Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry T-scores Research Articles

Evaluation of the modified MRI vertebral bone quality score for bone quality in lumbar degenerative disorders.

The traditional VBQ scoring method may lead to overestimation due to the concentration of intravertebral fat and vascular structures in the posterior half of vertebral bodies, potentially resulting in false-positive outcomes. This study aims to modify the measurement method of VBQ score (Modified-VBQ) and evaluate its effectiveness in evaluating bone quality of lumbar degenerative diseases. Retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from patients undergoing lumbar surgery for degenerative diseases between September 2022 and September 2023. Preoperative lumbar t1-weighted Magnetic resonance imaging was used for both modified and traditional VBQ scoring. Computed tomography (CT) images and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) data were collected through the picture archiving and communication system. The effectiveness of the modified VBQ score was evaluated, considering P < 0.05 as statistically significant. The study included 212 patients, revealing a significant difference between the modified VBQ and VBQ scores (P < 0.0001). Notably, patients with a history of hyperlipidemia exhibited a significant difference between the two scores (P = 0.0037). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the modified VBQ was 0.86, surpassing the VBQ score (AUC = 0.74). Linear regression analysis demonstrated a moderate to strong correlation between the modified VBQ and DEXA T-score (r = - 0.49, P < 0.0001) and a high correlation with CT Hounsfield units (HU) values (r = - 0.60, P < 0.0001). The modified VBQ score provides a simple, effective, and relatively accurate means of assessing bone quality in lumbar degenerative diseases. Preoperative implementation of the modified VBQ score facilitates rapid screening for patients with abnormal bone quality.

Ultrashort echo time MRI detects significantly lower collagen but higher pore water in the tibial cortex of female patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis.

Ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI can quantify the major proton pool densities in cortical bone, including total (TWPD), bound (BWPD), and pore water (PWPD) proton densities, as well as the macromolecular proton density (MMPD), associated with the collagen content, which is calculated using macromolecular fraction (MMF) from UTE magnetization transfer (UTE-MT) modeling. This study aimed to investigate the differences in water and collagen contents in tibial cortical bone, between female osteopenia (OPe) patients, osteoporosis (OPo) patients, and young participants (Young). Being postmenopausal and above 55years old were the inclusion criteria for OPe and OPo groups. The tibial shaft of fourteen OPe (72.5 ± 6.8years old), thirty-one OPo (72.0 ± 6.4years old), and thirty-one young subjects (28.0 ± 6.1years old) were scanned using a knee coil on a clinical 3T scanner. Basic UTE, inversion recovery UTE, and UTE-MT sequences were performed. Investigated biomarkers were compared between groups using Kruskal-Wallis test. Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated between the total hip dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) T-score and UTE-MRI results. MMF, BWPD, and MMPD were significantly lower in OPo patients than in the young group. Whereas T1, TWPD, and PWPD were significantly higher in OPo patients. The largest OPo/Young average percentage differences were found in MMF (41.9%), PWPD (103.5%), and MMPD (64.0%). PWPD was significantly higher (50.7%), while BWPD was significantly lower (16.4%) in OPe than the Young group on average. MMF was found to be significantly lower (27%) in OPo patients compared with OPe group. T1, MMF, TWPD, PWPD, and MMPD values significantly correlated with the total hip DXA T-scores (provided by the patients and only available for OPe and OPo patients). DXA T-score showed the highest correlations with PWPD (R = 0.55) and MMF (R = 0.56) values. TWPD, PWPD, and MMF estimated using the UTE-MRI sequences were recommended to evaluate individuals with OPe and OPo.

Bone density measured on sagittal reconstructed CT is highly correlated with axial CT but both measurements are only moderately correlated with DEXA T-scores

BackgroundDuring the preoperative evaluation of a patient being considered for spinal surgery, Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) has been traditionally used to diagnose poor bone mineral density (BMD) as a risk factor. As ordering a DEXA can add cost and delay diagnosis, spine surgeons have more recently began to use Hounsfield Units (HU) measured on computed tomography scans (CT) as a measure of BMD. The aim of our study was to evaluate associations between DEXA and HU on lumbar spine CT scans. MethodsForty-two patients (32 female, 10 male, mean age = 67.7 years) with DEXA and lumbar spine CT scans performed within one year of each other were identified. DEXA T-scores were collected from the hip, forearm and L1-L4. HU was determined using the maximum region of interest within the cancellous area in the mid-vertebral body from L1-L4 in the sagittal and axial planes. ResultsUsing the lowest T-score, 8 (19 %) cases were osteoporotic and 25 (60 %) were osteopenic. Statistically significant differences in HU were seen in osteoporotic cases (Axial HU = 59.2, Sagittal HU = 61.1, p = 0.006) compared to osteopenic (Axial HU = 119.8, Sagittal HU = 122.9) and normal cases (Axial HU = 141.2, Sagittal HU = 142.3). There were moderate associations between the spine T-scores and CT HUs (Axial HU:r2 = 0.50, Sagittal HU:r2 = 0.49, p < 0.001), weak associations between the Axial HU (r2 = 0.48, p < 0.000) and Sagittal HU (r2 = 0.48, p < 0.000) with hip T-scores, and no correlations with forearm T-scores. There were strong associations between Axial HU and Sagittal HU (r2 = 0.98, p < 0.001). Clinical relevanceThe results of the current study show a strong association between the sagittal and axial vertebral HU measurements, which supports the clinical use of either measurement technique. The weak correlation between T-scores and HU is consistent with prior studies and warrants future studies to determine which modality will better predict postoperative mechanical failures in patients undergoing spinal surgery. Level of EvidenceIII.

