Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Strategy Research Articles

Impact of diabetes mellitus on the early-phase arterial healing after drug-eluting stent implantation

BackgroundEarly arterial healing after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation may enable short dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) strategy. The impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on this healing has not been elucidated. We used coronary angioscopy (CAS) to compare intravascular status of DM and non-DM patients in the early phase after DES implantation.MethodsThis study was a multicenter retrospective observational study. We analyzed CAS findings of 337 lesions from 270 patients evaluated 3–5 months after DES implantation. We divided the lesion into two groups: DM (n = 149) and non-DM (n = 188). We assessed neointimal coverage (NIC) grades (dominant, maximum and minimum), thrombus adhesion and maximum yellow color grade. NIC was graded as follows: grade 0, stent struts were not covered; grade 1, stent struts were covered by thin layer; grade 2, stent struts were buried under neointima. Yellow color was graded as grade 0, white; grade 1, light yellow; grade 2, yellow; grade 3, intensive yellow.ResultsMinimum NIC grade was significantly lower in DM than in non-DM groups (p = 0.002), whereas dominant and maximum NIC grades were similar between them (p = 0.59 and p = 0.94, respectively), as were thrombus adhesion (44.3% vs. 38.8%, p = 0.32) and maximum yellow color grade (p = 0.78). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that DM was an independent predictor of minimum NIC of grade 0 (odds ratio: 2.14, 95% confidence interval: 1.19–3.86, p = 0.011).ConclusionsDM patients showed more uncovered struts than non-DM patients 3–5 months after DES implantation, suggesting that the recent ultra-short DAPT strategy might not be easily applied to DM patients.

Abstract 14325: Pooled Analysis of Bleeding, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in Clinical Trials of Time-constrained Dual-antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Introduction: The net clinical benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) reflects the paradoxical effects of an increased risk of bleeding and a reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). A time-constrained approach to DAPT has been recently investigated in five multicenter trials including GLOBAL LEADERS, STOP-DAPT2, SMART-CHOICE, TWIGHLIGHT and TICO. Methods: We undertook a pooled analysis of these trials to assess the overall associations between time-constrained P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy (“aspirin free regimen”) for bleeding events, MACE and all-cause mortality as compared to standard care with DAPT for at least 12 months post-PCI. We implemented a DerSimonian and Laird random effects meta-analysis using the metafor package in R. Results: 32,361 randomized trial participants, including 16,898 (52.2%) with a history of ACS, underwent PCI and had outcome data available. P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy from 1 - 3 months was associated with a reduced risk for bleeding (hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) 0.60 (0.45, 0.81); p=0.024), including in the ACS group in which the magnitude of risk reduction was greatest (HR (95% CI) 0.50 (0.41, 0.61). The estimates of the effect of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy on the hazard were also favorable for MACE (0.88 (0.77, 1.02)) and all-cause mortality (95% CI 0.85 (0.71, 1.03)). Conclusions: Compared with DAPT for 12 months post-PCI, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy from 1-3 months substantially reduces the risk of major and fatal bleeding and, in addition, potentially protective effects, for MACE and all-cause mortality. Considering patient safety, the results support a strategy of DAPT for 1-3 months followed by ‘aspirin free’ P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy.

Impact of diabetes mellitus on the early phase arterial healing after drug-eluting stent implantation: a multicenter coronary angioscopic study

Abstract Background Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a strong risk factor for major cardiac and cerebrovascular events. In particular, coronary artery disease with DM is often complicated with complex lesions. Drug-eluting stents (DES) are mainly used for these lesions, and dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has been used to prevent stent thrombosis. Early arterial healing after DES implantation may enable short DAPT strategy. However, the impact of DM on the arterial healing in the early phase has not been elucidated to date. Purpose We evaluated the arterial healing in the early phase after DES implantation using coronary angioscopy (CAS) and compared the findings between DM and non-DM patients. Methods This study was a multicenter retrospective observational study. We analyzed CAS findings of 337 lesions from 270 patients which were evaluated 3 to 5 months after DES implantation. Patients were divided into two groups: DM (149 lesions in 118 patients) versus non-DM groups (188 lesions in 152 patients). We assessed neointimal coverage (NIC) grades (maximum, minimum and dominant), thrombus adhesion and maximum yellow color of plaque underneath the stent. NIC was graded as follows: grade 0, stent struts were not covered; grade 1, stent struts were covered by thin layer; grade 2, stent struts were buried under neointima. Yellow color was graded as follows: grade 0, white; grade 1, light yellow; grade 2, yellow; grade 3, intensive yellow. Results Minimum NIC coverage grade was lower in DM group than in non-DM group (P=0.002, Figure), while maximum and dominant NIC coverage grades were similar between them (P=0.94 and P=0.59, respectively). Thrombus adhesion (44.3% versus 38.8%, P=0.32) and maximum yellow color grade (P=0.78) were also similar between DM and non-DM groups. Even after the adjustment by the confounding factors such as follow-up duration and primary disease of acute coronary syndrome, DM was an independent factor predicting grade 0 of minimum NIC (odds ratio [OR] 1.83 [95% confidence interval 1.11–3.03], P=0.019). Conclusion DM patients showed less covered struts than non-DM patients 3 to 5 months after DES implantation, suggesting that the recent ultra-short DAPT strategy might not be easily applicable to DM patients. Minimum neointimal coverage grade Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Dual antiplatelet therapy duration after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents: how short can we go?

