Dual Endothelin Receptor Antagonist Research Articles

Extra-domain A containing fibronectin in pulmonary hypertension and treatment effects of a function-blocking antibody.

Pulmonary vascular and right ventricular remodelling processes are important for development and progression of pulmonary hypertension (PH). The current study analyzed the functional role of the extra domain A containing fibronectin (ED-A+ Fn) for the development of PH by comparing ED-A+ Fn knockout (KO) and wild-type (WT) mice as well as the effects of an antibody-based therapeutical approach in a model of monocrotaline (MCT)-induced PH, which will be validated in a model of Sugen 5416/Hypoxia induced PH. PH was induced using monocrotaline (MCT) (PH mice). 69 mice were divided into the following groups: sham-treated controls (WT: n=7; KO: n=7), PH mice without specific treatment (WT: n=12; KO: n=10), PH mice treated with a dual endothelin receptor antagonist (MAC; WT: n=6; KO: n=11), WT PH mice treated with the F8 antibody, specifically recognizing ED-A+ Fn, (n=8) and WT PH mice treated with an antibody of irrelevant antigen specificity (KSF, n=8). Compared to controls, WT_PH mice showed a significant elevation of the right ventricular systolic pressure (RVPsys, p=0.04) and RV functional impairment including increased basal right ventricular (RVbasal, p=0.016) diameter or tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE, p=0.008). In contrast, KO PH did not show such effects compared to controls (p=n.s.). In WT_PH mice treated with F8, hemodynamic and echocardiographic parameters were significantly improved compared to untreated WT_PH mice or those treated with the KSF antibody (p<0.05). On the microscopic level, KO_PH mice showed significantly less tissue damage compared to the WT_PH mice (p=0.008). Furthermore, lung tissue damage could significantly be reduced after F8 treatment (p=0.04). Additionally, these findings could be verified in the Sugen 5416/Hypoxia mouse model, in which F8 significantly improved echocardiographic, hemodynamic and histologic parameters. ED-A+ Fn is of crucial importance for PH pathogenesis representing a promising therapeutic target in PH. We here show a novel therapeutic approach using antibody-mediated functional blockade of ED-A+ Fn capable to attenuate and partially reverse PH-associated tissue remodelling.

Recent developments in the management of resistant hypertension: focus on endothelin receptor antagonists.

Resistant hypertension is characterized by the inability of guideline-recommended triple combination therapy to control blood pressure(BP) to target. It is associated with a significantly increased risk of adverse outcomes. Despite abundant preclinical evidence supporting thecritical role of the endothelin pathway in resistant hypertension (RH), clinical implementation of endothelin antagonists for the treatment of hypertension was hindered by various factors. Recently, the novel dual endothelin-receptor antagonist aprocitentan was tested in individuals with resistant hypertension in the PRECISION trial and provided compelling evidence supporting both short and longer-term safety and clinically meaningful and sustained BP lowering efficacy.These findings resulted in therecent regulatory approval of aprocitentanby the FDA. Aprocitentan may be a particularly useful antihypertensive option for individuals with advanced age, chronic kidney disease, and albuminuria.

Population pharmacokinetics of the dual endothelin receptor antagonist aprocitentan in subjects with or without essential or resistant hypertension.

Aprocitentan is a novel, potent, dual endothelin receptor antagonist that recently demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of difficult-to-treat (resistant) hypertension. The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model describing aprocitentan plasma concentration over time, to investigate relationships between subject-specific factors (covariates) and model parameters, and to quantify the influence of the identified covariates on the exposure to aprocitentan via model-based simulations, enabling judgment about the clinical relevance of the covariates.PK data from 902 subjects in ten Phase 1, one Phase 2, and one Phase 3 study were pooled to develop a joint population PK model. The concentration-time course of aprocitentan was described by a two-compartment model with absorption lag time, first-order absorption and elimination, and reduced relative bioavailability following very high doses of 300 and 600mg.The population PK model described the observed data well. Volume and clearance parameters were associated with body weight. Renal function as reflected by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), hepatic impairment, and sex were identified as relevant covariates on clearance.The subject-specific characteristics of body weight, eGFR, hepatic impairment, and sex were shown to influence exposure parameters area under the concentration-time curve and maximum concentration in steady state to a limited extent, i.e., not more than 25% different from a reference subject, and therefore do not warrant dose adjustments.