Diagnostic Value of Radiographic Singh Index Compared to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scan in Diagnosing Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review.

Since various medications can control the rate of fractures and subsequent complications of osteoporosis, the early detection of the disease is crucial. This systematic study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Singh index (SI) with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) as a benchmark standard for diagnosing osteoporosis. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) were utilized in the current study. A detailed search was carried out using PubMed and Scopus from inception to 30 May 2022. Examining quality of the studies was performed by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). A total of 22 studies were included. In general, 50% of the studies considered SI a poor screening tool for detecting osteoporosis due to a negligible inter-observer agreement between SI and DEXA or a poor correlation of SI with the bone mineral density (BMD) category or DEXA T-score. A moderate inter-observer agreement was reported for SI in 5 (55.6%) studies. Among the studies assessing the sensitivity and specificity of SI compared to DEXA (n=13), six studies estimated a low sensitivity for SI. While there is supporting evidence indicating the potential usefulness of SI for predicting femoral neck fractures in individuals with suspected osteoporosis, numerous studies challenge its reliability and diagnostic value as a screening tool for identifying femoral neck osteoporosis. Further primary studies are required to verify the effectiveness of the SI index in identifying populations at risk of osteoporosis.

Assessing bone density on MRI: comparison between routine MRI sequences and DEXA scans.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is frequently utilised to aid in the comprehensive assessment of back pain, while dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is the gold standard test for the assessment of bone density. Assessing bone density on MRI could reduce costs and avoid exposing patients to ionising radiation. The aim of this paper is to investigate whether the relative signal intensity of vertebral bodies compared to other structures can detect osteoporosis on MRI. 100 patients that had undergone both a lumbar spine MRI and a DEXA scan were identified. The T1 and T2 signal intensity of L1-L4 vertebral bodies (VB), cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF), and psoas muscle were measured within a 1-cm2 region of interest (ROI), and the signal intensity ratios were calculated. The ratios were stratified as normal, osteopenic, or osteoporotic based on DEXA T-scores. The T1 VB /T1 CSF ratio was significantly higher in the osteoporotic group than the normal and osteopenic groups (p < 0.001). The T1 VB /T1 CSF ratio had excellent discrimination (AUC = 0.841) for the presence of osteoporosis. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the DEXA T-score and the T1VB/T1CSF ratio was -0.474 (p < 0.001). The intra-observer (ICC = 0.910, 95% CI = 0.757-0.966) and inter-observer reliability (ICC = 0.927, 95% CI = 0.824-0.970) were excellent. In our cohort, a T1 VB / T1 CSF ratio of greater than 4 is 66.7% sensitive but 90.0% specific for the presence of osteoporosis. A high T1VB/T1CSF ratio suggests osteoporosis on MRI. Prospective validation is needed to confirm these findings.

Usefulness of volumetric BMD measurement by using low dose CT image acquired on L-spine Bone SPECT/CT