Current guidelines recommend a duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and oral P2Y<inf>12</inf> receptor inhibitors following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) of 6 months for most patients with stable coronary disease and of 12 months for most patients with acute coronary syndromes. Large evidence from randomised clinical trials of shorter DAPT regimens after PCI with newer-generation DES is now emerging in heterogenous patient population not selected on the basis of high bleeding risk as well as in patients at high bleeding risk. The scope of this review is to provide an update on the benefits and harms of these short DAPT regimens and to discuss future directions in DAPT strategies after PCI with newer generation DES.

Pooled Analysis of Bleeding, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events, and All-Cause Mortality in Clinical Trials of Time-Constrained Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

BackgroundThe net clinical benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) reflects the paradoxical effects of an increased risk of bleeding and a reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. A time‐constrained approach to DAPT has been recently investigated in 5 multicenter trials including GLOBAL LEADERS, STOPDAPT2 (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Everolimus‐Eluting Cobalt‐Chromium Stent‐2), SMART‐CHOICE, TWILIGHT (Ticagrelor With Aspirin or Alone in High‐Risk Patients After Coronary Intervention), and TICO (Ticagrelor Monotherapy After 3 Months in the Patients Treated With New Generation Sirolimus Stent for Acute Coronary Syndrome).Methods and ResultsWe undertook a pooled analysis of these trials to assess the overall associations between time‐constrained P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy (aspirin‐free regimen) for bleeding events, major adverse cardiovascular events, and all‐cause mortality as compared to standard care with DAPT for at least 12 months post‐percutaneous coronary intervention. We implemented a DerSimonian and Laird random effects meta‐analysis using the metafor package in R. 32 361 randomized trial participants, including 16 898 (52.2%) who had a history of acute coronary syndrome, underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, and had outcome data available. P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy from 1 to 3 months was associated with a reduced risk for bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] 0.60; 95% CI, 0.45‐0.81), including in the acute coronary syndrome group in which the magnitude of risk reduction was greatest (HR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.41‐0.61). The estimates of the effect of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy on the HR were also favorable for major adverse cardiovascular events (0.88; 95% CI, 0.77‐1.02) and all‐cause mortality (0.85; 95% CI, 0.71‐1.03).ConclusionsCompared with DAPT for 12 months post‐percutaneous coronary intervention, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy from 1 to 3 months substantially reduces the risk of major and fatal bleeding and, in addition, confers potentially protective effects, for major adverse cardiovascular events and all‐cause mortality. Considering patient safety, the results support a strategy of DAPT for 1 to 3 months followed by aspirin‐free P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Drug-Eluting Stents: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents remains uncertain. We compared short-term (<6-month) DAPT followed by aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy; midterm (6-month) DAPT; 12-month DAPT; and extended-term (>12-month) DAPT after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents. Twenty-four randomized, controlled trials were selected using Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, and online databases through September 2019. The coprimary end points were myocardial infarction and major bleeding, which constituted the net clinical benefit. A frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted with a random-effects model. In 79 073 patients, at a median follow-up of 18 months, extended-term DAPT was associated with a reduced risk of myocardial infarction in comparison with 12-month DAPT (absolute risk difference, -3.8 incident cases per 1000 person-years; relative risk, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.54-0.87]), midterm DAPT (absolute risk difference, -4.6 incident cases per 1000 person-years; relative risk, 0.61 [0.45-0.83]), and short-term DAPT followed by aspirin monotherapy (absolute risk difference, -6.1 incident cases per 1000 person-years; relative risk, 0.55 [0.37-0.83]), or P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy (absolute risk difference, -3.7 incident cases per 1000 person-years; relative risk, 0.69 [0.51-0.95]). Conversely, extended-term DAPT was associated with a higher risk of major bleeding than all other DAPT groups. In comparison with 12-month DAPT, no significant differences in the risks of ischemic end points or major bleeding were observed with midterm or short-term DAPT followed by aspirin monotherapy, with the exception that short-term DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy was associated with a reduced risk of major bleeding. There were no significant differences with respect to mortality between the different DAPT strategies. In acute coronary syndrome, extended-term in comparison with 12-month DAPT was associated with a reduced risk of myocardial infarction without a significant increase in the risk of major bleeding. The present network meta-analysis suggests that, in comparison with 12-month DAPT, short-term DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy reduces major bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents, whereas extended-term DAPT reduces myocardial infarction at the expense of more bleeding events.

