We are grateful for the interesting article by Luciano et al. [1] describing a series of 10 cases from 5 different institutions of successful transcatheter closure of the partial anomalous pulmonary venous return (PAPVR). Their observations also included characteristics of patients with PAPVR in previously published 8 case reports. Two anatomic types of anomalous partial venous were described; the vertical vein (VV) type in which an abnormal left upper pulmonary vein connects to the innominate trunk via the VV and the scimitar vein (SV) type in which anomalous pulmonary venous connections from the middle and/or lower right pulmonary vein connect to the inferior vena cava (Fig.1a and b). It should be noted that both types are “extrapulmonary” dual drainage types of PAPVR. We hereby describe our own experience and follow-up of 4 patients (from 2004 to 2013) with PAPVR. Unlike Luciano et al., our patients had “intrapulmonary” duplicating pulmonary venous return in which a single lobar segment has separate venous channels draining to the left atrium as well as to a systemic vein (Fig. 1c and d). This remained undetected via preprocedural MRI but was successfully delineated in the catheterization lab using balloon occlusion angiography leading to successful device embolization. The clinical characteristics of these cases are shown in Table 1. Similar to the cases described by Luciano et al., we have closed the “extrapulmonary” PAPVR in few other patients which are not being described here. Previously, Snellen et al. [2] had elegantly described various patterns of anomalous pulmonary venous connections verified at surgery or autopsy in 124 patients. Even in that large series, therewas nodescription of intra-pulmonary anomalous pulmonary venous connections. Therefore, we believe that our cases may represent a unique and newly described entity. The embryological explanation of abnormal pulmonary venous connection based upon the differential time of development of primitive pulmonary vein and the atrial septum and the principle of preference of shortest path to the anastomosis between pulmonary veins and splanchnic complexes may also be applicable to “intrapulmonary” anomalous pulmonary venous connections as well. This newly described entity may remain underdiagnosed even with advanced imaging modalities and high index of suspicion is warranted in appropriate clinical settings.