Purpose: CT scan makes up for the weak point of the nuclear medicine image having a low resolution and also were used for attenuation correction on image reconstruction. Recently, many studies try to make use of CT images additionally, one of them is to measure the bone mineral density(BMD) using Quantitative CT(QCT) software. BMD exams are performed to scan lumbar and femur with DXA(Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry) in order to diagnose bone disease such as osteopenia, osteoporosis. The purpose of this study is to identify the usefulness of QCT_BMD analyzed with low dose CT images on L-spine Bone SPECT/CT comparing with DXA_BMD. Materials and Methods: Fifty five women over 50 years old (mean 66.4 ± 9.1) who took the both examinations(L-spine Bone SPECT/CT with SIEMENS Intevo 16 and DXA scan with GE Lunar prodigy advance) within 90 days from April 2017 to July 2022, BMD, T-score and disease classification were analyzed. Three-dimensional BMD was analyzed with low dose CT images acquired on L-spine Bone SPECT/CT scan on Mindways QCT PROTM software and two-dimensional BMD was analyzed on DXA scan. Basically, Lumbar 1-4 were analyzed and the patients who has lesion or spine implants on L-spine were excluded for this study. Pearson's correlation analysis was performed in BMD and T-score, chi-square test was performed in disease classification between QCT and DXA. Results: On 55 patients, the minimum of QCT_BMD was 18.10, maximum was 166.50, average was 82.71 ± 31.5 mg/cm3. And the minimum of DXA-BMD was 0.540, maximum was 1.302, average was 0.902 ± 0.201 g/cm2, respectively. The result shows a strong statistical correlation between QCT_BMD and DXA_BMD(p&lt;0.001, r=0.76). The minimum of QCT_T-score was -5.7, maximum was-0.1, average was -3.2 ± 1.3 and the minimum of DXA_T-score was -5.0, maximum was 1.7, average was -2.0 ± 1.3, respectively. The result shows a statistical correlation between QCT T-score and DXA T-score (p&lt;0.001, r=0.66). On the disease classification, normal was 5, osteopenia was 25, osteoporosis was 25 in QCT and normal was 10, osteopenia was 25, osteoporosis was 20 in DXA. There was under-estimation of bone decrease relatively on DXA than QCT, but there was no significant differences statistically by chi-square test between QCT and DXA. Conclusion: Through this study, we could identify that the QCT measurement with low dose CT images QCT from L-Spine Bone SPECT/CT was reliable because of a strong statistical correlation between QCT_BMD and DXA_BMD. Bone SPECT/CT scan can provide three-dimensional information also BMD measurement with CT images. In the future, rather than various exams such as CT, BMD, Bone scan are performed, it will be possible to provide multipurpose information via only SPECT/CT scan. In addition, it will be very helpful clinically in the sense that we can provide a diagnosis of potential osteoporosis, especially in middleaged patients.

Plain radiographic indices are reliable indicators for quantitative bone mineral density in male and female patients before total hip arthroplasty

Osteoporosis is underdiagnosed in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). Bone mineral density measurement by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard, but indices on plain hip radiographs also seemed to be reliable screening tools in female or Asian ethnicities in previous studies. Given the lack of knowledge about male patients and Caucasian ethnicities, this study was conducted to evaluate plane hip radiographic indices as a screening tool for osteopenia and osteoporosis in Caucasian female and also male patients before undergoing THA. A retrospective analysis of 216 elderly patients with pre-existing DXA before hip arthroplasty was performed and four indices were calculated on plain hip radiographs: Canal-Flare-Index (CFI), Canal-Calcar-Ratio (CCR), Canal-Bone-Ratio (CBR) 7 and 10 cm below the lesser trochanter. They were correlated with femoral neck DXA T-scores by Pearson’s correlation and intraclass correlation coefficient, and a ROC analysis was performed. A total of 216 patients (49.5% male) were included. CBR-7 and -10 were highly correlated (p < 0.001) with femoral neck T-score in males (Pearson’s correlation CBR-7 r = − 0.60, CBR-10 r = − 0.55) and females (r = − 0.74, r = − 0.77). CBR-7 and -10 also showed good diagnostic accuracy for osteoporosis in the ROC analysis in males (CBR-7: AUC = 0.75, threshold = 0.51; CBR-10: 0.63; 0.50) and females (CBR-7: AUC = 0.87, threshold = 0.55; CBR-10: 0.90; 0.54). Indices such as the Canal Bone Ratio (CBR) 7 or 10 cm below the lesser trochanter on plain hip radiographs are a good screening tool for osteopenia and osteoporosis on plain hip radiographs and can be used to initiate further diagnostics like the gold standard DXA. They differ between male and female patients.

Comparison between calcaneus quantitative ultrasound and the gold standard DXA in the ability to detect osteoporosis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients

BackgroundOsteoporosis is a prevalent comorbidity in patients with COPD that is usually underrecognized and hence, undertreated. Compared to the gold standard dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), calcaneus quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is less expensive, more portable, and more accessible, especially in less developed countries. The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of calcaneus QUS to screen and prescreen for osteoporosis in patients with COPD.MethodsThis cross-sectional study enrolled 67 males older than 50 years with clinically stable COPD. DXA scans of the lumbar spine (L2–4) and femoral neck were performed. QUS of the right calcaneus (AOS-100) was used to assess the broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), speed of sound (SOS), osteo sono-assessment index (OSI), and T-score. When the T-score was ≤ − 2.5, osteoporosis was diagnosed by both DXA and QUS.ResultsForty-eight patients (71.6%) had DXA T-scores ≤ − 2.5 at either the lumbar spine or femoral neck. All QUS parameters (BUA, SOS, OSI, and T-score) could discriminate DXA-determined osteoporosis (the area under the curve varied from 0.64 to 0.83). The QUS T-score was significantly moderately correlated with the DXA T-score at both the femoral neck (r = 0.55) and lumbar spine (r = 0.52). The sensitivity and specificity of QUS in identifying osteoporosis were 10.4% and 94.7%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 83.3% and 29.5%, respectively. When a QUS T-score of 0.09 was used as the cutoff, the sensitivity exceeded 90%, and 15% of the DXA scans were not warranted.ConclusionsThe sensitivity and specificity of calcaneus QUS were not sufficient for QUS to be used as an alternative to DXA for osteoporosis screening. However, QUS may be useful for prescreening before DXA to identify COPD patients who have either a high or low likelihood of osteoporosis. Consequently, QUS reduces the need for DXA referral.