Tailoring Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for the Complex PCI Patient: Current Status and Perspectives.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has long been considered a matter of controversy. Complex-PCI (C-PCI) is considered to be associated with an increased ischemic risk that tends to be greater with progressively higher procedural complexity. Thus, with a view to balance ischemic versus bleeding risks, high complexity of PCI intuitively represents an advocate of prolonged DAPT duration. However, the optimal DAPT strategy in this high ischemic risk subset of patients remains unclear, a fact that is exacerbated by the absence of a universal definition of C-PCI, resulting in a significant between-study heterogeneity. The aim of this review is to highlight the increased risks associated with C-PCI, compare long- versus short-term DAPT regimens regarding safety and efficacy endpoints as well as investigate outcomes in special C-PCI cohorts, such as patients with bifurcation, left main or chronic total occlusion lesions. Furthermore, controversial issues, such as antithrombotic regimens in C-PCI patients with atrial fibrillation, and future perspectives are addressed.

Cilostazol for Chinese Patients with Aspirin Intolerance after Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation

Cilostazol-based dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is widely used in patients with aspirin intolerance after coronary drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in China. However, this empirical strategy is not recommended or even mentioned in Chinese or international guidelines due to a lack of evidence from large-scale studies. We aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of cilostazol-based DAPT in this special population. In this cohort study, patients were grouped according to the DAPT strategy that they received after coronary DES implantation. The primary efficacy endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). Angiographic follow-up and major bleeding events were also recorded. A total of 918 patients receiving cilostazol-based DAPT due to aspirin intolerance were enrolled, matched with 918 patients receiving aspirin-based DAPT. After 15-month prospective follow-up, the cilostazol group had lower risk of MACCE (5.1% vs. 7.6%, propensity score adjusted hazard ratio = 0.671 [95% confidence interval 0.462-0.974], p = 0.036) compared with the aspirin group. Lower rate of coronary lesion progression was also found through follow-up angiography in the cilostazol group (17.4% vs. 23.6%, p = 0.022), especially in nontarget lesions (12.1% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.019). The two groups had the same risk of major bleeding events (0.8% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.364). In the current study, cilostazol is a good substitute for aspirin in patients who have aspirin intolerance but need DAPT after coronary DES implantation in China. However, large-scale randomized controlled trials were still required to further confirm its efficacy and safety.

De-escalation of antiplatelets after percutaneous coronary intervention: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of various de-escalation strategies.

To compare early de-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (1-3 months) to monotherapy with either P2Y12 inhibitor or aspirin vs. 12 months DAPT after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES). Electronic databases of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library were searched through February 2020 to identify randomized controlled trials. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted with random effects model. The main endpoints of interest were cardiovascular mortality and total bleeding events. Among seven trials (35821 patients), 52.6% patients were presented with acute coronary syndrome. A total of 3359 patients and 14530 patients were de-escalated to aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy, respectively. At a median follow-up of 12 months, compared with 12 months of DAPT, there was no significant difference in cardiovascular mortality between 1-month DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.84 (95% credible interval 0.29-2.43)], 3 months of DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy [HR 0.74 (0.39-1.46)], or 3 months of DAPT [HR 1.00 (0.54-1.86)] followed by aspirin monotherapy. Except for de-escalation of DAPT to aspirin monotherapy after 3 months [HR 0.75 (0.43-1.20)], de-escalation to P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after 1 month [HR 0.28 (0.10-0.83)], or 3 months [HR 0.57 (0.33-0.98)] were associated with significant decrease in total bleeding events. There were no significant differences in terms of ischaemic endpoints among different DAPT strategies. Early de-escalation of DAPT (1-3 months) to monotherapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor instead of aspirin might be a safer and equally effective approach compared with 12 months of DAPT in patients with PCI and DES.

Real-World Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Polymer-Free Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantations to Treat Coronary Artery Disease

