time to mR was 5 weeks in patients receiving immune checkpoint monotherapy and 6 weeks in patients receiving chemo-immunotherapy combination regimens. Patients in the mR group achieved longer OS (log rank p=0.001) and PFS (log rank p=0.0003) compared to those with mPD. Assessment of landmark PFS at 6 months demonstrated a significant association between ctDNA molecular response and durable clinical benefit (DCB) in patients receiving immune checkpoint monotherapy (p &amp;lt; 0.001, Fisher’s exact test), and a numerical association with DCB in patients on chemo-immunotherapy (p=0.07, Fisher’s exact test). Conclusions: Longitudinal tracking of ctDNA provides a real-time and accurate approach for monitoring immunotherapy response. These findings underscore the clinical utility of employing ctDNA molecular response to inform clinical decision-making. Citation Format: Lavanya Sivapalan, Bahar Alipanahi, Archana Balan, Jamie E. Medina, Noushin Niknafs, Erica Peters, Jaime Wehr, Alissa Konicki, Mimi Najjar, Bryan Chesnick, Gavin Pereira, Sarah Rongione, Nisha Rao, Michael Rongione, Brittany Shavatt, Lorenzo Rinaldi, Benjamin Levy, Victor E. Velculescu, Patrick M. Forde, Valsamo Anagnostou. Longitudinal cell-free tumor load dynamics represent an early endpoint for immunotherapy response in non-small cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6557.

Abstract 6397: Immune profiling for improving responsiveness to ipilimumab plus nivolumab checkpoint blockade treatment in patients with metastatic melanoma

Abstract Background:aCTLA-4 and aPD-1 combination therapy has significantly improved clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic melanoma, with 50%-60% of patients responding to treatment, but predictors of response and treatment induced immunological effects are poorly characterized. Identifying circulating immune populations as biomarkers could reveal crucial insights into the mechanisms driving treatment success. Methods:Using unbiased single-cell profiling (with cytometry by Time-Of-Flight, CyTOF), we characterized the systemic immune compartments of over 250 peripheral blood mononuclear samples from 89 patients with advanced melanoma before and during combination therapy. We evaluated the association between circulating immune populations and clinical outcome using nonparametric Mann-Whitney tests, and investigated the prognostic values of these features using survival analysis. Additionally, we assessed treatment-induced immunological effects, providing insights into the dynamic changes within the immune system during therapy. Results:We characterized circulating T cells, NK cells, B cells, and monocytes from peripheral blood. Following combination therapy, there was a shift from naïve and central memory T cells to effector populations in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells compartments. There was also a broad activation observed in both adaptive and innate populations, characterized by an elevation of multiple co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory molecules. Lower CD8+ NK cell populations prior to combination therapy were predictive of durable clinical benefit (DCB). Pre-treatment measurements of Tregs were not predictive of outcome, but higher Tregs one month after starting therapy, as well as increases of Tregs from pre to post treatment, predicted better progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Starting from early on treatment, higher “exhausted-like” CD8+ T cells, characterized by positive expression of at least two co-inhibitory markers, is associated with resistance. Conclusions:aCTLA-4 and aPD-1 combination therapy led to a longitudinal shift from naïve and central memory to effector phenotypes in T cells, along with a broad activation in both adaptive and innate populations. Within innate immune compartment, favorable clinical outcome was associated with lower CD8+ NK cells, capable of regulating proliferation and activation of CD4+ T cells. Interestingly, one month after the start of the therapy, the increase in Tregs and a decrease in 'exhausted-like' CD8+ T populations are associated with a better response. Collectively, these analyses suggest potential treatment-specific correlates of efficacy and may enable biomarker-selected patient populations in future. Citation Format: Joanna Baginska, Jiajia Chen, Giuseppe Tarantino, Anita Giobbie-Hurder, Jason L. Weirather, Mariano Severgnini, Michael Manos, Kelly Burke, Janice D. Russell, Martha Brainard, Elizabeth Gabriel, Ryan Brennick, Matthew Nazzaro, Emma Hathaway, Marta Holovatska, Claire Manuszak, Srinika Ranashinge, David Liu, F. Stephen Hodi. Immune profiling for improving responsiveness to ipilimumab plus nivolumab checkpoint blockade treatment in patients with metastatic melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6397.