Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Strategy Research Articles

DISCONTINUING DAPT: NOT JUST A MATTER OF SCORES BUT OF INTEGRATED EVALUATION? A KEY ROLE OF IMAGING IN A COMPLEX SCENARIO

Abstract The duration of the dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is a widely debated topic within the scientific community. The latest guidelines on acute coronary syndromes have supported the possibility of different therapeutic approaches tailored to patient characteristics. However, the clinical cardiologist‘s decisions are not always based on certain principles. The following case report is a practical example. Discussion: A 31–years–old man came to our attention after a resuscitated cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation during a motorcycle race. His history was characterized by a previous acute myocardial infarction at the age of thirteen due to a traumatic dissection of the proximal left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery and ascending aorta treated conservatively, with residual transmural necrosis of the mid and subendocardial anterior wall on cardiac MRI. At the admission, ECG showed ST–segment elevation in the anterior leads. Coronary angiography revealed occlusion of the proximal LAD coronary artery, treated with drug–eluting stent (ONYX 5.0 mm), with evidence of dissection and aneurysmal wall of that segment. The patient started a DAPT with aspirin and prasugrel. At discharge, echocardiogram evidenced a moderate left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction 34%) with signs of anterior and apical necrosis. Later, the patient was admitted for a subcutaneous defibrillator implantation, due to persistent moderate ventricular dysfunction. One year after revascularization, a lifelong DAPT strategy with downgrading to clopidogrel was considered the best choice for the following considerations: the young age of the patient, the low bleeding risk (PRECISE DAPT score 8), a not elevated DAPT score (value 2), the revascularization in the aneurysmal segment without an appropriate stent apposition (due to absence of a right sizing) and the previous dissection with sign of partial thrombosis at coronary CT. Conclusions: The anatomical complexity of angioplasty procedures and the delicate balance between ischemic and thrombotic risks have led to continuously evolving therapeutic strategies. The clinical scores currently available cannot often account for complex coronary anatomy. Thus, it‘s essential to consider a personalized approach, individualized on clinical and imaging characteristics, that encompasses ischemic and bleeding risk and procedural data for the appropriate treatment for each patient.

P2Y12 monotherapy versus standard dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Introduction Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the recommended therapy for lowering the ischemic risk among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the increased incidence of bleeding is a major concern. Monotherapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor after short-term DAPT to reduce adverse cardiovascular events and bleeding rates has not been fully established and remains uncertain. This meta-analysis aims to determine the effectiveness of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short-term DAPT in reducing cardiovascular and bleeding events. Methods A comprehensive search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the use of short-term DAPT followed by P2Y12 monotherapy in patients with ACS who underwent PCI was conducted. Outcome measures for all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and bleeding rates were analyzed using a random-effects model via Review Manager V5.4. Results A total of six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 36,724 subjects were analyzed. There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality (RR 0.89 [95% CI: 0.78-1.02], I² = 0%, p = 0.10) and myocardial infarction (RR 1.00 [95% CI: 0.88-1.14], I² = 0%, p = 0.72) between the P2Y12 inhibitor group and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) group. There was a lower rate of major bleeding in the P2Y12 group compared to the DAPT group (RR 0.65 [95% CI: 0.49-0.88], I² = 76%, p = 0.002). The major sources of substantial heterogeneity are due to different intervals of de-escalation and baseline risk factors prior to PCI in each study. Conclusion P2Y12 monotherapy has similar rates of all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction. However, early de-escalation leads to a lower incidence of bleeding. P2Y12 monotherapy showed a 35% decreased risk of bleeding compared to the DAPT strategy. This suggests that P2Y12 monotherapy is a preferable antiplatelet strategy in patients undergoing PCI, especially in the high-risk bleeding population.

Clinical Impact of Dyspnea after Ticagrelor Treatment and the Effect of Switching to Clopidogrel in Patients with Myocardial Infarction.

