Abstract

Abstract Background and Aims IgAN is the most common glomerular disease worldwide. Despite optimized standard of care, most patients with IgAN progress to kidney failure within 10-15 years, consequently seriously affecting their quality of life and mortality. Treatments that reduce proteinuria and risk of kidney disease progression are urgently needed for IgAN. Sparsentan is a novel, oral, non-immunosuppressive, single molecule that is a dual endothelin and angiotensin receptor antagonist being investigated for IgAN and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. The Phase 3 PROTECT study is examining the long-term antiproteinuric and nephroprotective potential and safety of sparsentan compared with an active control, angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) irbesartan, in adults with IgAN. Reported here are the PROTECT pre-specified interim primary efficacy endpoint and safety outcomes. Method PROTECT is an ongoing, global, Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active controlled study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sparsentan versus the active control irbesartan in adults with IgAN with overt proteinuria despite receiving maximized treatment with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) and/or ARB. The study duration is 270 weeks; the double-blind period is 114 weeks (110 treatment and 4 follow-up) with an open-label extension period up to 156 weeks. Adult patients with biopsy-proven IgAN (excluding IgAN secondary to another condition or IgA vasculitis), urine protein excretion value ≥1.0 g/day, eGFR ≥30 mL/min/1.73m2, systolic/diastolic blood pressure ≤150/≤100 mmHg, and on a stable dose of ACEi and/or ARB therapy for at least 12 weeks prior to screening that is both the patient's maximum tolerated dose and at least one-half of the maximum labeled dose were eligible for inclusion. Patients took their last ACEi and/or ARB dose the day before randomization. Patients were randomized 1:1 to sparsentan or irbesartan (target dose 400 and 300 mg/day, respectively), stratified by screening eGFR and urine protein excretion values. The pre-specified interim primary efficacy endpoint of change from baseline in urine protein/creatinine ratio (UP/C, based on a 24-hour urine sample) at Week 36 was analyzed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis. The safety evaluation included assessment of treatment emergent adverse events. Results A total of 671 patients were screened; 406 patients from clinical sites in 18 countries, including sites in North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific, met eligibility criteria and were enrolled and randomized into PROTECT. Two randomized patients withdrew from the study prior to initiating study treatment. The 404 randomized patients who received study drug were included in the primary analysis population. The mean reduction in UP/C from baseline at 36 weeks was significantly greater in the patients who received sparsentan (-49.8%) versus irbesartan (-15.1%, P<0.0001). Proteinuria reduction consistency across baseline demographic and clinical characteristics and rates of complete and partial remission are reported, as well as sustained proteinuria reduction over time. Safety outcomes related to edema and liver function tests are reported. Overall, sparsentan was generally well-tolerated and comparable to irbesartan. Conclusion The interim results of the PROTECT study show that in adult patients with IgAN and persistent proteinuria above 1 g/day despite being treated with ACEis and/or ARBs, once-daily treatment with sparsentan compared head-to-head with maximum labelled or tolerated irbesartan produced a robust and clinically meaningful reduction in proteinuria. The safety of sparsentan was consistent with previous studies in FSGS and comparable to irbesartan.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call