Evaluating alternatives to dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for assessing bone quality in patients undergoing spine surgery.

The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast lumbar bone quality and osteoporosis/osteopenia screening results via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), CT, and MRI. A consecutive series of 426 candidates screened for lumbar disc replacement over a 5-year period beginning in 2018 was reviewed. Patients with a preoperative lumbar spine DEXA scan and a CT and/or MRI scan were included. The primary outcome measures included the bone mineral density (BMD) and osteoporosis or osteopenia classification from DEXA scans, Hounsfield units (HUs) for CT, and vertebral bone quality (VBQ) assessment for MRI. Patients were included if they had a DEXA scan within 1 year of an MRI or CT scan. DEXA BMD scores from composite or level-by-level reports were recorded. Asynchronous MRI and CT measurements were conducted using PACS. Interrater and intrarater reliability scores were generated for both CT and MRI measurements and ranged from 1.000 for MRI L1-4 scans to 0.683 for MRI VBQ. All 3 types of scans were statistically significantly correlated with one another; however, CT was more strongly correlated with the lumbar DEXA value (r = 0.439, p < 0.001). The correlation between MRI VBQ and DEXA was -0.103, (p < 0.045). The CT level-by-level measurements correlate with the corresponding level-by-level DEXA BMD values (correlation ranging from 0.531 to 0.289, p < 0.001 to p = 0.007). CT HU values were more strongly related to osteoporosis/osteopenia classification based on DEXA T-scores than were MRI VBQ values. Receiver operating characteristic analyses found that the area under the curve was 0.817 for CT and 0.539 for MRI. These results demonstrate that CT HUs more closely correlate to DEXA scores than MRI VBQ in this population of patients undergoing surgery for symptomatic disc degeneration. Thus, CT may be an alternative to DEXA for assessing VBQ in this population.

Hounsfield units on abdominal computed tomography: a new tool for predicting osteoporosis.

Osteoporosis can cause bone fractures and disability, but early diagnosis faces challenges. Our proposed diagnostic indicators offer a new approach for early detection, which benefits early identification. To determine the most appropriate threshold for predicting osteoporosis in patients with each section of vertebral body. A retrospective analysis of 210 patients, including 646 vertebrae, who had both abdominal computed tomography (CT) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) within six months. The correlation between DXA T-score and CT Hounsfield units (HU) values was tested by Pearson. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated using the threshold obtained from the regression equation. The thresholds matching the T-score of -2.5 were 85, 95, 85, and 90 HU for the upper axial plane of the vertebral body (Lau), the middle axial plane of the vertebral body (Lam), the lower axial plane of the vertebral body (Lad), and the mid-sagittal plane of the vertebral body (Lsm), respectively. Defining osteoporosis using CT as Lau ≤ 85, Lam ≤ 95, Lad ≤ 85, or Lsm ≤ 90 HU had a specificity of 88.1% (116/134) and sensitivity of 90.8% (69/76) for distinguishing DXA osteoporosis of the lumbar spine in 210 patients. T-score ≤-2.5 defined as Lau ≤85 or Lam ≤95 or Lad ≤85 or Lsm ≤90 HU had a specificity of 85.9% (275/320) and sensitivity of 82.8% (270/326) for DXA T-score ≤-2.5 in 646 lumbar vertebrae. CT HU values obtained based on different sections of the vertebral body in abdominal CT can be used as a supplementary measure to assess osteoporosis.

Preoperative glenoid bone density is associated with systemic osteoporosis in primary shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundIn shoulder arthroplasty, poor bone mineral density can impact humeral and glenoid fixation, as well as increase the risk of periprosthetic fracture. The purposes of this study were to (1) determine the association between preoperative glenoid and humeral Hounsfield units (HUs) with systemic bone density in primary shoulder arthroplasty, (2) determine a threshold for HU on preoperative shoulder computed tomography (CT) to classify patients as osteoporotic, and (3) identify which anatomic T-score locations were significantly associated with glenoid and/or humeral HU measurements. MethodsConsecutive patients who had both a preoperative shoulder CT and a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan were included. HU measurements of the glenoid vault and proximal humerus were recorded. DEXA T-scores from the spine, hip, and femoral neck were recorded, and osteoporosis was defined as a T-score of −2.5 or lower in any of the anatomic sites. Patients were grouped into osteoporosis and nonosteoporosis cohorts and these cohorts were compared using standard statistical tests. To assess the association between HUs and DEXA T-score, linear regression analysis was performed. Additional receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to evaluate the ability of HUs to classify patients as osteoporotic. ResultsA total of 162 patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty with both preoperative CT and DEXA scores were included. The osteoporosis cohort had significantly lower body mass index (P = .001), although no other significant differences in demographics were found between the 2 cohorts. The osteoporosis cohort was associated with significantly lower glenoid vault bone density in HUs (183 ± 104 vs. 303 ± 157, P = .004) and trended toward significantly lower proximal humeral bone density in HUs (34.3 ± 54.8 vs. 64.5 ± 58.2, P = .058). Glenoid HU threshold of 175 had an area under the curve of 0.75, with sensitivity of 80.8% and specificity of 62.5% for classifying systemic osteoporosis. HUs of both the glenoid (P = .031) and proximal humerus (P = .003) were significantly associated with femoral neck T-scores on linear regression analysis. Similarly, HUs of both the glenoid (P < .001) and proximal humerus (P = .009) were significantly associated with spine T-scores on linear regression analysis. DiscussionThis study found that glenoid vault HU is significantly associated with systemic osteoporosis and can be used as a screening tool for detecting osteoporosis preoperatively. In addition to implications for component fixation and periprosthetic fracture, local bone density evaluation on shoulder CT prior to shoulder arthroplasty represents an opportunity for osteoporosis screening.