Dyspnea is frequent during ticagrelor-based dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, its clinical characteristics or management strategy remains uncertain. The study assessed 2,617 AMI patients from the Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Stabilized Patients with AMI (TALOS-AMI) trial. Dyspnea during 1-month ticagrelor-based DAPT and following DAPT strategies with continued ticagrelor or de-escalation to clopidogrel from 1 to 12 months were evaluated for drug adherence, subsequent dyspnea, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and bleeding events. Dyspnea was reported by 538 patients (20.6%) during 1 month of ticagrelor-based DAPT. Adherence to allocated DAPT over the study period was lower in the continued ticagrelor arm than the de-escalation to clopidogrel, particularly among the dyspneic population (81.1% vs. 91.5%, p < 0.001). Among ticagrelor-treated patients with dyspnea, those switched to clopidogrel at 1 month had a lower frequency of dyspnea at 3 months (34.3% vs. 51.7%, p < 0.001) and 6 months (25.5% vs. 38.4%, p = 0.002) than those continued with ticagrelor. In patients with dyspnea in their 1-month ticagrelor-based DAPT, de-escalation was not associated with increased MACE (1.3% vs. 3.9%, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.08-1.11, p = 0.07) or clinically relevant bleeding (3.2% vs. 6.2%, HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.22-1.19, p = 0.12) at 1 year. Dyspnea is a common side effect among ticagrelor-based DAPTs in AMI patients. Switching from ticagrelor to clopidogrel after 1 month in AMI patients may provide a reasonable option to alleviate subsequent dyspnea in ticagrelor-relevant dyspneic patients, without increasing the risk of ischemic events (NCT02018055).

Optimization of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Pakistani Patients Undergoing PCI: A Strategy to Minimize Bleeding Risks and Improve Outcomes

Background: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) is essential for treating coronary artery disease. The use of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) is crucial to prevent thrombotic complications but presents bleeding risks. This challenge is accentuated by the variability in genetic, demographic, and regional factors, particularly in Pakistan, where there is a high prevalence of cardiovascular diseases. Objective: To optimize DAPT strategies for Pakistani patients undergoing PCI by minimizing bleeding risks while ensuring therapeutic efficacy, aiming to pioneer personalized cardiovascular care. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted at Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, involving 500 patients who underwent PCI and received DAPT from January 1, 2023, to January 1, 2024. Comprehensive data collection included patient demographics, clinical histories, specifics of PCI procedures, and outcomes of bleeding and thrombotic events, through a detailed review of medical records. Results: The cohort predominantly consisted of males (70%), with an average age of 58 years. Most patients (96%, n=480) were prescribed aspirin and clopidogrel, while a smaller fraction (4%, n=20) received aspirin and ticagrelor. Compliance was high, with 90% adherence. Bleeding occurred in 10% of the cohort (n=50), with major bleeds necessitating hospitalization in 4% (n=20). Thrombotic events were noted in 3% of patients (n=15). Conclusion: The study underscores the importance of personalized DAPT regimens that address individual risks and regional healthcare challenges in Pakistan. Tailored approaches are essential for optimizing treatment efficacy and safety, advocating for advanced, nuanced cardiovascular care practices.

Real-world performance of indobufen versus aspirin after percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the ASPIRATION registry

BackgroundIndobufen is widely used in patients with aspirin intolerance in East Asia. The OPTION trial launched by our cardiac center examined the performance of indobufen based dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the vast majority of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and aspirin intolerance were excluded. We aimed to explore this question in a real-world population.MethodsPatients enrolled in the ASPIRATION registry were grouped according to the DAPT strategy that they received after PCI. The primary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding. Propensity score matching (PSM) was adopted for confounder adjustment.ResultsA total of 7135 patients were reviewed. After one-year follow-up, the indobufen group was associated with the same risk of MACCE versus the aspirin group after PSM (6.5% vs. 6.5%, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.65 to 1.52, P = 0.978). However, BARC type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding was significantly reduced (3.0% vs. 11.9%, HR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.40, P < 0.001). These results were generally consistent across different subgroups including aspirin intolerance, except that indobufen appeared to increase the risk of MACCE in patients with ACS.ConclusionsIndobufen shared the same risk of MACCE but a lower risk of bleeding after PCI versus aspirin from a real-world perspective. Due to the observational nature of the current analysis, future studies are still warranted to further evaluate the efficacy of indobufen based DAPT, especially in patients with ACS.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Register (https://www.chictr.org.cn); Number: ChiCTR2300067274.

Effect of Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel on All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients with Hyperuricemia.