Bosentan in the treatment of persistent pulmonary hypertension in newborns: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn is a life-threatening condition that affects about 1-2 per 1,000 live births worldwide. Bosentan is an oral dual endothelin receptor antagonist that may have a beneficial effect on persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn by reducing pulmonary vascular resistance and improving oxygenation. However, its role in persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn remains unclear. To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of bosentan as an adjuvant therapy for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn in newborns. We searched six English and two Chinese databases from their inception to 1 January 2023 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We included randomised controlled trials and retrospective studies that compared bosentan with placebo or other drugs for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn in newborns. We performed a meta-analysis using random-effects models and assessed the risk of bias and heterogeneity in the included studies. We included 10 studies with a total of 550 participants. Bosentan significantly reduced the treatment failure rate (relative risk = 0.25, P < 0.001), pulmonary artery pressure (mean difference = -11.79, P < 0.001), and length of hospital stay (mean difference = -1.04, P = 0.003), and increased the partial pressure of oxygen (mean difference = 10.02, P < 0.001) and blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) (mean difference = 8.24, P < 0.001) compared with a placebo or other drugs. The occurrence of adverse reactions was not significantly different between bosentan and a placebo or other drugs. Bosentan is effective in the treatment of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn but adverse reactions such as abnormal liver function should be observed when using it.

Expression of Inflammatory Genes in Murine Lungs in a Model of Experimental Pulmonary Hypertension: Effects of an Antibody-Based Targeted Delivery of Interleukin-9.

Pathogenesis of pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a multifactorial process driven by inflammation and pulmonary vascular remodeling. To target these two aspects of PH, we recently tested a novel treatment: Interleukin-9 (IL9) fused to F8, an antibody that binds to the extra-domain A of fibronectin (EDA+ Fn). As EDA+ Fn is not found in healthy adult tissue but is expressed during PH, IL9 is delivered specifically to the tissue affected by PH. We found that F8IL9 reduced pulmonary vascular remodeling and attenuated PH compared with sham-treated mice. To evaluate possible F8IL9 effects on PH-associated inflammatory processes, we analysed the expression of genes involved in pulmonary immune responses. We applied the monocrotaline (MCT) model of PH in mice (n = 44). Animals were divided into five experimental groups: sham-induced animals without PH (control, n = 4), MCT-induced PH without treatment (PH, n = 8), dual endothelin receptor antagonist treatment (dual ERA, n = 8), F8IL9 treatment (n = 12, 2 formats with n = 6 each), or with KSFIL9 treatment (KSFIL9, n = 12, 2 formats with n = 6 each, KSF: control antibody with irrelevant antigen specificity). After 28 days, a RT-PCR gene expression analysis of inflammatory response (84 genes) was performed in the lung. Compared with the controls, 19 genes exhibited relevant (+2.5-fold) upregulation in the PH group without treatment. Gene expression levels in F8IL9-treated lung tissue were reduced compared to the PH group without treatment. This was the case especially for CCL20, CXCL5, C-reactive protein, pentraxin related (CRPPR), and Kininogen-1 (KNG1). In accordance with the hypothesis stated above, F8IL9 treatment diminished the upregulation of some genes associated with inflammation in a PH animal model. Therefore, we hypothesize that IL9-based immunocytokine treatment will likely modulate various inflammatory pathways.

Bosentan effect on echocardiographic systolic pulmonary arterial pressure in systemic sclerosis-related pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review and metanalysis.

Bosentan is a dual endothelin receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of SSc digital ulcers (DU) and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (sPAP) is a relevant parameter for the follow-up and prognosis of SSc-PAH. The therapeutic magnitude of bosentan in SSc-PAH is not fully understood, thus we aim to establish the degree of sPAP reduction in bosentan treated SSc-PAH patients. We performed a systematic literature review in three databases from January 2000 to June 2023, involving sPAP measurement at transthoracic echocardiography of SSc patients before and after starting bosentan. Following the study quality assessment and data extraction, we performed random-effects meta-analysis and Egger's test for publication bias. Stratified analysis was performed for mono-/combination therapy, follow up duration (≤1 year), indication for bosentan therapy (PAH or DU/mixed). In the 11 selected manuscripts, sPAP mean difference before and after bosentan therapy was - 5.63mmHg (CI95% -9.79 to -1.48, p=0.0078). In stratified analysis, sPAP mean was significantly different before and after bosentan therapy only for studies considering < 1 year of follow-up (p=0.0020), monotherapy (p=0.0140) and the strict indication for PAH (p=0.0002). Bosentan significantly decreases sPAP, a relevant prognostic marker, especially in overt SSc-PAH. However, bosentan did not decrease sPAP when started for DU/mixed indication nor for follow-up>1 year. The burden of publication bias was significant. Therefore, further studies are required to assess bosentan's haemodynamic effect in high-risk patients for SSc-PAH.