ObjectivesThe objective of this post hoc analysis was to analyze real-world dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) regimens following polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent (PF-SES) implantations in an unselected patient population.MethodsPatient-level data from two all-comers observational studies (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02629575 and NCT02905214) were pooled and analyzed in terms of their primary endpoint. During the data verification process, we observed substantial deviations from DAPT guideline recommendations. To illuminate this gap between clinical practice and guideline recommendations, we conducted a post hoc analysis of DAPT regimens and clinical event rates for which we defined the net adverse event rate (NACE) consisting of target lesion revascularization (TLR, primary endpoint of all-comers observational studies) all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis (ST), and bleeding events. A logistic regression was utilized to determine predictors why ticagrelor was used in stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients instead of the guideline-recommended clopidogrel.ResultsFor stable CAD, the composite endpoint of clinical, bleeding, and stent thrombosis, i.e., NACE, between the clopidogrel and ticagrelor treatment groups was not different (5.4% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.745). Likewise, in the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) cohort, the NACE rates were not different between both DAPT strategies (9.2% vs. 9.3%, p = 0.927). There were also no differences in the accumulated rates for TLR, myocardial infarction ([MI], mortality, bleeding events, and stent thrombosis in elective and ACS patients. The main predictors for ticagrelor use in stable CAD patients were age < 65 years, smaller vessels, treatment of ostial and calcified lesions, and in-stent restenosis.ConclusionWithin the framework of a post hoc analysis based on a real-world, large cohort study, there were no differences in the combined endpoint of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), bleeding and thrombotic events for clopidogrel and ticagrelor in stable CAD or ACS patients. Despite the recommendation for clopidogrel by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), real-world ticagrelor use was observed in subgroups of stable CAD patients that ought to be explored in future trials.

Dual antiplatelet therapy strategies and clinical outcomes in patients treated with polymer-free biolimus A9-coated stents.

A large trial established the favourable clinical profile of a new polymer-free biolimus A9-eluting stent (PF-BES) with a one-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) regimen in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR). We aimed to evaluate the real-world patterns of indications, DAPT strategies and outcomes for the PF-BES following this evidence. CHANCE is a multicentre registry including all patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with at least one PF-BES. The reasons for the PF-BES PCI and planned antithrombotic regimens were collected. Primary outcomes were the 390-day Kaplan-Meier estimates of patient-oriented and device-oriented composite endpoints (POCE: death, myocardial infarction [MI] or target vessel revascularisation [TVR]; DOCE: cardiac death, target vessel MI or ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation [ID-TLR]). Between January 2016 and July 2018, 858 patients (age 74±10 years, 64.6% male, 58.7% acute coronary syndrome presentation) underwent PF-BES PCI. The main reasons for the physicians' choice of PF-BES reflected a perceived HBR in 77.7% of patients. One-month DAPT was planned in 40.3% of patients. At 390-day follow-up (median 340 days, interquartile range: 187-390 days), the estimated incidence of POCE was 13.1% (any MI 3.7%, any TVR 3.4%) and of DOCE was 7.1% (TV-MI 3.6%, ID-TLR 1.4%), while the 390-day estimate of any bleeding event was 11.1% (BARC 3-5 bleeding 3.0%). In a large all-comers registry, PF-BES was used mostly in HBR patients, frequently followed by a very short DAPT regimen. The reported outcomes suggest a favourable safety and efficacy profile for the PF-BES in a real-world clinical setting. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03622203.

Cost-effectiveness of Platelet Function-Guided Strategy with Clopidogrel or Ticagrelor.

Some patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) can still exhibit heightened residual platelet reactivity (HRPR), which is potentially linked to adverse vascular outcomes. Better tailored DAPT strategies are needed to address this medical need. Aim: To assess the cost-effectiveness of guided DAPT with clopidogrel or ticagrelor in addition to aspirin when using VerifyNow P2Y12 testing in post-ACS patients. Methods: The costs were calculated per 1,000 patients aged >55 years. It was assumed that all patients received either generic clopidogrel or ticagrelor for 1 year, and underwent VerifyNow P2Y12 assay testing before DAPT maintenance. Results: Guided DAPT will prevent five more MIs and six more deaths per 1,000 patients than a standard prescription of generic clopidogrel. The total predictive value of costs per patient is 32% lower if a guided strategy is used than if ticagrelor is given to all patients. Conclusion: Assessment of heightened residual platelet reactivity with P2Y12 assay in triaging DAPT post-ACS patients for 1 year is a cost-effective strategy that would reduce financial burden compared to routine administration of more expensive antiplatelet agents.

Patient-oriented composite endpoints and net adverse clinical events with ticagrelor monotherapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the randomised GLOBAL LEADERS trial.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy following one-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on the rates of patient-oriented composite endpoints (POCE) and net adverse clinical events (NACE). The rates of site-reported Academic Research Consortium (ARC)-2 defined POCE (all-cause death, any stroke, any myocardial infarction or any revascularisation) and NACE (POCE or bleeding type 3 or 5 according to the Bleeding ARC [BARC]) were reported up to two years by intention-to-treat principle in the randomised, multicentre, open-label GLOBAL LEADERS study comparing two antiplatelet strategies in 15,991 patients undergoing PCI. The experimental strategy consisted of aspirin with ticagrelor for one month followed by ticagrelor monotherapy for 23 months, whereas the reference treatment consisted of 12-month DAPT followed by 12-month aspirin monotherapy. At two years, POCE occurred in 1,050 (13.2%) patients in the experimental group and in 1,131 (14.2%) in the reference group (HR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.85-1.01, p=0.085). NACE occurred in 1,145 (14.4%) patients in the experimental group and in 1,237 (15.5%) patients in the reference group (HR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85-1.00, p=0.057). In pre-specified subgroup analyses, no significant treatment-by-subgroup interactions were found for either POCE or NACE at two years. The experimental treatment strategy of one-month DAPT followed by 23 months of ticagrelor alone did not result in a significant reduction in the rates of site-reported POCE or NACE, when compared to the reference treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01813435.