The relationship between hyperuricemia and mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is considerably controversial. Additionally, the strategy of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has not been evaluated in patients with ACS with hyperuricemia. This study aims to evaluate the impact of hyperuricemia on the prognosis of ACS and explore the efficacy of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with hyperuricemia. The study enrolled 4319 patients divided into hyperuricemia (HUA, n = 1060) and normouricemia (NUA, n = 3259) groups. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the impact of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Hyperuricemia significantly increased the risk of all-cause death compared with patients with NUA at 7 days [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 4.292, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.727-10.67]; P = 0.002), 14 days (adjusted HR: 2.871, 95% CI 1.326-6.219; P = 0.0074), 30 days (adjusted HR: 2.168, 95% CI 1.056-4.453; P = 0.035), 3 months (adjusted HR: 2.018, 95% CI 1.152-3.533; P = 0.0144) and 1 year (adjusted HR: 1.702, 95% CI 1.137-2.548; P = 0.009). No significant difference was found between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in 1-year all-cause mortality [7.0% versus 5.5%, adjusted HR: 1.114 (95% CI 0.609-2.037), P = 0.725] among patients with concomitant hyperuricemia. Hyperuricemia was independently related to an increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death in patients with ACS undergoing PCI. At 1-year follow-up, there were no significant differences between ticagrelor and clopidogrel concerning all-cause and cardiovascular death in patients with hyperuricemia.

Aspirin-free strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome based on the subtypes of acute coronary syndrome and high bleeding risk: the STOPDAPT-3 trial.

High bleeding risk (HBR) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) subtypes are critical in determining bleeding and cardiovascular event risk after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In 4476 ACS patients enrolled in the STOPDAPT-3, where the no-aspirin and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) strategies after PCI were randomly compared, the pre-specified subgroup analyses were conducted based on HBR/non-HBR and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)/non-ST-segment elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS). The co-primary bleeding endpoint was BARC type 3 or 5, and the co-primary cardiovascular endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, or ischemic stroke at 1 month. Irrespective of the subgroups, the effect of no-aspirin compared with DAPT was not significant for the bleeding endpoint (HBR [N=1803]: 7.27% and 7.91%, HR 0.91, 95%CI 0.65-1.28; non-HBR [N=2673]: 3.40% and 3.65%, HR 0.93, 95%CI 0.62-1.39; Pinteraction=0.94; STEMI [N=2553]: 6.58% and 6.56%, HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.74-1.35; NSTE-ACS [N=1923]: 2.94% and 3.64%, HR 0.80, 95%CI 0.49-1.32; Pinteraction=0.45), and for the cardiovascular endpoint (HBR: 7.87% and 5.75%, HR 1.39, 95%CI 0.97-1.99; non-HBR: 2.56% and 2.67%, HR 0.96, 95%CI 0.60-1.53; Pinteraction=0.22; STEMI: 6.07% and 5.46%, HR 1.11, 95%CI 0.81-1.54; NSTE-ACS: 3.03% and 1.71%, HR 1.78, 95%CI 0.97-3.27; Pinteraction=0.18). In patients with ACS undergoing PCI, the no-aspirin strategy compared to the DAPT strategy failed to reduce major bleeding events irrespective of HBR and ACS subtypes. The numerical excess risk of the no-aspirin strategy relative to the DAPT strategy for cardiovascular events was observed in patients with HBR and in patients with NSTE-ACS.

De-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

ObjectivesTo compare dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) de-escalation with five alternative DAPT strategies in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).DesignWe conducted a systematic review and network...

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy De-Escalation in Stabilized Myocardial Infarction With High Ischemic Risk

In patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who have high ischemic risk, data on the efficacy and safety of the de-escalation strategy of switching from ticagrelor to clopidogrel are lacking. To evaluate the outcomes of the de-escalation strategy compared with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with ticagrelor in stabilized patients with AMI and high ischemic risk following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This was a post hoc analysis of the Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in Stabilized Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction (TALOS-AMI) trial, an open-label, assessor-blinded, multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Patients with AMI who had no event during 1 month of ticagrelor-based DAPT after PCI were included. High ischemic risk was defined as having a history of diabetes or chronic kidney disease, multivessel PCI, at least 3 lesions treated, total stent length greater than 60 mm, at least 3 stents implanted, left main PCI, or bifurcation PCI with at least 2 stents. Data were collected from February 14, 2014, to January 21, 2021, and analyzed from December 1, 2021, to June 30, 2022. Patients were randomly assigned to either de-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel or ticagrelor-based DAPT. Ischemic outcomes (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, ischemia-driven revascularization, or stent thrombosis) and bleeding outcomes (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding) were evaluated. Of 2697 patients with AMI (mean [SD] age, 60.0 [11.4] years; 454 [16.8%] female), 1371 (50.8%; 684 assigned to de-escalation and 687 assigned to ticagrelor-based DAPT) had high ischemic risk features and a significantly higher risk of ischemic outcomes than those without high ischemic risk (1326 patients [49.2%], including 665 assigned to de-escalation and 661 assigned to ticagrelor-based DAPT) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.74; 95% CI, 1.15-2.63; P = .01). De-escalation to clopidogrel, compared with ticagrelor-based DAPT, showed no significant difference in ischemic risk across the high ischemic risk group (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.54-1.45; P = .62) and the non-high ischemic risk group (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.33-1.28; P = .21), without heterogeneity (P for interaction = .47). The bleeding risk of the de-escalation group was consistent in both the high ischemic risk group (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.37-1.11; P = .11) and the non-high ischemic risk group (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.24-0.75; P = .003), without heterogeneity (P for interaction = .32). In stabilized patients with AMI, the ischemic and bleeding outcomes of an unguided de-escalation strategy with clopidogrel compared with a ticagrelor-based DAPT strategy were consistent without significant interaction, regardless of the presence of high ischemic risk.