Successful treatment of pulmonary hypertension and right heart failure by antibody-based functional blocking of the extra-domain A of fibronectin in a preclinical animal model

Abstract Background Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) as heterogeneous disease group is pathogenetically accompanied by pulmonary vascular and right ventricular tissue remodelling showing similarities between the clinical groups 1 (Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension), 2 (PH associated with left heart disease) and 3 (PH associated with lung disease). Since the remodelling process entails the abundant re-expression of extra-domain A containing fibronectin (ED-A+ Fn), which is virtually absent in healthy adult organs, a potential functional role in PH development and progression has been suggested and recently proven by our group. The human recombinant antibody F8 (IgG) specifically recognises ED-A+ Fn and is capable to block its function at least in vitro. Thus, F8 might serve as a novel therapeutic agent for the treatment or even prevention of PH. Purpose Against that background, the current study was aimed to test the therapeutic efficacy of F8 after systemic administration in a well-established preclinical model of PH in comparison to a non-specific control antibody and a dual endothelin receptor antagonist as standard of care. Methods Induction of PH was realized by subcutaneous injection of Monocrotaline (MCT) in mice. In total, 41 animals were included in the study approach and were divided into the following experimental groups: sham-treated controls (controls; n=7), PH mice without a specific treatment (PH_untreated; n=12), PH mice treated with the dual endothelin receptor antagonist Macitentan (PH_MAC; n=6), PH mice treated with the F8 antibody (PH_F8; n=8) and PH mice treated with an antibody of irrelevant antigen specificity in the murine system (PH_KSF; n=8). Treatment effects were evaluated on the haemodynamic, echocardiographic and microscopic level. Results In comparison to controls, untreated PH mice showed significantly higher right ventricular systolic pressure values (RVPsys, p&amp;lt;0.05) as well as impaired echocardiographic parameters of right ventricular morphology and function, i.e., enlarged basal right ventricular (RVbasal, p=0.016) diameters and reduced tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion values (TAPSE, p=0.008). In the PH_F8 group, haemodynamic and echocardiographic parameters were significantly improved compared to the PH_untreated or the PH_KSF group (p&amp;lt;0.05 for the majority of parameters). Histological evaluation revealed significant lung tissue damage after in the PH_untreated group compared to controls (p=0.008), which were significantly attenuated in the PH_F8 (p=0.04) but not the PH_KSF group (p=n.s.). Conclusion The therapeutic efficacy of the human recombinant F8 antibody specific to ED-A+ Fn has been proven for the first time in vivo in a well-established preclinical model of PH. F8 acts as a disease-modifier by attenuating PH associated lung tissue remodelling resulting in remarkable improvements of pulmonary hemodynamics and echocardiographic parameters of right ventricular load.

Taming resistant hypertension: The promise of novel pharmacologic approaches and renal denervation.

Resistant hypertension is associated with an exceedingly high cardiovascular risk and there remains an unmet therapeutic need driven by pathophysiologic pathways unaddressed by guideline-recommended therapy. While spironolactone is widely considered as the preferable fourth-line drug, its broad application is limited by its side effect profile, especially off-target steroid receptor-mediated effects and hyperkalaemia in at-risk subpopulations. Recent landmark trials have reported promising safety and efficacy results for a number of novel compounds targeting relevant pathophysiologic pathways that remain unopposed by contemporary drugs. These include the dual endothelin receptor antagonist, aprocitentan, the aldosterone synthase inhibitor, baxdrostat and the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone. Furthermore, the evidence base for consideration of catheter-based renal denervation as a safe and effective adjunct therapeutic approach across the clinical spectrum of hypertension has been further substantiated. This review will summarise the recently published evidence on novel antihypertensive drugs and renal denervation in the context of resistant hypertension.