P2794Real-world reasons and outcomes for 1-month versus longer dual antiplatelet therapy strategies with a polymer-free biolimus A9-coated stent: insights from the all-comers FREEDOM registry

Abstract Background The LEADERS FREE trial established the favourable clinical profile of a new polymer-free biolimus A9-eluting stent (PF-BES) in patients at high bleeding risk when used with a 1-month dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT) strategy. Purpose This is the first study evaluating real-world reasons and outcomes for a 1-month versus longer DAPT strategies following PF-BES percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods FREEDOM is an all-comers registry including all patients who underwent PCI with at least one PF-BES at 10 sites, between January 2016 and July 2018. Patients were stratified according to DAPT strategy at discharge (1-month vs &gt;1-month). Baseline features, reasons for PF-BES as reported by the treating physician, and outcomes were compared between groups. Primary outcomes were the 390-day estimates of a patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE: death, myocardial infarction (MI) or target vessel revascularization) and of a device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE: cardiac death, target vessel-MI or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization). Incidence rates were adjusted for clinically relevant factors and outcome predictors. To avoid survival bias, landmark analyses starting from 1-month post-PCI were further carried. Results Following PF-BES PCI, 328 (40.3%) patients were discharged with 1-month DAPT and 485 (59.6%) patients with longer DAPT (median 12 months, IQR 6–12 months). Patients with hypertension or on oral anticoagulation (OAT) were more likely and patients with a previous or an index MI were less likely to be discharged on 1-month DAPT. Patients prescribed with 1-month DAPT were more likely to have had a PF-BES for a LEADERS FREE high bleeding risk criterium than those with longer DAPT (90.2% vs 69.9%, p=0.001). The same association was observed when the reason for PF-BES was a planned major surgery (13.1% vs 6.2%; p=0.001) or OAC to be continued after PCI (38.7% vs 16.5%, p&lt;0.001). Conversely, patients with planned longer DAPT were more likely to have had a PF-BES following the operator preference (2.4% vs 15.5%, p&lt;0.001) or for a reason other than a LEADERS FREE criterium or operator preference (5.2% vs 11.3%, p&lt;0.001). No between-groups differences in the occurrence of the primary outcomes (1-month vs &gt;1-month DAPT: POCE 11.9% vs 13.2%, p=0.747; adj-HR 1.29 [95% CI 0.78–2.10]; DOCE: 4.8% vs 8.1%, p=0.500; adj-HR 1.01 [95% CI 0.50–2.07]) and of bleedings (any: 11.3% vs 9.4%, p=0.472; adj-HR 0.87 [95% CI 0.51–1-50]; BARC 3–5: 4.2% vs 2.2%; p=0.108; adj-HR 1.50 [95% CI 0.58–3.87]) were observed. Landmark analyses showed similar results. Conclusions In a large contemporary all-comers registry, factors reflecting the operator-perceived patient high bleeding risk were the main drivers of a very-short DAPT strategy following PF-BES PCI. We found no interaction of DAPT duration with outcomes following PF-BES PCI, an observation warranting investigation in adequately powered randomised studies.

P2820Contemporary indications, dual antiplatelet therapy strategies and clinical outcomes for a polymer-free biolimus A9-coated stent: the all-comers FREEDOM registry