Individualization of Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Coronary Stenting: A Comprehensive, Evidence-Based Review.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), comprising aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, is the cornerstone of post-percutaneous coronary intervention treatment to prevent stent thrombosis and reduce the risk of adverse cardiovascular events. The selection of an optimal DAPT regimen, considering the interplay of various antiplatelet agents, patient profiles, and procedural characteristics, remains an evolving challenge. Traditionally, a standard duration of 12 months has been recommended for DAPT in most patients. While contemporary guidelines provide general frameworks, DAPT modulation with longer or shorter treatment courses followed by aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy are evolving towards an individualized strategy to optimize the balance between efficacy and safety. This review comprehensively examines the current landscape of DAPT strategies after coronary stenting, with a focus on emerging evidence for treatment individualization.

Impact of the antiplatelet strategy following patent foramen ovale percutaneous closure

Abstract Background Temporary dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is recommended following patent foramen ovale (PFO) percutaneous closure although its benefit, compared to single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), has not been demonstrated in this setting. Objective We aimed at assessing outcomes following PFO closure according to the antiplatelet strategy at discharge. Methods The ambispective AIR-FORCE cohort included consecutive patients from 7 centers in France and Canada undergoing PFO closure and discharged without anticoagulation. Patients treated in French and Canadian centers were mostly discharged with DAPT and SAPT, respectively. The primary endpoint was the composite of death, stroke, transient ischemic attack, peripheral embolism, myocardial infarction, or BARC type ≥2 bleeding with up to 5 years of follow-up. The impact of the antiplatelet strategy on outcomes was evaluated with a marginal Cox model (cluster analyses per country) with inverse probability weighting according to propensity score. Results A total of 1,532 patients were included from 2001 to 2022, of whom 599 (39.1%) were discharged with SAPT and 933 (60.9%) with DAPT, for ≤3 months in 894/923 (96.9%) cases (Table 1). After a median follow-up of 2.4[1.1-4.4] years, a total of 58 events were observed. In the weighted analysis the rate of the primary endpoint up to 5 years was 7.8% in the SAPT strategy and 7.3% in the DAPT strategy (weighted hazard ratio 1.04, 95% confidence interval 0.59-1.83) (Figure 1). Results were consistent in a sensitivity analysis. Conclusion The strategy of antiplatelet strategy following PFO closure did not seem to impact clinical outcomes, thus challenging the current recommendations of temporary DAPT.Table 1.Baseline characteristicsFigure 1.Central illustration

One-month dual antiplatelet therapy following stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndromes and high bleeding risk

