Weinberg replies: George Bankoff raises a touchy point about the relationship between Eugene Wigner, who holds the patent on the Hanford reactors, and the DuPont company, which built the reactors. As I point out in my book The First Nuclear Era: The Life and Times of a Technological Fixer (AIP Press, 1994), Wigner viewed the Hanford project as a quick and dirty way of making plutonium, whereas DuPont, in Wigner’s view, was unnecessarily slow and deliberate. In his memoirs, Wigner offers a silent apology for having implied that the company was motivated by other than a desire to produce as much plutonium-239 as possible as quickly as possible.As to the size of the Hanford reactors—1500 tubes in the Wigner design compared to 2004 in the DuPont design—there are two explanations for the discrepancy. When Arthur Compton assigned the water-cooled reactor design to Wigner in the spring of 1942, uranium was very scarce. Compton told Wigner and me that we had to do the job with only 200 tons of uranium—that is, the 1500-tube reactor. By the time DuPont came on the job, much more uranium was available. The first to suggest enlarging the reactor to 2004 tubes was Enrico Fermi, according to Volney C. Wilson, who was present when the suggestion was made. I have been told by John Wheeler that George Graves, a DuPont engineer, was the one who actually made the decision to add 504 tubes to the reactor, even though that exceeded Compton’s 200 tons of uranium by about 50 tons.© 2004 American Institute of Physics.