New Potential Treatments for Resistant Hypertension.

To provide an update and review approaches to the treatment of resistant hypertension (RH) with a focus on emerging potential therapies. Resistant hypertension is defined as a blood pressure that remains elevated above a patient's individualized target despite the concurrent use of 3 antihypertensive agents of different classes including a diuretic or use of 4 or more antihypertensive agents. Patients with RH have an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular and renal outcomes. Most RH is attributed to apparent RH and is not true RH. True RH is a diagnosis of exclusion after apparent RH has been excluded. Treatment of RH is challenging, and blood pressure goal is often difficult to achieve. Currently several new therapies have emerged with forthcoming data that provide promise for improved blood pressure control in those with resistant hypertension. Once RH has been diagnosed, patients should be on standardized therapy that includes agents from three different classes including a diuretic with addition in most cases of a mineralocorticoid as a fourth line agent. There are newer agents in development currently being studied in clinical trials including dual endothelin receptor antagonists and aldosterone synthase inhibitors that appear to be efficacious. Other approved medications including SGLT2 inhibitors and non-steroidal mineralocorticoids such as finerenone also need to be incorporated into treatment paradigms. Renal denervation with catheter based devices is another potential promising treatment option in this population.

Abstract 118: Effects Of Aprocitentan, A Dual Endothelin Receptor Antagonist, On Blood Pressure In Black/African American Patients With Resistant Hypertension: Results From A Randomized, Controlled Study (PRECISION) Including A Withdrawal Phase

Background: Resistant hypertension is prevalent among Black/African American drug-treated hypertensives and may increase cardiovascular risk. We evaluated aprocitentan (APRO) for BP lowering in Black patients with resistant hypertension. Methods: Patients had sitting unattended automated office systolic BP (SBP) ≥140 mmHg despite use of ≥3 antihypertensives of different classes in the year prior. After 4 weeks of combination therapy (amlodipine, valsartan, hydrochlorothiazide), those still hypertensive could enter a 4-week single-blind placebo (PBO) run-in period, followed by a 4-week double-blind period wherein patients were randomized 1:1:1 to APRO 12.5 mg, 25 mg, or PBO. A 32-week single-blind period on APRO 25 mg followed. Patients were then re-randomized 1:1 to APRO 25 mg or PBO in a 12-week withdrawal period. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to Week 4 in mean trough SBP. Changes in SBP from withdrawal baseline (Week 36) to Week 40 and in 24-hour, daytime (09:00-21:00), and nighttime (01:00-06:00) ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) measures at Weeks 4 and 40 were also assessed. Results: Eighty-two of 730 patients (11.2%) were Black (APRO 12.5 mg, n = 28; 25 mg, n&amp;nbsp;= 28; PBO, n = 26). At Week 4, APRO and PBO produced similar office SBP reductions (least squares mean difference from PBO, 12.5 mg: 0.63 mmHg; 25 mg: 0.12 mmHg). However, APRO produced pronounced reductions vs PBO in mean 24-hour (12.5 mg: –3.23 mmHg; 25 mg: –7.85 mmHg), daytime (12.5 mg: –6.16 mmHg; 25 mg: –9.13 mmHg), and nighttime (12.5 mg: –2.63 mmHg; 25 mg: –8.53 mmHg) ambulatory SBP. Four weeks after withdrawal, office SBP increased with PBO vs APRO 25 mg (difference: +9.87 mmHg), which was confirmed with ambulatory SBP (difference, 25 mg; 24-hour: +8.13 mmHg, daytime: +3.39 mmHg, nighttime: +9.70 mmHg). Safety in Black patients was comparable to the overall population, with no new signals. During the double-blind period, treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 6/28 (21.4%), 9/29 (31.0%), and 4/25 (16.0%) patients with APRO 12.5 mg, APRO 25 mg, and PBO. Edema or fluid retention occurred in 3/29 patients (10.3%) on APRO 25 mg, and no patients on APRO 12.5 mg or PBO. Conclusion: APRO was well tolerated and produced clinically relevant reductions in SBP by ABPM in Black patients.

Aprocitentan: A new development of resistant hypertension.