Abstract Background The absence of a polymer-coat along with fast drug absorption represent the benchmark counterpart of the favourable clinical profile of a new polymer-free biolimus A9-eluting stent (PF-BES), also when used with a very short dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) strategy. Its current use in the real-world setting has not been thoroughly assessed. Purpose We evaluated contemporary patterns of indications, DAPT strategies and outcomes for the PF-BES. Methods FREEDOM is a multicenter registry including all patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with at least one PF-BES at 10 italian sites. Reasons for PF-BES PCI and planned antithrombotic regimen at discharge were collected. Primary outcomes were the 390-day Kaplan Meier estimates of a patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE: death, any myocardial infarction [MI] or any target vessel revascularization [TVR]) and of a device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE: cardiac death, target vessel-MI or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization [ID-TLR]). The independent outcomes predictors were assessed through multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis. Results Between January 2016 and July 2018, 858 patients (age: 74±10 years, 64.6% males, 58.7% acute coronary syndrome presentation) underwent PF-BES PCI. Main reasons for PF-BES physician's choice were advanced age (26.0%), oral anticoagulation (OAT) to be continued after PCI (25.3%), operator preference for PF-BES (9.9%), planned major surgery (8.6%), cancer (8.6%), anemia (7.9%) and recent bleeding (7.0%). Overall, the operator choice to implant a PF-BES reflected a perceived high bleeding risk in 77.7% of patients. At discharge, 99.2% of patients were on DAPT, 19.5% on triple therapy, and 0.8% on single antiplatelet therapy plus OAT. Planned DAPT duration was 1-month in 40.3% of patients, with 33.8% of these being on triple therapy. At 390-day follow-up (median 340 days, interquartile range: 187–390 days) the incident estimate of POCE was 13.1% (any MI 3.7%, any TVR 3.4%) and of DOCE was 7.1% (TV-MI 3.6%, ID-TLR 1.4%); while 390-day estimate of any bleeding event was 11.1% (BARC 3–5 bleeding 3.0%). Independent predictors of 390-day POCE were eGFR≤60 ml/min (HR 1.81; 95% CI 1.09–3.04, p=0.028), a history of cancer (HR 2.62; 95% CI 1.43–4.81, p=0.002) and severely calcified lesion/s (HR 2.05; 95% CI 1.09–3.85, p=0.025). Independent predictors of DOCE were a previous MI (HR 2.06; 95% CI 1.03–4.15, p=0.041), a history of cancer (HR 2.69; 95% CI 1.18–6.13, p=0.019) and bifurcation lesion/s (HR 2.66; 95% CI 1.38–5.13, p=0.004). Conclusions In a large, contemporary all-comers registry, the main reasons for PF-BES use reflected in most cases the operator-perceived high bleeding risk of the patient. Following PF-BES PCI, a very-short DAPT strategy was frequently implemented. The outcomes observed in this registry suggest a favorable safety and efficacy profile for the PF-BES in a real-world clinical setting.

P5535Gender differences with short-term vs 12 months dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with the COMBO dual therapy stent: a 1-year analysis of the REDUCE trial

Abstract Background Gender differences in the thrombotic and bleeding risk have been suggested to condition the benefits of antithrombotic therapies in Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) patients, and mainly among those undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions with drug eluting stents (DES). Therefore, the impact of gender on the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) treated is still unclear and was therefore the aim of the present sub-study. Methods REDUCE is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, investigator-initiated study, designed to enroll 1500 ACS patients after treatment with the COMBO Dual Stent Therapy, based on a non-inferiority design. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either 3 or 12 months of DAPT. Primary study endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST), stroke, target-vessel revascularization (TVR) and bleeding (BARC II, III, V) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints were cardiovascular mortality and the individual components of the primary endpoint. Results From June 2014 to May 2016 300 women and 1196 men were randomized in the trial. Among them 43.7% of females and 51.9% of males were assigned to the 3 months DAPT treatment. Baseline characteristics were well matched between the two arms, but of a lower rate of TIMI flow &lt;3 (p&lt;0.001) and lower systolic blood pressure (p&lt;0.05) among women and a more advanced age (p=0.05) among men receiving a shorted DAPT. At 1 year follow-up, no difference in the primary endpoint was observed according to DAPT duration (females: 6.9% vs 5.9%, HR [95% CI]=1.19 [0.48–2.9], p=0.71; males: 8.2% vs 9%, HR [95% CI]=0.92 [0.63–1.35], p=0.67). Results were confirmed after correction for baseline differences (females: adjusted HR [95% CI]=1.12 [0.45–2.78], p=0.81; males: adjusted HR [95% CI]=0.90 [0.61–1.32], p=0.60). Comparable rates of survival, thrombotic (MI, stent thrombosis, TVR, stroke) and bleeding events were observed with the two DAPT strategies, with no impact of gender. Conclusions The present study shows that among ACS patients randomized in the REDUCE trial, a 3 months DAPT strategy offers comparable results as compared to a standard 12 months DAPT at 1-year follow-up in both male and female gender. Acknowledgement/Funding None

P2531Impact of age on clinical outcomes after PCI in patients with ACS and stable CAD treated with 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy following 1-month DAPT in the randomized GLOBAL LEADERS study