Abstract Background/introduction There is a paucity of data regarding the safety of a one-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Purpose We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients at HBR with ACS or chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) treated with PCI using bioresorbable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent followed by one-month DAPT. Methods This is a pre-specified sub-analysis of the POEM trial, an interventional, prospective, multicenter, single-arm trial, that evaluated the safety of PCI with bioresorbable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent followed by one-month DAPT in patients with HBR against an objective performance criterion (OPC). The OPC was derived from the reported 1-year primary endpoint rate of 9.4% observed in the LEADERS FREE trial. According to the POEM protocol, patients were treated with one-month DAPT. In case of need for anticoagulation, patients received an oral anticoagulant in addition to a P2Y12 inhibitor for one month, followed by oral anticoagulation only after that. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or definite/probable stent thrombosis at 12 months. Results 263 (59.4%) patients with CCS and 180 (40.6%) patients with ACS were included. Most of the HBR inclusion criteria were comparable between the two groups, Figure 1. At one year, the rates of the primary outcome were 4.3% (95% CI, 2.4-7.6%) and 5.7% (95% CI, 3.1-10.3%) among patients with CCS and ACS, respectively. Both 1-sided 97.5% upper confidence limits of the risk difference between the primary outcome and the prespecified OPC of 9.4% were below the non-inferiority margin of 3.85 % (CCS: -1.8 %; ACS: 0.9 %), Figure 2. No significant difference was evident between CCS and ACS patients for each isolated component of the primary endpoint (cardiac death: 1.7% vs. 2.0%, p= 0.857; myocardial infarction: 3.9% vs. 3.1%, p= 0.934; definite/probable stent thrombosis: 1.2% vs. 0.8%, p= 0.689). The risk for Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 1-5 or type 3-5 bleedings was also similar between CCS and ACS patients (4.3% vs. 5.2%, p=0.677, and 1.6% vs. 2.9%, p=0.351, respectively). Conclusions Among HBR patients with ACS who underwent PCI with BP-EES, a one-month DAPT strategy is associated with a similar risk of ischemic and bleeding events compared to those with CCS. These findings support the hypothesis that DAPT should be tailored to patients’ bleeding risk profiles and that a one-month strategy might be safely applied also in a particular setting of ACS.Figure 1.HBR inclusion criteria.Figure 2.Primary endpoint analysis.

Abbreviated versus standard dual antiplatelet therapy time after PCI in high bleeding risk patients with acute coronary syndrome - a report from the SWEDEHEART registry

Abstract Background The use of a short duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become increasingly common in patients with high bleeding risk (HBR). This study aimed to evaluate outcomes for an abbreviated DAPT strategy compared to standard DAPT time strategy for high bleeding risk-patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods A total of 22310 patients from the SWEDEHEART-registry with at least one high bleeding risk criteria who underwent PCI for ACS in Sweden between January 1, 2013, until January 15, 2021, were enrolled. Patients were grouped according to their planned DAPT time at discharge: standard DAPT with 12 months of any P2Y12 inhibitor and aspirin or an abbreviated DAPT duration (&amp;lt;6 months DAPT or 12-month single APT) and matched for intended P2Y12 inhibitor type (clopidogrel or prasugrel/ticagrelor). The primary outcome was net adverse clinical events (NACE) at one year defined as the first occurrence of cardiac mortality or hospitalization due to myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke or clinically significant bleeding. Major adverse cardiovascular events and the individual components of NACE were defined as secondary endpoints. Results No significant difference in NACE was observed between the abbreviated compared to standard DAPT time groups, Kaplan-Meier event rate: 12.9% (n = 584) vs 13.1% (n = 594) hazard ratio (HR) 0.99; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88-1.11, p=0.83. No differences were observed for MACE (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.94-1.25) or any of the elements of the primary composite outcome. The results were consistent in all HBR-subgroups. Conclusion For patients with a high bleeding risk undergoing PCI due to an ACS, an abbreviated DAPT strategy was associated with comparable rates of NACE and MACE as compared to a standard DAPT time strategy. The results add real-world evidence that abbreviated DAPT-regimes can be a viable treatment option for patients with ACS with a high bleeding risk.

Dual antiplatelet management in the perioperative period: updated and expanded systematic review