As the blood pressure threshold for commencing antihypertensive treatment diminishes, the cohort suffering from resistant hypertension (RH) correspondingly expands. Notwithstanding the availability of known antihypertensive medications, there exists a conspicuous lacuna in therapeutic options specifically intended for the management of RH. Currently, aprocitentan is the sole endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) under development for addressing this pressing clinical challenge. Aprocitentan (ACT-132577), deriving its active form as a metabolite of macitentan, demonstrates oral potency as a dual endothelin (ET) receptor antagonist. This compound effectively obstructs the binding of endothelin-1 (ET-1) to both ETA and ETB receptors, exhibiting an inhibitory potency ratio of 1:16. Clinical investigation of aprocitentan has advanced to phase 3 trials, yielding promising preliminary outcomes.

#4057 SUPERIOR PROTEINURIA REDUCTION WITH SPARSENTAN IN IMMUNOGLOBULIN A NEPHROPATHY (IGAN): A PROTECT STUDY INTERIM ANALYSIS

Abstract Background and Aims IgAN is the most common glomerular disease worldwide. Despite optimized standard of care, most patients with IgAN progress to kidney failure within 10-15 years, consequently seriously affecting their quality of life and mortality. Treatments that reduce proteinuria and risk of kidney disease progression are urgently needed for IgAN. Sparsentan is a novel, oral, non-immunosuppressive, single molecule that is a dual endothelin and angiotensin receptor antagonist being investigated for IgAN and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. The Phase 3 PROTECT study is examining the long-term antiproteinuric and nephroprotective potential and safety of sparsentan compared with an active control, angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) irbesartan, in adults with IgAN. Reported here are the PROTECT pre-specified interim primary efficacy endpoint and safety outcomes. Method PROTECT is an ongoing, global, Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active controlled study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sparsentan versus the active control irbesartan in adults with IgAN with overt proteinuria despite receiving maximized treatment with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) and/or ARB. The study duration is 270 weeks; the double-blind period is 114 weeks (110 treatment and 4 follow-up) with an open-label extension period up to 156 weeks. Adult patients with biopsy-proven IgAN (excluding IgAN secondary to another condition or IgA vasculitis), urine protein excretion value ≥1.0 g/day, eGFR ≥30 mL/min/1.73m2, systolic/diastolic blood pressure ≤150/≤100 mmHg, and on a stable dose of ACEi and/or ARB therapy for at least 12 weeks prior to screening that is both the patient's maximum tolerated dose and at least one-half of the maximum labeled dose were eligible for inclusion. Patients took their last ACEi and/or ARB dose the day before randomization. Patients were randomized 1:1 to sparsentan or irbesartan (target dose 400 and 300 mg/day, respectively), stratified by screening eGFR and urine protein excretion values. The pre-specified interim primary efficacy endpoint of change from baseline in urine protein/creatinine ratio (UP/C, based on a 24-hour urine sample) at Week 36 was analyzed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis. The safety evaluation included assessment of treatment emergent adverse events. Results A total of 671 patients were screened; 406 patients from clinical sites in 18 countries, including sites in North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific, met eligibility criteria and were enrolled and randomized into PROTECT. Two randomized patients withdrew from the study prior to initiating study treatment. The 404 randomized patients who received study drug were included in the primary analysis population. The mean reduction in UP/C from baseline at 36 weeks was significantly greater in the patients who received sparsentan (-49.8%) versus irbesartan (-15.1%, P&amp;lt;0.0001). Proteinuria reduction consistency across baseline demographic and clinical characteristics and rates of complete and partial remission are reported, as well as sustained proteinuria reduction over time. Safety outcomes related to edema and liver function tests are reported. Overall, sparsentan was generally well-tolerated and comparable to irbesartan. Conclusion The interim results of the PROTECT study show that in adult patients with IgAN and persistent proteinuria above 1 g/day despite being treated with ACEis and/or ARBs, once-daily treatment with sparsentan compared head-to-head with maximum labelled or tolerated irbesartan produced a robust and clinically meaningful reduction in proteinuria. The safety of sparsentan was consistent with previous studies in FSGS and comparable to irbesartan.