Abstract Background The efficacy and safety of ticagrelor monotherapy in elderly patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or stable coronary artery disease (CAD) has not been evaluated. Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor monotherapy following 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after PCI in relation to age and clinical presentation in the GLOBAL LEADERS study cohort. Methods This is a subanalysis of the randomized multicentre GLOBAL LEADERS study, comparing the experimental strategy of 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy after 1 month of ticagrelor and aspirin with the reference strategy of 12-month DAPT followed by 12-month aspirin monotherapy in 15991 patients undergoing PCI. Patients were categorized into elderly and very elderly according to a pre-specified cut-off of 75 years and a post-hoc defined cut-off of 80 years. Impact of age and clinical presentation (ACS versus stable CAD) on clinical outcome at 2 years was evaluated. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality or nonfatal, centrally adjudicated, new Q-wave myocardial infarction. Results In the overall elderly (&gt;75 years) population (n=2565), primary endpoint occurred in 7.2% of patients in the experimental group and in 9.4% of patients in the reference group (p=0.041) at 2 years (p int =0.23). Elderly patients in the experimental group had a lower rate of definite stent thrombosis (ST) (0.2% vs. 0.9%, p=0.043, p int=0.03), definite or probable ST (0.4 vs. 1.3%, p=0.015, p int=0.01) and a numerically higher rates of BARC 3 or 5 type bleeding (5.0% vs. 3.9%, p=0.192, p int=0.06), when compared to the reference arm. Among elderly patients presenting with ACS both treatment groups did not differ in the rates of primary endpoint (9.1% vs. 10.8%, p=0.367) and BARC 3 or 5 type bleeding (4.7% vs. 5.7%, p=0.458), whereas among elderly patients with stable CAD the experimental strategy was associated with numerically lower rates of the primary endpoint (5.7% vs. 8.4%, p=0.046) (p int =0.42) and a higher rate of BARC 3 or 5 type bleedings (5.3% vs. 2.6%, p=0.012) (p int =0.02) at 2 years. Exploratory analyses among very elderly (≥80 years) patients (n=1169) indicated no significant differences between treatment groups in the rates of the primary endpoint (10.2% vs. 11.7% p=0.411, p int=0.940) and BARC 3 or 5 type bleeding (6.0% vs. 5.3%, p=0.630, p int=0.514) at 2 years. Conclusions The efficacy and safety of the experimental treatment strategy of 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy after 1-month DAPT following PCI was not identified as age-dependent. Among elderly patients the anti-ischemic benefit was derived at the expense of increased rate of BARC 3 or 5 type bleeding in stable CAD subgroup, but not in ACS subgroup. Acknowledgement/Funding European Clinical Research Institute, which received unrestricted grants from Biosensors International, AstraZeneca, and the Medicines Company.

P6411Dyspnea in ticagrelor treated patients in the all-comer randomized GLOBAL LEADERS study and its association with clinical outcomes

Abstract Background Dyspnea represents a drug adverse effect reported with a higher frequency for ticagrelor, as compared with other P2Y12 antagonists. The impact of dyspnea on clinical outcomes has not been yet evaluated in the context of aspirin-free therapies after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Purpose The study aimed to evaluate the incidence of dyspnea and its associations with demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing PCI treated with ticagrelor either as monotherapy or as a part of a dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in the GLOBAL LEADERS cohort. Methods This is a sub-analysis of the randomized all-comer GLOBAL LEADERS study (n=15991), comparing the experimental strategy of ticagrelor monotherapy following one-month DAPT after PCI with the reference strategy of 12-month DAPT followed by 12-month aspirin monotherapy. The incidence of dyspnea reported as adverse event (AE) and its relation to demographic characteristics and 2-year clinical outcomes was evaluated (intention-to-treat analysis). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were performed, including randomized treatment and incidence of first dyspnea event as a time-dependent covariate. The primary endpoint was a composite of 2-year all-cause mortality or centrally adjudicated, new Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI). Patient-oriented clinical endpoints (POCE) comprised all-cause death, any stroke, MI or revascularization, whereas net adverse clinical events (NACE) included POCE and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC)-defined bleeding type 3 or 5. Results Overall, dyspnea was reported as an AE in 2101 patients (13.2%) up to two years of follow-up, with a higher frequency in the experimental arm (16.4%) as compared with the reference group (11.1%) (hazard ratio [HR]1.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.56–1.86, p=0.001). Predictors of dyspnea AE up to 2 years by multivariate analyses were: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR1.71, 95% CI 1.56–1.87, p=0.001), female gender (HR1.31, 95% CI 1.18–1.44, p=0.001), hypertension (HR1.31, 95% CI 1.19–1.44, p=0.001, prior coronary artery bypass grafting (HR1.30, 95% CI 1.10–1.54, p=0.003), left ventricle ejection fraction below 40% (HR1.22, 95% CI 1.04–1.42, p=0.012), presentation with acute coronary syndrome (HR1.19, 95% CI 1.09–1.29, p=0.001) and body mass index (≥27kg/m2) (HR1.17, 95% CI 1.08–1.28, p=0.001). In patients who reported dyspnea AE, the two-year rates of the efficacy and safety endpoints in the experimental and reference arm were: for the primary endpoint 3.4% vs. 4.3% (p adjusted=0.807), for POCE 15.8% vs. 17.6% (p adjusted=0.218), for NACE 17.2% vs. 19.6% (p adjusted=0.082), for BARC 3 or 5 type bleeding 17.2% vs. 19.6% (p adjusted=0.082), respectively. Conclusions The occurrence of dyspnea AE up to two years after PCI appeared not to affect the safety of the experimental treatment strategy of 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy following one-month DAPT after PCI. Acknowledgement/Funding Study founded by European Cardiovascular Research Institute, which received unrestricted grants from Biosensors Int., AstraZeneca, Medicines Company.