Hounsfield Unit for Evaluating Bone Mineral Density and Strength: Variations in Measurement Methods

To assess the consistency and accuracy of various measurements of the Hounsfield unit (HU) in lumbar vertebrae. The study reviewed lumbar spine computed tomography images of 60 postmenopausal women aged >50years. A total of 240 vertebrae were measured and analyzed for the variations of HU values in different sections and regions. Investigated the relationship between HU values of the lumbar spine under different measurements and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry results and the ability to identify patients with osteoporosis. HU values measured in midsagittal (r=0.763), midcoronal (r=0.768), and midaxial (r=0.786) sections exhibited a strong positive correlation with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry T-scores. HU values measured in midsagittal and midaxial sections of the vertebral body were in good agreement (P>0.1), but decreased in the midcoronal (P<0.001). HU values in the middle of the vertebral body were significantly higher than in the near end plate (P<0.001). HU values varied between L1 and L4 vertebrae, but all had a good ability to identify osteoporosis and did not differ significantly in screening ability (P>0.05). An averaged HU value in axial multilevel is a comprehensive assessment of vertebral bone density. Using the HU value of the lumbar spine can help identify patients with osteoporosis, and the screening ability does not differ significantly across vertebral segments.

Patterns of Misdiagnosis and Discordance in Detecting Osteoporosis: A Comparison of Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Lumbar Computed Tomography Hounsfield Units.

This was a retrospective chart review. This study aims to identify the prevalence of osteoporosis (OP) by lumbar computed tomography (CT) Hounsfield units (HUs) in patients who have normal or osteopenic bone determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). OP is a critical issue in the postmenopausal and aging population. Bone mineral density assessment by DEXA has been described as insensitive for diagnosing OP in the lumbar spine. Improving the detection of OP can bring more patients to treatment and reduce the risks associated with low bone mineral density. We retrospectively reviewed all patients with DEXA scans and noncontrast CTs of the lumbar spine over a 15-year period. Patients were diagnosed as non-OP if they had a normal DEXA T -score (≥ -1) or osteopenic DEXA T -score (between -1.1 and -2.4). Patients in this cohort were considered osteoporotic by CT if L1-HU ≤110. Demographics and lumbar HUs were compared between these stratified groups. A total of 74 patients were included for analysis. All patients were demographically, similar, and the average patient age was 70 years. The prevalence of OP determined by CT L1-HU ≤110 was 46% (normal DEXA: 9%, osteopenic DEXA: 63%). A significant number of males in our study were considered osteoporotic by L1-HU ≤110 (74%, P = 0.03). All individual axial and sagittal lumbar HU measurements including L1-L5 average lumbar HUs were statistically significant among non-OP and OP groups except for the lower lumbar levels ( P > 0.05 for L4 axial HUs, and L4-L5 sagittal HUs). The prevalence of OP in patients with normal or osteopenic T -scores is high. Among those with osteopenia by DEXA, more than 50% may lack appropriate medical treatment. The DEXA scan may be particularly insensitive to male bone quality making the CT HU the diagnostic method of choice for detecting OP. Level III.

Prediction of low DEXA T-scores by routine computed tomography body scans at different kilovoltage peaks.

Previous studies have demonstrated positive correlations between computed tomography (CT) attenuation of lumbar spine vertebrae and their bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). However, these studies were performed using a standard 120 kilovoltage peak (kVp) setting. As radiation attenuation in mineralised tissues varies by the tube voltage applied, we determined the diagnostic accuracy of CT attenuation at identifying individuals with low BMD at different kVp settings. Single centre retrospective study of adults who had CT and DEXA scans within 6 months of each other. CT scans were performed at either 100 kVp, 120 kVp or dual energy (80 kVp/140 kVp). Attenuation was measured in axial cross-sections of L1-4 vertebrae and correlated with the results of DEXA. Receiver operated characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine diagnostic cut-off thresholds. Analysis included 268 subjects (169 females; mean age: 70, range: 20-94 years). CT attenuation values at L1 or mean L1-4 correlated positively with DEXA-derived T-scores. At L1, the optimal Hounsfield units (HU) thresholds for predicting DEXA T-scores of -2.5 or less at 100 kVp, 120 kVp and dual-energy scans were <170, <128 and <164, with corresponding AUCs of 0.925, 0.814 and 0.743 respectively. For mean L1-4, the HU thresholds were <173, <134 and <151, with corresponding AUCs of 0.933, 0.824 and 0.707 respectively. CT attenuation thresholds differ depending on the tube voltage used. We provide voltage-specific, probability-optimised thresholds for the identification of persons likely to have low BMD on DEXA scanning.

Quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus (QUS): A valuable tool in the identification of patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer requiring screening for osteoporosis

Non-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) patients are at increased risk for osteoporosis and fractures mainly due to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-associated hypogonadism, but this remains largely underdiagnosed and untreated. In this study, we examine the value of pre-screening calcaneal QUS in identifying patients who should be referred for screening for osteoporosis using dual-energy X-Ray absorptiometry (DXA). In a single-center retrospective cross-sectional cohort study, we analysed data on DXA and calcaneal QUS measurements systematically collected between 2011 and 2013 in all non-metastatic PCa patients attending our Uro-Oncological Clinic at the Leiden University Medical Center. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess the positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of QUS T-scores of 0, −1.0, and − 1.8 in identifying DXA-diagnosed osteoporosis (T-scores ≤ − 2.5 and ≤ −2) at lumbar spine and/or femoral neck. Complete sets of data were available in 256 patients, median age 70.9 (53.6–89.5) years; 93.0 % had received local treatment, 84.4 % with additional ADT. Prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia was respectively 10.5 % and 53 %. Mean QUS T-score was −0.54 ± 1.58. Whereas PPV at any QUS T-score was <25 %, precluding the use of QUS as surrogate for DXA in screening for osteoporosis, QUS T-scores of −1.0 to 0.0 had a NPV of ≥94.5 % for DXA T-scores ≤ 2.5 and ≤ −2 at any site, confidently identifying patients least likely to have osteoporosis, thereby significantly reducing the number of patients requiring DXA screening for diagnosing osteoporosis by up to two-third. Osteoporosis screening is a significant unmet need in non-metastatic prostate cancer patients treated with ADT, and QUS may represent a valuable alternative pre-screening strategy to overcome logistics, time demands, and economic barriers encountered with current strategies for osteoporosis screening in these patients. SummaryOsteoporosis and associated increased fracture risk are common in non-metastatic prostate carcinoma, mainly due to androgen deprivation therapy, but these often remain underdiagnosed and untreated. We demonstrate that QUS is a safe, less costly pre-screen tool that reduces by up to two-third the number of patients requiring referral for DXA for osteoporosis screening.

Vertebral bone quality score to predict cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion

BackgroundCurrent evidence suggests that the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score is a good parameter for evaluating bone quality. We aimed to assess whether the VBQ score can predict the occurrence of postoperative cage subsidence after oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) surgery.MethodsPatients (n = 102) who had undergone single-level OLIF with a minimal follow-up for 1 year were reviewed in this study. Demographic and radiographic data of these patients were collected. Cage subsidence was defined as ≥ 2 mm of cage migration into the inferior endplate, superior endplate, or both. Further, the MRI-based VBQ score was measured on T1-weighted images. Moreover, univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were performed. Meanwhile, Pearson analysis was used to evaluate the correlation among the VBQ score, average lumbar dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) T-score, and degree of cage subsidence. Furthermore, ad-hoc analysis was used along with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to assess the predictive ability of the VBQ score and average lumbar DEXA T-score.ResultsOf 102 participants, cage subsidence was observed in 39 (38.24%) patients. According to the univariable analysis, patients with subsidence had older age, higher antiosteoporotic drug use, larger disk height change, a more concave morphology of inferior and superior endplates, higher VBQ score, and lower average lumbar DEXA T-score compared to patients without subsidence. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, a higher VBQ score was significantly associated with an increased risk of subsidence (OR = 23.158 ± 0.849, 95% CI 4.381–122.399, p < 0.001), and it was the only significant and independent predictor of subsidence after OLIF. Moreover, the VBQ score was moderately correlated with the average lumbar DEXA T-score (r = − 0.576, p < 0.001) and the amount of cage subsidence (r = 0.649, p < 0.001). Furthermore, this score significantly predicted cage subsidence with an accuracy of 83.9%.ConclusionsThe VBQ score can independently predict postoperative cage subsidence in patients undergoing OLIF surgery.

MRI-based porosity index (PI) and suppression ratio (SR) in the tibial cortex show significant differences between normal, osteopenic, and osteoporotic female subjects.

Ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI enables quantitative assessment of cortical bone. The signal ratio in dual-echo UTE imaging, known as porosity index (PI), as well as the signal ratio between UTE and inversion recovery UTE (IR-UTE) imaging, known as the suppression ratio (SR), are two rapid UTE-based bone evaluation techniques developed to reduce the time demand and cost in future clinical studies. The goal of this study was to investigate the performance of PI and SR in detecting bone quality differences between subjects with osteoporosis (OPo), osteopenia (OPe), and normal bone (Normal). Tibial midshaft of fourteen OPe (72 ± 6 years old), thirty-one OPo (72 ± 6 years old), and thirty-seven Normal (36 ± 19 years old) subjects were scanned using dual-echo UTE and IR-UTE sequences on a clinical 3T scanner. Measured PI, SR, and bone thickness were compared between OPo, OPe, and normal bone (Normal) subjects using the Kruskal-Wallis test by ranks. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were calculated between dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) T-score and UTE-MRI results. PI was significantly higher in the OPo group compared with the Normal (24.1%) and OPe (16.3%) groups. SR was significantly higher in the OPo group compared with the Normal (41.5%) and OPe (21.8%) groups. SR differences between the OPe and Normal groups were also statistically significant (16.2%). Cortical bone was significantly thinner in the OPo group compared with the Normal (22.0%) and OPe (13.0%) groups. DEXA T-scores in subjects were significantly correlated with PI (R=-0.32), SR (R=-0.50), and bone thickness (R=0.51). PI and SR, as rapid UTE-MRI-based techniques, may be useful tools to detect and monitor bone quality changes, in addition to bone morphology, in individuals affected by osteoporosis.

Abstract P5-08-13: Frequency of low bone mineral density in young women with breast cancer and associated factors

Abstract Background: Young women with breast cancer (YWBC) may experience bone mineral density (BMD) loss due to the effects of cancer treatment on estrogen levels. Studies assessing BMD in breast cancer (BC) patients have had a limited representation of young women. This study aimed to analyze the frequency of low BMD and its associated factors in this specific age group. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study included women ≤40 years diagnosed with stage 0-III BC, treated with chemotherapy (CT) and/or endocrine therapy (ET) between 2010-2020, and with no documented bone metastases during follow-up. The protocol was conducted in 5 BC referral centers in Mexico. Demographic, clinical and treatment data were collected, as well as bone dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) results. Low BMD was defined as T-score &amp;lt;-1.0 or Z-score ≤-2.0 at the lumbar spine (L1-L4) or femoral neck. The frequency of low BMD was analyzed with descriptive statistics. Binary logistic regression using complete case analysis was conducted to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) of experiencing low BMD according to demographic, clinical and therapeutic factors. Results: In total, 716 YWBC met inclusion criteria. Median age at BC diagnosis was 36 years (21-40); 708 (99%) women were premenopausal at diagnosis. Most were married (355; 50%), had higher education (381; 53%), were unemployed (433; 61%), and were non-smokers (552; 77%). Body mass index (BMI) was &amp;lt; 18.5 kg/m2 (underweight) and ≥25.0 kg/m2 (overweight/obese) in 14 (2%) and 392 (58%) cases, respectively. The most common BC subtype was hormone receptor (HR) positive/HER2 negative (371; 52%), followed by triple negative (168; 24%), HR positive/HER2 positive (122; 17%) and HR negative/HER2 positive (55; 8%). Patients were mostly diagnosed with stage II (346; 48%) or III (276; 39%) disease. As for treatment, CT in 667 (93%), ET in 468 (65%), anti-HER2 therapy in 168 (24%), and radiotherapy was administered in 562 (79%) cases. DEXA scans were documented in 213/716 (30%) patients. In total, 286 DEXA results were available. The time elapsed from the start of the first systemic treatment to the DEXA result was 0-12 months in 42 cases (15%); 13-36 months in 103 (36%); 37-60 months in 72 (25%); and &amp;gt;60 months in 69 (24%). Overall, 133/213 patients (62%; 95%CI 56-69%) had at least one low BMD report after the start of CT or ET. T-scores and Z-scores in each period are detailed in the Table. No fractures were recorded in any case after BC diagnosis. The only variable associated with at least one low BMD result was BMI ≥25.0 kg/m2 (OR, 1.88; 95%CI, 1.04-3.40). The described demographic, clinical and treatment factors were not significantly associated with low BMD. Conclusion: This study showed a suboptimal frequency of bone DEXA monitoring in YWBC. A considerable proportion of YWBC experienced low BMD after initiation of CT and/or ET; and a significant association was found between obesity/overweight at BC diagnosis and subsequent low BMD. These data reflect the importance of requesting DEXA scans in young patients on a regular basis and promoting the maintenance of an adequate body weight, in line with international recommendations. Further studies evaluating the degree of BMD loss and its determinants would contribute to establish the optimal periodicity to monitor BMD in relation to BC therapy, allow timely offering of interventions to reduce bone morbidity, as well as improve the quality and life and survivorship of this young group of patients. Table. DEXA T-scores and Z-scores. Citation Format: Fernanda Mesa-Chavez, Yanin Chavarri-Guerra, Sandy Ruiz-Cruz, Paula Cabrera-Galeana, Christopher Jesus del Rio-Martinez, Carmen Guadalupe Bermudez-Barrientos, Brizio Moreno-Jaime, Abigail Samayoa-Mateos, David Vega-Morales, Cynthia Villarreal-Garza. Frequency of low bone mineral density in young women with breast cancer and associated factors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-08-13.