Sparsentan in patients with IgA nephropathy: a prespecified interim analysis from a randomised, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial

Sparsentan is a novel, non-immunosuppressive, single-molecule, dual endothelin and angiotensin receptor antagonist being examined in an ongoing phase 3 trial in adults with IgA nephropathy. We report the prespecified interim analysis of the primary proteinuria efficacy endpoint, and safety. PROTECT is an international, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled study, being conducted in 134 clinical practice sites in 18 countries. The study examines sparsentan versus irbesartan in adults (aged ≥18 years) with biopsy-proven IgA nephropathy and proteinuria of 1·0 g/day or higher despite maximised renin-angiotensin system inhibitor treatment for at least 12 weeks. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive sparsentan 400 mg once daily or irbesartan 300 mg once daily, stratified by estimated glomerular filtration rate at screening (30 to <60 mL/min per 1·73 m2 and ≥60 mL/min per 1·73 m2) and urine protein excretion at screening (≤1·75 g/day and >1·75 g/day). The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to week 36 in urine protein-creatinine ratio based on a 24-h urine sample, assessed using mixed model repeated measures. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were safety endpoints. All endpoints were examined in all participants who received at least one dose of randomised treatment. The study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03762850. Between Dec 20, 2018, and May 26, 2021, 404 participants were randomly assigned to sparsentan (n=202) or irbesartan (n=202) and received treatment. At week 36, the geometric least squares mean percent change from baseline in urine protein-creatinine ratio was statistically significantly greater in the sparsentan group (-49·8%) than the irbesartan group (-15·1%), resulting in a between-group relative reduction of 41% (least squares mean ratio=0·59; 95% CI 0·51-0·69; p<0·0001). TEAEs with sparsentan were similar to irbesartan. There were no cases of severe oedema, heart failure, hepatotoxicity, or oedema-related discontinuations. Bodyweight changes from baseline were not different between the sparsentan and irbesartan groups. Once-daily treatment with sparsentan produced meaningful reduction in proteinuria compared with irbesartan in adults with IgA nephropathy. Safety of sparsentan was similar to irbesartan. Future analyses after completion of the 2-year double-blind period will show whether these beneficial effects translate into a long-term nephroprotective potential of sparsentan. Travere Therapeutics.

Novel Dual Endothelin Inhibitors in the Management of Resistant Hypertension

Resistant hypertension (RH) is defined as the failure to achieve blood pressure control despite using triple combination therapy with a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RAS-i), a calcium antagonist, and a diuretic. The endothelin (ET) system is implicated in the regulation of vascular tone, primarily through vasoconstriction, intervenes in cardiac contractility with inotropic effects, and contributes to water and sodium renal reabsorption. ET inhibitors, currently approved for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension, seem to be also useful for essential hypertension and RH as well. Studies into the development of new dual ET inhibitors, which inhibit both type A and B ET (ETA and ETB) receptors, present initial results of managing RH. Aprocitentan (ACT-132577) is a novel, orally active and well tolerated dual ET receptor antagonist, which has been examined in several experimental studies and clinical trials with promising results for RH control. The recent publication of the large PRECISION study in The Lancet journal provides further reassurance regarding the efficacy and safety of aprocitentan for RH, with the aim of overcoming unmet needs in the management of this difficult group of patients.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of bosentan in Japanese patients with systemic sclerosis: A single-center retrospective study.

Patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) develop various vascular disorders, including digital ulcers (DUs), which are sometimes intractable. Bosentan is a dual endothelin receptor antagonist expected to suppress the development of new DUs. The objective of this study was to analyze retrospectively Japanese SSc patients treated with bosentan and investigate its efficacy and safety. We analyzed 40 patients who visited our department from 2009 to 2022 and were treated with bosentan. Of the 25 patients who were able to continue bosentan, 64% (16 patients) were cured by 16 weeks . New DUs occurred in 5.9% (2/34) of patients and the number of new DUs per person was 0.1. Adverse events occurred in 45% (18/40), and hepatic dysfunction was occurred most frequently at 32.5% (13/40). In univariate analysis, hepatic dysfunction was significantly high in patients with low modified Rodnan total skin thickness score. Antimitochondria-antibody-positive patients were more likely to develop liver dysfunction. Hepatic dysfunction was improved without the reduction or discontinuation, dose reduction, discontinuation, or concomitant use of ursodeoxycholic acid. These results suggest that bosentan can be selected as an additional treatment for DU, which is difficult to treat with existing therapies, while carefully monitoring hepatic function.