Impact of aging on platelet reactivity in diabetic patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy.

Advanced age and diabetes represent summative conditions in the determination of cardiovascular risk, and especially for the management of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), often requiring balancing between bleeding and thrombotic complications. However, few studies have so far evaluated the impact of age on platelet reactivity and suboptimal platelet inhibition (high-on treatment platelet reactivity-HRPR) on DAPT among diabetic patients, that was, therefore the aim of the present study. In diabetic patients treated with DAPT (ASA + clopidogrel or ticagrelor) platelet reactivity was assessed at 30-90days post-discharge for an acute coronary syndrome or elective PCI. Aggregation was assessed by multiple-electrode aggregometry. HRPR was defined for values above the lower limit of normality (in non-treated patients). Elderly patients were considered ≥ 75years of age. We included 462 patients, among them 149 (32.2%) were ≥ 75years. Elderly patients were more often females (p = 0.006), with lower body size (p = 0.04), acute coronary syndrome at presentation and renal failure (p < 0.001), non-smokers (p = 0.002), in therapy with insulin (p = 0.02) and diuretics (p < 0.001) and lower rate of betablockers (p = 0.02). Age directly related with C reactive protein (p = 0.01), creatinine levels and inversely with hemoglobin (p < 0.001) and triglycerides (p = 0.003). No association was found at linear regression analysis for platelet reactivity and age with different activating stimuli, but for ASPI test (r = 0.12; p = 0.03). No significant difference in HAPR was found in elderly patients (2.4 vs. 3.2%, p = 0.76, OR[95% CI] = 0.45[0.1-2.11], p = 0.31). HRPR for ADP antagonists was similarly not affected by age (30.1% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.28, adjusted OR[95% CI] = 0.78[0.47-1.29], p = 0.33). Comparable results were obtained when considering separately the DAPT strategies with clopidogrel or ticagrelor, or when adjusting our results according to propensity score values. Among diabetic patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy for an acute coronary syndrome or elective percutaneous coronary intervention, age does not affect platelet reactivity or the rate of high-on treatment platelet reactivity. Similar results were obtained for ASA and clopidogrel or ticagrelor.

Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy and outcome in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous revascularization: A meta-analysis of 11 randomized trials

BackgroundAcute coronary syndromes (ACS) represent a context of higher thrombotic risk, where larger advantages have been achieved by the administration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). However, the indication of 1 year DAPT after coronary angioplasty for ACS has been supported by an outdated randomized trial (PCI-CURE). In addition, the initial fear of late thrombotic events emerged with first generation drug-eluting stents (DES), that suggested the need of a prolonged DAPT prescription, has been completely overcome by the recent technological evolution of DES, that have shown faster re-endothelization and lower rates of late thrombotic complications. By keeping in mind the balance between thrombotic and bleeding complications, and due to the paucity of dedicated randomized trials, the identification of the optimal duration of DAPT after ACS is still matter of debate, and is therefore the aim of the present meta-analysis. MethodsLiterature and main scientific session abstracts were searched. The primary efficacy endpoint was mortality, primary safety endpoint was the occurrence of major bleedings. A pre-specified analysis was conducted according to the DAPT strategy allocation (<12 vs standard 12 months duration and 6–12 months vs extended DAPT). ResultsWe included 3 RCTs and subanalyses from 8 RCTs, with a total of 17,941 patients. No difference in mortality was observed between shorter vs longer DAPT (OR[95%CI] = 1.11[0.90,1.36], p = 0.33; phet = 0.76). A shorter DAPT duration significantly reduced the rate of major bleeding events (1.5%, vs 1.9%, OR [95%CI] = 0.75 [0.60, 0.94], p = 0.01; phet = 0.43). The reduction in bleeding events was more significant in trials evaluating extended DAPT duration (OR[95%CI] = 0.62[0.45, 0.85], p = 0.003; phet = 0.49). No difference in cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis was observed with shorter vs standard 12-moth DAPT, whereas a more extended treatment (beyond 1 year), was associated with a significant reduction in recurrent ischemic events. Similar results were observed at a sensitivity analysis conducted according to the type of stent, time to randomization or DAPT duration. ConclusionsBased on the current meta-analysis including 17,941 ACS patients undergoing PCI, a short duration of DAPT may be safely considered, with similar rates of recurrent thrombotic complications as compared to the standard 12 months, and similar mortality. A more extended DAPT administration (beyond 1 year) provides benefits in ischemic events, but with an excess in haemorragic complications, with overall neutral effects on mortality.