Correlation between bone density measurements on CT or MRI versus DEXA scan: A systematic review

BackgroundNovel methods of bone density assessment using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been increasingly reported in the spine surgery literature. Correlations between these newer measurements and traditional Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) is not well known. The purpose of this study is to perform an updated systematic review of correlations between bone mineral density (BMD) from CT or MRI and DEXA. MethodsArticles published between 2011 and 2021 that reported correlations between the CT-HU or MRI measurements to DEXA t-scores or BMD of lumbar spine or hip were included in this systematic review. ResultsA total of 25 studies (15 CT, 10 MRI) met the inclusion criteria with a total number of 2,745 patients. The pooled correlation coefficient of spine CT-HU versus spine DEXA, spine CT-HU versus hip DEXA and spine CT-HU versus lowest t-score were 0.60, 0.50 and 0.60 respectively. Regarding spine DEXA parameters, the pooled r2 for spine CT-HU versus spine t-score was 0.684 and spine CT-HU versus spine BMD was 0.598. Furthermore, in patients undergoing spine surgery in four studies, the pooled correlation between spine CT and spine DEXA was (r2: 0.64). In MRI studies, the pooled r2 of spine MRI versus spine DEXA and spine MRI versus hip DEXA were -0.41 and -0.44 respectively. ConclusionsCT-HU has stronger correlations with DEXA than MRI measurements. Lumbar CT-HU has the highest pooled correlation (r2 = 0.6) with both spine DEXA and lowest skeletal t-score followed by lumbar CT-HU with hip DEXA (r2 = 0.5) and lumbar MRI with hip (r2 = 0.44) and spine (r2 = 0.41) DEXA. Both imaging modalities achieved only a moderate correlation with DEXA. Few studies in both modalities have investigated the correlation in spine surgery populations and the available data shows that the correlations are worse in the degenerative spine population. A careful interruption of CT HU and MRI measurement when evaluation of BMD as they only moderately correlated with DEXA scores. At this time, it is unclear which modality is a better predictor of mechanical complications and clinical outcomes in spine surgery patients.

Vertebral bone quality score provides preoperative bone density assessment for patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery: a retrospective study.

The novel MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score has been described as an opportunistic screening tool for osteoporosis, but the stability and practical value of this score deserve further investigation. The purpose of this study was to assess whether preoperative VBQ scores could assist in identifying reduced bone mineral density (BMD) or osteoporosis and evaluating the consistency between MRI systems with different field strengths. The VBQ scores of the patients who underwent surgery for lumbar disc herniation and the single-level VBQ scores of each L1-4 vertebral body were measured and calculated with preoperative lumbar MRI noncontrast T1-weighted phases. The VBQ scores were evaluated for correlation analysis using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) T-scores. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the ability of the VBQ scores to identify patients with reduced BMD and with osteoporosis. Differences in CSF measurements at different levels of L1-4 were compared. Twenty-four patients who had been examined using another MRI machine were used as controls to test the interdevice agreement of the VBQ scores. The study included 100 patients with mean VBQ scores of 2.81 ± 0.28 (normal BMD), 3.06 ± 0.36 (osteopenia), and 3.43 ± 0.37 (osteoporosis). VBQ scores differed significantly between BMD subgroups (p < 0.001). The Pearson correlation coefficient showed a moderate negative linear correlation between novel VBQ scores and the lowest DEXA T-scores (r = -0.524). ROC analysis showed good discrimination of VBQ scores in patients with reduced BMD (area under the curve [AUC] 0.793) and with osteoporosis (AUC 0.810). The diagnostic thresholds of reduced BMD and osteoporosis according to the maximum Youden index were 3.06 (sensitivity 0.636, specificity 0.870, positive predictive value [PPV] 0.942, negative predictive value [NPV] 0.417) and 3.05 (sensitivity 0.875, specificity 0.618, PPV 0.519, NPV 0.913), respectively. CSF measurements at the L2, L3, and L4 levels were essentially identical and did not significantly affect the final VBQ scores (p > 0.05), whereas CSF measurements at the L1 level were found to be heterogeneous (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in VBQ scores between the same brand of MRI machines at different field strengths (1.5 and 3.0 T, p = 0.107). The new VBQ score provides an additional screening opportunity for preoperative BMD assessment. A VBQ score < 3.05 essentially excludes osteoporosis, whereas a VBQ score ≥ 3.05 (especially ≥ 3.06) suggests the need for further examination. The VBQ score is comparable between different MRI systems.