Bosentan Is Associated with a Reduction in Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure N-Terminal Pro-Hormone B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Levels in Young Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension is a rare and potentially fatal disease in children if left untreated. Emerging therapies, including Bosentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, have shown significant benefits in the adult pulmonary hypertension population; however, few studies have assessed the efficacy and safety of endothelin receptor antagonists in infants and young children. Our study was a single-center retrospective analysis of patients less than two years of age with a confirmed diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension and initiated on Bosentan therapy between 2017 and 2020. Twelve cases met eligibility criteria. Demographic data, laboratory data, echocardiographic, and cardiac catheterization data were analyzed. With treatment, there was a statistically significant decrease in mean right ventricular systolic pressure estimated by the tricuspid regurgitation jet (79 ± 23 mmHg reduced to 52 ± 25 mmHg; p < 0.001) N-terminal pro-hormone B-type natriuretic peptide levels (21,071 reduced to 2,037; p < 0.001). Additionally, improvement and eventual normalization of right ventricular function and septal geometry was seen within the first four months of therapy. Patients who underwent cardiac catheterization after therapy initiation (n = 4) demonstrated hemodynamic improvements; however, only the decrease in diastolic pulmonary artery pressure was statistically significant (p = 0.018). No significant differences in hemoglobin, platelet count, or liver function tests were observed between groups. In conclusion, these data suggest that Bosentan may be an effective and relatively safe treatment option for children less than two years of age with pulmonary hypertension. Further long-term randomized control studies are necessary to validate the potential clinical benefit of utilizing this drug therapy in young children.

Effectiveness of bosentan in the treatment of systemic sclerosis-related digital ulcers: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of bosentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, for systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients with digital ulcers (DUs). A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus was done using appropriate keywords till September 2021. Weighted mean difference (WMD) as the effect of therapeutic efficacy of bosentan on continuous outcomes was an estimate. Furthermore, the pooled prevalence of diffuse SSc and limited SSc was computed. Fixed or random effects models when appropriate were used for data synthesis. Totally, 469 patients, with a mean age ranging from 48.1 to 63.7 years, from 8 studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled frequency of diffuse SSc and limited SSc was 56% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 39%, 73%) and 44% (95% CI: 27%, 61%). The pooled prevalence of new DUs following bosentan treatment was 21% (95% CI: 10%, 33%). The results of the meta-analysis showed a pooled mean decrease of WMD: -0.09 (95% CI: -0.020, 0.02, P = 0.10), WMD: -2.82 (95% CI: -5.91, 0.27, P = 0.07), and WMD: -6.65 (95% CI: -9.49, -3.82, P < 0.001) in mean SSc-Health Assessment Questionnaire, pain, and Rodnan score, respectively. Our meta-analysis also indicated a significant pooled decrease in the number of new DUs in SSc patients compared to placebo subjects (WMD: -0.89 [95% CI: -1.40, -0.37; P = 0.001]) and baseline values (WMD: -1.34 (95% CI: -1.95, -0.73; P < 0.001). Bosentan possibly is an efficacious treatment option for SSc-related DUs. Although further large-scale randomized clinical trials are required to confirm the preliminary finding and underlying mechanisms of action.

Targeted Interleukin-9 delivery in pulmonary hypertension: Comparison of immunocytokine formats and effector cell study.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is accompanied by pulmonary vascular remodelling. By targeted delivery of Interleukin-9 (IL9) via the immunocytokine F8IL9, beneficial effects could be demonstrated in a mouse model of PH. This study aimed to compare two immunocytokine formats (single-chain Fv and full IgG) and to identify potential target cells of IL9. The Monocrotaline mouse model of PH (PH, n= 12) was chosen to evaluate the treatment effects of F8IL9F8 (n= 12) and F8IgGIL9 (n= 6) compared with sham-induced animals (control, n= 10), the dual endothelin receptor antagonist Macitentan (MAC, n= 12) or IL9-based immunocytokines with irrelevant antigen specificity (KSFIL9KSF, n= 12; KSFIgGIL9 n= 6). Besides comparative validation of treatment effects, the study was focused on the detection and quantification of mast cells (MCs) and regulatory T cells (Tregs). There was a significantly elevated systolic right ventricular pressure (104± 36 vs. 45± 17 mmHg) and an impairment of right ventricular echocardiographic parameters (RVbasal: 2.52± 0.25 vs. 1.94± 0.13 mm) in untreated PH compared with controls (p< 0.05). Only the groups treated with F8IL9, irrespective of the format, showed consistent beneficial effects (p< 0.05). Moreover, F8IL9F8 but not F8IgGIL9 treatment significantly reduced lung tissue damage compared with untreated PH mice (p< 0.05). There was a significant increase in Tregs in F8IL9-treated compared with control animals, the untreated PH and the MAC group (p< 0.05). Beneficial treatment effects of targeted IL9 delivery in a preclinical model of PH could be convincingly validated. IL9-mediated recruitment of Tregs into lung tissue might play a crucial role in the induction of anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative mechanisms potentially contributing to a novel disease-modifying concept.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of the dual endothelin receptor antagonist aprocitentan in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment

The effect of moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of the dual endothelin receptor antagonist aprocitentan was clinically investigated as 25% of aprocitentan is cleared through the liver. Aprocitentan is in clinical development for the treatment of resistant hypertension. This was an open-label, Phase 1 study. Subjects were recruited in two groups (i.e., moderate hepatic impairment (Child–Pugh B; n = 8) and matched healthy subjects (n = 9) and received a single oral dose of 25 mg aprocitentan. Thereafter, they were observed for 14 days. Due to personal reasons one healthy subject discontinued the study. The PK of aprocitentan were similar between subjects with moderate hepatic impairment and healthy subjects, with maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) reached at 4.0 h. There was no difference in Cmax, indicated by the geometric means ratio (90% confidence interval) of 1.03 (0.86–1.24). There was a lower apparent clearance, a similar apparent volume of distribution, a longer terminal half-life (56.4 h vs 48.3 h in healthy subjects), and an increase in area under the curve from zero to infinity of 23% in moderate hepatically impaired subjects compared to healthy subjects. There were no differences observed in plasma protein binding (range 98.7–99.0%). Aprocitentan was well tolerated, and headache was the only adverse event reported by one subject. In conclusion, there were no clinically relevant differences in PK between subjects with moderate hepatic impairment and healthy subjects. Based on these results, aprocitentan can be administered in subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment and dose adjustment is not required.Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04252495.

Treatment of nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy with an endothelin antagonist: ENDOTHELION (ENDOTHELin antagonist receptor in Ischemic Optic Neuropathy)—a multicentre randomised controlled trial protocol

BackgroundNonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAAION) is a major cause of blindness in individuals over 50 years of age, with no available effective treatment. The oral dual endothelin receptor antagonist, bosentan, increases retinal optic nerve head blood flow in healthy humans and glaucoma patients. The objective of this trial is to assess the efficacy of bosentan administered at the acute stage in improving outcomes in NAAION patients.MethodsENDOTHELION (ENDOTHELin antagonist receptor in Ischemic Optic Neuropathy) is a phase III, interventional, prospective, multicentre, placebo-controlled randomised double-blind clinical trial. The primary outcome is change in the visual field mean deviation (MD) at 3 months (Humphrey 30-2 SITA standard programme). Secondary outcomes include MD and visual acuity changes up to 24 months, changes in peripapillary retinal nerve fibre and macular ganglion cell layer thickness in the affected eye, as measured by optical coherence tomography, rate of NAAION bilateralisation at 2 years, and quality-of-life. Patients over 50 years of age presenting with typical NAAION of recent onset (less than 21 days) are randomly assigned to either 125 mg oral bosentan or placebo, twice a day, during 8 weeks. Besides visits during the treatment phase, patients attend follow-up visits at 2, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. The inclusion of patients began in August 2015 at five French University hospital ophthalmology departments and two specialised ophthalmology centres. It is planned to include 86 patients in this trial. To date we have included 72 patients and 49 have completed the full follow-up process.DiscussionAn endothelin receptor antagonist is a potential approach to improving the anatomical and functional prognosis of patients with NAAION. This multicentre double-blind randomised controlled trial is an opportunity to assess (1) the effect of bosentan on the structure and function of the optic nerve in NAAION, at 3 months, (2) the effect of bosentan on the bilateralisation rate at 24 months and (3) the tolerance profile of bosentan in this population.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02377271. Registered on March 3, 2015.