BackgroundAntiplatelet agents are central in the management of vascular disease. The use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for the management of thromboembolic complications must be weighed against bleeding risk in the perioperative setting. This balance is critical in patients undergoing cardiac or non-cardiac surgery. The management of patients on DAPT for any indication (including stents) is not clear and there is limited evidence to guide decision-making. This review summarizes current evidence since 2015 regarding the occurrence of major adverse events associated with continuing, suspending, or varying DAPT in the perioperative period.MethodsA research librarian searched PubMed and Cochrane from November 30, 2015 to May 17, 2022, for relevant terms regarding adult patients on DAPT for any reason undergoing surgery, with a perioperative variation in DAPT strategy. Outcomes of interest included the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events, major adverse limb events, all-cause death, major bleeding, and reoperation. We considered withdrawal or discontinuation of DAPT as stopping either aspirin or a P2Y12 inhibitor or both agents; continuation of DAPT indicates that both drugs were given in the specified timeframe.ResultsEighteen observational studies met the inclusion criteria. No RCTs were identified, and no studies were judged to be at low risk of bias. Twelve studies reported on CABG. Withholding DAPT therapy for more than 2 days was associated with less blood loss and a slight trend favoring less transfusion and surgical re-exploration. Among five observational CABG studies, there were no statistically significant differences in patient death across DAPT management strategies. Few studies reported cardiac outcomes. The remaining studies, which were about procedures other than exclusively CABG, demonstrated mixed findings with respect to DAPT strategy, bleeding, and ischemic outcomes.ConclusionThe evidence base on the benefits and risks of different perioperative DAPT strategies for patients with stents is extremely limited. The strongest signal, which was still judged as low certainty evidence, is that suspension of DAPT for greater than 2 days prior to CABG surgery is associated with less bleeding, transfusions, and re-explorations. Different DAPT strategies’ association with other outcomes of interest, such as MACE, remains uncertain. Systematic review registrationA preregistered protocol for this review can be found on the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of systematic reviews (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; registration number: CRD42022371032).

An assessment of platelet response to ticagrelor in post-percutaneous coronary intervention patients using light transmission platelet aggregometry (LTA)

Background: Low on-treatment platelet reactivity (LTPR) or High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) with P2Y12 inhibitors is associated with bleeding (LTPR) or ischemic events (HTPR) in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Objective: Mapping of Indonesian patients’ platelet response secondary to ticagrelor and thus identifying either LTPR or HTPR. Method: During May – June 2019, 20 post-PCI patients on aspirin–ticagrelor combination were included. Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) for monitoring platelet function was used. Ticagrelor’s LTA &lt;40% is LTPR while &gt;70% is HTPR. Result: Patients were mostly male (18 patients) and aged between 40-73 years old with a history of diabetes and/or hypertension and smoking. About eight patients (40%) were LTPR and one (5%) patient was HTPR. Conclusion: A personalised DAPT strategy for preventing bleeding events, a de-escalation, might be valuable for Indonesian patients.

One-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Chronic and Acute Coronary Syndromes Treated With Bioresorbable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents

There is a paucity of data regarding the safety of a 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients at HBR with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) or ACS treated with PCI using bioresorbable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (BP-EES) followed by 1-month DAPT. Patients at HBR who underwent PCI with BP-EES were prospectively enrolled in 10 Italian centers. All patients were treated with 1-month DAPT. In case of need for anticoagulation, patients received an oral anticoagulant in addition to a P2Y12 inhibitor for 1month, followed by oral anticoagulation only after that. The primary end point was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or definite/probable stent thrombosis at 12months. Overall, 263 patients (59.4%) with CCS and 180 patients (40.6%) with ACS were enrolled. No significant difference was evident between patients with CCS and ACS for the primary end point (4.3% vs 5.6%, respectively, p=0.497) and for each isolated component. The risk for Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 1 to 5 or type 3 to 5 bleedings was also similar between patients with CCS and ACS (4.3% vs 5.2%, p=0.677, and 1.6% vs 2.9%, p=0.351, respectively). In conclusion, among HBR patients with ACS who underwent PCI with BP-EES, a 1-month DAPT strategy is associated with a similar risk of ischemic and bleeding events compared with those with CCS.

Net clinical benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Contemporary dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) strategies, such as short-term DAPT or de-escalation of DAPT, have emerged as attractive strategies to treat patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, it remains uncertain whether they are suitable for elderly patients. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched in September 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating DAPT strategies, including standard (12 months), short-term, uniform de-escalation, and guided-selection strategies for elderly patients with ACS (age ≥ 65 years) were identified, and a network meta-analysis was conducted. The primary endpoint was the net clinical benefit outcome, a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs: cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) and clinically relevant bleeding (equivalent to bleeding of at least type 2 according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium). The secondary outcomes were MACE and major bleeding. Sixteen RCTs with a combined total of 47,911 patients were included. The uniform de-escalation strategy was associated with an improved net clinical benefit compared with DAPT using potent P2Y12 inhibitors. The short-term DAPT strategy was associated with reduced risks of the primary outcome and major bleeding compared with DAPT using potent P2Y12 inhibitors, however, it was ranked as the least effective strategy for MACE compared with other DAPT strategies. Uniform de-escalation and short-term DAPT strategies may be advantageous for elderly patients, but need to be tailored based on individual bleeding and ischemic risks. Further RCTs of contemporary DAPT strategies specifically designed for elderly patients are warranted to confirm the findings of the present study.

