You have accessJournal of UrologyStone Disease: Surgical Therapy I (PD01)1 Apr 2020PD01-10 SURGICAL SITE INFLUENCES COST EFFECTIVENESS OF URETEROSCOPY IN A LARGE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM Sari Khaleel*, Andrew Portis, James Anderson, and Michael Borofsky Sari Khaleel*Sari Khaleel* More articles by this author , Andrew PortisAndrew Portis More articles by this author , James AndersonJames Anderson More articles by this author , and Michael BorofskyMichael Borofsky More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000821.010AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Ureteroscopy(URS) has become the most common surgical management for urolithiasis. Disposable instruments (DI’s) used during URS may vary, which in turn affects overall procedure cost. To date, the influence of surgeon and hospital site on the total DI cost (DIC) of URS has not been formally studied. We sought to assess whether surgeon and site were independently associated with DIC in a large multi-hospital system. METHODS: Our institutional electronic medical record (Epic Systems, Madison, WI) was retrospectively searched for procedures billed for CPT codes 52356/52353 (URS with/without stent placement), performed from 8/2018 – 08/2019. We developed a computer program in Perl programming language to analyze raw EMR data. Our outcomes of interest were mean case length, number of DI’s, and hospital-incurred total DIC. DI’s were classified as laser fiber, wires, ureteral stent, stone basket, ureteral access sheath, ureteral dilator, dual lumen catheter, or other “miscellaneous” items with DIC ≥$50. We selected for surgeons who performed at least 20 procedures at more than one site. Sites were deemed high- or low-volume (HV, LV) sites if their annual volume was above or below median site volume in the system.Multivariate regression was used identify predictive factors, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess variation across different sites and surgeons. RESULTS: We identified 368 cases performed by 8 surgeons across 6 sites (3 HV sites, 3 LV sites). Median site volume was 100 cases. Most cases (304, 75.2%) were performed at HV sites. Mean case DIC, case length, and number DI’s used varied significantly across sites (ANOVA p = 0.000 for all three variables). Overall mean DIC was $975 ($388.8 – $1863), mean number of DI’s used was 5.48 (3-9), and mean total case length was 78.7 minutes (28 – 187.8). On multivariate regression, only surgical site was a significant predictor of DIC (p = 0.000), when adjusting for surgeon and high/low volume status (Figure 1). Site and surgeon were both significant predictors of number of DI’s used (p=0.000), and case length (p = <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Procedural costs related to URS may vary between hospitals even when performed by the same surgeon. Further investigation into hospital practices with low DIC’s is warranted in an effort to potentially identify opportunities for cost savings. Source of Funding: None © 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 203Issue Supplement 4April 2020Page: e63-e64 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Sari Khaleel* More articles by this author Andrew Portis More articles by this author James Anderson More articles by this author Michael Borofsky More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...