Short Versus Long Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Implantation in Patients with Diabetes.

Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains uncertain, with increasing data suggestive of acceptable short-term duration. Metabolically accelerated atherosclerosis associated with diabetes makes it essential to study short-term DAPT in this subgroup. With limited studies determining optimal DAPT strategies after second-generation stents in this subset, we aimed to establish the optimal duration of DAPT in the diabetic population using second-generation stents. To determine optimal DAPT duration in diabetic population undergoing PCI in 2nd generation stents. We conducted an electronic database search of randomized controlled trials from PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. A meta-analysis was conducted comparing outcomes of short-term (3-6 months) DAPT therapy versus long-term (12 months) DAPT therapy in the diabetic population undergoing PCI with second-generation stents. A total of 5 randomized controlled trials were included with a total of 3117 diabetic patients. Short-term DAPT did not show any statistical difference from long-term DAPT in achieving primary outcomes (relative ratio: 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-1.35, P = 0.84). Overall mortality (OR 0.92; 95% CI, 0.52-1.63, P = 0.98), myocardial infarction [odds ratio (OR)OR 1.02; 95% CI, 0.53-1.94, P = 0.85], stent thrombosis (OR 1.20; 95% CI, 0.55-2.60, P = 0.55), target vessel revascularization (OR 1.10; 95% CI, 0.45-2.73, P = 0.74), and stroke (OR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.082-2.43, P = 0.81) did not show any statistical difference between the 2 groups. Similarly, a subgroup analysis of study population comparing 6 versus 12 months of DAPT in diabetic population did not show any difference in net primary outcomes (relative ratio: 0.86, 95% CI 0.45-1.45, P = 0.60). There was no significant heterogeneity noted between the 2 groups. This meta-analysis showed no statistically significant benefit of longer DAPT over shorter DAPT therapy in patients undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stent in patients with diabetes.

Preferred monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials

BackgroundRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy following short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, no studies have compared P2Y12 inhibitor and aspirin monotherapy following short-term DAPT. We aimed to compare available strategies for DAPT duration and post-DAPT antiplatelet monotherapy following PCI. MethodsSeven DAPT strategies [ticagrelor or clopidogrel following 1-month DAPT, ticagrelor following 3-month DAPT, aspirin following 3–6 months of DAPT (reference strategy), aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitor following 6–18-months of DAPT, and DAPT for ≥18 months] were compared using a network meta-analysis. The primary efficacy outcome was defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. The primary bleeding outcome was trial-defined major or minor bleeding. ResultsOur analysis identified 25 eligible RCTs, including 89,371 patients who underwent PCI. Overall, none of the strategies negatively affected the primary efficacy outcomes. For primary bleeding outcomes, ticagrelor following 3-month DAPT was associated with a reduced risk of primary bleeding outcomes (HR 0.73; 95 % CI 0.57–0.95). Clopidogrel following 1-month DAPT was also associated with a reduced risk of primary bleeding outcomes (HR 0.54; 95 % CI 0.34–0.85), however, the strategy was associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis. Similar trends were observed among patients with acute coronary syndrome and high bleeding risk. ConclusionsCompared with aspirin monotherapy following short-term DAPT, ticagrelor following 3-month DAPT was associated with a reduced risk of primary bleeding outcomes without increasing any ischemic outcomes.

P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after complex percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

It remains unknown whether the recent trend of short dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy can simply be applied to patients undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy vs. conventional DAPT in patients undergoing complex PCI and non-complex PCI (PROSPERO: CRD42022335723). Primary endpoint was the 1-year Net Adverse Clinical Event (NACE). Among 5,323 screened studies, six randomized trials fulfilled the eligibility criteria. A total of 10,588 complex PCI patients (5,269 vs. 5,319 patients) and 25,618 non-complex PCI patients (12,820 vs 12,798 patients) were randomly assigned to P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy vs. conventional DAPT. In complex PCI patients, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy was associated with a lower risk of NACE than conventional DAPT [Odds ratio (OR) 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63–0.91, P = 0.003], whereas in non-complex PCI patients, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy was associated with a trend toward lowering the risk of NACE (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.72–1.02, P = 0.09). This meta-analysis across randomized trials demonstrated that a strategy of short DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy reduces the risk of 1-year NACE in patients undergoing complex PCI.